پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 939 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,734 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,722,384 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,064,007 |
بررسی سازها و جنسیت نوازندگان در نگاره‌های نسخۀ مصوری از دیوان حافظ از دربار گورکانی | ||
| پژوهش نامه گرافیک نقاشی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 5، شماره 9، بهمن 1401، صفحه 60-76 اصل مقاله (2.33 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/pgr.2023.41586.1175 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سهند سلطاندوست1؛ مهدی کشاورز افشار* 2 | ||
| 1دکتری پژوهش هنر، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس ، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار گروه پژوهش و تاریخ هنر، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس ، تهران، ایران، نویسنده مسئول. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| موضوع این پژوهش، سازشناسی موسیقیِ قدیمِ ایران از دریچۀ روایتِ تصویری در نگارگری، و مادۀ مطالعۀ موردی آن یک نسخۀ خطی نفیس از دیوان حافظ (به شمارۀ راهنمای Or. 14319 در کتابخانۀ بریتانیا) است. این نسحه، نخست در مکتب هرات دورۀ تیموری فراهم آمده و سپس در دربار گورکانیان هند نگاره‌های متعددی به آن پیوست شده‌است. این نسخۀ جالب توجه، تاکنون در مطالعات تاریخی سازشناسی بر مبنای تصویر، مغفول مانده‌است. مسئلۀ اصلی، شناسایی و بررسی ۳۴ ساز موجود در نگاره‌های حواشی این نسخه و نیز تعیین ترکیب جنسیتی نوازندگان این سازها است. پرسش‌های پژوهش از این قرارند که در این نگاره‌ها کدام سازها در دست نوازندگان مرد و کدام سازها در دست نوازندگان زن نقش شده‌اند؟ این انتخاب‌ها تا چه اندازه با کلیشه‌ها یا انگاره‌های ناظر بر هویت جنسیتی سازها همخوانی دارد؟ در این مقاله، با بهره‌گیری از مکتوبات فارسی در باب موسیقی، به ویژه آثار عبدالقادر مراغی و رسالۀ ارزشمند کنزالتُحَف اثر حسن کاشانی، به روش توصیفی-تحلیلی به مطالعۀ تطبیقی نگاره‌ها (Iconography) با اسناد کتابخانه‌ای پرداخته‌ایم. از یافته‌های پژوهش می‌توان به اختصاص سازهای بادی (نی و سُرنا)، و نیز رُباب به نوازندگان مرد اشاره کرد. همچنین غلبۀ حضور رُباب بر سازهایی همچون عود و تنبور که نقش محوری در موسیقی نظری و عملی قدیم ایران بر عهده دارند، نمایانگرجهت‌گیری جدید سازبندی در فرهنگ موسیقایی زمانه در منطقۀ ایران فرهنگی است. نگارگران این نسخه، زنان بیشتری را در حال نواختن سازهای آرشه‌ای تصویر کرده‌اند. تنها نوازندۀ قانون، مطابق با انتظار قبلی و وضعیت رایج در موسیقی معاصر ایرانی، زن است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها: موسیقی قدیم ایران؛ سازشناسی؛ نگارگری گورکانی؛ آیکونوگرافی؛ کنزالتحف؛ هنر و جنسیت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Instruments and the Gender of the Musicians in the Paintings of an Illustrated Manuscript of Divan of Hafez from the Mughal Court | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Sahand Soltandoost1؛ Mehdi Keshavarz Afshar2 | ||
| 1PhD., Department, Department of Art Studies & Art History, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Art Studies & Art History, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran, Corresponding Author. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The general subject of this paper is an interdisciplinary study in the field of organology, considering ancient Persian music with a reference to visual narration in Iranian painting. In current research, two significant issues are specifically addressed: first, the identification of musical instruments in the marginal illustrations of an exquisite manuscript of Divan of Hafez; and second, research on the gender composition of the musicians in these paintings. Among the questions are: Generally, which instruments are depicted with how many repetitions and variations in these paintings? Which instruments are primarily in the hands of male musicians? Which are mainly in the hands of female musicians, and which are almost in the hands of both genders? By answering these questions, iconographical knowledge can be obtained based on the images of common or famous instruments at the time and place of the creation and completion of the aforementioned manuscript. As an implicit purpose, by analyzing the choices of painters in deciding the gender of instrumentalists, it is possible to try out hypotheses about the gender composition of musicians or produce new speculations in this field. In historical musicology, the musicological studies of images and paintings are known as iconography or iconology. The scope of research in the historical sociology of Persian music has not yet expanded, and the collection of musical literature that has been provided by using visual narratives and considering them as texts has remained relatively poor. Organology is a large branch of musicology with a broad scope; therefore, considering the limited scope of an article and the multitude and variety of research topics, we have to choose a case study regarding the material and its limits. The reigning period of the Timurid dynasty (1370-1507) is of particular significance in musical studies. The music of Iran in the post-Timurid era (especially in some periods of the Safavid era) until the Zand and Qajar eras, in which a rebirth takes place, has been stuck in a kind of stagnation and decline, especially in the theoretical aspect. The study materials in this research are divided into two categories: primary research material and comparative sources. Comparative sources are those sources that will be used for the comparative