پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 960 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,934 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,425,480 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,544,051 |
واکاوی خشونت نمادین در برنامۀ درسی | ||
| اندیشه های نوین تربیتی | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 20، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 74، دی 1403، صفحه 179-193 اصل مقاله (549.31 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jontoe.2022.40030.3570 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فرشته اشکان* 1؛ کوروش فتحی واجارگاه2؛ محبوبه عارفی3؛ مهناز اخوان تفتی4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری برنامه‌ریزی‌درسی، دانشکده علوم‌تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استاد گروه علوم‌تربیتی، دانشکده علوم‌تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیارگروه علوم‌تربیتی، دانشکده علوم‌تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 4استاد گروه روان‌شناسی‌تربیتی، دانشکده علوم‌تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه الزهراء، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی خشونت نمادین و مصداق‌های آن در برنامۀ درسی به روش کیفی (تحلیل مضمون یا تماتیک) انجام شده است. حوزۀ پژوهش برنامۀ درسی مدارس ایران و جامعۀ آماری آن با توجه به میان‌رشته ای بودن موضوع پژوهش، شامل اعضای هیئت علمی، متخصصان و صاحب‌نظران حوزه های برنامۀ درسی، روان‌شناسی‌تربیتی و جامعه شناسی آموزش و پرورش بوده است. نمونه پژوهش بر اساس اشباع نظری 15 نفر به شیوۀ نمونه گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات، مصاحبۀ عمیق و نیمه‌ساختاریافته بود که به منظور حفظ فاصلۀ اجتماعی با استفاده از شبکه های اجتماعی و به شکل نیمه‌حضوری انجام شد. بسندگی پژوهش و اطمینان از کیفیت داده ها و تفسیرهای صورت‌گرفته، با ترکیبی از راهبردهای اعتبارپذیری، انتقال پذیری، اتکاپذیری و تأییدپذیری مورد سنجش قرار گرفت. پایایی کدگذاری مصاحبه ها، با استفاده از ضریب درون موضوعی کاپا تعیین گردید. داده های گردآوری شده با استفاده از الگوی سه مرحله ای براون و کلارک تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد که خشونت نمادین میتواند در تمامی عناصر برنامۀ درسی (اهداف، محتوا، محیط اجرا، راهبردهای یاددهی-یادگیری و روش های ارزشیابی) اعمال شود. مدارس به‌عنوان ابزار نظام آموزشی از طریق برنامۀ درسی و به‌طور غیرعمدی به بازتولید نابرابری‌های فردی و اجتماعی اقدام می‌کنند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| خشونت نمادین؛ برنامۀ درسی؛ بازتولید | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Symbolic violence in the school curriculum | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fereshteh Ashkan1؛ Kourosh Fathi Vajargah2؛ Mahboubeh Arefi3؛ Mahnaz Akhavan Tafti4 | ||
| 1PhD student, Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Curriculum Studies, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This study aimed to identify symbolic violence and its exemplars in the Iranian school curricula via interviews and thematic analysis. Due to the interdisciplinary nature of the subject, the interviewees were purposively selected from among faculty members and curriculum planning, educational psychology, and sociology of education experts. The data were collected using in-depth semi-structured interviews. The adequacy of the research sample and the quality of the data and interpretations were ensured via a combination of credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. The reliability of interview coding was determined using the intra-class correlation coefficient of kappa. The collected data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's three-step model. The results showed that symbolic violence can be applied to all elements of the curriculum. As an instrumental component of the educational system, schools unintentionally reproduce individual and social inequalities through the curriculum. Introduction The concept of symbolic violence was proposed by Pierre Bourdieu, who defines it as a type of violence imposed with the tacit complicity of people who are subjected to this violence and those who impose it because neither group is aware of this imposition (Bourdieu, 1996/2008: 25). Symbolic violence is "quiet and tacit" and manifests itself in an invisible form through socially and culturally accepted internal meanings. Therefore, it is not considered unfair or against social interactions, and is understood by the subject in an unspoken and usually imperceptible manner. Prejudices, humiliation, and discrimination are regarded as severe acts of violence since the suffering they cause is not socially unfair (Riscal