پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 931 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,652 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,492,082 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,884,378 |
پژوهشی در علل و پیامدهای حضانت پذیری زنان مطلقه با کاربست نظریه مبنایی | ||
| مطالعات اجتماعی روان شناختی زنان | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 20، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 73، بهمن 1401، صفحه 134-165 اصل مقاله (983.33 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jwsps.2022.39936.2606 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حامد شیری* 1؛ محمد حبیبی2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه جامعهشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران. h.shiri@pnu.ac.ir | ||
| 2کارشناسی ارشد جامعهشناسی و کارمند کمیته امداد شهرستان مریوان. (نویسنده مسئول) mfa5559@gmail.com | ||
| چکیده | ||
| یکی از مهمترین دگرگونی‌های کمی و کیفی رو به رشد در نهاد خانواده معاصر پدیده حضانت‌پذیری زنان است. مقاله حاضر در چارچوب مطالعات جنسیتی و با استناد به تحلیل و تفسیرهای نظریه فمینیستی علل و پیامدهای این پدیده را به مثابه یک مسئله اجتماعی مورد بررسی قرار داده است. از نظر روش‌شناختی این مطالعه با رویکرد نظریه مبنایی و عمدتاً کاربرد تکنیک مصاحبه با 20 نفر از زنان مطلقه شهرستان مریوان که تحت پوشش کمیته امداد بوده‌اند به اجرا درآمده است. یافته‌های پژوهش بر اساس مدلی پارادایمی و با استخراج 13 مقوله محوری در فرایند کدگذاری داده‌ها مورد تحلیل و تفسیر قرار گرفته است: «جبر اجتماعی ـ قانونی» و «عواطف مادرانه» موجبات علی حضانت‌پذیری را توضیح می‌دهند. «پایگاه طبقاتی» و «کودک همسری» شرایط زمینه‌ای؛ و «اختلافات زناشویی»، «ناتوانی مردان در تأمین هزینه‌های خانواده» و «خشونت خانگی» عوامل مداخله‌گر مؤثر در این وضعیت هستند. پیامدهای حضانت‌پذیری در مقوله‌های «فقر فزاینده»، «فشار نقش»، «وابستگی» و «احساس رهاشدگی» انعکاس یافته است. نهایتاً اینکه زنان با راهبردهای دوگانه «استیصال» و «تحمل» که بازنمای مواجهه ذهنی و پذیرش عینی حضانت-پذیری است نسبت به آن واکنش نشان می‌دهند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| زن سرپرست خانوار؛ حضانت‌پذیری؛ زنان مطلقه؛ نظریه مبنایی؛ مریوان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A Research on the Causes and Consequences of Divorced Women's Custody Using Grounded Theory | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hamed Shiri1؛ Mohammad Habibi2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran h.shiri@pnu.ac.ir | ||
| 2Master in Sociology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. mfa5559@gmail.com. (Corresponding Author) | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| One of the most important quantitative and qualitative changes in the contemporary family is the phenomenon of women's custody, which has a growing trend. In the framework of gender studies and with reference to the feminist theory approach, the article examines the causes and consequences of custody as a social issue. Methodologically, the study was conducted with the Grounded theory approach and using the research interview technique. The samples are divorced women in Marivan city. Using purposive sampling and theoretical sampling, 20 people were interviewed. The finding is based on a paradigm model and is analyzed by extracting 13 central categories in the data coding process. "Socio-legal determinism" and "maternal emotions" are categories that imply causal conditions. "Class status" and "spouse child" as contextual conditions; and "Marital disputes", "men's inability to pay for family expenses" and "domestic violence" play a role as interfering conditions. The consequences of custody are reflected in the categories of "increasing poverty", "role pressure", "dependence" and "feeling of abandonment". Finally, the women react to the situation with dual strategies of "despair" and "tolerance". "Despair" represents subjective confrontation and "tolerance" means the objective acceptance of the custody. Keywords Female Head of Household, Custody, Divorced Women, Grounded Theory, Marivan. Introduction