analysis of the primary material. Numerous books, treatises, and manuscripts about Persian music contain valuable organological information. The crucial premise of this research, in case of possible estimation and generalization of the gender structure of musicians to the entire musical culture of that time, is that painters did not act arbitrarily in deciding the gender of musicians of different instruments. Instead, according to their own experiences and the traditions of the musical culture of the time, they depicted the so-called ‘masculine’ instruments in the hands of male musicians and the ‘feminine’ instruments in the hands of female musicians. In the tradition of Persian painting, as well as the Indo-Mughal style, not only often are the time and place of the events not precisely known, but the identity and gender of the figures could hardly be determined only by the face. An exquisite copy of Divan of Hafez is held in the British Library under Or. 14319 is the primary material of the present research. Its creation and completion took place between the end of the Timurid era and the middle of the Safavid era, first in Herat and then in the Mughal court of India. What doubles its value and significance in organological studies are the images of the musicians. These images are depicted in the decorative zones in the margins of the poems. Due to the general inaccuracy of painters in drawing details, it is only possible to partially match the rigid descriptions of the ancient musicology with the paintings drawn by the painters. However, in general, the instruments of this collection are divided into several general groups and subgroups: Group 1 Wind instruments, including: a) Ney (mizmar) and similar instruments (without reed); b) Sorna and similar instruments (with reed). Group 2 Percussions: Dayereh Group 3 Bowed instruments: Kamancheh (fiddle, with or without a bow) and similar instruments. Group 4 String instruments, including: a) Rubab with a vase-shaped bowl similar to a tulip flower; b) Oud, Tanbur, and similar instruments; c) Qanun. It is peculiar that out of the relatively large number of string instruments in this collection, only one example can be matched with our knowledge about the Oud, an essential instrument in ancient Persian music. Therefore, it can be assumed that the creation of the illustrations in this manuscript took place at a time and place when the Oud gradually lost its importance compared to other string instruments, such as the Rubab, and diminished. Among the 34 musicians that we see in the illustrations of this version of Divan of Hafez, about 71% are men, and 29% are women. In addition, in this version: If we exclude the musicians depicted in the image of the angels, all the musicians of the wind instruments (Ney and Sorna) are men. Contrary to the widespread belief that Dayereh players were once women, only one out of six are female. About the musicians of bowed instruments, the creators have considered an almost equal share for men and women. None of the five Rubab musicians are women. Compared to wind and percussion instruments, more women are seen playing various string instruments (except Oud and Tanbur). The Qanun player is shown only once, and that time, according to the standard gender stereotype, is a female musician. In this research, thirty-four portraits of musicians have been studied. The instruments and gender of the musicians have been identified. Ney and Sorna instruments, Dayereh, Kamancheh or Ghezhak, Rubab, Oud, Tanbur, Seta, Sheshtai or Roohafzai, and Qanun, are present in the present collection. As much as the structure of instruments such as Ney, Sorna, and Dayereh is more straightforward, their design is also easier for painters. That is why half of the instruments in this collection are made up of these three. Also, the striking predominance of the presence of the Rubab compared to the essential instruments of old Persian music, i.e., Oud and Tanbur, indicates shifts in the typical instrument composition in this period (17th century). The contribution of female musicians in this manuscript could be more impressive. Some instruments such as Qanun and Setar, which stereotypically are considered ‘feminine’ even today, are seen in the hands of women. In addition, if we exclude the three angelic beings, none of the Ney, Sorna, and Rubab players in this collection are women; and this confirms that men often played wind instruments in ancient times. At the same time, we see only one Dayereh musician in the image of a woman. If this idea and method are used in the study and examination of a more significant number of paintings and manuscripts of the history of Persian art, perhaps it will bring more detailed results regarding the historical sociology of Persian music in terms of the gender composition of musicians. Although the number of images of musicians in this manuscript is significant compared to many others, we need a more reliable and suitable statistical sample to consider the results as generalizable. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Keywords: Ancient Music of Iran, Organology, Mughal Painting, Iconography, Kanz al-Tuhaf, Art and Gender | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
آقاحسین شیرازی، ابوالقاسم (۱۳۸۲). پوشاک زنان ایران از آغاز تا امروز، تهران: انتشارات اوستا فراهانی.
