دانشگاه الزهرا

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات25
تعداد شماره‌ها933
تعداد مقالات7,666
تعداد مشاهده مقاله12,514,814
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله8,896,677
Mohammadi, Elham, Khosravi, Robab, Masoumi, Azam. (1401). The Relationship Between Iranian EFL Learners’ Personality Traits and Their Mobile Assisted Vocabulary Learning. جلوه هنر, 6(3), 137-155. doi: 10.22051/lghor.2021.35941.1482
Elham Mohammadi; Robab Khosravi; Azam Masoumi. "The Relationship Between Iranian EFL Learners’ Personality Traits and Their Mobile Assisted Vocabulary Learning". جلوه هنر, 6, 3, 1401, 137-155. doi: 10.22051/lghor.2021.35941.1482
Mohammadi, Elham, Khosravi, Robab, Masoumi, Azam. (1401). 'The Relationship Between Iranian EFL Learners’ Personality Traits and Their Mobile Assisted Vocabulary Learning', جلوه هنر, 6(3), pp. 137-155. doi: 10.22051/lghor.2021.35941.1482
Mohammadi, Elham, Khosravi, Robab, Masoumi, Azam. The Relationship Between Iranian EFL Learners’ Personality Traits and Their Mobile Assisted Vocabulary Learning. جلوه هنر, 1401; 6(3): 137-155. doi: 10.22051/lghor.2021.35941.1482

The Relationship Between Iranian EFL Learners’ Personality Traits and Their Mobile Assisted Vocabulary Learning

Journal of Language Horizons
مقاله 7، دوره 6، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 13، اسفند 2022، صفحه 137-155    اصل مقاله (392.84 K)
نوع مقاله: Research article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/lghor.2021.35941.1482
نویسندگان
Elham Mohammadi* 1؛ Robab Khosravi2؛ Azam Masoumi3
1Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
2Associate Professor, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
3MA Graduate, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
چکیده
The growing inclusion of technological devices in language learning calls for exploring their efficacy and determining to what extent learners’ characteristics mediate their effectiveness. In light of these concerns, the current study has sought to examine the relationship between learning English vocabulary via mobile phone and the learners’ personality traits. The participants of the study were 100 intermediate English as foreign language (EFL) learners studying English at the University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran. Sixty American English idioms were chosen and made available in a Telegram channel, during a six-week period of treatment to provide the participants with Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL). A researcher-designed achievement test was administered to assess the learners’ vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Big Five Inventory (BFI)” (John et al. 2008) was used to estimate the learners’ personality traits. The data analyses showed no significant correlation between the variables; however, simultaneous multiple regression offered extraversion as the unique significant predictor. The results revealed MALL not only frees the learners from the restrictions of time and place, but also minimizes the possible intervention of learners’ characteristics in the process of language learning. The fruitfulness of MALL in leaving behind students’ characteristics has important implications for both educators and practitioners.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Big Five Inventory؛ EFL learners؛ learning vocabulary؛ mobile-assisted language learning؛ personality traits
عنوان مقاله [English]
ارتباط میان تیپ شخصیتی زبان‌آموزان ‌ایرانی و یادگیری واژگان به‌ کمک تلفن همراه
نویسندگان [English]
الهام محمدی1؛ رباب خسروی2؛ اعظم معصومی3
1استادیارآموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده ی علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران
2دانشیار ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشکده ی علوم انسانی دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران
3کارشناسی ارشد آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده ی علوم انسانی ، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران
چکیده [English]
به کارگیری رو به رشد ابزارهای فناورانه در یادگیری زبان، بررسی سودمندی آن‌ها و تعیین میزان تاثیر ویژگی‌های زبان‌آموزان بر اثربخشی‌ آن ها را ضروری میکند. با توجه به این نگرانی‌ها، پژوهش حاضر به دنبال بررسی رابطة بین یادگیری واژگان انگلیسی از طریق تلفن همراه و ویژگی‌های شخصیتی زبان‌آموزان است. شرکت‌کنندگان در این مطالعه 100 زبان‌آموز انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی بودند که در دانشگاه زنجان، ایران به تحصیل زبان انگلیسی مشغول بودند. تعداد 60 اصطلاح زبان انگلیسی از طریق یک کانال تلگرام به مدت 6 هفته و در قالب آموزش زبان به‌ کمک تلفن همراه در اختیار شرکت‌کنندگان قرار گرفت. یک آزمون پیشرفت ،طراحی‌شده توسط محقق، برای ارزیابی یادگیری واژگان زبان‌آموزان از طریق تلفن همراه به اجرا درآمد. مقیاس پنج بزرگ (جان و همکاران 2008) برای سنجش تیپ شخصیتی زبان‌آموزان به کار گرفته شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها همبستگی معناداری را بین متغیرها نشان نداد؛ با این حال، رگرسیون چندگانه همزمان، برون‌گرایی را به عنوان پیش‌بینی‌کننده معنادار منحصر به ‌فرد ارائه کرد. نتایج نشان داد که یادگیری زبان به کمک تلفن همراه نه تنها زبان‌آموزان را از محدودیت‌های زمانی و مکانی رها می‌کند، بلکه دخالت احتمالی ویژگی‌های زبان‌آموزان را در فرآیند یادگیری زبان به حداقل می‌رساند. اهمیت یادگیری با استفاده از تلفن همراه در کاهش اثر ویژگی‌های شخصیتی بر یادگیری واژگان توسط دانش‌آموزان دستاوردهای مهمی برای معلمان و دست اندرکاران آموزش به همراه دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
مقیاس پنج بزرگ, فراگیران زبان انگلیسی, یادگیری واژگان, یادگیری زبان به کمک تلفن همراه, تیپ شخصیتی
مراجع