et al., 2016). Symbolic violence is theoretically based on reproduction theories, in which dominant groups are believed to reproduce inequalities of power, income, and social status. Reproduction theories are divided into cultural and social forms (Bourdieu and Passeron, 1977). Based on Antonio Gramsci's (1891-1937) theory of hegemony, the domination system transforms its preferred culture into the culture of the masses through mass media, the church, schools, and family (Strinati, 1996/2001). Inspired by the ideas of Antonio Gramsci, Herbert Marcuse, and especially Paulo Freire, Henri Giraux (1983) introduces the concept of resistance and believes that students' resistance is always shaped against the manifest and latent curricula of the educational system. Reproduction and resistance theories offer two different approaches to explaining the influence of schools on different social strata. Freire believes that education should promote students' awareness so that they can take an active, and not a passive stand towards the world (Freire et al., 1998). According to McLaren (1985), schools should become places to develop critical knowledge as well as social and political action. According to James, an education researcher, even the best schools impose violence in different ways. When educational rules and regulations are formulated and enacted without the participation of students, or when the school curriculum is scheduled without addressing students' needs and only based on adults' opinions, this per se is a promotion of violence (James, 2000: 43). Methodology The present study examined symbolic violence in the Iranian school curriculum through a qualitatively thematic approach. The research domain is the curriculum of Iranian schools. According to the research topic— curriculum, educational psychology, and sociology of education, the statistical population comprised faculty members, education experts, curriculum experts, educational psychologists, and sociologists, who were purposively selected. Theoretical saturation was reached with 15 interviewees. Field data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews. The interviews started using the qualitative approach, by posing some general questions about symbolic violence in the curriculum of elementary schools as the interview guide, which served as the initial framework for starting the interviews. The next questions were formed based on the interviewees' answers and were developed in the course of the interviews. The greatest weight of the interview questions was allocated to symbolic violence in the school curriculum and its examples. The data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's three-step model (2006) as follows: Step 1) Analysis and description of texts and interviews Step 2) Description and interpretation of texts and interviews Step 3) Combination and integration of texts and interviews To measure the adequacy of the research sample and ensure the quality of the data and interpretations, a combination of credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability strategies was used. To calculate coding reliability, some interviews were randomly selected and the codes assigned by two coders were compared. Then, inter-class correlation Kappa was used to determine the reliability of coding. Results The results revealed that symbolic violence can be observed in all elements of the curriculum: In curriculum objectives: The development of objectives based on the dominant culture, ideology, and thinking of society in the educational system In curriculum content: Ignoring diversity in the design of the curriculum content and the adaptation of all students to a single program despite their differences In curriculum implementation environment: Affective harm, lack of participation opportunity for everyone, differences in facilities and access, lack of standard and uniform facilities in all regions and schools, disproportion between textbook volume and instruction hours, human resources' professional competence, and the social atmosphere of the school In teaching-learning strategies: The teacher serving as a representative of power in the classroom and not using active teaching methods In evaluation methods: Inappropriate assessment methods and failure to attend to students' individual differences Discussion and conclusion Besides the spread of violence in society, these forms of violence can hinder the path of social evolution and prevent the realization of individual