تعداد نشریات | 25 |
تعداد شمارهها | 933 |
تعداد مقالات | 7,666 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,513,476 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,895,919 |
تاثیر سینما بر عکاسی در پایان قرن بیستم و آغاز قرن بیست و یکم | ||
جلوه هنر | ||
دوره 16، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 44، آذر 1403، صفحه 137-146 اصل مقاله (2.01 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jjh.2023.45496.2075 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
فرناز موذن* 1؛ احمد الستی2؛ لیلا منتظری3 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری گروه هنر، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران، نویسنده مسئول. | ||
2دانشیار گروه سینما، دانشکده هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
3استادیار گروه هنر، واحد علوم و تحقیقات ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
پس از ابداع عکاسی و بهدنبال آن تولد سینما، هر دو این هنرها مسیر رشد و تحول را با فاصلهای کمتر از یک قرن، سایه به سایه یکدیگر طی کردند. عکاسی که از۱۸۳۷م تا ۱۸۹۶م یعنی زمان تولد سینما به تجربههای گوناگون دست زده بود هم در تکنیک و هم در مضمون، راهنمای سینمای نوظهور شد. سینمااین هنر جدید، گوی سبقت را در جذب مخاطب از دیگر هنرها ربود و آرام آرام به تاثیرگذارترین هنر زمان تبدیل شد. سینمای نوپا نه تنها وامدار عکاسی که وامدار ادبیات، نقاشی، تئاتر و موسیقی هم بود. اما ارتباط مستقیم عکاسی و سینما با تصویر ثبت شده، تعامل این دو را نسبت به دیگر هنرها پررنگتر کرد. از سوی دیگر جریانهای فکری همعصر با تولد سینما نیز مباحث نظری ویژهای را رقم زد که نظریههای عکاسی و تئوریهای فیلم را در پی داشت هدف این مطالعه نشان دادن تأثیر سینما بر عکاسی معاصر و یافتن پاسخ برای چرایی این تأثیرگذاری، با استفاده از مطالعات نظری صورتگرفته در این زمینه، به روش مطالعه توصیفی، تحلیلی منابع مکتوب و منابع تصویری با رویکرد به آراء اندیشمندانی مانند والتر بنیامین [1]خصوصاً در مقاله اثر هنری در عصر بازتولید تکنیکی، و نظریۀ لحظۀ قطعی هنری کارتیه برسون[2] و نظریههای جدیدتری مانند تصویر زمان ژیل دلوز[3]است. جریانات فکری که به نظر میرسد تأثیرپذیری سینما از هنرها را معکوس کرده و جهت تأثیر سینما بر دیگر هنرها را تغییر داده است. اکنون در ابتدای قرن بیست و یکم میلادی و بهدنبال تحولات فکری انتهای قرن بیستم میلادی، این ردپای سینما است که بر عکاسی دیده میشود. در پی این تحولات، مطالعۀ عواملی مانند زمان، سکون، قاب، حرکت، تداوم و توالی نشان میدهد که شکلی نو از زبان بصری در سینما و عکاسی رقم خورده است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
کلید واژه ها: تأثیرات متقابل؛ سینما؛ عکاسی؛ تصویر؛ زمان | ||
موضوعات | ||
هنرهای تجسمی و کاربردی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
The Impact of Cinema on late 20th and early 21st Century Photography | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Farnaz Moazen1؛ Ahmad Alasti2؛ Leila Montazeri3 | ||
1Ph.D. Student of Art, Science and Research Branch,Islamic Azad University, Tehran,Iran, Corresponding Author. | ||
2Associate professor, Department of Cinema, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
3Assistant professor, Department of Art ,Science and Research Branch ,Islamic Azad University Tehran,Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
After the invention of photography, followed by the birth of cinema, both arts experienced growth and evolution over less than a century. The techniques and themes guiding cinema emerged. This new art form surpassed other arts in attracting audiences and gradually became the most influential art of its time. Cinema was not only indebted to photography but also to literature, painting, theater, and music. However, the direct connection between photography and cinema through recorded images made the interaction between the two more prominent than with other arts. Additionally, contemporary intellectual movements that coincided with the birth of cinema created unique theoretical discussions, leading to the development of photography and film theories. This study aims to demonstrate the influence of cinema on contemporary photography and to explore why this influence occurs, utilizing theoretical studies conducted in this field through descriptive analysis of written and visual sources, with an emphasis on the views of thinkers such as Walter Benjamin, particularly in his essay The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Henri Cartier-Bresson and his theory of The Decisive Moment, as well as more recent theories such as Gilles Deleuze's The Time-Image. Intellectual movements appear to have shifted the influence of cinema on the arts, redirecting it toward cinema's impact on other art forms. At the beginning of the 21st century, following