Women's custody is one of the most important changes that have occurred in the construction of the contemporary family. This phenomenon, as a result of the decline of the extended family and the growth of the nuclear family, along with changes such as the decrease in the fertility rate and the size of the family, the increase in divorce and the growth of the single-parent family, has been considered as a new subject in recent social sciences (Abbott & Vallace, 1997; Chant, 2007). In this regard, the study examines the narrative of custody women about their lived experience by posing two central questions: 1) Divorced women who are covered by the Relief Committee Organization, why and how did they get custody of their children? And 2) what are the consequences of this responsibility for them and how do they face it?. Methodology The article examines the causes and consequences of this phenomenon as a social issue in the framework of gender studies, specifically by referring to feminist theory. Feminist criticism, especially its radical approach, is mainly focused on the institution of the family, which is organized based on patriarchal values (De Beauvoir, 2010). Radical feminism argues that men not only exploit women through free domestic work but also prevent them from accessing positions of power and influence in society (Giddens & Birdsall, 2001: 168). In the absence of common role patterns and when performing tasks such as guardianship and custody, women face unknown and difficult situations due to subordination and lack of educational and training experiences and are caught in the flood of economic and social crises. Therefore, it is as a result of such gender structure and discourse that the phenomenon of custody of women becomes problematic. In addition, the pathological consequences of women's custody have been discussed in the theory of "feminization of poverty". According to this theory, the different experiences that female heads of households have of poverty, have fueled the discourse of the "feminization of poverty" (Chant, 2007 and Mwangi, 2017). Another approach is the theory of “role conflict and pressure theory" (Rosenfield, 1989). This theory argues that female heads of the household suffer from role conflict and role pressure due to simultaneously playing the role of "breadwinner" and "housekeeper". The problem of the female heads of the household has also been considered from the perspective of Marxist theory and class analysis. The problem of female heads of the household has also been considered from the perspective of Marxist theory. According to this approach, age, gender, or racial and ethnic characteristics do not necessarily have a direct relationship with poverty, rather it is the class position that determines what resources and facilities women have access to. It can be argued that the understanding and validity of the "feminization of poverty" and "role conflict and pressure" Theories, ultimately require reference to feminist theory. The discourse of patriarchy through the subjugation and exploitation of women as well as symbolic violence in socialization processes leads to gender discrimination and the degradation of women's status and the creation of the issue of custodial women. The discourse of patriarchy through the subjugation and exploitation of women as well as symbolic violence in socialization processes leads to gender discrimination and the degradation of women's status and creates the problem of women's custody. In such conditions, women's impoverishment processes and their role conflicts are produced and reproduced in society. Findings The research has been implemented with a qualitative approach and using the Grounded Theory methodology (Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Corbin, & Strauss, 1998). The data has been collected through the qualitative interview technique and also based on the lived experience and field observations of the researchers. The method of sampling and determination of samples is based on Grounded Theory methodology: 1) Purposive sampling and 2) Theoretical Sampling (Flick, 2006). In Purposive Sampling, the structure of the sample (in terms of age, age of marriage, and the number of children), and in Theoretical Sampling, the number of samples, how to select them, and the combination of experimental information in the process of data gathering and interpreting has been specified. According to the "theoretical satisfaction" rule, 20 people from "divorced women covered by Marivan Relief Committee" were interviewed. Also, the Grounded Theory coding methods (including open, axial and selective coding) have been used in the data analysis. Result The findings have been analyzed and interpreted based on a paradigmatic model and by extracting 13 core categories in the data coding process: Social-legal compulsion and maternal emotions explain the "causes of custody". Class status and marital child are “Contextual conditions"; and marital disputes, men's inability to provide family expenses and domestic violence are "intervening factors". The "consequences" are reflected in the categories of increasing poverty, role pressure, dependence and feeling of abandonment. Finally, women react to custody through the dual strategies of "desperation" and "tolerance", which is a reflection of subjective encounter and objective acceptance. In general, it can be argued that the results are an empirical test for the assumptions of Class Theory and especially Feminist Theory. Although the former should be analyzed with caution (due to the class homogeneity of the studied sample), the claims of the latter are confirmed in an empirical and concrete way by thinking about the causal causes (Social-legal compulsion and maternal emotions), Contextual conditions (marital child), intervening factors (breadwinner role and domestic violence) and especially the consequences (poverty, role pressure, dependence and feeling of abandonment). | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Female head of household, Custody, Divorced women, Grounded theory, Marivan | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
آبوت، پاملا و والاس، کلر. (1395). جامعهشناسی زنان. ترجمۀ منیژه نجم‌عراقی. تهران: نشر نی. استراس، آنسلم و کوربین، جولیت. ام. (1390). اصول روش تحقیق کیفی. ترجمه بیوک محمدی. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی. ایسنا. (1400). افزایش تعداد خانوارهای تک نفره زنان/ زنان سرپرست ۱۲ درصد خانوارهای ایرانی. دسترسی در https://www.isna.ir/news/1400022618382. بختیاری، آمنه و محبی، سیدفاطمه. (1385). حکومت و زنان سرپرست خانوار. مطالعات راهبردی زنان، 34، 110-67. پیران، پرویز. (1383). مردسالاری و بهداشت باروری زنان. رفاه اجتماعی، 3(13)، 196-167. جمالی، محمود.، سپاه‌منصور، مژگان و فلاحیان، معصومه. (1392). مقایسه بهزیستیِ روانشناختی زنان سرپرست خانواده با زنان دارای سرپرست. زن در توسعه و سیاست، 11(4)، 542-531. حسینی، سید‌احمد.، ستاره فروزان، آمنه و امیرفریار، معصومه. (1388). بررسی سلامت روان زنان سرپرست خانوار تحت پوشش بهزیستی شهر تهران. پژوهش اجتماعی، 2(3)، 139-119. خسروی، زهرا. (1380). بررسی آسیب‌های روانی ـ اجتماعی زنان سرپرست خانواده. علوم انسانی دانشگاه الزهرا، 11(39)، 94-71. دوبووار، سیمون. (1400). جنس دوم. دوجلدی. ترجمه قاسم صنعوی. تهران: نشر توس. رستگار خالد، امیر. (1385). اشتغال زنان و ضرورت کنترل فشارهای ناشی از کار خانگی. روان‌شناسی بالینی و شخصیت، 4(7)، 52-33. رید، اولین. (1380). آزادی زنان. ترجمة افشنگ مقصودی. تهران: نشر گل آذین. ساروخانی، باقر.