  1. Afzali, P., Shabani, S., Basir, Z., & Ramazani, M. (2017). Mobile-assisted vocabulary learning: A review study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(2), 190-195.   https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.2p.190
  2. Ali, Z., Mukundan, J., Ayub, A., & Baki, R. (2011). The effectiveness of using contextual clues, dictionary strategy and computer assisted language learning (CALL) in learning vocabulary. International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), 1(1), 136-152. https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v1i1.218
  3. Al-Hamad, R. F., Al-Jamal, D. A. H., & Bataineh, R. F. (2019). The effect of MALL instruction on teens' writing performance. Digital Education Review, 35, 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2019.35.289-298
  4. Al Saidi, F. A., & Al Shezawi, R. A. (2020). Smartphones fostering English language learners’ vocabulary. Proceedings of the 20th TESOL Arabia Conference: Methods and means in ELT. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079627
  5. American Psychological Association (2020). Retrieved July 29, 2017, from http://www.apa.org/topics/personality/
  6. Amiryousefi, M., & Dastjerdi, H. V. (2010). Vocabulary: Challenges and debates. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n3p89
  7. Baleghizadeh, S., & Oladrostam, E. (2010). The effect of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) on grammatical accuracy of EFL students. Mextesol Journal, 34(2), 77-86. https://www.mextesol.net/journal/index.php?page=journal&id_article=50
  8. Bayram, S., Deniz, L., & Erdogan, Y. (2008). The role of personality traits in web based education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 7(2), 41-50. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v7i2/725.pdf
  9. Bensalem, E. (2018). The impact of WhatsApp on EFL students' vocabulary learning.  Arab World English Journal, 9(1), 23- 38. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.2
  10. Biedroń, A. (2011). Personality factors as predictors of foreign language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(4), 467-489. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.4.2
  11. Carrell, P. L., Prince, M. S., & Astika, G. G. (1996). Personality types and language learning in an EFL context. Language Learning, 46(1), 75-99.
  12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb00641.x
  13. Chen, C. J. (2014). Using concept mapping instruction in mobile phone to learning English vocabulary. Creative Education, 5(1), 4-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.51002
  14. Cherry, K. (2020). Theories and terminology of personality psychology. Verywellmind. https://www.verywellmind.com/personality-psychology-study-guide-2795699
  15. Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9-16. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/74432/
  16. Cocoradă, E., Maican, C. I., Cazan, A., & Maican, A. M. (2018). Assessing smartphone risk addiction and its associations with personality traits among adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 93, 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.08.006
  17. Constantinescu, A. I. (2007). Using technology to assist in vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. The Internet TESL Journal, XIII(2), 122‐133. http://iteslj.org/Articles/Constantinescu-Vocabulary.html
  18. Crozier, W. R. (1997). Individual learners: Personality differences in education. Routledge.
  19. Dewan, S., & Ho, K. (2013). The effects of learners’ personality traits on m-learning. In H. Deng & C. Standing (Eds.), ACIS 2013: Information systems: Transforming the Future: Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Melbourne, Australia (pp. 1-11). http://mo.bf.rmit.edu.au/acis2013/237.pdf
  20. Esmaeili, N. (2018). The association between anxiety and perfectionism in writing: Iranian EFL learners' writing performance on IELTS [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
  21. Fageeh, A. A. I. (2013). Effects of MALL applications on vocabulary acquisition and motivation. Arab World English Journal, 4(4), 420-447.
  22. Gürlüyer, M. (2019). Examining students’ perceptions and achievements in terms of the utilization of WhatsApp in learning EFL vocabulary. Kafdağı, 4(2), 173-193. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kafdagi/issue/51260/661338 
  23. Han, T., & Keskin, F. (2016). Using a mobile application (WhatsApp) to reduce EFL speaking anxiety. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 12(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.243
  24. Hassanzadeh, V., Gholami, R., Allahyar, N., & Noordin, N. (2012). Motivation and personality traits of TESL postgraduate students towards the use of information and communications technology (ICT) in second language teaching. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n4p74
  25. Hsiao, K. L. (2017). Compulsive mobile application usage and technostress: The role of personality traits. Online Information Review, 41(2), 272-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2016-0091
  26. Hu, Z. (2013). Vocabulary learning assisted by mobile phones: Perceptions of Chinese adult learners. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 8(1), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.1468
  27. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). The Guilford Press.
  28. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives.  In L. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.) (pp. 102-138). The Guilford Press. 