the intellectual developments of the late 20th century, cinema's trace is evident in photography. Examining these developments, factors such as time, stillness, framing, movement, continuity, and sequence reveal that a new visual language has been established in both cinema and photography. By observing the earliest cinematic works following the invention and emergence of cinema, one can discern the role of photography in this new form of artistic expression, both in the technical aspects of cinema's creation and in the themes presented in films. Many filmmakers have created films influenced by individual photographs or collections of photographs by renowned photographers. John Ford, for instance, developed the unique mise-en-scène of his films under the influence of Edward Curtis's collection of American photographs. Filmmakers such as Stanley Kubrick, Nuri Bilge Ceylan, and Abbas Kiarostami are notable for integrating photographic elements into their cinematic works. Conversely, with the evolution of photography tools from analog to digital, the methods of creating photographs have also transformed, resulting in a diverse range of photographic styles that have been significantly affected. These changes evoke connections to Cindy Sherman’s work, as many artists incorporate cinematic concepts as a structural framework and utilize photography as a new medium. Meanwhile, certain works have transcended mere documentation of reality and seem to approach cinema more closely than other media in their search for novel forms of artistic expression, as seen in the works of Hiroshi Sugimoto and Denis Darzacq. This raises the question: Are these influences one-directional, or is there a two-way interaction between cinema and photography? If such an interaction exists, which ideas have shaped and expanded it? Furthermore, in light of cinema's influence on photography, what vision can be anticipated for the future of both media in the 21st century? This research aims to address these questions by drawing on new schools of thought and analyzing contemporary visual arts. Answering these questions will ultimately clarify the main goal of this study, which is to identify the reasons behind the influence of cinema on contemporary photography. This research employs descriptive and analytical methods to examine how cinema and photography interact and how their new forms emerged at the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century. To achieve this, the study focuses particularly on the works of photographers and cinematographers after 1980, using both written sources from libraries and image resources from various archives. The selection of artists and works has been conducted through non-random, purposeful sampling. In discussing the interaction between photography and cinema, the period from 1980 to the present is considered, focusing on the ideas that have had the greatest impact on significant shared elements such as time, stillness, framing, movement, continuity, and sequence. These elements have contributed to establishing a new form of visual language in both cinema and photography. David Bordwell, a noted cinema author and researcher, asserts that philosophical and structuralist approaches cannot be simultaneously applied in cinema studies. Although this research provides a suitable context for post-structuralist analysis, a philosophical approach is chosen to allow for a broader exploration and the incorporation of various theories. Theories such as Henri Cartier-Bresson's The Decisive Moment, Gilles Deleuze's Time-Image, and Dudley Andrew's collection of contemporary theories are pivotal in understanding the influence of cinema on photography. It is important to note that the roots of this perspective in photography—and subsequently in cinema—are significantly influenced by Walter Benjamin's ideas, particularly following the publication of his essay The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In this essay, Benjamin argues that technical reproduction holds value for two main reasons. Firstly, the reproduced work gains independence from the original; he provides the example of photography, where aspects of the original can be captured by the lens in ways that human vision alone cannot achieve, such as through zooming and angle discovery. Secondly, Benjamin notes that a reproduced work can sometimes surpass the original in terms of its condition. In his A Short History of Photography, he highlights how photography can reveal angles that are