بینش، تقی (۱۳۷۱). سه رسالۀ فارسی در موسیقی: موسیقی دانشنامۀ علائی، موسیقی رسائل اخوان‌الصفا، کنزالتحف، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
پاکباز، رویین (۱۳۷۹). نقاشی ایران؛ از دیرباز تا امروز (چاپ دهم)، تهران: انتشارات زرین و سیمین،
حافظ، شمسالدین محمد (ف. ۷۹۲ق). دیوان اشعار، لندن: کتابخانۀ بریتانیا. شمارۀ Or 14139. [نسخۀ خطی]. تاریخ کتابت ۸۷۴ق. <http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Or_14139>
حجاریان، محسن (۱۳۹۳). مکتب‌های کهن موسیقی ایران، تهران: نشر گوشه.
حسینی، سیدمحمدتقی (۱۳۹۱). کتاب فارسی فی فن الالحان، تهران: انتشارات سوره مهر.
ذاکر جعفری، نرگس (۱۳۹۶). حیات سازها در تاریخ موسیقایی ایران: از دورۀ ایلخانیان تا پایان صفویه، تهران: مؤسسه فرهنگی-هنری ماهور.
ردموند، لِین (۱۳۸۶). آن هنگام که دایره‌نوازان زن بودند، ترجمۀ کیوان پهلوان و محمد ریاحی، تهران: مؤسسۀ فرهنگی-هنری ماهور.
رسولتیف، جسور (۱۳۸۱). «آلات موسیقی در مینیاتورهای بهزاد»، کتاب ماه هنر، ۵۳ و ۵۴، ۳-۱۵۲.
سیمز، الینور (۱۳۸۳). «پوشاک دورۀ مغول و تیموریان» در پوشاک در ایران‌زمین (دانشنامۀ ایرانیکا؛ مصور). زیر نظر احسان یارشاطر. ترجمۀ پیمان متین. تهران: مؤسسۀ انتشارات امیرکبیر.
شمسالدین آم‍ل‍ی، محمدبن م‍ح‍م‍ود [قرن ۸ق] (۱۳۸۱). ن‍ف‍ائ‍س ال‍ف‍ن‍ون فی ع‍رای‍س ال‍ع‍ی‍ون (3 جلد). به تصحیح ابوالحسن شعرانی و ابراهیم میانجی. تهران: انتشارات اسلامیه.
طهماسبی مراغی، طغرل (۱۳۹۵). فرهنگ سازها به همراه نمونه‌هایی از نظم و نثر ادب فارسی، تهران: انتشارات سوره مهر.
فارابی، محمدبن محمد (۱۳۹۲). کتاب الموسیقی الکبیر، ترجمۀ مهدی برکشلی، تهران: انتشارات سروش.
فلاح‌زاده، مهرداد (۱۳۹۸). مکتوبات فارسی در باب موسیقی: قرن پنجم تا نهم هجری قمری، ترجمۀ سهند سلطاندوست، تهران: نشر مرکز.
قطب‌الدین شیرازی، محمدبن مسعود (۱۳۸۷). رسالۀ موسیقی از دُرة التاج لغُرة الدباج، 2 جلد) تصحیح نصـرالله ناصح‌پور، تهران: انتشارات فرهنگستان هنر.
کاشانی، حسن (قرن ۸ق). کنزالتحف. پاریس: کتابخانۀ ملی فرانسه. شمارۀ S. P. 1121. [نسخۀ خطی]. تاریخ کتابت ۸۳۸ق.
کاشانی، حسن (قرن ۸ق). کنزالتحف. لندن: کتابخانۀ بریتانیا (مجموعۀ هندوستان). شمارۀ I. O. Islamic 2067. [نسخۀ خطی].
کاشانی، حسن (قرن ۸ق). کنزالتحف. لندن: کتابخانۀ بریتانیا. شمارۀ Or. 2361. [نسخۀ خطی]. تاریخ کتابت ۱۰۷۵ق.
مراغی، عبدالقادربن غیبی (۱۳۵۶). مقاصدالألحان، به اهتمام تقی بینش، تهران: بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب.
مراغی، عبدالقادربن غیبی (1388). جامع‌الألحان، مقابله و ویرایش بابک خضرائی، تهران: فرهنگستان هنر.
مسعودیه، محمدتقی (۱۳۸۹). سازشناسی، تهران: انتشارات سروش.
منصوری، پرویز (۱۳۹۳). سازشناسی، تهران: انتشارات زوّار.
میثمی، سیدحسین (۱۳۸۹). موسیقی عصـر صفوی، تهران: فرهنگستان هنر.
وبر، ماکس (۱۳۹۵). بنیان‌های عقلانی و اجتماعی موسیقی، ترجمۀ حسن خیاطی، تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
References
Agha Hossein Shirazi, A. (2003). Iranian Women's Clothing from the Beginning to Today, Tehran: Avesta Farahani Publications, (Text in Persian).