and social goals. It can also have different consequences for the perpetrator of violence, the victim, and others (observers or mediators). In this sense, a deep and comprehensive study of violence prevention in schools appears vital. Contrary to the general belief, violence is not limited to physical conflicts; rather, it includes wider layers of human behavior, an example of which is symbolic violence. The outcome of these factors for students' minds and spirits is the training of students with a rebellious and disobedient spirit, a sense of inferiority, and lacking self-confidence and self-esteem. According to the results of this study, education officials are advised to consider developmental dimensions, needs, respect for students' individual differences, ethnicities, and micro-cultures in curriculum planning (goals, content, teaching, and assessment methods). It is recommended that school executives and educational staff prevent the reproduction of inequalities in school by allowing everyone to participate in decision-making, equality in access to facilities, respecting students' individual characteristics and differences, applying active teaching methods, promoting students' group activities, creating equal opportunities according to students' individual differences and intellectual, social, cultural, emotional, and economic backgrounds, using punishment or reward correctly, preventing the violation of students' right in assessments, and preventing discrimination among students. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Symbolic violence, Curriculum, Reproduction theory | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Atlı, C. S., & Kokalan Cimrin, F. (2023). A Qualitative Study of the Elements of Symbolic Violence in Official Education Documents. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, (33). https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.33.879 Sadafi, A. , Moradi, A. and Momeni, K. M. (2023). Lived experience of junior high school students regarding satisfying basic psychological needs in the classroom: A phenomenological study. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 19(3), 237-254. doi: 10.22051/jontoe.2022.36254.3352 (Text in Persian) Amirou, R. (2003). Consideraţii psihosociologice asupra noţiunilor de agresivitate şi frustrare comparativă. Gilles, F., Neculau, A., Violenţa. Aspecte psihosociale, Editura Polirom: Iaşi, 42-44. Bourdieu, P. (1986). L'illusion biographique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 62(1), 69-72. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Vol. 4). Sage. Bourdieu, Pierre (1996). Sur la television: suidide l'emprise du sournalidsme, (Nasser Fakuhi 2009), Tehran: Ashian. (Text in Persian) Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Cecilia Luiz, M.(2019). Pesquisa-Inter Vencao No Eninio Fundamental Anos Finais: Convivencias e Violencias Escolares. 4989 - Trabalho - 39ª Reunião Nacional da Anped GT13 - Educação Fundamental. Dehghani Firoozabadi, Seyed Jalal (1390). Power Technologies in Soft War, Strategic Studies Quarterly , 14(1), 5-30. (Text in Persian) Dortier, Jean François (1999). Pierre Bourdieu Sociologist, Anthropologist, (Morteza Kotobi 2002) . Iranian Journal of Anthropology 1(1), 222-234. (Text in Persian) dos Santos Souza, É., da Silva Niz, M., & Neves, R. A. (2018). Educacao Infantil As Violencias Silenciadas: Um Ambiente Democratico E Acolhedor?. Cadernos da Pedagogia, 11(22) ,51-64. Elena, B. (2016). Objective violence and symbolic violence in schools. Studies on the perception of high-school students. International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation (IJSEIro), 3(5), 53-60. Keramati, E. (2023). The hidden social curriculum in primary schools: Interactions between new teachers and primary school principals. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 19(3), 89-115. doi: 10.22051/jontoe.2022.39209.3509 (Text in Persian) Ergin, M., Rankin, B., & Gökşen, F. (2019). Education and symbolic violence in contemporary Turkey. British Journal of sociology of Education, 40(1), 128-142. Fathi Vajargah, Kourosh (2003). Investigating the Place of Peace and War in Elementary School Textbooks. Research Journal of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Beheshti University, 2(38), 25-48. (Text in Persian) Foucault, Michel. (2013). Care and Punishment: Birth of Prison. Nikoo Sarkhosh and Afshin Jahandideh 2020 17th edition. Tehran, Ney. (Text in Persian) Fraya, Helen. (2012). La violence, (Abbas Bagheri 2012), Tehran, Farzanrooz. (Text in Persian) Freire, p. (1985). the political of education. london: macmillan. Freire, P., Araujo,M. & Macedo,D. (1998). The Paulo Freire Reader, New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc. Freire, Paulo. (1978). Education in progress, (Ahmad Birashk 1984), Tehran, Kharazmi. (Text in Persian) Giroux, H.