پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 932 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,654 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,496,807 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,887,337 |
مقایسه ی انعطافپذیری، خلاقیت هیجانی و خلاقیت شناختی دانش‌آموزان تک‌زبانه‌ی فارسی زبان و دو زبانه‌ی عرب_ فارسی زبان | ||
| اندیشه های نوین تربیتی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 18، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 65، آبان 1401، صفحه 69-83 اصل مقاله (593.34 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jontoe.2021.34474.3238 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مروارید سلیمانی فر1؛ همایون هارون رشیدی* 2؛ کبری کاظمیان مقدم2 | ||
| 1کارشناسی ارشد گروه روانشناسی، واحد دزفول، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دزفول، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد دزفول، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دزفول، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| دوزبانگی از عوامل تأثیرگذار بر توانایی‌های شناختی و زبانی است و بررسی اثر این پدیده بر انعطافپذیری، خلاقیت هیجانی و شناختی دانش‌آموزان از اهمیت بالایی برخوردار است. بنابراین این پژوهش با هدف مقایسۀ انعطافپذیری، خلاقیت هیجانی و شناختی دانش‌آموزان تک‌زبانۀ فارسی زبان و دوزبانۀ عرب_ فارسی زبان انجام شد. روش پژوهش علّی_ مقایسه‌ای بود. جامعۀ آماری شامل تمامی دانش‌آموزان تک‌زبانۀ فارسی زبان و دوزبانۀ عرب_ فارسی زبان شهر اهواز در سال تحصیلی 1399-1398 بود. نمونۀ پژوهش در مجموع شامل 80 دانش‌آموز مقطع اول متوسطه بوده‌اند که 40 نفر از آنها دوزبانه و 40 نفر دیگر تک‌زبانه بوده‌اند و به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای چندمرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند. برای گرد‌آوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامه‌های انعطافپذیری شناختی دنیس و واندروال (2010)، خلاقیت شناختی عابدی (1363) و خلاقیت هیجانی آوریل (1999) استفاده شد. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون تحلیل واریانس استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان داد که بین دانش‌آموزان دوزبانه و تک‌زبانه در میانگین انعطافپذیری شناختی تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد (0/001>p). همچنین نتایج نشان داد که بین دانش‌آموزان دوزبانه و تک‌زبانه در میانگین خلاقیت هیجانی تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد (0/001>p). افزون بر این، نتایج نشان داد که بین دانش‌آموزان دوزبانه و تک‌زبانه در میانگین خلاقیت شناختی تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد (0/001>p). به‌عبارت دیگر، دانش‌آموزان دوزبانه نسبت به دانش‌آموزان تک‌زبانه، از انعطافپذیری شناختی، خلاقیت هیجانی و شناختی بالاتری برخوردار بودند. با توجه به برتری دانش‌آموزان دوزبانه می‌توان نسبت به برنامه‌ریزی زودهنگام آموزش زبان دوم در مدارس اقدام کرد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| انعطافپذیری؛ تک‌زبانگی؛ خلاقیت؛ دانش‌آموزان؛ دوزبانگی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Comparison of flexibility, emotional creativity and cognitive creativity in monolingual Persian-speaking and bilingual Arabic-Persian-speaking students | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Morvarid Solimani Far1؛ Homayoon Haroon Rashidi2؛ Kobra Kazemian Moghadam2 | ||
| 1M.A, Department of Psychology, Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor Department of Psychology, Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The present study was conducted to compare flexibility, emotional creativity and cognitive creativity in monolingual Persian-speaking and bilingual Arabic-Persian-speaking students. The study methodology was causal-comparative. The statistical population consisted of all the monolingual Persian-speaking and bilingual Arabic-Persian-speaking students in Ahvaz, Iran. Multi-stage cluster sampling was used to select the study samples, including 80 junior high school students (40 bilingual and 40 monolingual students). The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI) developed by Dennis and Vander Wal (2010), the Abedi-Schumacher Creativity Test (ACT) (1984) and the Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) by Averill (1999) were used to collect the data. An ANOVA was used to analyze the data. The results showed a significant difference between the bilingual and monolingual students in terms of the mean cognitive flexibility, emotional creativity and cognitive creativity (P<0.001). In other words, bilingual students possessed higher levels of cognitive flexibility, emotional creativity and cognitive creativity than the monolingual students. Introduction Bilingualism is a global phenomenon that can be observed in most countries, since about 50% of the world's population is bilingual or multilingual. Bilingualism refers to the regular use of two languages, and bilinguals are people who need to use two languages in their daily life at home and at school (Hartsuiker, Costa, and Finkbeiner, 2008). There is little consensus among experts on the consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development, social adaptability, and academic achievement among students. Some studies have argued that bilingualism has detrimental effects on cognitive factors (Maroufi and Mohammadnia, 2013). Bilingualism is a multidimensional phenomenon and various factors contribute to its emergence, which means that it might itself affect many cognitive processes too. The general interest in the study of the cognitive abilities and function of the human brain has attracted researchers’ attention to phenomena such as bilingualism, given the close link between language and cognition. Recent studies have demonstrated some differences between bilinguals