Exploring Stance and Engagement Markers in Covid-19 Related CMC

Abe, S., Jamshidi, S., & Rezaei, S. (2022). Religious debates on the coronavirus pandemic in Iran: Examination of their discourses, rationales, and implications. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture, 16(1), 77-98.

                https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.18941

Alghazo, SH., Al Salem, M. N., & Alrashdan, I. (2021). Stance and engagement in English and Arabic research article abstracts. System, 103, 1-11,

                https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021. 102681

Anthony, L. (2018). AntConc 3.5.7: A free text analysis software. Retrieved from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.html

Association for Progressive Communications (APC) (2015). The right to freedom of expression and the use of encryption and anonymity in digital communications. Retrieved online from

                https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Opinion/Communications/AssociationForProgressiveCommunication.pdf

Babapour, M., & Kuhi, D. (2018). A contrastive study of stance-markers in opinion columns of English and Persian newspapers. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice,11(22), 23-53. https://doi.org/10.30495/jal.2018.541064

Cato, S., Iida, T., Ishida, K., Ito, A., Katsumata, H., McElwain, K. M. et al. (2021) Social media infodemics and social distancing under the COVID-19 pandemic: Public good provisions under uncertainty. Global Health Action, 14.

Chesser, A., Drassen Ham, A., & Keene Woods, N. (2020) Assessment of COVID-19 knowledge among university students: implications for future risk communication strategies. Health Education & Behavior, 47, 540–543.

                https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120931420

Chiluwa, I. (2015). Radicalist discourse: A study of the stances of Nigeria's Boko Haram and Somalia's Al Shabaab on Twitter. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10(2), 214-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1041964

Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspect of second-language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Ebadi, S., Salman, A. R., & Ebrahimi, B. (2015). A comparative study of the use of metadiscourse markers in Persian and English academic papers. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(4), 28-41.

                https://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/60

Farnia, M., & Shirzadkhani, Z. (2023). Cross-cultural study of stance and engagement markers in motivational speeches. Journal of Researches in Linguistics, 15(2), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.22108/jrl.2023.138031.1769

Fu, X. (2012). The use of interactional metadiscourse in job postings. Discourse Studies, 14(4), 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612447975

Ghaffori, A. A. M. (2022). The impact of COVID 19 on non-verbal politeness. Journal of Language Studies,5(4), 106-119. https://search.emarefa.net/en/detail/BIM-1543483-the-impact-of-COVID-19-on-non-verbal-politeness

Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,9(2), 128-139.

                https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. Continuum.

Hashemi, M.R., & Hosseini, H. (2019). Stance and culture: A comparative study of English and Persian authorial stance in applied linguistics research articles. Advanced Education. 12, 212-27. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.123284

Herzuah, P. A. A. (2018). Enacting personal identity through language: An exploration of some profile statuses of WhatsApp messenger. Journal of Communications, Media & Society (JOCMAS), 5(1), 99-119. Available at: http://journals.gij.edu.gh/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/JOCMAS-Enacting-Personal-Identity-through-Language-An-Exploration-of-Some-Profile-Status-of-WhatsApp-Messenger.pdf

Hill, K., & Monk, A. F. (2000). Electronic mail versus printed text: the effects on recipients. Interacting with Computers,13, 253–263.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00040-0

Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press.

                https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299868.001.0001

Hyland, K. (2002). Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 215-239, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.2.215

Hyland, K. (2005a). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies,7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, K. (2005b). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge:
representing self and others in research writing. International Journal
of English Studies,8(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.8.2.49151

Hyland-Wood, B., Gardner, J., Leask, J., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2021). Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1),1-11.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00701-w

Jiang, F. K., &Hyland, K. (2022). COVID-19 in the news: The first 12 months. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 241-258.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12412

Kahkesh, M., & Alipour, M. (2017). A comparative study of metadiscourse markers in English and Persian university lectures. Research in Applied Linguistics (Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language, Discourse and Pragmatics), 8,125-135.  https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2017.12917

Kemp, S. (2020). Digital 2020: 3.8 billion people use social media [Internet],  Retrieved online on August 15^th, 2023 from: https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2020/01/digital-2020-3-8-billion-people-use-social-media/

Kitjaroonchai, N., & Duan, J. (2019). Stance and engagement use in a timed argumentative essay by Asian first-year university students studying English as a foreign language. Human Behavior, Development and Society, 20(3), 105-115.

https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hbds/article/view/216760/150551

Lazarus, J. V., Romero, D., Kopka, C. J., Karim, S. A., Abu-Raddad, L. J., Almeida, G. et al.; COVID-19 Consensus Statement Panel. (2022) A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat. Nature, 611,332–345.

                https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05398-2

Lee, C., & Chau, D. (2018). Language as pride, love, and hate: Archiving emotions through multilingual Instagram hashtags. Discourse, Context, & Media,22(2), 1-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.002

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910

Matheson, K., & Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 4(3),  221-233.

                https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(88)90015-5.

Millan, E.L. (2008). Epistemic and approximative meaning revisited: The use of hedges boosters and approximators when writing research in different disciplines. In  S. F. Burgess, & P. A. M. Martín (Eds.). English as an additional language in research publication and communication (pp. 65-82). Peter Lang.

Mirshamsi, A., & Allami, H. (2013). Metadiscourse markers in the discussion/conclusion section of Persian and English master’s theses. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 5(3), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2013.1706

Moreno, A. I. (1997). Genre constraints across languages: Causal metatext in Spanish and English research articles. ESPJournal,16(3),161-179.

                https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00023-3

Orts, M. Á., &Vargas-Sierra, C.(2022). Warning, or manipulating in pandemic times? A critical and contrastive analysis of official discourse through the English and Spanish news. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law,35(3), 903-935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09869-z

Qiu, X., & Jian, F. (2021). Stance and engagement in 3MT presentations: How students communicate disciplinary knowledge to a wide audience. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,51, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100976

Rezaee, A., & Ghobadi, A. (2021). A comparative study of metadiscourse markers in Geology research articles. Journal of Language Horizons, 5(2), 7-26.

                https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2021.31247.1299

Salager-Meyer, F. (1997). I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. In T. Miller (Ed.) Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications (pp. 105–118). English Language Programs.

Shen, Q., & Tao, Y. (2021). Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opinion columns: A comparative corpus-based study. PLoS ONE, 16(3), e0247981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247981.

Sharif, N., Opu, R. R., Alzahrani, K. J., Ahmed, S. N., Islam, S., Mim, S. S. et al. (2021) The positive impact of social media on health behavior towards the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: a web-based cross-sectional study. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 15(5), 102-206.

                https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102206.

Zou, H. J., & Hyland, K. (2023). Stance in article highlights: The promotion of COVID-19 research. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(2) 1–18.

                https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12502