پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 951 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,816 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,972,716 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,205,275 |
تمایز دانش‌آموزان با تعلل‌ورزی تحصیلی بالا و پایین بر اساس مؤلفه‌های حس تعلق به مدرسه و انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی | ||
| اندیشه های نوین تربیتی | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 19، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 68، تیر 1402، صفحه 149-164 اصل مقاله (633.96 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jontoe.2022.39364.3517 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سیاوش شیخعلی زاده* 1؛ عمادالدین احراری2؛ سیدقاسم مصلح2؛ فاطمه علی پور2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پژوهش حاضر با هدف متمایز ساختن دانش‌آموزان با تعلل‌ورزی تحصیلی بالا و پایین، بر اساس مؤلفه‌های احساس تعلق به مدرسه و انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی انجام شد. روش پژوهش علّی_ مقایسه‌ای بود. جامعۀ آماری شامل تمامی دانش‌آموزان دختر و پسر مقطع متوسطه دوم شهرستان خواف در سال تحصیلی 1401-1400 بود که بر اساس جدول کرجسی و مورگان درنهایت 368 نفر از آنها با روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای انتخاب شدند. برای گرد‌آوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامۀ انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی دنیس و وندروال (2010)، احساس تعلق به مدرسه بری، بتی و وات (2004)، تعلل‌ورزی تحصیلی سولومون و راثبلوم (1984) استفاده گردید. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار spss-24 و آزمون تحلیل تشخیصی مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفتند. یافته‌های تحلیل تشخیصی، منجر به یک تابع تشخیص معنادار شد که طبق این تابع مؤلفه‌های حمایت معلم، ادراک کنترلپذیری و مشارکت علمی، دارای بالاترین توان تمایز بود (01/0p<). نتایج تحلیل تشخیصی نشان داد که 8/88 درصد از دانش‌آموزان در دو گروه طبق تابع به‌دست‌آمده به‌طور صحیح مجدداً طبقه‌بندی شده بودند که خود حاکی از توان این مؤلفه‌ها در متمایز ساختن دانش‌آموزان در سطوح مختلف تعلل‌ورزی تحصیلی بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی؛ احساس تعلق به مدرسه؛ تعلل‌ورزی تحصیلی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Discrimination of Students with High and Low Academic Procrastination Based on Components of Sense of School Connectedness and Cognitive Flexibility | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Siavash Sheikhalizadeh1؛ Emad Aldin Ahrari2؛ Seyed Qasem Mosleh2؛ Fatemeh Alipour2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| 2PhD Student of Educational Psychology, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This study aimed to differentiate students with high and low academic procrastination based on the sense of school connectedness and cognitive flexibility components. The research method was causal-comparative. The statistical population included all male and female high school students in Khaf city, among whom 368 individuals were selected by cluster sampling. Cognitive Flexibility Inventory, Students’ Sense of Connectedness with School Scale, and Procrastination Assessment Scale were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using SPSS-24 software and discriminant analysis. The findings showed that the obtained discriminant function was significant and the components of teacher support, controllability perception, and scientific distribution had the highest differentiation power (p <0.01). The results of the discriminant analysis showed that according to the obtained function, 88.8% of students in the two groups were correctly reclassified which indicates the ability of these components to differentiate students at different levels of academic procrastination Introduction: Studies show that procrastination is one of the common experiences of human beings and includes different types, among which academic procrastination is the most common. Academic procrastination is a purposeful and unnecessary delay doing academic tasks (Hen and Goroshit, 2020). According to the existing literature, many students suffer from procrastination in their academic life. Various studies in the domain of cognitive approaches have introduced cognitive flexibility as a cognitive variable related to students' procrastination (Schommer-Aikins and Easter, 2018; Emamverdi and Taher, 2020). Cognitive flexibility is an important aspect of executive function and refers to the ability to adapt behaviors in response to environmental changes (Durairaja and Fendt, 2021). Meanwhile the lack of cognitive flexibility leads to passive reaction to the environment and delays in doing things (Sternberg and Frensch, 1992). Among other factors affecting academic procrastination, the sense of school connectedness affects students' procrastination because school as a productive environment can create a sense of belonging in students and this feeling helps students demonstrate better time management for their homework (Çıkrıkçı & Erzen, 2020). The prevalence of academic procrastination indicates the need for further research to identify potential factors that lead to academic procrastination, and subsequently consider appropriate strategies to reduce procrastination (Zhou, et al., 2021). Therefore, the present study seeks to answer the question of whether the components of sense of school connectedness and cognitive flexibility can differentiate students with high and low procrastination. Method: This causal-comparative study aimed to differentiate students with high and low academic procrastination based on the components of sense of school connectedness and cognitive flexibility. The