دانشگاه الزهرا

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات25
تعداد شماره‌ها932
تعداد مقالات7,652
تعداد مشاهده مقاله12,492,885
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله8,884,594
Mahmoodi, Mohammad Hadi, Karbakhsh, Rahime, Sheykholmoluki, Hamidreza. (1403). EFL Learners’ Goal Orientation, Willingness to Communicate, Listening Anxiety, and Listening Comprehension: A Path Analysis. جلوه هنر, 8(2), 71-98. doi: 10.22051/lghor.2023.43303.1796
Mohammad Hadi Mahmoodi; Rahime Karbakhsh; Hamidreza Sheykholmoluki. "EFL Learners’ Goal Orientation, Willingness to Communicate, Listening Anxiety, and Listening Comprehension: A Path Analysis". جلوه هنر, 8, 2, 1403, 71-98. doi: 10.22051/lghor.2023.43303.1796
Mahmoodi, Mohammad Hadi, Karbakhsh, Rahime, Sheykholmoluki, Hamidreza. (1403). 'EFL Learners’ Goal Orientation, Willingness to Communicate, Listening Anxiety, and Listening Comprehension: A Path Analysis', جلوه هنر, 8(2), pp. 71-98. doi: 10.22051/lghor.2023.43303.1796
Mahmoodi, Mohammad Hadi, Karbakhsh, Rahime, Sheykholmoluki, Hamidreza. EFL Learners’ Goal Orientation, Willingness to Communicate, Listening Anxiety, and Listening Comprehension: A Path Analysis. جلوه هنر, 1403; 8(2): 71-98. doi: 10.22051/lghor.2023.43303.1796

EFL Learners’ Goal Orientation, Willingness to Communicate, Listening Anxiety, and Listening Comprehension: A Path Analysis

Journal of Language Horizons
مقاله 3، دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 20، آبان 2024، صفحه 71-98    اصل مقاله (428.6 K)
نوع مقاله: Research article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/lghor.2023.43303.1796
نویسندگان
Mohammad Hadi Mahmoodi* 1؛ Rahime Karbakhsh2؛ Hamidreza Sheykholmoluki3
1Department of English, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
2Department of English, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran .
3Department of English, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده
This study investigated the interrelationship among EFL learners' goal orientations, willingness to communicate (WTC), listening anxiety, and listening comprehension. Two-hundred participants, selected through convenience sampling procedure from private language institutes, completed the following questionnaires: Goal Orientation Questionnaire section of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Pintrich et al., 1991), WTC Questionnaire (Cao & Philip, 2006), and Foreign Language Listening Anxiety Scale (Kim, 2000). The listening section of the IELTS exam was also utilized for measuring the participants’ listening comprehension ability. First, a hypothesized model was tested through the AMOS program. The results revealed that all the variables in the study were positively correlated with L2 listening comprehension except for L2 listening anxiety and performance goal orientation, which were negatively correlated with L2 listening comprehension. Moreover, it was found that mastery goal orientation was the strongest predictor of the dependent variable. Then, the revised model for the interrelationship among the variables was presented. The results showed that both psychological and cognitive variables could have crucial roles in EFL learners’ success in learning listening comprehension ability. The implications of the study are discussed in the text.
کلیدواژه‌ها
goal orientation؛ listening anxiety؛ listening comprehension؛ WTC
عنوان مقاله [English]
رابطه میان جهت گیری هدف، تمایل به برقراری ارتباط، اضطراب شنیداری و درک مطلب شنیداری زبان آموزان ایرانی: مطالعه ای مبتنی بر تحلیل مسیر
نویسندگان [English]
محمد هادی محمودی1؛ رحیمه کاربخش2؛ حمیدرضا شیخ الملوکی3
1گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.
2گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران،
3گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
چکیده [English]
این پژوهش رابطه متقابل میان جهت گیری هدف، تمایل به برقراری ارتباط، اضطراب در هنگام شنیدن زبان خارجی و درک مطلب شنیداری را در فراگیران زبان انگلیسی بررسی می کند. برای این منظور، 200 نفر از فراگیران زبان موسسات خصوصی که بر اساس روش نمونه گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند، پرسشنامه‌های جهت گیری هدف (پینتریچ و همکاران، 1991) ، تمایل به برقراری ارتباط (کائو و فیلیپ، 2006) و اضطراب شنیداری (کیم، 2000) را تکمیل کردند. بعلاوه، محققان برای اندازه گیری میزان درک مطلب شنیداری یادگیرندگان از آزمون آیلتس استفاده کردند. پس از جمع آوری داده‌ها، مدل فرضیه از طریق نرم افزار ایموس مورد آزمایش قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که همه متغیرهای مطالعه به طور مثبت و معنی داری با درک مطلب شنیداری فراگیران زبان انگلیسی همبستگی دارند به جز اضطراب در هنگام شنیدن زبان خارجی و جهت گیری هدف عملکردی که با درک مطلب شنیداری رابطه منفی دارند. همچنین، مشخص شد که جهت گیری هدف قوی ترین پیش بینی کننده‌ متغیر وابسته است. در ادامه، یک مدل پیشنهادی برای روابط متقابل بین متغیرها ارائه شد. بر اساس یافته‌های این مطالعه، می توان نتیجه گرفت که هم متغیرهای روانشناختی مانند اضطراب در هنگام شنیدن زبان خارجی و هم متغیرهای شناختی مانند جهت گیری هدف در موفقیت زبان آموزان بسیار مهم هستند. کاربردهای نتایج این مطالعه به تفصیل در متن مورد بحث قرار گرفته‌اند.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
جهت گیری هدف, تمایل به برقراری ارتباط, اضطراب شنیداری, درک مطلب شنیداری
مراجع
  1. Ames, C., & Ames, R. (1984). Systems of student and teacher motivation: Toward a qualitative definition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 535–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.535
  2. Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., van Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62(2), 49-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00706.x
  3. Ballesteros Muñoz, L., & Tutistar Jojoa, S. (2014). How setting goals enhances learners’ self-efficacy beliefs in listening comprehension. HOW, 21(1), 42–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.19183/how.21.1.14
  4. Bernales, C. (2016). Towards a comprehensive concept of willingness to communicate: Learners predicted and self-reported participation in the foreign language classroom. System, 56(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.11.002
  5. Cao, Y., & Philip, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002
  6. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613349
  7. Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom University of Washington. The Modern Language Journal, 89(11), 206-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00275.x
  8. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
  9. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
  10. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
  11. Elliot, A. J., & Trash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009057102306
  12. Fang, H., Fu, H., Li, X., & Meng, L. (2019). Trapped in the woods: High performance goal orientation impedes competence restoration. Personality and Individual Differences, 150(1), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.022
  13. Geitza, G., Joosten-ten Brinkeb, D., & Kirschner, P. A. (2016). Changing learning behavior: Self-efficacy and goal orientation in PBL groups in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 146–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.001
  14. Ghahari, S., & Piruznejad, M. (2016). Recast and explicit feedback to young language learners: impacts on grammar uptake and willingness to communicate. Issues in Language Teaching, 5(2), 187-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2017.8058
  15. Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2011). A study of factors affecting EFL learners' English listening comprehension and the strategies for improvement.  Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 977–988. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.977-988
  16. Gregersen, T. S. (2005). Nonverbal clues: Clues to the detection of foreign language anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 388-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02225.x   
  17. Gregersen, T., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). Capitalizing on language learners' individuality: From premise to practice. Multilingual Matters. http://dx.doi.org/10.21832/9781783091218
  18. Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
  19. Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for /the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422–449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018947
  20. Janke, S. (2022). Give me freedom or see my motivation decline: Basic psychological needs and the development of students' learning goal orientation. Learning and Individual Differences, 96(11), 102-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102158
  21. Joe, H. K., Hiver, Ph., & Al-Hoorie, A. H., (2017). Classroom social climate, self-determined      motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: A study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 133–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.lindif.2016.11.005
  22. Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004
  23. Karakus T. E. (2019).  The effect of listening attitude and listening anxiety on listening comprehension: A regression model, Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(2), 356-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070207
  24. Karbakhsh, R., & Ahmadi Safa, M. (2020). Basic psychological needs satisfaction, goal orientation, willingness to communicate, self‑efficacy, and learning strategy use as predictors of second language achievement: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(2), 803-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09714-7
  25. Kilmen, S. (2022). Prospective teachers' professional achievement goal orientations, their self-efficacy beliefs, and perfectionism: A mediation analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74(2).15-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101165
  26. Kim, J. H. (2000). Foreign language listening anxiety: A study of Korean students learning English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
  27. Krashen, S.D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
  28. Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. L. (2015). Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students’ critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 68–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.006
  29. Liu, M., & Yuan, R. (2021).  Changes in and effects of foreign language classroom anxiety and listening anxiety on Chinese undergraduate students’ English Proficiency in the COVID-19 context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(4), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.670824
  30. MacIntyre, P., Dörnyei, Z., Clement, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: a situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
  31. MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System, 38(2), 161-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.013
  32. MacIntyre, P. D., Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq037
  33. Magni, F., Gong, Y., & Chao, M. M. (2021). A longitudinal examination of the reciprocal relationship between goal orientation and performance: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 179(2), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110960   
  34. Mahmoodi, M. H., & Moazam, I. (2014). Willingness to communicate (WTC) and L2 achievement: The case of Arabic language learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1069 – 1076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.518
  35. McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369817
  36. McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369817
  37. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. In: Booth-Butterfield, M. (Ed.), Communication, cognition and anxiety (pp. 19-44). SAGE.
