پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 938 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,697 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,622,369 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,985,874 |
تحلیل ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مقیاس بیگانگی دانشگاهی و عوامل اثرگذار بر آن در آموزش الکترونیکی دوران کووید-19 | ||
| اندیشه های نوین تربیتی | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 09 خرداد 1402 اصل مقاله (726.7 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jontoe.2023.40832.3609 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| سعیده سبزیان* | ||
| گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه (س)، قم، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مقیاس بیگانگی دانشگاهی و عوامل اثرگذار بر آن در آموزش الکترونیکی دوران کووید-19 صورت پذیرفت. پژوهش حاضر یک مطالعه توصیفی-تحلیلی از نوع مقطعی است. جامعه‌ی پژوهش شامل تمامی دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی دانشگاه لرستان در سال تحصیلی 1401-1400 بود. 215 دانشجو به‌صورت آنلاین و در دسترس در این مطالعه شرکت کردند و به مقیاس بیگانگی (AS)، چارچوب اجتماع اکتشافی (CIF) و مقیاس خودکارآمدی عمومی (GSES) پاسخ دادند. برای تجزیه‌و‌تحلیل داده‌ها از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی به روش مؤلفه‌های اصلی و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که مقیاس در نمونه حاضر از ساختار تک‌عاملی مناسبی برخوردار است که در مجموع 94/66 درصد واریانس را تبیین می‌کند. تحلیل عاملی تأییدی نیز این ساختار را تأیید کرد. همچنین همسانی درونی مقیاس نیز با آلفای کرونباخ 93/0 و بازآزمایی 89/0 به تأیید رسید. نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون نشان داد که 17 درصد واریانس بیگانگی از طریق مؤلفه‌های چارچوب اجتماع اکتشافی قابل تبیین است. همچنین بین خودکارآمدی با بیگانگی دانشگاهی رابطه منفی و معنی‌داری وجود داشت. مقیاس بیگانگی دانشگاهی از روایی و پایایی لازم برخوردار است و وجود حسی از حضور آنلاین در کلاس و همچنین باور به توانایی‌های خود تأثیر قابل ملاحظه‌ای بر کاهش بیگانگی دانشجویان داشت. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بیگانگی دانشگاهی؛ چارچوب اجتماع اکتشافی؛ خودکارآمدی؛ ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Psychometric Analysis of the University Alienation Scale and Factors Affecting it in E-Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Saeideh Sabzian | ||
| Department of Counseling, School of Humanities, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometrics of the university alienation scale and factors affecting it in e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study population in this descriptive-analytic research comprised all undergraduate students of Lorestan University in the academic year 2022-2023. Convenience sampling was used to select 215 students to complete the University Alienation Scale, Community of Inquiry Framework and Generalized Self-efficacy Scale online. The data were analyzed through exploratory factor analysis, principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The results showed that the scale has a one-factor structure that explains 66.94% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis also confirmed this structure. The internal consistency of the scale was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha of 0.93 and a test-retest reliability of 0.89. The results of multiple regression analysis showed that 17% of the variance of university alienation can be explained through the components of the community of inquiry framework. There was also a significant negative relationship between the self-efficacy and university alienation. Introduction Current advances in information and technology have led to changes in social, economic and cultural structures in developed and developing countries. Hence, the concept of individual has been redefined in modern world structures. With technology developments in the information era, access to information has accelerated, and while gaining power over nature, human has been enslaved by what he has produced. Individuals as the subject have turned away from themselves and turned into someone who strives for their own unhappiness for the sake of the happiness of others and is adversely affected by the social and cultural environment. This situation led to the emergence of alienation as a historical and social phenomenon (Yılmaz & Sarpkaya, 2009). Alienation is currently a widely discussed concept for a variety of reasons including the fact that individuals are experiencing alienation toward themselves and many social institutions in modern societies, e.g. family, parents, spouses, organizations and professions. One of the areas that alienation affects the most is education (Çelik, 2020). However, despite the importance of alienation in learning and its impact on various aspects of education, few studies are found in this field. This shortage may have several reasons, one of which is the focus of the present research: the lack of valid and reliable tools. Furthermore, it is important to determine the factors affecting academic alienation. We considered two of such factors: the community of inquiry framework and self-efficacy. Research results indicated that individuals with low self-efficacy experience higher levels of alienation (Çelik, 2020; Polat, Dilekmen & ve Yasul, 2015). In addition to self-efficacy, it appears that another important variable affecting university alienation during e-learning is the community of inquiry framework (educational, social and cognitive online presence) (De Gagne & Walters, 2009). Therefore, the current research seeks to answer the question whether the Persian version of the University Alienation Scale is reliable and valid, and whether university alienation can be predicted through community of inquiry framework and self-efficacy. Methodology The statistical population of this applied descriptive-correlational research included 7500 undergraduate students from Lorestan University in the academic year 2022-2023. Using rules-of-thumb, 215 people entered the study by voluntary sampling method (due to special health conditions and corona restrictions) and respond to Alienation Scale (AS; Kurtulmuş, Kaçire, Karabıyık and Yiğit, 2015), Community of Inquiry Framework (CIF; Arbaugh, Cleveland-Innes, Diaz, Garrison & Richardson, 2008) and Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES; Schwarzer and Jerusalem, 1995). The link of the questionnaires was posted in a WhatsApp channel of the participating students who completed the questionnaires online. Ten experts assessed and confirmed face and content validity of the items. Face validity was determined qualitatively through criteria of relevance, ambiguity, and misconceptions. As per face validity, if each item scored more than 1.5, that item was considered appropriate. For content validity, the researcher asked experts to provide the necessary feedback, after a qualitative review of the tool for grammar, use of appropriate words, and appropriate placement of the items, according to which the items were corrected. To check the content validity in a quantitative way, two content validity ratios were used to check the necessity of the item, and the Content Validity Index was used to check the relevance of the item. CVI score above 0.79 indicated the appropriateness of the item. The obtained CVR value was also compared with Lawshe's table (1975). For ten evaluators, a CVR value greater than 0.62 was considered appropriate. After confirming the face and content validity of the questionnaire, SPSS statistical software version 22 was used for exploratory factor analysis, obtaining subscales, and data analysis. To measure sampling adequacy and justifiability of factor assessment, Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO), and Bartlett Sphericity tests were used. Data analyses were conducted with a confidence level of 95%. Mean±SD was used to describe the quantitative data, and frequency (percentage) to describe the qualitative data. Results The face validity and the content validity were evaluated using qualitative and quantitative approaches. Throughout assessment of face and content validity, minor changes were made according to the participants and the educational experts, without changing the content of the items. Then the items were reviewed and finally approved by the research team. For quantitative face validity, the item impact score was calculated, with the minimum score of 3.45. Therefore, all the items were confirmed. For quantitative content validity, CVR and CVI were calculated. The minimum score was reported to be 0.88 for CVI, and 0.66 for CVR. Thus, all the items were confirmed. The results showed that the scale has a one-factor structure that explains 66.94% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis also confirmed this structure. Considering the goodness of fit indices (GFIs) such as the CFI, NFI, TLI, IFI, SRMR, RMSEA, and χ2/df, it can be concluded that the model properly fits the data. The internal reliability of the above instrument was obtained using Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.93, and since it was greater than 0.70, the internal reliability of the present instrument was confirmed. The results of test-retest and the correlation among the obtained answers were studied and the coefficients were reported to be above 0.89, indicating the moderate reliability of the questionnaire. Relationships between variables were tested by Pearson’s correlation test. The correlation results are shown in Table 2. The results of multiple regression analysis showed that 17% of the variance of university alienation can be explained through the components of the community of inquiry framework. There was also a significant negative relationship between the self-efficacy and university alienation. Discussion and conclusion The results confirmed the appropriate validity and reliability of the university alienation scale as well as the impact of self-efficacy and online educational and cognitive presence on this variable. Among the limitations of the present study, we can mention the limitation of sampling due to traffic restrictions, maintaining social distance, and closing universities. To accurately generalize the findings, further studies are required with larger sample sizes because we recruited only students. Research findings should be cautiously generalized to other people and age groups because we did not have access to different age groups. Due to the proper validity and reliability of the university alienation scale, it can be used to determine and improve alienation. Given that online educational and cognitive presence is related to alienation, it is suggested that professors optimally utilize online and electronic classes in order to enhance the educational presence and cognitive presence of learners and to provide participatory learning in the classroom. Cognitive and emotional engagement helps to better understand and motivate learners and facilitate reducing alienation. Overall, it can be said that the university alienation scale is valid and reliable for Iranian students. Furthermore, a sense of online presence in the classroom as well as believing in one’s abilities has a significant effect on reducing students' university alienation. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| University Alienation, Community of Inquiry Framework, Self-Efficacy, Psychometric properties | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2), 1-21. doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.490 Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological science, 1(2), 164-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8 Çelik, O. T. (2020). Prediction of alienation from university according to gender, department selection, academic success and academic self-efficacy. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education (INUJFE), 21(2), 813-826. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd. 661389 De Gagne, J. C., & Walters, K. (2009). Online teaching experience: A qualitative metasynthesis (QMS). MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 577-589. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol5no4/abstracts.htm DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas‐Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing scholarship, 39(2), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x Garrison, D. R. (2003). Self-directed learning and distance education. Handbook of distance education (814), 161-168. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071 Grunschel, C., Patrzek, J., & Fries, S. (2013). Exploring different types of academic delayers: A latent profile analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.014 Harrell, K. (2017). The impact of blended learning on social presence, cognitive presence, teaching presence, and perceived learning. Liberty University. Hascher, T., & Hagenauer, G. (2010). Alienation from school. International journal of educational research, 49(6), 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.03.002 Jenaabadi, H., Marziyeh, A., & Ebrahimi, M. (2020). The effectiveness of study and learning skills training on of students' reduction of negative academic Emotions and Educational Self-Handicapping. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 8(15), 73-89 10.22084/J.PSYCHOGY.2020.21127.2111. (Text in Persian) Jones, E. G., & Kay, M. (1992). Instrumentation in cross-cultural research. Nursing Research, 41(3), 186–188. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199205000-00012 Kaçire, İ. (2016). The Impact of the university students' level of alienation on their perception of general satistaction. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(1), 38-46. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1082100 Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications. Kurtulmus, M. (2016). The effect of diversity climate perception on alienation of students to university. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(1), 141-151. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1088676 KURTULMUŞ, M., KAÇİRE, İ., KARABIYIK, H., & Yiğit, B. (2015). ÜNİVERSİTE YABANCILAŞMA ÖLÇEĞİ GEÇERLİK GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(7), 100-110. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/147668 Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x Lewis, J. (2009). Social alienation, self-efficacy, and career goals as related to the academic performance of college sophomores. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Marywood University, USA. Lim, J., & Richardson, J.C. (2020). Predictive effects of undergraduate student’s perceptions of social, cognitive, and teaching presence on affective learning outcomes according to disciplines. Computers & education. 104063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104063 Mann, S. J. (2005). Alienation in the learning environment: a failure of community? Studies in higher education, 30(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507052000307786 McNeill, L., Rice, M. & Wright, V. (2019). An exploratory factor analysis of a teaching presence instrument and the ICAP framework in an online computer applications course. In Global Learn (pp. 310-317). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/210327/. Milner, M., & Wolfer, T. (2014). The use of decision cases to foster critical thinking in social work students. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 34(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2014.909917 POLAT, M., DİLEKMEN, M., & YASUL, A. F. (2015). Öğretmen Adaylarinda Okula Yabancilaşma ve Akademik Öz-Yeterlik: Bir Chaid Analizi İncelemesi. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi(4), 214-232. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/inesj/issue/40013/475705 Bavojdan, R., Bavojdan, M. R., Nikazin, M., & Kaviani, A. (2012). N. Khezri Moghadam A. (2012). Relationship Between General Self-Efficacy And Metacognition Believes With Coping Strategies In Male Substance Abuse. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6 (3), 85-102. https://apsy.sbu.ac.ir/article_95696.html (Text in Persian) Rajabi, G. R. (2006). Reliability and validity of General Self-Efficacy beliefs scale (GSE-10) in psychology students of the faculty of educational sciences and psy-chology of Shahid Chamran University of Ahwaz and Marvdasht Azad University. Quarterly Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 1 (1), 111-122. 10.22051/JONTOE.2006.287 (Text in Persian) Rezaei Kalantari, M., & Eftekhari Kanzari, F. (2019). The relationship between loneliness and mental health with internet addiction in high school students in Sari, 1397-1396. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 9(36), 5-23. https://ictedu.sari.iau.ir/article_670220.html?lang=en (Text in Persian) Sarıalioğlu, A., Atay, T., & Arıkan, D. (2022). Determining the relationship between loneliness and internet addiction among adolescents during the covid-19 pandemic in Turkey. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 63, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2021.11.011 Schabracq, M., & Cooper, C. (2003). To be me or not to be me: About alienation. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 16(2), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951507031000152650 Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs, 35-37. https://diabetes-psychologie.de/downloads/Beschreibung_GSE.pdf Simonson, M., Zvacek, S. M., & Smaldino, S. (2019). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education 7th edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc. Şİmşek, H., & Akdemir, Ö. A. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinde okula yabancılaşma. Current Research in Education, 1(1), 1-12. Taghizade, A., Hatami, J., Fardanesh, H., & Noroozi, O. (2018). Validating the Persian version of the Community of Inquiry framework survey instrument in web-based learning environments. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 8(31), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.22054/jem.2018.30681.1716 (Text in Persian) Thomas, M. K. (2017). Electronic versus physical art making: an exploration of the process and product. Notre Dame de Namur University. Yılmaz, S., & Sarpkaya, P. (2009). Eğitim örgütlerinde yabancılaşma ve yönetimi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 314-333. http://www.insanbilimleri.com | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 266 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 219 |
||