statistical population of the study included male and female high school students in Khaf city in the academic year 2021-2022. Among them, 368 were selected by cluster sampling according to Krejcie and Morgan's table. Based on the academic procrastination scores, 95 students with scores lower than the first quartile were selected as students with low academic procrastination, and 92 students with scores higher than the third quartile were selected as students with high academic procrastination. Finally, data from these 187 individuals was analyzed by discriminant analysis. Procrastination assessment scale - student version (PASS): Academic procrastination was assessed by the Solomon and Rothblum (1984) Procrastination Assessment Scale, which includes 27 items and three components: preparation for exams, homework preparation, and essay preparation. In this study, Cronbach's alpha for the whole scale was 0.87. Students’ sense of connectedness with school (SSCS): This scale was designed by Brew et al. ( 2004) and consists of 27 items and six subscales of teacher support, participation in the community, respect and fairness in school, positive feeling about school, belonging to school, and scientific contribution. In this study, the reliability was obtained as 0.89 through Cronbach's alpha for the whole scale. Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI): This questionnaire was designed by Dennis and Vander Wal (2010) and consists of 20 items and three subscales of perception of controllability, perception of different options, and perception of behavior justification. The Cronbach's alpha for the whole scale in the present study was 0.89. Findings: Using histogram plot and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the distribution of predictor variables was normal. The results of multivariate outlier data using Mahalanobis distance showed that there were ten real outlier data; therefore, this data was deleted before the analysis. In order to evaluate the homogeneity of the variance-covariance matrix, the Mbox test was used and showed the homogeneity of the variance-covariance matrix of the predictor variables within the groups (Mbox statistic = 6.77, F = 2.23, P> 0.05). Also, the results of the Pearson correlation coefficient matrix and statistical indices of variance inflation factor and tolerance index showed that there were no significant correlations among the predictor variables and the assumption of non-collinearity was confirmed. Table 1 presents the mean and standard deviation of the components of predictor variables for two groups of students with high and low academic procrastination and t-test results to examine the significance of the difference in means between the two groups. A significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of the components except perception of behavior justification. Table 5 presents the results of classifying students in groups with high and low academic procrastination based on the obtained discriminant function. Accordingly, 83 students (87.4%) with low academic procrastination and 83 students (90.2%) with high academic procrastination were identified. Also, in total, about 88.8% of the students were correctly regrouped in their primary group, which showed the ability of the components of the variables of school connectedness and cognitive flexibility in differentiating between students with high and low academic procrastination. Discussion and conclusion: Our findings showed that the components of the sense of school connectedness were able to significantly differentiate students with high and low academic procrastination. This finding can be explained in that as students' sense of school belonging and attachment decreases, they will be more likely to find excuses to reduce their willingness to complete homework and academic activities. Among other findings of this study was that the components of cognitive flexibility, except the component of perception of behavior justification, were able to significantly differentiate students with high and low academic procrastination. In fact, students with high cognitive flexibility use more effective and useful methods when faced with various stresses; it appears delaying homework is not one of the effective strategies and methods for such students. The lack of gender separation in this study limits the generalizability of findings. It is suggested that future studies examine the relationship of academic procrastination with cognitive flexibility and the sense of school connectedness regarding gender factor. Given the results, it is suggested that researchers evaluate the effectiveness of various programs and plans to improve the sense of school connectedness and cognitive flexibility. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cognitive flexibility, sense of school connectedness, academic procrastination | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abouyi, M. J. & Jafariharandi, R. (2018). Predicting academic procrastination based on cognitive flexibility and fear of success in male students of Qom University in the academic year 2018-2019. Master’s thesis, University of Qom. (Text in Persian) Alghamdi A., Karpinski A.C., Lepp A., Barkley J. (2020). Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 214–222. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.018 Al-Atoum, A. (2017). Cognitive Psychology, Theory and Practice. Dar Al-Masirah for Publishing and Distribution. Amani, E., Fadaei, E., Tavakoli, M., Shiri, E., & Shiri, V. (2018). Comparison among children with specific learning disorder (SLD) and typically children on measures of planning, selective attention and cognitive flexibility. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(2), 94-111. (Text in Persian) Arslan, G., Yıldırım, M., & Zangeneh, M. (2021). Coronavirus Anxiety and Psychological Adjustment in College Students Exploring the Role of College Belongingness and Social Media addiction. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00460-4 Bahrami, F., Amiri, M. (2020). The role of the perceptions of learning environment in academic self-handicapping considering the mediating role of academic procrastination and academic optimism. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 17(39), 52-23. (Text in Persian) Barutçu, Y, F., & Demir, A. (2020). Self-Handicapping among University Students, The Role of Procrastination, Test Anxiety, Self-Esteem, and Self-Compassion. Psychological reports, 123(3), 825-843. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118825099 Brew, C. Beatty, B. & Watt, A. (2004). Measuring students’ sense connectedness with school. Paper presented at the Australian ssociation for Research in Education Annual Conference. Melbourne. Brew, C., & Beatty, B. (2005). Measuring Student Sense of Connectedness with School, Development of an Instrument for Use in Secondary Schools. Leading and managing, 11(2), 103–118. Bu, X., Wu, L., & Wang, H. (2021). Impact of college students' academic procrastination on subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 49(7), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.9858 Custer N. (2018). Test Anxiety and Academic Procrastination among Prelicensure Nursing Students.Nursing Education Perspectives. 39(3), 3-162. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nep.0000000000000291 Çıkrıkçı, Ö., & Erzen, E. (2020). Academic procrastination, school attachment, and life satisfaction: a mediation model. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 38(2), 225-242. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10942-020-00336-5 Durairaja, A. and M. Fendt (2021). Orexin deficiency modulates cognitive flexibility in a sex dependent manner. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 20(3): e12707. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12707 Dennis, J.P. & Vander Wal, J.S. (2010). The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory: Instrument Development and Estimates of Reliability and Validity. Cogn Ther Res, 34, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4 Demir, Y., & Kutlu, M. (2018). Relationships among Internet addiction, academic motivation, academic procrastination and school attachment in adolescents. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(5), 315-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2018.05.020 Emamverdi, P., Taher, M. (2020). The role of cognitive flexibility and mindfulness in predicting student procrastination. Journal of School Psychology, 9(3), 19-34. (Text in Persian) Goroshit, M. (2018). Academic procrastination and academic performance: An initial basis for intervention.Journal of prevention & intervention in the community, 46(2), 131-142. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10852352.2016.1198157 Grunschel, C., Patrzek, J., & Fries, S. (2013). Exploring reasons and consequences of academic procrastination: An interview study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 841-861. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10212-012-0143-4 Güdül, M. D., Gürhan, C. A. N., & Ceyhan, A. A. (2021). The Role of Academic Motivation in Predicting Turkish Undergraduates’ Life Satisfaction and Academic Procrastination.Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 11(60), 129-146. Erzen, E., & Çikrıkci, Ö. (2018). The role of school attachment and parental social support in academic procrastination. Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 7(1), 17-27. Fernie, B. A., Bharucha, Z., Nikčević, A. V., & Spada, M. M. (2017). The unintentional procrastination scale. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 35(2), 136-149. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10942-016-0247-x Hen, M., & Goroshit, M. (2020). The Effects of Decisional and Academic Procrastination on Students, Feelings Toward Academic Procrastination. Current Psychology, 39(2), 556-563. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s12144-017-9777-3 Hong, J. C., Lee, Y. F., & Ye, J. H. (2021). Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Personality and individual differences, 174. Hosseinmardi, A., Ghorban Shiroodi, S., Zarbakhshbahri, M., Tizdast, T. (2021). The relationship of academic engagement, school engagement and school belonging with academic achievement by mediated the aacademic achievement motivation in male students. Iranian Journal of Educational Society, 14(2), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijes.2021.534830.1123 (Text in Persian) Islak, R.B. (2011). Academic procrastination in relation to gender among gifted and talented college students. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Education University of Houston. Jafariharandi, R., Setayeshi Azhari, Fazlollahighomeshi, S. (2019). The structural relationships between school bonding and academic procrastination in primary school students: the mediating role of the academic self-efficacy. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology, 20(3). 110-121. https://doi.org/10.30486/jsrp.2019.577173.1527 (Text in Persian) Jaahedfaal, L. & Liaghat, R. (2019). Psychometric properties of academic procrastination test and its relationship with achievement motivation and academic performance in high school students in Tehran province. 