پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 932 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,653 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,496,699 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,887,280 |
طراحی الگوی مدرسۀ سالم و میزان تطابق آنها از دیدگاه مدیران و معلمان مدارس | ||
| اندیشه های نوین تربیتی | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 18، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 65، آبان 1401، صفحه 85-117 اصل مقاله (805.34 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی ترکیبی آمیخته | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jontoe.2021.36095.3341 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی جاویدان1؛ رحمت اله مرزوقی* 2؛ جعفر جهانی3؛ جعفر ترک زاده3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری علوم تربیتی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز ، ایران | ||
| 2استاد گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز ، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز ، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف از انجام این پژوهش، طراحی الگوی مدرسۀ سالم و بررسی میزان مطابقت آنها با وضعیت موجود از دیدگاه عوامل مدرسه (مدیران و معلمان) است. این پژوهش به لحاظ روش‌شناسی از نوع ترکیبی (آمیخته) است، این پژوهش در دو گام کیفی و کمّی انجام گرفته است. در مرحلۀ کیفی از روش پدیدارنگاری و در مرحلۀ کمّی از تحقیق پیمایشی_ توصیفی استفاده شده است. نتایج در قالب ۳ مجموع مضامین پایه، سازمان دهنده و فراگیر دسته‌بندی و در قالب شبکۀ مضامین سازمان‌دهی شدند. در نتیجه ۳۷ مقولۀ فرعی و ۷ مقولۀ اصلی را برشمرده شد که عبارت‌اند از: 1. محیط فیزیکی، 2. ویژگی‌های مدیریتی، 3. منابع انسانی، 4. فرهنگ مدرسه، 5. ارتباط و مشارکت اجتماعی، 6. محیط عاطفی_ روانی_اجتماعی 7. عناصر برنامۀ درسی. نتایج آزمون تی_استیونت تک‌نمونه‌ای نشان داد که میانگین وضعیت ابعادی چون ویژگی‌های مدیریتی، منابع انسانی، برنامۀ درسی، مشارکت و ارتباطات اجتماعی، به‌صورت معناداری بالاتر از میانگین متوسط جامعه؛ و در وضعیت مطلوب است. ابعادی مانند فرهنگ، محیط فیزیکی، محیط عاطفی_ روانی، پایین‌تر از میانگین متوسط جامعه و نامطلوب بودند. همچنین نتایج آزمون رتبه‌ای فریدمن نشان داد که محیط عاطفی (با ضریب 89/5) بیشترین تأثیر (اهمیت)؛ و محیط فیزیکی (با ضریب 36/1) کمترین تأثیر (اهمیت) را در بین ابعاد مدارس سالم دارد. در خصوص اولویت‌بندی مضامین فرعیِ تم‌ها نتایج نشان داد که فناوری، انسجام، تعامل، باور، گزینش و توسعه، اجرایی، طراحی و معماری بیشترین اهمیت را به ترتیب در بین تم‌های برنامۀ درسی، محیط عاطفی، مشارکت و ارتباطات، فرهنگ، منابع انسانی، ویژگی‌های مدیریتی، محیط فیزیکی دارند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| مدرسۀ سالم؛ مدیران؛ معلمان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Development of a healthy school model and compliance of schools from the perspective of teachers and principals | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Javidan1؛ Rahmatallah Marzooghi2؛ Jaafar Jahani3؛ Jafar Turkzadeh3 | ||
| 1PhD student in Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Educational Management and Planning, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management and Planning, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The aim of this research was to develop a healthy school model and compliance of schools from the perspective of teachers and principals. This mixed method study used phenomenological approach for the qualitative phase and survey-descriptive approach for the quantitative phase. Its target population in the qualitative phase included educational team leaders, principals, education experts and curriculum specialists. Principals and teachers of schools in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad and Fars provinces constituted the statistical population in the quantitative phase. Seventeen individuals were selected by criterion-based purposive sampling for the qualitative phase, and 300 individuals were selected by stratified random sampling for the quantitative phase. The research tool was a semi-structured interview in the qualitative phase and a researcher-made questionnaire with 5-point Likert scale in the quantitative phase. The results were categorized into three sets of basic, organizing, and comprehensive themes and organized into a network of themes. The results included 37 subcategories and 7 categories, namely 1- physical environment, 2- managerial characteristics, 3- human resources, 4- school culture, 5- communication and social participation, 6- emotional-psychological-social environment, 7- curriculum elements. The results of one-sample t-student test showed that the average status of the aspects such as managerial characteristics, human resources, curriculum, participation and social communication is significantly higher than the average of the population in a good status. Introduction The Education Department is one of the most important and effective social systems that focus on educating human and developing their personality (Safi, 2012). Ascertaining the ultimate mission of schools and achieving macro, economic, social, and cultural, and educational goals is possible when schools are healthy and dynamic because the fulfillment of the serious mission of education takes place in a site called school, and that is why turning the school into a healthy, lively, dynamic, and exciting place is one of the biggest challenges for those involved in any educational system (Rahimian et al., 2016). Since school is the place to fulfil educational goals, it is necessary to address the safety and soundness of all its components, which is possible through the concept of a healthy school. Studies by Hui and Tarter (1991)(1992)(2013)) Proterius and Elsab (2009), American Institute for Healthy School (2013), Al-Qarni (2016), Hoy and Cutcump (2013), Kaplan (1993), Leiden and Klingle (2000), Lapoint and Stephen (2006), Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006), Fisher and Saik (2007), Graham Lowe (2010) ), Lake and Frittler (2012), Ramdas (2012), Bafandeh Zand (2017), Torkzadeh (2008) (1396) (1387), and Rahimian (2017) all emphasize the importance of a healthy school and its aspects. To ascertain the effectiveness in school in the conceptual light of healthy school requires defining aspects, elements, and components that can lead to the conceptual explanation of a healthy school. Therefore, first the aspects of a healthy school are identified using a qualitative approach and then, the current status of the aspects in schools in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad and Fars provinces is evaluated from the perspective of principals and teachers. Accordingly, the research questions are as follows: What are the components and aspects of a healthy school? How is the current situation of the aspects of healthy schools from the perspective of principals and teachers? Which of the following aspects has the greatest impact and importance on school safety and soundness? Methodology The present research is a mixed method study with a qualitative phase for identifying the components of a healthy school and a quantitative phase for measuring the compliance of schools. The qualitative phenomenological approach was used to answer the first question and a quantitative survey approach was used for the second and third questions. The research population in the qualitative phase included educational team leaders, principals, education experts and curriculum specialists. Principals and teachers of the schools in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad and Fars provinces (n=1360) constituted the statistical population in the qualitative phase. For the quantitative phase, 300 principals, teachers, and educators were selected via stratified sampling method. For the qualitative phase, 17 individuals including 4 curriculum specialists, 4 educational team leaders, 4 educational experts and 5 principals were selected using criterion-based purposive sampling method. The research tool was semi-structured interviews based on notes in the qualitative phase and a researcher-made questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale in the quantitative phase. The content validity of the tool was confirmed by 7 education specialists and its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.87. Results Question 1: What are the components and aspects of a healthy school? In the first phase, data were collected during in-depth structured interviews. This process yielded the thematic network of healthy school aspects consisting of 7 themes organizing the first level, 37 themes organizing the second level, and 82 basic themes. The aspects include physical school environment, managerial characteristics, human resources, school culture, communications and social participation, curriculum, emotional-social-psychological environment. Question 2: How is the current state of the aspects of healthy schools from the perspective of principals and teachers?" According to Table 10, the numerical value of the significance coefficient of the aspects of managerial characteristics, human resources, participation and social relations, and curriculum elements has been less than 0.05 and the average scores of these components are higher than the assumed average (3) and the average score of these aspects are significantly larger than the theoretical average. Therefore, we conclude that the aspects of managerial characteristics, human resources, participation and social communication, curriculum elements are at a desirable level. On the other hand, the numerical value of the significance coefficient of the aspects such as physical environment, emotional-psychological-social environment, school culture has been less than 0.05, but the average scores of these aspects are lower than the assumed average (3) and the average score of these aspects is significantly lower than the theoretical average, so we conclude that the aspects of the physical environment, emotional-psychological-social environment, and school culture are not at desirable level. Question 3: Which of the existing aspects has the greatest impact