پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 932 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,653 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,495,828 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,886,828 |
تحلیل فرآیند خوانش عکس بر اساس نظریه کنشگر – شبکه | ||
| جلوه هنر | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 15، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 39، تیر 1402، صفحه 75-88 اصل مقاله (1.62 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jjh.2023.41984.1870 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| علیرضا مهدی زاده* | ||
| دانشیار گروه نقاشی، دانشکده هنر و معماری صبا،دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان،کرمان، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| عکس همانند سایر متون هنری به‌محض این‌که وارد یک شبکۀ ارتباطی می‌شود در معرض انواع پرسش‌ها قرار گرفته و این‌گونه کنشی تحت عنوان خوانش عکس آغاز می‌شود. منتقدان از پایگاه‌های فکری متفاوت، به‌روش‌ها و رویکردهای گوناگون با عکس ارتباط برقرار می‌کنند و بدین شکل به خوانش، تفسیر و تعبیر آن مبادرت می‌ورزند. هدف این پژوهش، تحلیل فرایند خوانش عکس و چگونگی برساخت خود خوانش عکس است. لذا، در این مقاله، به شناسایی عناصر و عوامل اصلی دخیل در خوانش عکس و نحوۀ پیوند آن‌ها با یک‌دیگر پرداخته‌ایم. روش پژوهش توصیفی - تحلیلی و تطبیقی و رویکرد به کار گرفته‌شده، نظریۀ کنشگر - شبکۀ برونو لاتور است. بنابراین، پس از شرح نظریه مورد نظر، مفاهیم قابل‌تعمیم آن (کنشگر، شبکه، گذارده و ترجمه) در رابطه با فرایند خوانش عکس بررسی و تحلیل شده‌اند. لاتور فارغ از تقسیم‌بندی‌های رایج مانند واقعی و غیر واقعی، معتقد است جهان متشکل از کنشگران انسانی و غیرانسانی شامل اشیا، موجودات و مصنوعات است که به‌صورت شبکه‌ای با یک‌دیگر پیوند می‌یابند و این‌گونه انواع سازه‌ها از یک واقعیت علمی تا دولت، کتاب، قصه و... برساخته می‌شود. دغدغۀ اصلی این نظریه، مطالعۀ چگونگی پیوند کنشگران با یک‌دیگر در درون هر شبکه‌ای و تحلیل فرایند ساخت یک محصول یا سازه است. از این‌جهت این پرسش‌ها مطرح می‌شوند که: 1) فرایند خوانش عکس چگونه شکل گرفته و در نهایت، برساخته می‌شود؟ 2) کنشگران اصلی برساخت خوانش عکس کدامند؟ 3) نحوۀ پیوند، ارتباط و تعامل کنشگران دخیل در خوانش عکس با یک‌دیگر چگونه است؟ نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که، خوانش عکس در گام نخست از مواجهۀ دیداری و اتحاد کنشگری انسانی یعنی منتقد با عکس شکل می‌گیرد. سپس، از طریق درآمیختن، تعامل، تقابل و مذاکرۀ تمامی کنشگران درگیر در درون شبکه، یک خوانش از عکس برساخته می‌شود. در واقع، عاملیت منتقد مستقل نبوده و به بازیگری سایر کنشگران شبکه وابسته است. این کنشگران عبارتند از: عنوان و بیانیۀ عکس، دیدگاه و قصد عکاس، شاخه و مقولۀ عکس و نظریه‌های زیبایی‌شناسی و نقد هنری. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| واژه‌های کلیدی: عکاسی؛ خوانش عکس؛ منتقد؛ کنشگر - شبکه؛ برونو لاتور | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| هنرهای تجسمی و کاربردی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis of Photo Reading Process Based on Actant - Network Theory | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Reza Mehdizadeh | ||
| Associate Professor, Department of Painting, Saba School of Art and Architecture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Like other artistic contents such as poetry, painting and film, the product of photographic action, i.e. photo (Image), is exposed to all kinds of questions when entering into a communicational process. This kind of action is called " Image reading". Critics usually look at the photos in various ways and approaches based on different philosophical and aesthetic definitions and theories, and thus read, interpret and elaborate it and share their opinions with others. In general, the act of reading literal and artistic artworks is related to the ontological, epistemological and methodological encounter with them in order to understand, interpret, and analyze their different aspects and layers. From this perspective, reading of artworks, including photographs, is a kind of action that can be compared with the action and encounter of scientists and thinkers toward the world and objects in order to gain knowledge and insight. If scientists seek to understand the world and explain its phenomena in many different manners, the goal and intention of critics is the recognition and explanation of art works and sharing of their interpretations with others. Hence, science and art can beperceied in the same manner, and sometimes by similar methods, therefore by using some theories and models in the field of science and technology one can reflect on and contemplate how to encounter and read artworks. In this regard, the purpose of this research is to analyze the process of image reading and its constructionism. Therefore, identification of the main factors and elements involving image reading and the relation between them, has been attempted. The research method is descriptive, analytical and comparative, and the used approach is the theory of Bruno Latour. He has provided a different and interesting theory about the encounter of scientists to the world and objects and also the construction of all kinds of scientific and technical innovations which the investigational and analytical power to study all types of networks and their construction methods are among its characteristic feature. Based on his theory, Actor–network theory (ANT), Latour believes that everything is the output of relating human and non-human actors, including all living creatures, objects and artifacts, and so it is the way that all kind of structures such as scientific reality, buildings, government, parties, books and films are made. Latour looks at the universe regardless of common categorizations such as subject-object, real- unreal, natural- artificial and based on the Actor–network theory (ANT), he believes that the universe is composed of a heterogeneous interrelation betwen human and non-human (creatures, objects, artifacts), observable and unobservable (virus, microbes and electrons) actors that unite together to achieve their goals, and that is how scientific, technical, legal, political, cultural, and artistic structures form a scientific reality a political party, or government, buildings, cars, books and stories. Actor–network is a concert concept that shows two sides of one phenomenon; network is made of the connections among actors, and any entity that owns action and can cause change is considered as an actor. Therefore, there is no difference between a human actor and other non-human ones such as stones, birds, words, books, etc. Thus the nature, role, power and the functionality of each actor is determined within the network and relationships and connections that it has with other actors. Basically, in isolation and without any connection with other human and non-human actors, no actor can make a change or create an action. For example, driving takes place in network consisting of driver, car, road, weather, traffic rules, traffic signs, police, etc. that each of these actors influences the other and they define, interpret and adjusts the goals and strengths of one another. Speed, does not depend only on the driver's will, but it is determined and adjusted by other actors like car, weather, road, and the police. In other words, the driver here decides and acts as a network actor and has functionality but he is not a separate actor. Since the basis of this theory is according to the way that actors are connected within each network, so if we want to study actions in the field of science, technology, religion, law and art law and investigate a product like law, government, book, movie or reading, first we have to identify the actors involved in the creation of the product and then reconstruct and analyze their interaction and negotiation within the network. In fact, instead of studying a product, the process of making it is considered here.Activist-network theory is ontological and a general method that is not allocated just to science and technology, as we can study scientific and methodological approaches with reference to this theory, as well as religion, politics,culture, and art. Therefore, by reconstructing this theory ontologically and psychologically and borrowing some generalizable concepts of Latour's theory, explaining and interpreting them, we can use it to present the formation and construction the process of image reading and trace the main actors and involvers in the process to clarify how they interact with each other through conflict, negotiation and interpretation, define and redefine change and adjust one another in order a reading to be created. The main concern of this theory is the study of the nature of union, relation, connection and interaction of different human and non-human actors with each other within any network and how an output or structure is made. From this aspect, all types of image readings can be considered as a structure or product, in which many elements and actors have role and influence. Critics usually do the image reading with a certain method and approach and place their emphasis and orientation towards the artwork, artist, audience or a combination of them, but in this article, instead of describing the methods and approaches of image reading, we study and analyze the constructionism of the process itself. Therefore, these questions are raised, how is the process of image reading formed and finally made? Who are its main actors? What is the way of connection, communication and interaction of the actors involved in image reading with each other? Regardless of the creation of identity and definite homogenization between scientific and artistic theories, one can increase their understanding and analytical power in relation to artworks and photographs through such studies. Also, due to the lack of such attitudes and researches in the field of photography, by conducting and expanding such approaches new horizons and frameworks for interpretation of photography, and photography itself will be opened. Finally, this research comes to the conclusion that image reading forms in the first step from the vision exposure and its union with human activism, i.e. the image critic, and then through blending, interaction, confrontation and negotiation of all actors involved in the network- from the title and statement of the photo up to the perspective and intention of the photographer- the branch and category of the photos and aesthetics theories and art criticism are made. In fact, the critic's action is not independent and depends on the acting of other network actors. In this way each of the actors makes or breaks relationships and links and defines and redefines each other's nature and change and adjust each other's actions to create a reading. In fact, due to the connection and interaction of visible and invisible actors, image reading goes through the process of change and transformation. Also, emerging different types of readings arises from the way of connection, negotiation and conflict between the actors. On the other hand, if any kind of reading is noticed, approved and confirmed by other critics, acts as a new actor and can cause change and transformation in the whole network of image reading. In this way the network of reading expands and changes. At the end, it is suggested the how-ness of reading different artworks to be investigated and analyzed by experts from Actor–network theory (ANT) point of view. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Keywords: Photo, Photo Reading, Critic, Actant - Network, Bruno Latour | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
منابع
آیزینگر، جوئل (1399). اثر و استحاله، ترجمه حسن خوبدل و زهرا داورزنی، تهران: تماشا.
اسکروتن، راجر (1394). بازنمایی و عکاسی، ترجمه بابک محقق، تهران: فرهنگستان هنر.
ایگلتون، تری (1368). پیش درآمدی بر نظریه ادبی، ترجمه عباس مخبر، تهران: مرکز.
برت، تری (1379). نقد عکس، ترجمه اسماعیل عباسی و کاوه میرعباسی، تهران: مرکز.
بلاف، هالا (1375). فرهنگ دوربین، ترجمه رعنا جوادی، تهران: سروش.
جی، بیل و هورن، دیوید (1388)، درباره نگاه به عکس‌ها، ترجمه محسن بایرام نژاد، تهران: حرفه‌هنرمند.
رامامورتی، آنداندا (1390). وهم و نمایش‌ها؛ عکاسی و فرهنگ کالایی، ترجمه مهران مهاجر، عکاسی: درآمدی انتقادی، ترجمه محمد نبوی و دیگران، ویراستار لیز ولز، تهران: مینوی خرد.
روزنبلوم، نیومی (1399). تاریخ جهانی عکاسی، ترجمه کریم متقی، تهران: پرگار.
سارکوفسکی، جان (1393). نگاهی به عکس‌ها، ترجمه فرشید آذرنگ، تهران: سمت.
سوتر، لوسی (1398). چرا عکاسی هنری، ترجمه محسن بایرام نژاد، تهران: پرگار.
شریف‌زاده، رحمان (1397). مذاکره با اشیا، برونو لاتور و نظریه کنشگر-شبکه، تهران: نی.
کاتن، شارلوت (1399). عکس به‌مثابه هنر معاصر، ترجمه کیارنگ علایی، تهران: حرفه هنرمند.
لاینز، ناتان (1388). عکاسان و عکاسی، ترجمه وازریک درساهاکیان و بهمن جلالی، تهران: سروش.
لوپس، دومینیک مک آریو (1396). چهار هنر عکاسی، ترجمه حامد زمانی گندمی، تهران: پرگار.
محمدی، شادی و مقدم حیدری، غلامحسین (1391). بازسازی و بررسی مقومات متافیزیکی نظریه عامل- شبکه برونو لاتور، ذهن، سال سیزدهم، شماره 52، 139- 172.
مهدی زاده، علیرضا (1400). بررسی ویژگی های عکس مستند هنری، جلوه هنر، دوره 13، شماره 2، 72- 87.
مهدی زاده، علیرضا (1401). بررسی و تحلیل کنش عکاسی بر اساس نظریه کنشگر - شبکه برونو لاتور، هنرهای زیبا- هنرهای تجسمی، دوره 27، شماره 3، 99- 108.