and monolinguals in different areas (Calvo and Bialystok, 2014). Cognitive flexibility and creativity are among the cognitive domains that may be affected by bilingualism. Comparing the cognitive factors and functions of bilingual and monolingual students with each other can help plan more effective education strategies for bilinguals (Golshani, 2019). Nonetheless, disagreement about whether the consequences of bilingualism are positive or negative, the contradictory research findings on the role of bilingualism in creativity, the gap in literature on the effects of bilingualism on cognitive functions and creativity among students and also the theoretical and practical significance of bilingualism make research on this subject crucial. The present study seeks to answer the question of whether there is a significant difference between monolingual and bilingual students in terms of cognitive flexibility, emotional creativity and cognitive creativity. Methodology This study has a causal-comparative or ex post facto methodology. The statistical population of the research consisted of all the junior high school students in Ahvaz (2340 bilingual Arabic-Persian-speaking students and 3245 monolingual Persian-speaking students) in the academic year 2019-2020. A sample of 80 students were selected from this population by multistage cluster sampling, including 40 monolingual and 40 bilingual students. To measure the research variables, three questionnaires were used: The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI) by Dennis and Vander Wal (2010), which has 20 items and Cronbach’s alpha reliability of 0.77, the Abedi-Schumacher Creativity Test (ACT) (1984), which has 60 items and Cronbach’s alpha reliability of 0.84, and the Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) by Averill (1999), which has 30 items and Cronbach’s alpha reliability of 0.88. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS-19 using the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results As shown in Table 1, there was a significant difference between the bilingual and monolingual students in terms of cognitive flexibility, cognitive creativity, and emotional creativity (P<0.001). Discussion and conclusion The results showed that bilingual students have higher cognitive flexibility, emotional creativity, and cognitive creativity than monolingual students. Nazari et al. (2012) earlier showed that bilingual children have significantly fewer total number of errors, perseverative errors and reduced number of stages than monolingual children. The cognitive structure of bilingualism and the cultural linguistic structure of Arabic appear to have had a positive role in the cognitive flexibility of the examined bilingual children. Furthermore, these results can be explained by noting that bilingualism, proficiency and skills in the second language and the richness of the environment and the opportunities provided by the second language are among the facilitators of creativity in bilingual students. A limitation of the present study was that it was conducted only on a sample of students in Ahvaz; therefore, the generalization of the results to students in other cities of Iran should be carried out with caution. Similar studies are recommended to be conducted in other parts of Iran to reach a better conclusion on the subject. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Flexibility, Monolingualism, Creativity, Students, Bilingualism | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Averill, J.R. (1999). Individual differences in emotional creativity: structure and correlate. Journal of personality; 6: 342-371. Ajam, A. A. Badnova, S. Abdullahi, M. and Momeni Mohamui, H. (2015). The Relationship between Emotional Creativity and Academic Achievement of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences Students. Research in Medical Education, 8 (4): 10-18. (Text in Persian). Amini Masouleh, M. Bafandeh Gharamaleki, H. and Ahmadi, E. (2016). Comparison of cognitive flexibility and metacognitive beliefs between bilingual and monolingual individuals in Turkish, Azeri and Persian. Social Linguistics Quarterly, 1 (2): 37-45. (Text in Persian). Agha Mohammadi, J. and Shah Hosseini, S. (2015). Comparison of the effect of the use of direct communication and media communication on the creative thinking of undergraduate students of Arak University. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities, 5 (4): 121-140. (Text in Persian). Atash Afroz, A. Derakhshanfar, R. and Maktabi, Gh. (1399). Comparison of creativity, emotional intelligence and academic performance of monolingual and bilingual students in the sixth grade of Ramhormoz city. Recent Advances in Psychology, Educational Sciences, and Education. 3 (26): 31-46. (Text in Persian). Abedi, Jamal (1992). Creativity and new ways of measuring it. Psychological Research, 3, 46-54. (Text in Persian). Alaeddin, Z. Kalantari, M. Kajbaf, M. B. and Molavi, H. (2016). The Effect of Alpha / Theta Neurofeedback on Emotional and Cognitive Creativity in Children, Journal of Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities, 7 (3): 32-25. (Text in Persian). Bahar, A., & Ozturk, M.A. (2018). An exploratory study on the relationship between creativity and processing speed for gifted children. International Education Studies; 11(3): 77–91. Barr, R., Rusnak. Sylvia, N., Brito., & Natalie, H. (2019). Actions speak louder than words: Differences in memory flexibility between monolingual and bilingual 18 month olds. Journal of Developmental Science, 5:1-13. Bialystok, E., & Barac, R. (2012). Emerging bilingualism: Dissociating advantages for metalinguistic awareness and executive control. Cognition, 122: 67-73. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Grady, C., Chau, W., & Ishii, R. (2005). Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: evidence from MEG. NeuroImage, 24: 40-49. Barzgarfard, Sh and Keramati, H. (2014). Investigating cognitive control, social problem solving and self-esteem between monolingual and bilingual students. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3 (3 and 4): 61-69. (Text in Persian). Bianlu, A. Azad Fallah, P. and Rasoulzadeh Tabatabai, K. (2013). Evaluation and comparison of creative thinking in early monolingual and bilingual children. Scientific Quarterly of Educational Innovations, 13 (1): 92-107. (Text in Persian). Calvo, A., & Bialystok, E. (2014). Independent effects of bilingualism and socioeconomic status on language ability and executive functioning, Cognition, 130: 278–288. Dennis, J.P., & Vanderwal, J.S. (2010).The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research; 34(3):241-253. Delaware, Ali (2010). Theoretical and practical foundations of research in humanities and social sciences. Tehran: Roshd Publications. (Text in Persian). Ghadiri, F., & Abdi, B. (2010). Factor structure of emotional Creativity Inventory of Iranian undergraduate students in Tehran Universities. Procedia social and Behavioral Sciences, 5(1): 1836-1840. Guilford, J.P. (1987). Creativity research: Past, present and future. Ins. G. ISaksen. Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics. Buffalo, N. Y. Bearly Ltd. Golshani, Sh. (2018). Comparison of critical thinking, cognitive flexibility and cognitive control in bilingual and monolingual adolescents in Urmia. Master Thesis, Educational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Urmia Branch. (Text in Persian). Hommel, B., Colzato, L.S., Fischer, R., & Christoffels, I. (2012). Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits in convergent thinking come with losses in divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:273-77. Hartsuiker, R.J., Costa, A, & Finkbeiner, M. (2008). Bilingualism: Functional and neural perspectives. Acta Psychologica, 128(3): 413-415. Hayrabidian, E and Keramati, H. (2015). Comparison of critical thinking and creativity of Persian-speaking monolingual and bilingual Armenian-speaking students. Cognitive Psychology Quarterly, 4 (1-2): 63-75. (Text in Persian). Hosseini Zadeh, N. Abdollahi, M. H. and Shahgholian, M. (2017). Executive functions and creative thinking in bilinguals and monolinguals of 60-80 year olds in Tehran. Elderly, 13 (4): 481-495. (Text in Persian). Kharkhurin, V.A. (2010). Sociocultural differences in the relationship between bilingualism and creative potential. Cross-Cultural Psychology Journal, 5: 776 -78. Leikin, M. (2012). The effect of bilingualism on creativity: Developmental and educational perspectives. International Journal of Bilingualism;17(4): 431–447. Lee, H., & Hee Kim, K. (2011). Can speaking more languages enhance your creativity? Relationship between bilingualism and creative potential among Korean American students with multicultural link. Personality and Individual Differences; 50: 1186–1190. Maddux, W.W., Adam, H., Galinsky, A.D.(2010). When in Rome? Learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6):731-41. Marufi, Y. and Mohammadnia, I. (2013). Bilingualism and its relationship with critical thinking skills. Journal of Educational Innovations, 12 (45): 45-60. (Text in Persian). Nazari, S. Mahdipour, A. and Siyahi, H. (2012) The role of Arabic-Persian bilingualism on the cognitive flexibility of Ahwazi children, National Conference on Bilingualism (Challenges and Solutions), Shazand, Payame Noor Shazand University. (Text in Persian). Phillips, E.L. (2011). Resilience mental flexibility and cortisol response to the montreal imaging stress task in unemployed men (Dissertation). Michigan: The University of Michigan. Poulin-Dubois, B., Blaye, A., & Bialystok, E. (2011). The effects of bilingualism on toddlers’ executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 567–579. Qrabaghy, H. Amir Teymouri, M. H. and Maghami, H. (2011) The relationship between creativity and computer self-efficacy in undergraduate students of Educational Technology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaei University. Quarterly Journal of Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities, 1 (2): 151-178. (Text in Persian). Shareh, H., Farmani, A., & Soltani, E. (2014). Investigating the reliability and validity of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI-I) among Iranian university students. Practice in Clinical Psychology, 2(1), 43-50. Salehi, M. Hosseini, S. Z. and Nazak Tabar, H. (2018). The effect of family functioning and intelligence beliefs on students' creativity. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities, 9 (2): 230-211. (Text in Persian). Van Dijk, M., Kroesbergen, E.H., Blom, E., & Leseman, P.M. (2019). Bilingualism and creativity: Towards a situated cognition approach. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2): 178-188. Zadahmad Kalashi, Kh. Pirkhaefi, A. and Souri, A. (2020). Comparison of working memory, creativity and cognitive flexibility in bilingual and monolingual students (Persian-Azeri language). Scientific Quarterly, Research in School and Virtual Learning, 8 (4): 85-92. (Text in Persian). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 384 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 363 |
||