4th International Conference of Modern Research in Psychology, Counseling and Educational Sciences. (Text in Persian) Khan, I., Schommer-Aikins, M., & Saeed, N. (2021). Cognitive Flexibility, Procrastination, and Need for Closure Predict Online Self-Directed Learning Among Pakistani Virtual University Students. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 6(2), 31-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.36261/ijdeel.v6i2.1860 Kennedy, G. J., & Tuckman, B. W. (2013). An exploration into the influence of academic and social values, procrastination, and perceived school belongingness on academic performance. Social psychology of education, 16(3), 435-470. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11218-013-9220-z Li, L., Gao, H., & Xu, Y. (2020). The mediating and buffering effect of academic self-efficacy on the relationship between smartphone addiction and academic procrastination.Computers & Education, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104001 Makian, R. A. & Kalantarkousheh, S. M. (2015). Normalizing sense of belonging to school questionnaire and its relationship with academic burnout and achievement motivation among persian students. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 5(20), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.22054/jem.2015.1790 (Text in Persian) Mousavi, S. M. & Kazemi, M. (2019). Investigating the relationship between school moral atmosphere and teaching styles with academic procrastination in high school students in district 1 of Zanjan. Applied Research in Counseling, 2(5), 1-17. (Text in Persian) Noran, F. Y. (2000). Procrastination among students in institutes of higher learning: Chalenges for K-Economy.Retrieved December, 30, 2008. Rozgonjuk, D., Kattago, M., & Täht, K. (2018). Social media use in lectures mediates the relationship between procrastination and problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 191-198. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.003 Rose, A. (2011). Restorative environments' influence on cognitive flexibility in developing adults.The University of Utah. Rostami, C., Jahangerlu, A., Ahmadian, H., & Sohrabi, A. (2016). The role of cognitive flexibility and mindfulness in predicting student Procrastination. Zanko Journal of Medical Science, 17 (53), 50-61. (Text in Persian) Shahbaziyankhonig, A., alipour, F., anahid, E., mohammadiyan garibe, A., sheikhalizadeh, S. (2021). Discriminative Role of Social intelligence, Bullying and Academic well-being in social isolation of students. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 16(4), 135-151. (Text in Persian) Syed, S., Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., Hamilton, H. A., Kingsbury, M., & Colman, I. (2021). Low school belongingness and non-prescription opioid use among students in Ontario, Canada.Canadian Journal of Public Health, 112(3), 449-455. Shareh, H., Farmani A. & Soltani, E. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory among Iranian university students. Practice in Clinical Psychology, 2 (1), 43-50. Scent, C. L., & Boes, S. R. (2014). Acceptance and commitment training: A brief intervention to reduce procrastination among college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 28(2), 144-156. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/87568225.2014.883887 Siqi-Liu, A., & Egner, T. (2020). Contextual adaptation of cognitive flexibility is driven by task-and item-level learning. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20, 757-782. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3758/s13415-020-00801-9 Schommer-Aikins, M., & Easter, M. (2018). Cognitive flexibility, procrastination, and need for closure linked to online self-directed learning among students taking online courses. Journal of Business and Educational Leadership, 8(1), 112-121. Sternberg, R. J., & Frensch, P. A. (1992). On being an expert: A cost-benefit analysis. In the psychology of expertise (pp. 191-203). Springer, New York, NY. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. Guilford Press. Tuckman, B. W. (2007). The effect of motivational scaffolding on procrastinators’ distance learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 49(2), 414-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.10.002 Wurster, K. G., Kivlighan III, D. M., & Foley-Nicpon, M. (2021). Does persongroup fit matter? A further examination of hope and belongingness in academic enhancement groups. Journal of counseling psychology, 68(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000437 Yang, X., Liu, R.-D., Ding, Y., Hong, W., & Jiang, S. (2021). The Relations between Academic Procrastination and Self-Esteem in Adolescents a Longitudinal Study.Current Psychology, 1-15. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-021-02075-x Zhang, L., Zhang, D., Fang, J., Wan, Y., Tao, F., & Sun, Y. (2020). Assessment of mental health of Chinese primary school students before and after school closing and opening during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA network open, 3(9). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21482 Zhou, M., Lam, K. K. L., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Metacognition and Academic Procrastination: A Meta-Analytical Examination. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 1-35. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10942-021-00415-1 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 727 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 269 |
||