not apparent when viewing the original piece, exemplified by architectural photography. In What is Cinema? (2010), Dudley Andrew expresses his concern over the transformation brought about by the shift from analog to digital, fearing the loss of the film’s unique characteristics. He suggests that film is no longer merely a modern medium but embodies modernity itself and has become entirely historical. Deleuze made significant contributions to cinema theory through his works Cinema 1 and Cinema 2. Unlike the dominant theories of cinema before 1980—namely, the realist and phenomenological approaches (the latter of which emphasizes subjective perception as a reference model, based on André Bazin’s ideas) and the linguistic approach (which equates images with forms of expression, as seen in Christian Metz's psychological analysis)—Deleuze uncovers the essence of cinema and articulates the unique state in which cinema can reflect on images as independent entities. In Image-Movement, Deleuze examines the relationship between montage and the shot, as well as the connection between cinema and narrative. In Image-Time, he explores the leap in post-war cinema and the break between classical and modern cinema. Deleuze, in his analysis of image movements, emphasizes the equality of movement and light, considering images as perceptions independent of the human gaze. He views perception as conscious only when it retains the useful aspects of objects and conscious perception is linked to action. He observes that classical cinema (including both the Soviet Union and Europe) is structured around the link between perception and action. When this link is broken and perception becomes associated with images of time and thought, the shift from classical to modern cinema occurs, exemplified by Italian Neorealism and the French New Wave. Deleuze uses these points to connect Bergson's philosophy to cinema, asserting that, after this rupture, cinema becomes about "seeing to see" rather than "seeing to act." Time and movement are distinguishing features that separate cinema from photography. However, their use in contemporary photography has transformed its nature, making it distinct from traditional photography. While it might seem that movement and time are characteristics that differentiate cinema and photography, later theories, such as Deleuze's, propose that movement and action no longer define time and space. Deleuze considers time as independent and absolute, not subordinate to movement. He believes that, in cinema, time is layered over scenes and characters, diminishing the significance of recording natural movement. Modern cinema, influenced by these theories, has evolved to perceive time as more than just recorded duration. Although time is often seen as an element uniquely belonging to cinema, photography during this period also developed in a way that treated time as incidental. This notion manifests in photography through stillness, or the suspension of time. Beyond the concept of time, examining other characteristics shaped by cinema—such as framing, storytelling, and narration—helps explain why cinema has influenced contemporary photography. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Keywords: Mutual Effects, Cinema, Photography, Image-Time | ||
مراجع | ||
منابع
اسلامی، زینب، (1392)، رساله دکتری با عنوان«نظریه دلوز درباره سینما: تحلیل حرکت و زمان». دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی .دانشگاه تهران.
بوردیو،پی یر(۱۳۹۴)، عکاسی :هنر میان مایه،ترجمه کیهان ولی نژاد،نشر پیام امروز.
تی.کریبل، سابین(1395)، تاریخ مختصری از نظریه های عکاسی ، ترجمه حسن خوبدل،مجله اطلاعات حکمت و معرفت ،سال 11 شماره 2.
خوانساری، صالحه(1397)، مکتب عکاسی دوسلدورف،نشر پرگار چاپ دوم ..کمپنی ،دیوید(1392) عکاسی و سینما ،ترجمه محسن بایرام نژاد ،نشرمرکز، چاپ اول.
دلوز، ژیل و دیگران(1393)، مجموعه مقالات نظریه فیلم،ترجمه مازیاراسلامی و دیگران ، فصل نامه ارغنون شماره ۲۳ نشر سازمان چاپ و انتشارات، چاپ اول.
رهبرنیا، زهرا، مصدری، فاطمه (1394)، تاثیر رسانه های نوین بر تعاملی شدن هنرجدید با رویکردی به نظریه هنر در عصر بازتولید مکانیکی، مجله جهانی رسانه، شماره 20.
سولاژ، فرانسوا(1401)، زیباشناسی عکاسی ، ترجمه محمدرضا ابوالقاسمی ،تهران،نشر چشمه.
علی رضایی، احسان، سجودی، فرزان، مرادخانی، علی(1399)، “مطالعه تطبیقی نظریه واقع گرایی فیلم با حاد واقعیت ژان بودریار، مجله هنرهای زیبا"هنرهای نمایشی و موسیقی"دوره 25 شماره 4.
لنگفورد، مایکل(1399)، داستان عکاسی، ترجمه رضا نبوی، نشر افکار، چاپ چهارم.
لوپس، دومینیک مک آیور(1395)، چهار هنر عکاسی، مترجم حامد زمانی گندمانی،تهران،کتاب پرگار، چاپ اول.