and importance on school safety and soundness? The aspects of healthy schools are significantly distinct in terms of prioritizing and influencing the school safety and soundness. In addition, emotional environment with a ranking of 5.89 has the greatest impact on the safety and soundness of schools, and the physical environment with a ranking of 1.36 has the least impact on and importance for the safety and soundness of schools. Discussion and conclusion Having a healthy school has currently changed into a global demand because parents send their children to school for a better future. Children enthusiastically attend classes from the first day and look forward to a bright future. Teachers consider schools as platforms for work and effort and fulfillment of their will, and principals, politicians, and thinkers want to train their future citizens in this place. The purpose of this research was to develop a healthy school model and determine the compliance of schools from the perspective of school teachers and principals. In line with the results of the research, it is suggested that architects of the physical environment of schools pay attention to the psychological-emotional aspect of students during school construction. As is clear from the theoretical foundations, the design of schools’ architectural elements affects students’ mentality, psych-body, and soul. Since one of the aspects of healthy schools is their psychological-emotional aspect, it is recommended to use colors and lights in accordance with the ages and interests of students to help prevent or reduce some mental diseases such as depression, anxiety, stress, and aggression. It is hoped that the findings of this research are used by education planners of the Islamic Republic of Iran to help improve schools and achieve the components and aspects of a healthy school. The results included 37 subcategories and 7 categories, namely 1- physical environment, 2- managerial characteristics, 3- human resources, 4- school culture, 5- communication and social participation, 6- emotional-psychological-social environment, 7- curriculum elements. The results of one-sample t-student test showed that the average status of the aspects such as managerial characteristics, human resources, curriculum, participation and social communication is significantly higher than the average of the population in a good status. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| healthy school, principals, teachers | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbas Nejad, A; Farzad Freya, M (2013). Examining the relationship between transformational management and organizational health. Quarterly Journal of Supervision and Inspection Organization. 8(28). (Text in Persian) Abdeen, M. A. (2013). organizational health at Midwest Bank Government School: analysis of teachers and administrators perceptions. Jourdan Journal of Educational sciences, 9(1), 89-100. Alagheband, Ali (1378). School organizational health. Management in education. 6(21). 14-33. (Text in Persian) Algarni, S.A.Y.(2016).Linking Organizational Health in Jeddeh Secondary School to Student Acadamic Achivment Educational Reasearch and Review.11 (7)328-338. Ali Mohamadzadeh K, Darabi A, Jafari M. The Relationship between Organizational Agility and Organizational Health in Hospitals Affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. payavard. 2017; 11 (3) :276-286 (Text in Persian) American school Health Association(2013). TheWellnessImpact: Enhancing Academic Success through Healthy School Environments.Unpublished Rport of GENYOUthFoundation.Available from: GENYOUthFoundation.org. Andishmand, V; Sharifzadeh, M (2018). Teachers' experienced perception of the dimensions and components of a healthy school, the quarterly journal of new research approaches in management and accounting. (7) 15-21. (Text in Persian) Bacal, A. (2007). Organizational Health and Success. Viewed on, 30. Bafande Zand, A; Mohaghegh, S; Shayan Fakher, N (2016). Designing a hybrid model of organizational health based on the integration of existing models of organizational health, international conference on opportunities and challenges of management, economics and accounting. (Text in Persian) Bevans, K. Bradshaw, C. Miech, R. & Leaf, P. (2007). Staff‐and school‐Level predictors of school organizational health: A multilevel analysis. Journal of School Health, 77(6), 294-302. Barth, J. J. (2002). The investigation of the relationship between middle school organizational health, school size, and school achievement in the areas of reading, mathematics, and language. Braun, V&Clarke, V.(2006).”Using thematic analysis in psychology”,Qualitative Reasearch in Psychology,Vol.3,NO.2,Pp.77-101. Cootet Solek. Ellen W.