، خادمیان، طلیعه و نادری، فاطمه‌الزهرا. (1393). زنان سرپرست خانوار و تنگناهای جامعه‌پذیری فرزندان (مطالعۀ موردی: زنان سرپرست خانوار تحت پوشش شهرداری تهران). مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران، 3(4)، 558-539. ستاره فروزان، آمنه و بیگلریان، اکبر. (1382). زنان سرپرست خانوار: فرصت‌ها و چالش‌ها. زن در توسعه و سیاست، 1(5)، 58-35. شادی‌طلب، ژاله و گرایی‌نژاد، علیرضا. (1383). فقر زنان سرپرست خانوار. زن در توسعه و سیاست، 2(1)، 70-49. شیری، حامد. (1398). نگرش جنسیتی و عوامل مؤثر بر آن (مطالعه‌ی تطبیقی میان کشوری). زن و جامعه، 10(37)، 262-237. فلیک، اووه. (1388). درآمدی بر تحقیق کیفی. ترجمه هادی جلیلی. تهران: نشر نی. فیروزآبادی، سید احمد و دیباجی فروشانی، شکوه. (1396). نقد سیاست اجتماعی در باب زنان سرپرست خانوار در ایران. بررسی مسائل اجتماعی ایران، 8(2)، 51-25. قلیپور، آرین و رحیمیان، اشرف. (1390). رابطه عوامل اقتصادی، فرهنگی و آموزشی با توانمندسازی زنان سرپرست خانوار. رفاه اجتماعی، 11(40)، 62-29. کاظمی پور، شهلا. (1391). وضعیت آموزش، مطالعات جمعیتی و منابع آماری ایران. کتاب ماه علوم اجتماعی، 58(160)، 13-11. کردزنگنه، جعفر و اقبالی، علیرضا. (1395). بررسی وضعیت اشتغال زنان سرپرست خانوار در ایران. جمعیت، 23(98 و 97)، 34-15. کمیته امداد امام خمینی شهرستان مریوان. (1399). سیستم جامع الکترونیکی، دسترسی در شبکه داخلی به آدرس http://sajaya.emdad.ir/s4. گروسی، سعیده و شبستری، شیما. (1390). بررسی رابطه سرمایه اجتماعی و سلامت روان در بین زنان سرپرست خانوار در شهر کرمان. مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، 5(1)، 123-99. گیدنز، آنتونی. (1400). جامعهشناسی (با همکاری کارن بردسال). ترجمه حسن چاوشیان. تهران: نشر نی. مدنی، سعید. (1381). طرح توانمندسازی زنان سرپرست خانوار. دفتر بررسی‌های اقتصادی فرهنگی مرکز پژوهشهای مجلس شورای اسلامی. معیدفر، سعید و حمیدی، نفیسه. (1386). زنان سرپرست خانوار: نگفته‌ها و آسیب‌های اجتماعی. نامه علوم اجتماعی، 15(2)، 158-131. مؤمنیزاده، ندا. (1393). تحلیل مقایسه‌ای در خصوص زنان سرپرست خانوار. مجله اقتصادی، 14(3و4)، 120-95. همتی، رضا و کریمی، زهرا. (1397). زنان مطلقه و تجربة سرپرستی خانوار: یک پژوهش کیفی (نمونة موردی زنان مطلقة سرپرست خانوار شهر فارسان). پژوهشنامه زنان، 9(2)، 211-181. یزدخواستی، بهجت و شیری، حامد. (1387). ارزش‌های پدرسالاری و خشونت علیه زنان. مطالعات اجتماعی ـ روانشناختی زنان، 6(3)، 79-55. Abbott, P. & Vallace, C. (1997). An introduction to sociology: a feminist perspective. Translated by M Najm Iraqi. Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian) Bakhtiari, A. & Mohebi, S. F. (2006). Government and women head of the household. Womens Strategic Studies, 34, 67-110. (In Persian) Chant, S. (1997). Women-Headed Households, Diversity and Dynamics in the Developing World, Consultant Editor: Jo Campling, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK Chant, S. (2007). Children in Female-Headed Households: Interrogating the Concept of an ‘Inter-Generational Transmission of Disadvantage’ With Particular Reference to the Gambia, Philippines and Costa Rica. New Working Paper Series. Issue 19. London School of Economics, Gender Institute Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Translated by B Mohammadi. Tehran: Institue for Humanities and Cultural Studies. (In Persian) De Beauvoir, S. (2010). The Second Sex. Translated by G Sanavi. Tehran: Toos Publishing. (In Persian) El-Lawindi, M. I., Sabry, H. A. & Elsebaie, E. H. (2018). Household headship and women’s health: An exploratory study from Egypt. The Egyptian Journal of Community Medicine, 37(2), 1-9. Firouzabadi, S. A. & Dibaji Forooshani, S. (2017). Criticizing the social policy of female-headed households in Iran. Iranian Journal of Social Problems, 8(2), 25-51. (In Persian) Flick, U. (2006). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Translated by H Jalili. Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian) Garosi, S. & Shabestari, S. (2011). Investigate the relationship between social capital and mental health among female-headed households in Kerman. Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 5(1), 99-123. (In Persian) Gholipour, A. & Rahimian, A. (2011). Economic, cultural, and educational factors related to empowerment of head-of-household women. Social Welfare Quarterly, 11(40), 29-62. (In Persian) Giddens, A. & Birdsall, K. (2001). Sociology. Translated by H Chavoshian. Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian) Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine. Hemmati, R. & Karimi, Z. (2018). Divorced women and family supervision experience: A qualitative study (Case study: Divorced family-headed women of Farsan. Women Studies, 9(24), 181-211. (In Persian) Hoseini, S. A., Setare Frozan, A. & Amir Fariar, M. (2009). Investigating the mental health of female heads of households in Tehran. Social Research, 2(3), 119-139. (In Persian) Imam Khomeini Relief Committee of Marivan. (2019). Comprehensive electronic system, access in the internal network at the following address: http://sajaya.emdad.ir/s4. (In Persian) ISNA. Iran Students News Agency. (2021). Increase in the number of single-person households of women. Access at https://www.isna.ir/news/1400022618382. (In Persian) Jamali, M., Sepah Mansor, M. & Fallahian, M. (2014). Comparative study of psychological well-being of female heads of house hold & women in male headed households in Tehran. Woman in Development & Politics, 11(4), 531-542. (In Persian) Kazemipor, S. (2012). The state of education, population studies and statistical sources in Iran. Social Science Monthly. 58(160), 11-13. (In Persian) Khosravi, Z. (2001). A study of psycho-social pathology of female heads of the family. Human Sciences (Alzahra University), 11(39), 71-94. (In Persian) Kord Zangane, J. & Eghbali, A. (2016). The employment status of women heads of households in Iran. Population Magazine, 23(97-98), 15-34. (In Persian) Langlois, J. & Fortin, D. (1994). Single-parent mothers, poverty & mental: Reviw of litertur. Santé-Mental Health, 19(1), 157-73. Liu, C., Esteve, A. & Trevino, R. (2017). Female-headed households and living conditions in Latin America. World Development, 90, 311-328. Madani, S. (2002). Women Head of Household Empowerment Plan. Office of Economic and Cultural Investigations of the Research Center of the Islamic Council. (In Persian) Moeidfar, S. & Hamidi, N. (2007). Single parent mothers: Untold stories and social pathologies. Journal of Social Sciences Letter, 15(2), 131-158. (In Persian) Momenizade, N. (2014). A comparative analysis of women heads of households. Economic Research and Policies, 14(3-4), 95-120. (In Persian) Mwangi, C. (2017). An assessment of impact of poverty on female headed household in kangemi, Kenya, master thesis in University of Nairobi, http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/102357 Narayana, N., Nair, M. K. S. & Legwale, O. C. (2015). Factors determining savings of women-headed households in Botswana. International Journal of Economic Issues, (8)2, 55-62. Piran P. (2004). Male domination & reproductive health. Social Welfare Quarterly, 4(13), 167-196. (In Persian) Rastegar Khaled. A. (2006). Employed women and strains of domestic works. Clinical Psychology & Personality, 4(7), 33-52. (In Persian) Reed, E. (2001). Problems of Women's Liberation. Translated by A Maghsodi. Tehran: Gol Azin. (In Persian) Rosenfield, S. (1989). The effects of women’s employment; Personal control and sex diffrences in mental health. Journal of Health and social Behavior, 30, 77-91 Sarookhani, B., Khademian, T. & Naderi, F. (2015). Women’s headed households and bottlenecks of children socialization (A case study: The householder women supported by Tehran Municipality Organization). Social Studies and Research in Iran, 3(4), 539-558. (In Persian) Setare Frozan, A. & Biglarian, A. (2003). Female heads of household: opportunities and challenges. Women in Development and Politics, 1(5), 35-58. (In Persian) Shaditalab, Z. & Geraeinajad, A. (2003). Poverty of female heads of household. Women in Development and Politics, 2(1), 49-70. (In Persian) Shiri, H. (2019). Gender attitude and its effective factors (A comparative cross-country study). Women and Society, 10(37), 237-262. (In Persian) United Nations. (UN). (2010). The World's Women 2010, Trends and Statistics. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, and United Nations Publication. Yazd-khasti, B. & Shiri, H. (2008). Patriarchy values and violence against women. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological, 6(3), 55-79. (In Persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 304 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 206 |
||