پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 932 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,652 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,494,464 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,885,825 |
بررسی تاثیر ناهمگونی سرمایه‌گذاران بر همزمانی قیمت سهام و بازده سهام | ||
| راهبرد مدیریت مالی | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 11، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 42، مهر 1402، صفحه 219-236 اصل مقاله (979.26 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jfm.2023.32907.2409 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهدی حاج ابراهیمی1؛ حسین شفیعی بافتی* 2؛ عباس شیبانی تذرجی2 | ||
| 1گروه حسابداری ، واحد زاهدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زاهدان ، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار حسابداری ، واحد سیرجان ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سیرجان ، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| سرمایه‌گذاران دارای باورهای قبلی ناهمگون در ارزش یک شرکت هستند. همگن‌سازی سرمایه‌گذار فرض بسیار مهم در فرضیه بازار کارا است. با این حال، بازارهای مالی از دیدگاه سرمایه‌گذار حرفه‌ای کارا نمی‌باشد. بازارهای مالی از سرمایه‌گذاران ناهمگن شکل گرفته است که هدف آن‌ها حدس و گمان است. بسیاری از ناهنجاری‌ها اغلب به دلیل فاصله بیش از حد تئوری و واقعیت رخ می‌دهد. در همین راستا، ادبیات نظری بیشتر بر تحرکات ناشی از اعتقادات سرمایه‌گذاران یا ناهگونی سرمایه‌گذاران متمرکز است. حرکت قیمت سهام به عنوان یکی از ناهنجاری‌های رایج بیشتر مورد توجه محققان و متخصصان قرار گرفته است که نشان‌دهنده حرکت ناشی از اعتقادات افتراقی سرمایه‌گذاران یا ناهمگونی سرمایه‌گذاران است. لذا، بر پایه این استدلال، در این پژوهش تاثیر ناهمگونی سرمایه‌گذاران بر بازده و همزمانی قیمت سهام بررسی می‌شود. بدین منظور، برای اندازه‌گیری ناهمگونی سرمایه‌گذاران مطابق با پژوهشهای صورت گرفته از مدل قیمت‌گذاری دارایی‌های سرمایه‌ای استفاده گردید. به منظور آزمون فرضیه‌ها از تحلیل رگرسیون با استفاده از داده‌های ترکیبی 96 شرکت پذیرفته‌شده طی بازه زمانی 1390 الی 1397 در بورس اوراق بهادار استفاده شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که ناهمگونی سرمایه‌گذاران بر همزمانی قیمت سهام شرکت‌ها تأثیرگذار است. همچنین، نتایج در برگیرنده تاثیر ناهمگونی سرمایه‌گذاران بر بازده سهام شرکت‌ها است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ناهمگونی سرمایه‌گذاران؛ همزمانی قیمت سهام؛ رفتار سرمایه‌گذار | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the Effect of Investor Heterogeneity on the Concurrence of Stock Prices andStock Returns | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mehdi Hajebrahimi1؛ Hossein Shafie Bafty2؛ Abbas Sheybani2 | ||
| 1Department Of Accounting . Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Sirjan Branch, Sirjan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Investors have heterogeneous beliefs about the value of a company. Investor homogenization is a very important assumption in the efficient market hypothesis. However, Many anomalies often occur due to too much distance between theory and reality. In this regard, the theoretical literature focuses more on the movements resulting from the beliefs of investors or the heterogeneity of investors. Stock price movements have been considered by researchers and experts as one of the most common anomalies, which indicates the movement caused by differential beliefs of investors or investor heterogeneity. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of investor heterogeneity on the concurrence of stock prices and stock returns of companies. to investigate the issue, based on multivariate regression, data of 96 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period 2011-2018 were collected from the new Rahavard software, financial statements and the official website of the Tehran Stock Exchange and used to test research hypotheses. According to the research findings, investors who have high heterogeneity in their investments increase the synchronization of stock prices and stock returns. Heterogeneous beliefs of investors affect the concurrence of stock prices and stock returns of companies. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Investor Heterogeneity, Stock Price Synchronicity, Investor Behavior | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadi, M. R., Ahmadi Angali, K., & Drise, A. (2012). Evaluation of disclosure of financial information on the cost of capital based on CAPM model. Quarterly Financial Accounting Journal. 4 (13), 66-85. (in persian).
Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. M., & Choe, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian journal of management, 35(3), 291-311.
Damoori, D., Saeeda, S., Fallahzadeh, A. (2009). The Investigating Overreaction of Investors to Patterns of Past Financial Performance Measures in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Auditing Review, 16(1). (in persian).
Darakhshandeh, S., Ali Ahmadi, S. (2017). Evaluation the Role of Investor’s Beliefs on the Direction of price and Trading in Capital Market. Financial Knowledge of Securities Analysis, 10(33), 51-63. (in persian).