  38. Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 487–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258
  39. Oxford, R. L. (1999). Anxiety and language learner: new insights. In J. Arnold (Eds.), Affect in language learning (pp. 58-67). Cambridge University Press.
  40. Öz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Willingness to communicate of EFL learners in Turkish context. Learning and Individual Differences, 37(15), 269–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.009
  41. Pan, Y. (2016). Analysis of listening anxiety in EFL class. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 4(6), 12-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.0406002
  42. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
  43. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan.
  44. Pulkka, A. T., & Niemivirta, M. (2013). Predictive relationships between adult students’ achievement goal orientations, course evaluations, and performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.03.015
  45. Roebken, H. (2007).  The influence of goal orientation on student satisfaction, academic engagement and achievement. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 679-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v5i13.1246
  46. Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and Researching Listening (2nd Ed.). Pearson.
  47. Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02034.x
  48. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A. & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
  49. Soyoof, A. (2022). Iranian EFL students' perception of willingness to communicate in an extramural digital context. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 44-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2024579
  50. Sparks, R. L., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning differences: affective or native language aptitude differences? Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 3-16.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb01076.x
  51. Tayşi, E. K. (2019). The effect of listening attitude and listening anxiety on listening comprehension: A regression model. Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(2), 356-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070207 
  52. Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening: comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004338
  53. VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006009
  54. Vogely, A. J. (1998). Listening comprehension anxiety: Students’ reported sources and solutions. Foreign Language Annals, 31(1), 67-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1998.tb01333.x
  55. Wallace, M. P., & Lee, K. (2020). Examining second language listening, vocabulary, and executive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(11), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2020.01122
  56. Wang, S. (2010). An experimental study of Chinese English major students’ listening anxiety of classroom learning activity at the university level. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(5), 562-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.5.562-568
  57. Wang, H., Peng, A., &Patterson, M. M. (2021). The roles of class social climate, language mindset, and emotions in predicting willingness to communicate in a foreign language. System, 99(3), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102529
  58. Wang, S. Y., & Cha, K. W. (2019). Foreign language listening anxiety factors affecting listening performance of Chinese EFL learners. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(1), 121–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.1.8.121
  59. Wu, H. J. (2011). Anxiety and reading comprehension performance in English as a foreign language. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 273-307. Available at http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/PDF/June_2011.pdf#page=273
  60. Xu, J., & Huang, Y. T. (2018). The mediating effect of listening metacognitive awareness between listening test anxiety and listening test performance. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(4), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0388-z
  61. Yashima, T. (2012). Willingness to communicate: Momentary volition that results in L2 behavior. In S. Mercer, M. Williams, & S. Ryan (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 119–135). Palgrave. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137032829_9
  62. Yashima, T., & Zenuk-Nishide, L. (2008). The impact of learning contexts on proficiency, attitudes, and L2 communication: Creating an imagined international community. System, 36(4), 566–585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.03.006
  63. Young, D. J. (1990). An investigation of students’ perspective in anxiety and speaking. Foreign Language Annals, 23(5), 539-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1990.tb00424.x
  64. Zangoei, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). Measuring the predictability of Iranian EFL students’ pragmatic listening comprehension with language proficiency, self-regulated learning in listening, and willingness to communicate. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 9(2), 79-104. https://doi.org/10.22049/jalda.2021.27199.1292
  65. Zhang, R., & Zhong, J. (2012). The hindrance of doubt: Causes of language anxiety. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(3), 27-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n3p27
  66. Zhang, S., & Zhang, X. (2020). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 26, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820913998
  67.  Zhang, X. (2013). Foreign language listening anxiety and listening performance: Conceptualizations and causal relationships. System, 41(1), 164-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.004
  68. Zhou, L., Yiheng, X., & Lochtman, K. (2020). The relationship between second language competence and willingness to communicate: The moderating effect of foreign language anxiety. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2(5), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1801697
  69. Zhou, Z. (2021). On college students’ listening anxiety and listening strategy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(11), 1467-1473. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1111.15
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 395
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 323


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب