پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 932 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,653 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,495,196 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,886,534 |
بررسی اثربخشی آموزش خردورزی بر یادگیری خودراهبر دانشجویان | ||
| اندیشه های نوین تربیتی | ||
| دوره 18، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 66، دی 1401، صفحه 207-222 اصل مقاله (531.96 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jontoe.2022.41889.3676 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مسلم دانش پایه* 1؛ فریبرز درتاج2؛ کامران شیوندی چلیچه3؛ علی دلاور4؛ حسن اسدزاده5 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری روان شناسی تربیتی، دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استاد، گروه روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار، گروه روان شناسی تربیتی، دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 4استاد، گروه سنجش و اندازه گیری، دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 5دانشیار، گروه روان شناسی تربیتی، دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف پژوهش حاضر، اثربخشی آموزش خردورزی در یادگیری خودراهبر و مؤلفههای آن در دانشجویان بود. روش پژوهش از نوع هدف کاربردی و از نوع مطالعات شبه آزمایشی (پیش‌آزمون پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل) بود. جامعه آماری شامل دانشجویان دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی تهران در سال تحصیلی 1400- 1401بود که از بین آنها 30 نفر به روش نمونه گیری در دسترس انتخاب و به دو گروه آزمایش (15 نفر) و کنترل (15 نفر) تقسیم شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه یادگیری خودراهبر فیشر و همکاران(2001) و بسته آموزش خردورزی دانش‌پایه و همکاران(2022) بود. گروه آزمایش به مدت 10 جلسه تحت آموزش خردورزی قرار گرفتند. داده‌ها با استفاده از آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس تحلیل شدند. نتایج نشان داد که اثربخشی آموزش خردورزی در افزایش یادگیری خودراهبر، خودمدیریتی، و تمایل به یادگیری دانشجویان معنی‌دار است. ولی بر بعد خودکنترلی دانشجویان تأثیر معنی‌داری نداشت. بر این اساس، آموزش خرد می تواند یادگیری خودراهبر دانش آموزان را افزایش دهد. از این رو پیشنهاد می‌شود اساتید و معلمان بر مهارت‌های لازم برای آموزش خرد تسلط یافته و به فراگیران انتقال دهند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| خردورزی؛ یادگیری خودراهبر؛ خودکنترلی؛ خود مدیریتی؛ میل به یادگیری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effectiveness of Wisdom Training on Students' Self-directed Learning | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Moslem Daneshpayeh1؛ Fariborz Dortaj2؛ Kamran Sheivandi Cholicheh3؛ Ali Delavar4؛ Hasan Asadzadeh5 | ||
| 1Ph.D. student of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 4Professor, Assessment and Measurement Department, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 5Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of wisdom training in self-directed learning and its components in students. This research was applied and quasi-experimental with pre-test, post-test and a control group. The statistical population included students of of Allameh Tabataba'i University in the academic year 2021-2022, among whom 30 students were selected by convenience sampling method, and divided into an experimental group (n=15) and a control group (n=15). The data collection tool was Fisher et al.'s Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (2001) and the wisdom training package of Daneshpayeh and colleagues (2022). The experimental group received 10 sessions of wisdom training. The data were analyzed using the analysis of the covariance test. The results showed that wisdom training was significantly effective in increasing self-directed learning, self-management, and students' desire to learn, but had no significant effect on the self-control dimension. Accordingly, wisdom training can increase students’ self-directed learning. Hence, it is suggested that professors and teachers master the skills required for wisdom training, and transfer them to the learners. Introduction Learning skills are essential for the 21st-century students to enable them to thrive in an uncertain future. These skills enable individuals to determine their learning needs and goals according to the existing knowledge and achieve self-direction. As such, self-directed learning is a critical competency for living and working in our complex and unpredictable world (Morris and Rohs, 2021). Knowles et al. (2015) consider self-directed learning a learning process in which learners take the main responsibility to direct their learning tools and goals to achieve personal learning goals. In the educational system, self-directed learning is currently a widely-accepted approach and promoted at higher and professional education levels (Mulube and Jooste, 2014, Song et al., 2015). University students are expected to be more independent and responsive to learning according to their curiosity, interests, and abilities such that their potential and talents are cultivated (Shirazi et al., 2017). Self-directed learning appears to be a desirable method for dealing with today's rapid changes because it will increase the effectiveness and quality of education, as well as improving the learning process (Loeng, 2020). One of the personality traits related to self-directed learning is wisdom (Lander, 2009). Lander (2009) showed that wise individuals may initially adopt role models, but often reach levels of expertise beyond their teachers and require self-direction in new areas of knowledge. Indeed, approaches to understanding self-directed learning often cite the same characteristics of learning associated with wisdom and wisdom development. Shirazi et al. (2021) consider wisdom of choice a characteristic of self-directed students, which motivates students to learn. Given the relationship between wisdom and self-directed learning, developing wisdom can enhance self-directed learning. Researchers believe wisdom should be infused into regular classroom activities, which means that teachers and professors in various disciplines should learn to teach wisdom using existing wisdom teaching packages (Sternberg et al., 2008). Despite a variety of local and international research on the relationship of wisdom with self-directed learning and its components, we did not find any research on the effectiveness of wisdom training on self-directed learning and its components in students. Therefore, considering the importance of self-directed learning in students, the purpose of this research is to investigate the effectiveness of wisdom training on self-directed learning and its components in students. The research hypotheses are: Wisdom training is effective on students' self-directed learning. Wisdom training is effective on the dimensions of self-management, desire to learn, and self-control of self-directed learning of students. Methods This quasi-experimental with pretest-posttest design and a control group was conducted with a statistical population of students of Allameh Tabatabai University in Tehran in the academic year 2021-2022. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, convenience sampling was used to select a sample of 30 students who were divided into an experimental group (n=15) and a control group (n=15). The inclusion criterion was willingness to participate in the study, and the exclusion criterion was being absent for more than one session. This research was reviewed and ethically approved at Allameh Tabatabai University (IR.ATU.REC.1401.011). Fisher et al.’s Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS) (2001) was used to collect data, and the wisdom training package designed by Daneshpaye et al. (2022) was used for the educational intervention. Before commencing the research, the participants were briefed on the confidentiality of their data, the voluntary nature of the research and were asked to sign a consent form. Then, both groups did a pre-test for self-directed learning. Next, the experimental group received wisdom training for 10 sessions of 90 minutes, but the control group did not. Finally, both groups did self-directed learning post-test. The obtained data regarding the hypotheses were analyzed by multivariate covariance analysis (MANCOVA) in SPSS26 software. Findings The comparison of the mean scores of pre-test and post-test in the experimental and control groups indicates that wisdom training increased students’ mean score of self-directed learning. MANCOVA was used to check the significance of changes in mean scores. According to Table 1, the overall effect of the group is significant because the F value of all four tests is significant (p<0.01). This means a significant difference exists between the experimental and control groups in at least one of the dependent variables. According to Table 2, the F ratio of covariance analysis are significant for self-management (F = 14.004 and p = 0.001), desire to learn (F = 9.574 and p = 0.005), and self-directed learning (F = 13.510 and p = 0.001), but it was not significant for self-control (F = 3.001 and p = 0.096). These findings reveal a significant difference in the variable of self-directed learning, self-management components, and desire to learn between the experimental group and the control group. Discussion and conclusion The purpose of this research was to investigate the effectiveness of wisdom training on self-directed learning and its components in students. The findings of the research showed that wisdom training led to an increase in self-directed learning, self-management, and the desire to learn in the experimental group compared to the control group. These findings are consistent with the results of Lander's (2009) studies and inconsistent with the results of Azadmanesh et al. (2020), and Desi and Rodelando (2017). These findings can be explained in that self-directed learning encourages students to expand their ability to assess their knowledge deficiencies, to have attitudes such as a strong desire to learn and self-discipline, to accept responsibility for their learning, and to see problems as challenges. These attitudes are likely to be based on independence and self-confidence and appear to be related to intrinsic motivation (Lander, 2006a, 2006b), which are associated with wisdom and self-directed learning (Lombardo, 2006). This research had limitations including no follow-up, the outbreak of COVID-19 which hindered accessing the target population, and failure to include the effect of variables such as age and socioeconomic status. According to our results, it is suggested that professors and teachers master the skills required for wisdom training, and transfer them to the students to improve their self-directed learning. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Wisdom, Self-directed learning, Self-control, Self-management, Desire to learn | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three–dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25(3), 275–324. Azadmanesh, M., Abolmaali, K., & Mohammadi, A. (2020). The structural relationship between wisdom and moral behavior: The mediating role of self-control. 16(63), 321-332. (Text in Persian) Barnes, S. A., Brown, A., & Warhurst, C. (2016). Education as the underpinning system: Understanding the propensity for learning across the lifetime. Londres, Reino Unido: Foresight, Government Office for Science, The University of Warwick. Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (1993). The search for a psychology of wisdom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Published by Cambridge University Press, 2, 75–80. Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–136. Boyer, S. L., Edmondson, D. R., Artis, A. B., & Fleming, D. (2014). Self-directed learning: A tool for lifelong learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(1), 20–32. Bracher, M. (2021). Foundations of a Wisdom-Cultivating Pedagogy: Developing Systems Thinking across the University Disciplines. Philosophies, 6(3), 73. Bruya, B.; Ardelt, M.( 2018). Wisdom Can Be Taught: A Proof-of-Concept Study for FosteringWisdom in the Classroom. Learn. Instr, 58, 106–114. Cazan, A.-M., & Schiopca, B.-A. (2014). Self-directed learning, personality traits and academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 640–644. Case, P., & Gosling, J. (2007). Wisdom of the moment: Pre-modern perspectives on organizational action. Social Epistemology, 21(2), 87–111. Choi, E & Lindquist, R & Song, Y (2013). Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students' critical thinking. problem-solving, and self-directed learning. Elsevier. Nurse Education, 34(11),6-25. de Groot E, Endedijk MD, Jaarsma ADC, Simons PR-J, van Beukelen P. 2014. Critically reflective dialogues in learning communities of professionals. Stud Contin Educ. 36(1):15–37. Desi, D., & Rodelando, O. (2017). Levels of moral intelligence virtues and wisdom development among selected Filipino working adults. The Bedan Journal of Psychology, 1, 61-66. DeMichelis, Carey, Michel Ferrari, Tanya Rozin, and Bianca Stern. (2015). “Teaching for Wisdom in an Intergenerational High-School-English Class.” Educational Gerontology 41(8): 551–66. Du Toit-Brits, C., & van Zyl, C.-M. (2017). Self-directed learning characteristics: Making learning personal, empowering and successful. Africa Education Review, 14(3–4), 122–141 Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse education today, 21(7), 516-525. Fisher, M. J., & King, J. (2010). The self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education revisited: A confirmatory factor analysis. Nurse Education Today, 30(1), 44–48. Gibbons, M. (2003). The self-directed learning handbook: Challenging adolescent students to excel. John Wiley & Sons. Glück, J., Sternberg, J. R., Nusbaum, N. (2019). Not Today, and Probably Not Tomorrow Either: Obstacles to Wisdom and How We May Overcome Them, In book: Applying Wisdom to Contemporary World Problems. 445-464. Grimm, S. R. (2014). Wisdom. Australasian Journal of Philosophy,93(1), 139–154. Baltes, P. B., & Smith, J. (1990). Toward a psychology of wisdom and its ontogenesis. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 87–120). Cambridge University Press. Grossman, I.( 2017). Wisdom and How To Cultivate It: Review of Emerging Evidence for a Constructivist Model of Wise Thinking. Eur. Psychol, 22, 233–246. Grossmann, I., Weststrate, N. M., Ardelt, M., Brienza, J. P., Dong, M., Ferrari, M., Fourniere, A. M., Hug, C. S., Nusbaumh, H. C., & Vervaekei, J. (2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2),103–133. Grossmann, I. (2017a). Wisdom in context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 233–257. Knowles MS, Holton EF, Swanson RA. (2015). The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (Vol. 8). Oxon, UK: Routledge. Koksma JJ, van Woezik T, van den Bosch S, van den Bergh C, Geerling L, Keunen JE. (2017). Learning to see things from a different perspective: interns and residents collaborate with artists to become better Kovalenko, N.A., & Smirnova, A.Y. (2015), Selfdirected learning through creative activity of students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 393-398. Jeste, D., & LaFee, S. (2020). Wiser: The scientific roots of wisdom, compassion, and what makes us good. Sounds True. Lander, L. (2006a, February). Achievement motivation goals and study strategies in adult college students engaged in self-directed study versus a traditional classroom. Poster presented at the 20th International Self-Directed Learning Symposium, Cocoa Beach, Florida. Lander, L. (2006b, April). Achievement motivation goals and study strategies in adult college students versus traditional-aged college students. Poster presented at the Biennial Human Development Conference, Louisville, Kentucky. Lasfeto, D. (2020). The relationship between self-directed learning and students’ social interaction in online learning environment. Journal of e-learning and knowledge society, 16(2), 34-41. Loeng, S. (2020). Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult education. Education Research International,4(5), 1-12. Lombardo, T. (2006). The pursuit of wisdom and the future of education. Creating global strategies for humanity's future, 157-176. McCrae, R. R., & L¨ockenhoff, C. E. (2010). Self-regulation and the five-factor model of personality traits. In Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 145–168). Maxwell, N.( 2019). The Urgent Need for SocialWisdom. In The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom; Sternberg, R.J., Glück, J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, pp. 754–780. Morris, T. H. (2019a). Adaptivity through self-directed learning to meet the challenges of our ever-changing world. Adult Learning, 30(2), 56–66. Morris, T. H. (2019d). Self-directed learning: A fundamental competence in a rapidly changing world. International Review of Education, 65(4), 633–653. Morris TH, K¨onig PD.(2020). Self-directed experiential learning to meet ever-changing entrepreneurship demands. Education + Training.63(1):23–49. Morris, T. H., & Rohs, M. (2021). Digitization bolstering self-directed learning for information literate adults–A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100048. Mulube, S., Jooste, K., (2014). First year learner nurses’ perceptions of learning motivation in self-directed learning in a simulated skills laboratory at a higher education institution. S. Afr. J. High. Educ. 28 (6), 1776–1794. Nadi, M., Moshfeghi, N., Amini, M.(2018). Exploratory Relationship between Epistemological Beliefs and Self-directed Learning among Nursing Students. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 12-24. (Text in Persian) Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. Shahin, E.S., Tork, H.M.(2013). Critical thinking and self-directed learning as an outcome of problem-based learning among nursing students in Egypt and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. Nurs. Educ. Pract. 3 (12) https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v3n12p103. Shahraki niya, B., Pourghaz, A., & Jennaabadi, H. (2017). The Relationship Between Cultural Intelligence And Critical Thinking With Self-Directed learning Students. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 14(28), 127-148. (Text in Persian)
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 647 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 406 |
||