(1983).Theory & resistance in education. Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey. Hazeri, Ali Mohammad. And Rezapour, Ismail. (2013). The Study of Some Effective Factors on Appearance of Student Resistance Against School Norms, In Tehran High Schools. Iranian Journal of Sociology,14(4). (Text in Persian) Henry, S. (2000). What is school violence? An integrated definition. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 567(1), 16-29. Huerta, A. H. (2018). Educational persistence in the face of violence: Narratives of resilient Latino male youth. Boyhood Studies, 11(2), 94-113. Izadifar, Afsaneh, Safaei Movahhed, Saeid and Shali, Elham (2018). Hidden Curriculum and Violent Behaviors: What our female students learn in schools. The Journal of Qualitative Research in Curriculum, 2(6), 127-150. (Text in Persian) James, J.(2000).Hope Throught Action,Paper presented at National Conference of Peace Education.New York,Nov.16. Jamshidi, Hossein. (2017). schools; Centers of reproduction of inequality in wealth and power. Retrieved from http://siasatrooz.ir/vdcbwfb8grhbg5p.uiur.html Spring 2022(Text in Persian) Katbi, Morteza (2003). Heirs of students and culture. Iranian Journal of Anthropology. 2(3). (Text in Persian) Maleki, Hassan. (2016). Curriculum Introduction. 11th Edition, Tehran, Samt. (Text in Persian) McLaren, P. L. (1985). The ritual dimensions of resistance: Clowning and symbolic inversion. Journal of Education, 167(2), 84-97. Mir Hosseini, Zohreh; Dogchi, Zohreh and Nasiri, Somayeh (2017). The Role of cultural products in the absence of violence among teenagers as social capital. Social Research, (9)35(. (Text in Persian) Nairz-Wirth, E., Feldmann, K., & Spiegl, J. (2017). Habitus conflicts and experiences of symbolic violence as obstacles for non-traditional students. European Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 12-29. Nouri, Ali and Mehr Mohammadi, Mahmoud (2011). A Model for Applying Grounded Theory in Educational Studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 6 (23). 35- 8. (Text in Persian) Riscal, S.A., Riscal, J.R., Stabelini, A. M.. (2016). The Invisible Violence: Symbolic Violence and Relations of Sociability in Brazilian Schools. Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(4), 237-244. Roshan, Belqis., Qasempour Moghaddam, Hossein and Azizi, Hossein (2011). Content Aanalysis of Persian Books in Iranian Schools in Terms of The Use of Words Carrying Violence and Words Carrying Mildness and Peace, 2nd National Congress of Humanities, Tehran. (Text in Persian) Sharepour, Mahmoud. (2015). Sociology of Education. Qom, Golha. (Text in Persian) Șoitu, L., (2001). ”Agresivitatea indiferenței” . Șoitu, L. &Hăvârneanu, C., Agresivitatea în școală, Institutul European: Iași(pp.11-18). Souza, L. P.D. (2012). Symbolic Violence In School: French Sociologists Contribution To The Phenomenon Of Brazilian School Violence. Revista Labor, 1(7), 20-34. Strinati, Dominic (1996). Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture, (Soraya Paknazar 2013), Tehran: Gam No. (Text in Persian) Tahmasebi, Hossein. (2015). Analyze the experience of school counselors and educators to select and apply a violence prevention curriculum. Master Thesis of Kurdistan University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. (Text in Persian) The World Health Organization(WHO).(2016). www. Who.int, accessed March 5, 2016. Tiradentes, A. R. (2015). Violencia Simbolica No Contexto Escolar: Discriminacao, Inclusao E O Direito À Educacao. Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito–PUC Minas Serro, (12), 33-48. Yarigholi, B. , herfati sobhani, M. , Ghsabzadeh, J. and RAHIMI, H. (2018). Teachers’ experiences of the underlying factors of violence in schools, a phenomenology study. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 14(1), 159-197. doi: 10.22051/jontoe.2018.10043.1283 (Text in Persian) Zizek, Slavij (2008). Violence, Violence: Six Sideways Reflections 4th edition , (Alireza Pak Nahad 2010), Tehran, ney. (Text in Persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 107 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 58 |
||