(2004). A Case Study of Organization H Safety and Secority. And the Role of the Middle School Principal In Higschools. Doctoral Disscrtion. University of Hartford Avaiable Cressol c. (2019). Qualitative research and research design (choose from 5 approaches). Translated by Danai Fard, Hassan and Kazemi, Hossein. Safar Publications. (Text in Persian) Danaifard, H; Kazemi S.H (2009) Promotion of interpretive research in the organization: a review of the philosophical foundations and the process of implementing the phenomenological method. Quarterly Journal of Management Studies and Transformation Improvement. 17(61). (Text in Persian) Davies, B. & Ellison, L. (1997). Teachers’ perceptions of school quality and effectiveness: improving schools using staff attitude surveys. International Journal of Educational Management, 11(5), 222-228. Edalati, Gholamhossein. (1385). Healthy school student. Hamshahri news papar. November 11. (Text in Persian) EftEkhar Zadeh, S (2016). A healthy person from the point of view of Quran and Hadith. Ship Quarterly. 5(7).104-114. (Text in Persain) Frueauff, Ronda l(1998). Organizational Health And The Influences That Enable And Constrain The Development of Healthy Schools. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona stste. Ghoroneh, D. Melkinia, Imad (2014). Teachers' perception of the state of organizational health of schools. A scientific quarterly, A new research approach in educational management. 6(3) (Text in Persian) Hart, P. M. Wearing, A. J. Conn, M. & Carter, N. L. (2000). Development of the School Organisational Health Questionnaire: A measure for assessing teacher morale and school organisational climate. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 211-228. Hedayati, F (2015). Test design and evaluation of the healthy school model with an emphasis on organizational health. PhD thesis of Allameh Tabatabai University. (Text in Persian) Helm Seresht, Parivosh; Del Pisheh, Ismail (2006). School Health, Tehran: Chehreh Publications. (Text in Persian) Hoy, W. K, Tarter, C. J, & Kottkamp, R. B (2013). Open school/healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Newbury park, CA: Sage. Hoy, w.k. Tarter, C.J.Kottkamp,R.B, (1990). OpenSchools/Healthy-Schools, Measuring OrganizationalClimatc. Hoy, W. K. and Tarter, C. J. (1997). The road toopen and healthy school thousand Oaks calif: Corwin. Hoy, W. K. Tarter, C. J & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open school, healthy schools: measuring organizational climate. Sage, London.health and robust school vision in elementary school".Educational Research Quarterly,Vol,1, 14-36. Ho, J. T. (2000). Managing organizational health and performance in junior colleges. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(2), 62-73. Hassani Bafrani, T., & Mahdavi Rad, M. (2012). The System of Fundamental Believes of Perfect man from Qur’anic Viewpoint. Philosophy of Religion, 8(11), 161-188. (Text in Persian) Huey, Wayne; Miskel, Cecil (2011). Theory, research and practice in educational management. Translated by Mir Mohammad Seyed Abbaszadeh. Urmia: Urmia University Press.( Text in Persian) Leonard, J. S. (2002). Quality of Life and Attendence in Primary Schools, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of New Castle, Faculty of Education and Arts. Lee Albert& Chenge,France F.K& Legar, Lawey(2005). Evaluating promoting schools in Hong Kong:development of a framework.Oxford Journal Health Promotain Intrnational,20(2), 177-186 Lapointe, M. & Stephen, H. D. (2006). Efecctive schools require effective principals. Leadership, 1-36. Maeyer, S.D, Bergh, H.V, Rymenans. R, Petegem, P.V,Rijlaarsdam. G. (2010). "Effectiveness criteriain school effectiveness studies: further research on the choice for a multivariate model". Journal educational research review 5, 81-96. Marzooqi, Rahmatullah (1391). Basics, principles of education and training with a view to the developments of the contemporary era. Avai Noor Publications. (Text in Persian) Mehta,T.G, Atkins,M.S, Frazier.S.L. (2013)."The organizational health of urban elementary school: schools health and teacher functioning". New York. Journal school mental health. Vol; 5, 144-154. Montazeri, M. Ghezelayagh, M. Ferdousi Pour, L.(2017). A Study of the Relationship between Organizational Health and Job Performance with the Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment of Executive Entities Staffs of Sirjan City. Pal. Jour. 2017, 16, 141:149 Miles, M. (1969). Planned chenge and organization health: Figure and Ground from Organization and Human Behavior: Foucus on schools. Ferd. Caver & Thomas J. S ergiovani. MC Grow Hill. 1969. Nasiri, M.H (2012). Safe school design model in Shiraz. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. Shahid Rajaei University, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning Engineering. (Text in Persian) Niknami, M; Mahdian, M.J(1388). Explaining the dimensions and components of effective schools and presenting a model for improving the effectiveness in the country's schools. Educational Leadership and Management Quarterly. 3(7). 196-171.( | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 247 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 276 |
||