Binesh, T. (1992). Three Persian Treatises on music: Music of Ala’i Daneshnama, Ekhwan al-Safa’s Music Treatises, Kanz al-Tuhaf, Tehran: Markaz-e Nashr-e Daneshgahi. (Text in Persian)
Fallahzadeh, M. (2018). Persian Writing on Music : A Study of Persian Musical Literature from 1000 to 1500 AD, c2005. Translated by Sahand Soltandoost. Tehran: Nashr-e Markaz, (Text in Persian)
Farabi, M. (2013). Kitab Al Musiqa Al Kabir. Translated by Mehdi Barkashli, Tehran: Soroush Publications, (Text in Persian).
Hafez (d. 792 AH). Diwan of Poems. London: British Library. No. Or 14139. The date of writing: 874 AH. <http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Or_14139> (Manuscript) (Text in Persian)
Hejarian, M. (2014). Old Schools of Persian Music, Tehran: Gusheh, (Text in Persian)
Hosseini, S. M. T. (2012). Ketab-e Farsi Fi Fann al-Alhan, Tehran: Sureh Mehr Publications, (Text in Persian)
Kashani, H. (14th century). Kanz al-Tuhaf. London: British Library. No. Or. 2361. The date of writing: 1075 AH. (Manuscript), (Text in Persian)
Kashani, H. (14th century). Kanz al-Tuhaf. London: British Library (India Collection). No. I. O. Islamic 2067. (Manuscript), (Text in Persian).
Kashani, H. (14th century). Kanz al-Tuhaf. Paris: National Library of France. No. S. P. 1121. The date of writing: 838 AH. (Manuscript), (Text in Persian).
Losty, J. P. (2016). Ascetics and Yogis in Indian painting. British Library Blog, Retrieved July 16, 2022, from <https://blogs.bl.uk/asian-and-african/2016/08/ascetics-and-yogis-in-indian-painting.html>
Losty, J.P. (1985). The “Bute Hafiz” and the Development of Border Decoration in the Manuscript Studio of the Mughals. The Burlington Magazine, 127(993), 855–871. Retrieved fron http://www.jstor.org/stable/882258.
Mansouri, P. (2014). Organology, Tehran: Zovar Publications, (Text in Persian)
Maraghi, A. (1977). Maqased al - alhan, Taqi Binesh (ed). Tehran: Book Translation and Publishing Company, (Text in Persian)
Maraghi, A. (2009). Djami'al-Alhan. Babak Khazrai (ed), Tehran: Art Academy, (Text in Persian)
Massoudieh, M. T. (2010). Organology, Tehran: Soroush Publications, (Text in Persian)
Maysami, S. H. (2010). The Music of the Safavid Era, Tehran: Art Academy, (Text in Persian)
Pakbaz, R. (2000). Persian Painting; From Long Ago to Today (10nd ed), Tehran: Zarrin and Simin Publications, (Text in Persian)
Qutbuddin Shirazi (2008). A Treatise on Music from Durrat Al-Taj Leghora Al-Dabaj [2 vols]. Nasrullah Nasehpour (ed), Tehran: Art Academy, (Text in Persian)
Rasoultiev, J. (2002). “Musical instruments in Behzad's miniatures”. The Monthly Book of Art, 53 & 54, 152-153, (Text in Persian)
Redmond, L. (1997). When the Drummers Were Women, Translated by Keyvan Pahlavan and Mohammad Riyahi, Tehran: Mahour, (Text in Persian).
Shams al-Din Amuli [14th century] (2000). Nafais al-Fanun fi Arais al-Ayun [3 vols]. Abolhasan Shaarani and Ebrahim Miyanji (Eds). Tehran: Islamiyeh Publications. (Text in Persian)
Sims, E. (2004). “Clothing of the Mongol and Timurid Period" in Clothing in Persia (Iranica Encyclopedia; illustrated). Under the supervision of Ehsan Yarshater. Peyman Matin (trans). Tehran: Amir Kabir, (Text in Persian).
Tahmasebi Maraghi, T. (2006). Dictionary of Musical Instruments. Along with Examples of Poetry and Prose of Persian Literature. Tehran: Soore Mehr, (Text in Persian).
Tsuge, G. (2013). Musical Instruments Described in a Fourteenth-Century Persian Treatise, “Kanz al-tuhaf”,The Galpin Society Journal, 66, 165-184
Weber, M. (1958). The Rational and Social Foundations of Music, Translated by Hasan khayyati, Tehran: Elmi-o-Farhangi (Text in Persian)
Zaker Jafari, N. (2017). The Lives of Instruments in the Musical History of Iran: From the Ilkhanate Period to the End of the Safavid Era, Tehran: Mahoor Cultural-Art Institute, (Text in Persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,786 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,130 |
||