تعداد نشریات | 25 |
تعداد شمارهها | 932 |
تعداد مقالات | 7,652 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,494,894 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,886,365 |
رابطه کیفیت سود و ریسک نقدشوندگی | ||
پژوهش های تجربی حسابداری | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 4، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 11، فروردین 1393، صفحه 37-53 اصل مقاله (1.36 M) | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jera.2014.610 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
منصور نخعی* ؛ کاوه مهرانی | ||
دانشگاه تهران | ||
چکیده | ||
این تحقیق به بررسی رابطه میان کیفیت سود و ریسک نقدشوندگی می پردازد. کیفیت سود با استفاده از سه معیار، پایداری سود، ارتباط با ارزش و کیفیت اقلام تعهدی اندازه گیری شده است. ریسک نقدشوندگی نیز بصورت حساسیت بازده سهام نسبت به تغییرات غیرمنتظره در نقدشوندگی بازار تعریف می شود که در این تحقیق با استفاده از مدل ارائه شده توسط ویل (2006) اندازه گیری شده است. بررسی رابطه میان کیفیت سود و ریسک نقدشوندگی، با استفاده از اطلاعات 71 شرکت پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران طی دوره زمانی 1385 تا 1389 نشاندهنده وجود رابطه منفی و معنادار بین کیفیت اقلام تعهدی بعنوان معیاری از کیفیت سود و ریسک نقدشوندگی سهام می باشد. اما یافته های تحقیق رابطه معناداری میان پایداری سود و ارتباط با ارزش سود بعنوان معیارهای کیفیت سود و ریسک نقدشوندگی نشان نمی دهد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
ارتباط با ارزش سود؛ کیفیت اقلام تعهدی؛ پایداری سود؛ ریسک نقدشوندگی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
The relationship between earnings quality and liquidity risk | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Mansour Nakhaei؛ Kaveh Mehrani | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Abstract: This research invetigates the relationship between earnings quality and liquidity risk. Earnings quality is measured using three different proxies: earnings persistence, value relevance, and accrual quality. Liquidity risk is also defined as the sensitivity of stock returns to unexpected changes in market liquidity and, in this research, is measured through the model introduced by Weil. The examination of the relationship between earnings quality and liquidity risk by using the data from 71 firms during the period from 1385 to 1389 indicates that there is a significant, negative relationship between accrual quality, as a proxy of earnings quality, and liquidity risk. However, the results indicate no significant relationship of earnings persistence and value relevance, as the proxies of earnings quality, with liquidity risk. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Keyword: Value relevance, earnings persistence, Accrual Quality, Liquidity Risk | ||
مراجع | ||
Acharya, V. , Pedersen, L. H. (2005). Asset pricing with liquidity risk. Journal of Financial Economics 77, 375–410. Barone, J. G. (2003). Perceptions of earnings quality and their associations with the cost of equity capital. Working paper. The University of Texas at Austin. Botosan C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equiry capital. Accounting Review 72, 323-349. Chordia, T. , Roll, R. , Subrahmanyam, A. , (2000). Commonality in liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics 56, 3–28. Collins, D. , Maydew, E. , Weiss, I. (1997). Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24, 39-67. Dechow, P. , Dichev, I. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting Review 77, 35–59. Francis, J. , LaFond, R. , Olsson, P. , Schipper, K. (2004). Costs of equity and earnings attributes. Accounting Review 79, 967–1010. Francis, J. , LaFond, R. , Olsson, P. , Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39, 295–327. Francis, J. , Schipper, K. (1999). Have financial statements lost their relevance?. Journal of Accounting Research 37, 319-352. Grossman, S. , Miller M. (1988). Liquidity and market structure. Journal of Finance 43, 617–633. Healy, P. , Palepu, K. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31, 405–440. Kim, O. , Verrecchia, R. E. (1994). Market liquidity and volume around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17, 41–67. Kyle, A. S. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53, 1315–1335. Kyle, A. S. (1989). Informed speculation with imperfect competition. Review of Economic Studies 56, 317–356. Lambert, R. , Leuz, C. , Verrecchia, R. (2007). Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 45, 385–420. Lambert, R. , Verrecchia, R. (2008). Market risk, liquidity risk, adverse selection, and the cost of capital. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania. Lang, M. , Maffett, M. (2011). Transparency and liquidity uncertainty in crisis periods. Journal of Accounting and Economics 52, 101–125. Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics 47, 13-37. Ng, J. (2011). The effect of information quality on liquidity risk. Journal of Accounting & Economics 52 , 126–143. Pastor, L. , Stambaugh, R. (2003). Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. Journal of Political Economy 111, 642–685. Schipper, K. , Vincent, L. (2003). Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons 17, 235-250. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk, Journal of Finance 19, 425-442. Verrecchia, R. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32, 97–180. Weill, P. O. (2006). Liquidity Premia in Dynamic Bargaining Markets. University of California, Los Angeles , Sep. Zhang, F. , Tian, Y. , Wirjanto, T. (2007). Liquidity Risk and Cross- Sectional Returns: Evidence from the Chinese Stock Markets. Finance Research Letters 6, No 4. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,571 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,735 |