مقیم نژاد، مهدی (1397)، عکاسی و نظریه، نشر سوره مهر، چاپ اول.
مقیم نژاد، مهدی(1388)، درآمدی برهنرهای چند رسانه ای :درآمدی بر بحث روایت در عکاسی، فصلنامه هنر، شماره 88.
موراتی، پایولا (1395) ژیل دلوز سینما و فلسفه،ترجمه فایزه جعفریان و مهرداد پارسا ،تهران انتشارات شوند .چاپ اول. مورتون، جان (1393)، ژیل دلوز و عکاسی، ترجمه میترا سرحدی، اطلاعات حکمت و معرفت، سال نهم، شماره ۱.
والری، پل (1401) والتر بنیامین درباره عکاسی، ترجمه آیدین رحیمی پورآزاد، تهران: نشر حرفه هنرمند.
References
Alirezaei,E.Moradkhani ,A.Sojoodi ,F1(2021).A Comparative Study of Theory of Film Realism and Jean Baurdrillard Hyperreality (Honarhaye Ziba)Jornal of Fine Arts:Performing Artsand Music, ,17-23 , (4)(Text in Persian).
Andrew. Spider, Film and visual culture. (2011). The Handbook of Visual Culture, ed. Heywood and sandy well. Bloomsbury Publishing.London.
Beckman. Karen, Ma. Jean. (2005). Still moving: Between Cinema and Photography,.Duke University Press.USA
Bourdieu,Pierre (1990),Photography A Middle – Brow Art.Translated by: Keyvan Valinejad (3 ed),Payame emrooz Publication . ( Text in Persian).
Campany ,David, (2008), Photography And Cinema. Translated by:Mohsen Bayramnejad(1st ed),Markaz Publication, ( Text in Persian).
Ione Amy. Art in an age of science and technology.(2000).The San Francisco International Art Exposition.
Khansari,Saleheh,(2016), Dusseldorf School Of Photography,(2nd ed), Pargar Publication,(Text in Persian).
Langford ,Michael John, (1980), Story Of Photography. Translated by: Reza
Nabavy(4th ed),Tehran:Afkar Publication,(Text in Persian).
Lopes,Dominic,(2016), Four arts of photography : an essay in philosophy.
Translated by: Hamed Zamani Gndomani(1st ed),Pargar Publication,(Text in Persian).
Marrati ,Paola, ,(2016), Gilles Deleuze : cinema and philosophy, Translated by:Faezeh Jafarian,Mehrdad Parsa (1st ed).Shavand Publication,(Text in Persian).
Moghimnejad, Mehdi,(2014), Photography and Theory,(1sted),Soreh Mehr Pablication, ,(Text in Persian).
Moghimnejad ,M.(2009)Multimedia arts: an introduction to the discussion of narrative in photography .Jornal of Art(faslnameh honar),88(3),247-269, (Text in Persian).
Morton ,John,(2014),Gill Deleuz And Photography . Translated by: Mitra Sarhaddi, Ettealat Hekmat va Marefat,9(1)32-38
Rahbarnia ,Z.Masdari,F.(2015) The Impact of New Media on Interactivity of ModernArt : Using the Theory of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. The Global of Communication Scholars(majale jahanie rasaneh),10(2),221-235, (Text in Persian).
Sontag, Susan, (1977), On Photography. Translated by: Majid Akhgar,(4th ed) ,Bidgol Publication,(Text in Persian).
Soulages, François,(2005),Esthétique de la photographie : la perte et le reste , Translated by:MohammadReza Abolghasemi(2nd ed).cheshmeh Publication,(Text in Persian).
Tcible,S, A Short History of Phptography Theories .Ettelaat,e hekmatomarefat ,11(1),19 -25,(Text in Persian).
Valery, Paul, (2015),On photography, Translated by:Aidin Rahimi Pourazad(1st ed).Herfeh Nevisandeh Publication,(Text in Persian).
Ward,Glen,(2017),Postmodernism.Translatedby:AliMorshedizad(6thed) ,Ghasidehsara.
URLs
Url3: https://www.phototraces.com/creative-photography/famous-contemporary-photographers/
Url4: www.seemorgh.com/culture
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 138 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 11 |