Dhaoui, A. (2015). Empirical Linkages between Trading Volume and Stock Markets Shocks: When Sentiments Drive Investors Behavior. Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 5(2), 105-126.
Dong, D and Wu, K. (2019). Investor attention is a risk pricing factor? Evidence from Chinese investors for self-selected stocks. China Finance Review International, 10 (1), 95-112.
Eskandarli, T. (2019). Investigating the effect of Accruals on the Heterogeneity of investors' Beliefs and their interaction on Stock Returns. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 8(29), 149-160(in persian).
Fallahzadeh Abarghouhei, A., Taftiyan (Ph.D), A., Heirany (Ph.D), F. (2019). Relationship between Information Disclosure with the Stock Price Synchronicity and Crash Risk of Falling Stock Prices within Simultaneous Equations System., 10(1), 169-194. doi: 10.22103/jak.2019.11485.2580 (in persian).
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2007). Disagreement, tastes, and asset prices. Journal of financial economics, 83(3), 667-689.
Farooq, O., Aktaruzzaman, K. (2016). Does stock price synchronicity effect information content of reported earnings? Evidence from the MENA. Financial Markets & Institutions, 6(3), 41-47.
Fernandes, N., & Ferreira, M. A. (2009). Insider trading laws and stock pric informativeness. Review of Financial Studies, 22(5), 1845-1887
He, W., Li, D., Shen, J., & Zhang, B. (2013). Large foreign ownership and stock price informativeness around the world. Journal of International Moneyand Finance, 36, 211-230.
Hoffmann, A. O., Post, T., & Pennings, J. M. (2015). How investor perceptions drive actual trading and risk-taking behavior. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 16 (1), 94-103.
Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2007). Disagreement and the stock market. Journal of Economic perspectives, 21(2), 109-128.
Jagadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, XLVIII (1), pp. 65-91.
Jin L., Myers S. C. (2006). Raround the word: Theory and new tests. Journal of Finacial Economics, 79:257-292
Jin, Y., Yan, M., Xi, Y. (2016). Stock price synchronicity and stock price crash risk: Basedon the mediating effect of herding behavior of QFII. China Finance Review International, 31(2), 1011-1041
Kim, T., & Ha, A. (2010, August). Investor sentiment and market anomalies. In 23rd Australasian Finance and Banking Conference.
Li, Q., Wang, T., Li, P., Liu, L., Gong, Q., & Chen, Y. (2014). The effect of news and public mood on stock movements. Information Sciences, 278, 826-840.
Markowitz, H. (1952). The utility of wealth. Journal of political Economy, 60(2), 151-158.
Miller, E. M. (1977). Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. The Journal of finance, 32(4), 1151-1168.
Mushinada, V.N.C and Veluri, V.S.S. (2019). Elucidating investor's rationality and behavioural biases in Indian stock market. Review of Behavioral Finance, 11 (2): 201-219.
Ng, L., Wu, F., Yu, J., & Zhang, B. (2011). The Role of Foreign Blockholders in Stoc Liquidity: A Cross-Country Analysis. Working Paper. Retrieved from.
Osoolian, M., Sadeghi Sharif, S., Khalili, M. (2018). Accruals, Cash Flow, and Operating Profitability in the Cross Section of Stock Returns; Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Accounting and Auditing Review, 24(4), 463-482. doi: 10.22059/acctgrev.2018.240522.1007683. (in persian).
Rahimi, I. & Nezampour, I. (2016). Relationship with accounting disclosure, reasonable price synchronization and risk of supporting the company in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, New in Management Sciences, 3 (14), 141-117. (in persian).
Roll, R. (1988). The stochastic dependence of security price changes and transaction volumes: implications for the mixture-of-distributions hypothesis. The Journal of Finance, 43(3), 541-566
Rostami, M., bikzadeh, l & azdari, f. (2016). Testing capital asset pricing model based on exogenous information assumptions in TSE. Financial engineering and securities management ,7(27), 71-86. (in persian).
Safarpoor, M., Darabi, R., Hamidian, M. (2019). Different Effect of Corporate size on The Relationship Between Conventional Returns, unconventional Returns and Heterogeneous Investor Beliefs. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 8(31), 143-164. (in persian).
Sayyadi Tooranloo, H., Azizi, P & Sayyahpoor, A. (2019), Analyzing causal relationships of effective factors on the decision making of individual investors to purchase shares, International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 36 (1), 12-41.
Song, L. (2015). Accounting disclosure, stock price synchronicity and stock crash risk: An emerging-market perspective. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 23(4), 349-363.
Wang, J. (1994). A model of competitive stock trading volume. Journal of political Economy, 102(1), 127-168.
Williams, H. C. (1977). On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and planning A, 9(3), 285-344.
Zhang, X. F. (2006). Information uncertainty and analyst forecast behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(2), 565-590. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 464 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 187 |
||