References
Balaf , H,. (1996). Camera Culture, translated by Rana Javadi, (1st ed), Tehran: Soroush, (text in persian).
Bert, T,. (2000). Criticizing photographs, translated by Ismail Abbasi and Kaveh Mir Abbasi, second edition, Tehran: Markaz publication.
Clark, G,. (2016). The Photograph, translated by Hassan Khoobdel and Fariba Maghrebi, first edition, Tehran: Shoorafarin Publication, (text in persian).
Cotton, C,. (2020). The photograph as contemporary art, translated by Kiarang Alaei, Tehran: Artist's Profession, (text in persian).
Eisinger, J,. (2020). Trace and transformation, translated by Hassan Khoobdel and Zahra Davarzani, Tehran: Tamasha, (text in persian).
Eagleton, T,. (1989). An Introduction to Literary Theory, translated by Abbas Mokhber, Tehran: Center, (text in persian).
Jay, B and Horn, D,. (2009). On looking at photographs: A practical guide, first edition, translated by Mohsen Bayraminejad, Tehran, The Artist's profession, (text in persian).
Lanes, N,. (2009). Photographers and photography, translated by Vazrik Darsahakian and Bahman Jalali, Tehran: Soroush. (text in persian).
Latour, B,. (1996). Do Scientific Objects Have a History: Pastear And Whiehead In A Bath Of Lactic Aid, Common Knowledge, Vol,5.No.1.
Latour, B,. (1999). Pandora,s Hope, Essays on the Reality of Scince Studies, Cambridge Societys,vol.19.no.5.
Latour, B,. (2005). Reassembling the Social, the Introduction to Actor – Network Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, J,. (1985). Titles, the journal of aesthetics and art criticism,autumn, vol,44 no 1. Pp:29-39.
Lopez, D,. (2016). Four Arts of Photography, first edition, translated by Hamed Zamani Gandomi, Tehran: Pargar Publication, (text in persian).
Mohammadi, S., and Moghadam Heydari, G. (2012). Reconstruction and investigation of the metaphysical elements of Bruno Latour's actor-network theory, Mind Quarterly, Winter, 13th year, 52nd issue, pp. 139-172, (text in persian).
Mehdizadeh, A,. (2022). Investigation and analysis of photographic action based on actor-network theory of Bruno Latour, Fine Arts Quarterly - Visual Arts, Volume 27, (3), pp. 108-99,(text in persian).
Mehdizadeh, A,. (2021). Reviewing the features of documentary artistic photo, Quarterly, JELVE-Y-HONAR,13, (2), 72-87, (Text in Persian).
Ramamurthy, A,. (2011). Spectacles and illusions: photography and commodity culture, translated by Mehran Mohajer, in Lees, Wales (Editor) Photography, Critical introduction, translated by Mohammad Nobavi et.al , (1st ed), Tehran: Minooye Kherad, (text in persian).
Rosenblum, N,. (2020). A world history of photography, translated by Karim Motaghi, Tehran: Pargar, (text in persian).
Sarkovsky, J,. ( 2014). Looking at the photographs, translated by Farshid Azarang, first edition, Tehran: Samt Publications, (text in persian).
Scruton, R,. (2015). Representation and photography, translated by Babak Mohaghegh, Tehran: Art Academy, (text in persian).
Sharifzadeh, R,. (2018). Negotiating with objects, Bruno Latour and actor theory - Network, Tehran: Ney Publishing,(text in persian).
Soutter, L,. (2019). Why art photography, translated by Mohsen Bayramnejad, Pargar Publishing, Tehran, (text in persian).
Szarkowski, J,. (2007). Photographer's Eye. Museum of Modern Art. New York.
Walton, K. (1970). Categories of art, the philosophical review, 334-367.
URLs
URL1. https://www.andreasgursky.com/en (access date: 2022/03/24).
URL2. http://www.artnet.com/artists/gregory-crewdson/ (access date: 2022/03/24).
URL5.https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/goldin-nan-one-month-after-being-battered-p78045 (access date: 2022/03/24).
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 392 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 239 |
||