  29. Kacetl, J., & Klímová, B. (2019). Use of smartphone applications in English language learning: A challenge for foreign language education. Education Science, 9(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030179
  30. Kamal, A., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2019). Individual learning preferences based on personality traits in an E-learning scenario. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 407-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9777-4
  31. Kao, P. C., & Craigie, P. (2014). Effects of English usage on Facebook and personality traits on achievement of students learning English as a foreign language. Social Behavior and Personality, 42(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.1.17
  32. Kaufmann, S. (2016). Personality has less impact on language learning than you think. Huffington Post.
  33. https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/steve-kaufmann/language-learning-introvert-extrovert_b_11408702.html
  34. Komachali, M. E. (2012). The effect of using vocabulary flash card on Iranian pre-university students. Vocabulary Knowledge, 5(3), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.5539/Ies.V5n3p134
  35. Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001
  36. Korlu, H., & Mede, E. (2018). Autonomy in vocabulary learning of Turkish EFL learners. The Eurocall Review, 26(2), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2018.10425
  37. Kukulska‐Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile‐assisted language learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-9). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0768.pub2
  38. Lane, W., & Manner, C. (2011). The impact of personality traits on smartphone ownership and use. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(17), 22-28. https://ijbssnet.com/view.php?u=http://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_17/4.pdf
  39. La Spisa, L. (2015). Using small talk cards to help lower the affective filter and increase language acquisition in adult English learners [Unpublished master’s thesis]. William Paterson University.
  40. Lee, S., Tam, C. L. & Chie, Q. T. (2013). Mobile phone usage preferences: The contributing factors of personality, social anxiety and loneliness. Social Indicators Research, 118(3), 1205-1228. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24721058
  41. Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Language Teaching Publications.
  42. Li, J., & Cummins, J. (2019). Effect of using texting on vocabulary instruction for English learners. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 43-64. https://doi.org/10125/44682
  43. Li, M., Ogata, H., Hou, B., Hashimoto, S., Uosaki, N., Liu, Y., & Yano, Y. (2010, April). Development of adaptive vocabulary learning via mobile phone e-mail. In 2010 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education (pp. 34-41). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WMUTE.2010.9
  44. Lin, J. J., & Lin, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 878-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359
  45. Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00289.x
  46. Mahdi, H. S. (2018). Effectiveness of mobile devices on vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 134-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117698826
  47. MALL Research Project Report. (2009). Mobile application for language learning. Curriculum Corporation: The Learning Federation. http://www.thelearningfederation.edu.au/verve/_resources/MALL_Report_final.pdf
  48. Marcela, V. (2015). Learning strategy, personality traits and academic achievement of university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3473-3478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1021
  49. McCarthy, M., & O’Dell, F. (2004). English idioms in use. Cambridge University Press.
  50. Miri, F., & Shamsaddini, M. R. (2014). The effect of different personality traits on Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary learning. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4(2), 106-115. http://www.cibtech.org/J-LIFE-SCIENCES/PUBLICATIONS/2014/Vol-4-No-2/JLS-017-023-FATEMEH-THE-LEARNING.pdf 
  51. Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128
  52. Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child (D. Coltman, Trans.). Orion.
  53. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.​doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305  
  54. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833835
  55. Saran, M., Seferoglu, G., & Cagiltay, K. (2012). Mobile language learning: Contribution of multimedia messages via mobile phones in consolidating vocabulary. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(1), 181-190. https://hdl.handle.net/11511/52396
  56. Saranraj, L., & Meenakshi, K. (2016). Influence of motivation factor and anxiety in L2 learning among engineering students in Dharmapuri, India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(18), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i18/90371
  57. Scheid, S. (2015). Cultural and personal factors affecting mobile language learning: An investigative approach (Publication No. 97850) [Master’s thesis, University of Tampere]. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:uta-201507292184
  58. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569057
  59. Setzler, H. H. (1981). Basic idioms in American English. Science Research Associates.
  60. Shahbaz, M., & Khan, R. M. I. (2017). Use of mobile immersion in foreign language teaching to enhance target language vocabulary learning. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends & Practices, 7(1), 66-82. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2017/v7/i1/1448
  61. Sole, R. C, Calic, J., & Neijmann, D. (2010). A social and self-reflective approach to MALL. ReCALL, 22(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009990188
  62. Soto, C. J. & John, O. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.002
  63. Srivastava, S. (2017). Measuring the Big Five personality factors. https://pages.uoregon.edu/sanjay/bigfive.html
  64. Vasbieva, D. G., Klimova, I. I., Agibalova, E. L., Karzhanova, N. V., & Bírová, J. (2016). Enhancement of students' vocabulary learning through a blended learning approach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1195-1203.
  65. Wang, Y. H., & Shih, S. K. H. (2015). Mobile-assisted language learning: Effects on EFL vocabulary learning. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 13(4), 358-375. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2015.070060
  66. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  67. Yaghoobinejad, N., & Ahour, T. (2019). The relationship between Iranian EFL students’ personality characteristics and their assertiveness: A case of postgraduate students. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 12, 138-156. https://doi.org/10.30495/JAL.2019.671930
  68. Zhang, H., Song, W., & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 10(3), 203-214.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 741
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 320


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب