تعداد نشریات | 25 |
تعداد شمارهها | 932 |
تعداد مقالات | 7,652 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,492,909 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,884,620 |
Syntactic Comprehension in Persian-Speaking Agrammatics: Further Proof of Trace Deletion Hypothesis | ||
Journal of Language Horizons | ||
دوره 5، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 9، فروردین 2021، صفحه 185-203 اصل مقاله (466.47 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/lghor.2020.32410.1346 | ||
نویسنده | ||
Omid Azad* | ||
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities and Literature, University of Gonabad, Gonabad, Iran. | ||
چکیده | ||
So far, there have been three important theories explaining the nature and extent of grammatical deficit in agrammatic aphasia. In this respect, while the two mainly performance-based theories of agrammatics, i.e. trade-off hypothesis (TOH) and mapping hypothesis (MH), provide a very broad account of this deficit, the trace deletion hypothesis (TDH) presents a much narrower stance on the nature of the deficit as well as on the question of modularity. This research, being the first one in the Persian context, tries to test this theory in four gender-, education-, and age-matched Persian-speaking agrammatics and the same matched controls via executing a grammatical judgment test. For the purpose of evaluating our participants’ performance, 90 pairs of sentences, composed of well-formed and ill-formed ones, were presented to the subjects in a randomized manner, based on which participants were supposed to express their opinions regarding their grammaticality in a grammatical judgment task. The types of sentences being testified included active agentive, object cleft, subject cleft, agentive passive, psychological passive and object WH-constructions. Our findings, in line with the predictions of TDH, indicated that agrammatics faced many challenges with constructions in which constituent movements are involved. In contrast, their comprehension remained intact in agentive constructions. The theoretical and psychological implications of the findings are discussed. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
aphasia؛ processing؛ neurological؛ modular؛ TDH | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
درک نحوی در بیماران دستورپریش فارسیزبان: گواهی دیگر در باب فرضیه حذف رد | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
امید آزاد | ||
استادیار، گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گناباد، گناباد، ایران. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
تاکنون، سه نظریه مهم به بررسیِ ماهیت و میزانِ نقصانِ دستوری، در بیماران زبانپریش پرداختهاند. از این منظر، در حالیکه دو نظریة کنش-محور دستور پریشی، یعنی فرضیه آستانة کنشی و فرضیة نگاشتی، رویکردی بسیار کلی را در زمینة این نقص به کار میگیرند، فرضیه حذفِ رد، تبیینی بسیار موشکافانه در باب ماهیت و همچنین حوزهای بودنِ مغز در پیش میگیرد. مقالة حاضر، به مثابه نخستین پژوهش در بافتِ فارسی، میکوشد تا کارایی نظریة مزبور را در چهار بیمار دستورپریشِ فارسیزبان که از جنبة جنسیت، تحصیلات و سن، با یکدیگر همتا شده بودند، را با همین تعداد گروه کنترل و پس از اجرای یک آزمون قضاوت دستوری به محک آزمون گذارد. به منظور ارزیابی عملکرد آزمودنیها، 90 جفت جملة خوشساخت و غیرِ خوشساخت، به شکل تصادفی در اختیار آزمودنیها قرار گرفت که بر مبنای آن، آزمودنیها میبایست دیدگاه خویش را نسبت به دستوری بودن این جملهها، در یک فعالیتِ قضاوت دستوری بیان کنند. انواع جملههای آزمونشدة این پژوهش، مشتمل بر جملههای عاملی، اسنادی مفعولی، اسنادی فاعلی، مجهول عاملی، مجهول روانشناختی و پرسشواژة محتوایی بودند. یافتهها، همسو با پیشبینی فرضیه حذف رد، نشان داد که بیماران دستورپریش، در ساختارهایی که در آنها حرکت سازهای مشاهده میشود، با چالشهای زیادی روبهرو هستند. در مقابل، آنها در ساختارهای عاملی، از درک مطلوبی برخوردار بودند. کاربردهای نظری و روانشناختی یافتهها مورد بحث قرار گرفت. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
زبانپریشی, پردازش, عصبشناختی, حوزهای, فرضیة حذفِ رد | ||
مراجع | ||
Ameri, H., Golfam, A., Kolk, H., Ashayeri, H., Hagh-Shenas, A. M., & Kord-Za'feranlou, E. (2008). Interaction of syntactic comprehension and ability of cognitive sequence processing in Persian speaking Broca aphasic patients. Archives of Rehabilitation, 9(2), 16-25. http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-250-en.html
Arslan, S., & Felser, C. (2018). Comprehension of wh-questions in Turkish-German bilinguals with aphasia: A dual-case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 32(7), 640-660. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2017.1416493
Austin, G., Pongpairoj, N., & Trenkic, D. (2015). Structural competition in second language production: Towards a constraint‐satisfaction model. Language Learning, 65(3), 689-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12108
Avrutin, S. (2000). Comprehension of discourse-linked and non-discourse-linked questions by children and Broca's aphasics. Language and the Brain, 11(2), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012304260-6/50017-7
Aziz, M. A. A., Hassan, M., Razak, R. A., & Garraffa, M. (2020). Syntactic abilities in Malay adult speakers with aphasia: A study on passive sentences and argument structures. Aphasiology, 6(7), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1742283
Barbieri, E., Luzzatti, C., Brambilla, I., Rizzi, G., Zonca, G., & Thompson, C. (2013). Comprehension of syntactically complex sentences in Broca's aphasia: Evidence from the northwestern assessment of verbs and sentences in Italian. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(4), 542-542. https://hdl.handle.net/10281/46706
Bates, E. (1998). Construction grammar and its implications for child language research. Journal of Child Language, 25(6), 462-466. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.140.1532&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Beeke, S., Wilkinson, R., & Maxim, J. (2007). Grammar without sentence structure: A conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism. Aphasiology, 21(3-4), 256-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600911344
Beretta, A., & Munn, A. (1998). Double-agents and trace-deletion in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 65(3), 404-421. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1998.1997
Brown, J. A., Wallace, S. E., Knollman-Porter, K., & Hux, K. (2019). Comprehension of single versus combined modality information by people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(1), 278-292. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0132
Caramazza, A., & Berndt, R. S. (1985). A multicomponent deficit view of agrammatic Broca's aphasia. Agrammatism, 12(5), 27-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-402830-2.50006-7
Chapman, R. S. (2000). Children's language learning: An interactionist perspective. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(1), 33-54. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-26300-012
Charles, D., Olm, C., & Powers, J. (2008). Grammatical comprehension deficits in non-fluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 85(3), 249-256. https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/85/3/249.short
Chomsky, N. (2014). The minimalist program. MIT press.
Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (2013). Typology of Iranian languages. SAMT.
Dimmendaal, G. J., Ahland, C., Jakobi, A., & Lojenga, C. K. (2019). Linguistic features and typologies in languages commonly referred to as “Nilo-Saharan.” In E. Wolf (Ed), The Cambridge handbook of African linguistics (pp. 326-381). Cambridge University Press.
Diouny, S. (2010). Some aspects of Moroccan Arabic agrammatism. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Faust, M., Babkoff, H., & Kravetz, S. (1995). Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: Implications for modularity vs interactionism. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639508405117.
Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 321-338. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1010447102554
Frazier, L. (1995). Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(6), 437-468. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02143161
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. MIT Press.
Frazier, L., & Friederici, A. D. (1991). On deriving the properties of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 40(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90116-I
Friederici, A. D., & Frazier, L. (1992). Thematic analysis in agrammatic comprehension: Syntactic structures and task demands. Brain and Language, 42(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(92)90053-H
Friedmann, N. (2008). Traceless relatives: Agrammatic comprehension of relative clauses with resumptive pronouns. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(2), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.10.005
Fyndanis, V., Varlokosta, S., & Tsapkini, K. (2013). (Morpho)syntactic comprehension in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from Greek. Aphasiology, 27(4), 398-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.770817
Garraffa, M., & Grillo, N. (2008). Canonicity effects as grammatical phenomena. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(2), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.09.001
Ghomeshi, J. (1996). Projection and inflection: A study of Persian phrase structure. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics. https://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/6521
Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (1998). Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(7), 262-268. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661398011875
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. 1972. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Lea & Febiger. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10006198251/
Goodglass, H., & Menn, L. (1985). Is agrammatism a unitary phenomenon? Agrammatism, 7(3), 1-26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124028302500055
Grodzinsky, Y. (1995a). A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 50(1), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1995.1039
Grodzinsky, Y. (1995b). Trace deletion, θ-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language, 51(3), 469-497. https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?publisherName=ELS&contentID=S0093934X85710723&orderBeanReset=true
Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The trace deletion hypothesis and the tree-pruning hypothesis: Still valid characterizations of Broca's aphasia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00582399
Grodzinsky, Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(2), 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.007
Grodzinsky, Y., Pierce, A., & Marakovitz, S. (1991). Neuropsychological reasons for a transformational analysis of verbal passive. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 9(3), 431-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135354
Grodzinsky, Y., & Santi, A. (2008). The battle for Broca’s region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 474-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.001
Grodzinsky, Y., Swinney, D., & Zurif, E. (1985). Agrammatism: Structural deficits and antecedent processing disruptions. Agrammatism, 21(8). 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-402830-2.50007-9
Guo, Y., Shao, Z., & Hua, N. (2010). A cognitive interactionist sentence parser with simple recurrent networks. Information Sciences, 180(23), 4695-4705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.08.008
Hadjistavropoulos, T., Malloy, D. C., Sharpe, D., Green, S. M., & Fuchs-Lacelle, S. (2002). The relative importance of the ethical principles adopted by the American Psychological Association. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 43(4), 254-259. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-06469-004
Hagiwara, H. (1993). Nonagentive predicates and agrammatic comprehension. Metropolitan Linguistics, 13(7), 127-142. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10008744967/
Hanne, S., Sekerina, I. A., Vasishth, S., Burchert, F., & De Bleser, R. (2011). Chance in agrammatic sentence comprehension: What does it really mean? Evidence from eye movements of German agrammatic aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 25(2), 221-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2010.489256
Harun, M. (2020). Investigating the agrammatic production of canonical and non-canonical sentences cross-linguistically. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(1), 6-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.1p.6
Hickok, G., & Avrutin, S. (1995). Representation, referentiality, and processing in agrammatic comprehension: Two case studies. Brain and Language, 14(2), 156-174. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1995.1038
Hickok, G., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1992). Modularity in locating wh-gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21(6), 545-561. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01067530
Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., & Grohmann, K. K. (2005). Understanding minimalism. Cambridge University Press.
Ingram, J. C. (2007). Neurolinguistics: An introduction to spoken language processing and its disorders. Cambridge University Press.
Karimi, S. (2008). A minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Walter de Gruyter.
Kristinsson, S., Thors, H., Yourganov, G., Magnusdottir, S., Hjaltason, H., Stark, B. C., Basilakos, A., Ouden, D., Rorden, C., Hickok, G., Hillis, A., & Fridriksson, J. (2020). Brain damage associated with impaired sentence processing in acute aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(2), 256-271. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01478
LaCroix, A. N., Blumenstein, N., Tully, M., Baxter, L. C., & Rogalsky, C. (2020). Effects of prosody on the cognitive and neural resources supporting sentence comprehension: A behavioral and lesion-symptom mapping study. Brain and Language, 203(8), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104756
Lasnik, H. (2002). The minimalist program in syntax. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(10), 432-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01977-0
Linebarger, M. C. (1995). Agrammatism as evidence about grammar. Brain and language, 50(1), 52-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1995.1040
Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Saffran, E. M. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13(3), 361-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90015-X
Linebarger, M., McCall, D., Virata, T., & Berndt, R. S. (2007). Widening the temporal window: Processing support in the treatment of aphasic language production. Brain and Language, 100(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.09.001
Love, T., & Swinney, D. (1996). Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708418
Mack, J. E., Mesulam, M. M., Rogalski, E. J., & Thompson, C. K. (2019). Verb-argument integration in primary progressive aphasia: Real-time argument access and selection. Neuropsychologia, 134(6), 107-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107192
Mahmoudi, S. (2019). Elements in the restrictive relative clause: Resumptive pronoun or null operator. Language Sciences, 6(9), 55-82. https://dx.doi.org/10.22054/ls.2019.5847.1025
Malyutina, S., & Zelenkova, V. (2020). Verb argument structure effects in aphasia are different at single-word versus sentence level. Aphasiology, 34(4), 431-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1697866
Marshall, J. (1995). The mapping hypothesis and aphasia therapy. Aphasiology, 9(6), 517-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039508248712
Maruszewski, M. (2017). Language communication and the brain: A neuropsychological study. Walter de Gruyter.
Maviş, I., Arslan, S., & Aydin, Ö. (2019). Comprehension of word order in Turkish aphasia. Aphasiology, 12(6), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1622646
McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. Canegie-Mellon University Press. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA180133
McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1998). Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(2), 432-445. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.432
Mehri, A., Ghorbani, A., Darzi, A., Jalaie, S., & Ashayeri, H. (2016). Comparing the production of complex sentences in Persian patients with post-stroke aphasia and non-damaged people with normal speaking. Iranian Journal of Neurology, 15(1), 28-34. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852068/
Mitchum, C. C., Haendiges, A. N., & Berndt, R. S. (1995). Treatment of thematic mapping in sentence comprehension: Implications for normal processing.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(5), 503-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299508252006
Mondini, S., Arcara, G., & Jarema, G. (2014). Semantic and syntactic processing of mass and count nouns: Data from dementia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 36(9), 967-980. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2014.958437
Murray, L. L. (2018). Sentence processing in aphasia: An examination of material-specific and general cognitive factors. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 48, 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.03.007
Nedergaard, J. S., Martínez-Ferreiro, S., Fortescue, M. D., & Boye, K. (2020). Non-fluent aphasia in a polysynthetic language: Five case studies. Aphasiology, 34(6), 654-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1643000
Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 5-19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01069043
Nilipour, R. (1994). Persian aphasia battery (PAB). Iran Medical University Press.
Nilipour, R., & Raghibdoust, S. (2001). Manifestations of aphasia in Persian. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 14(2-4), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(01)00015-X
O'Grady, W., & Lee, M. (2005). A mapping theory of agrammatic comprehension deficits. Brain and Language, 92(1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.05.009
Rahmany, R., Marefat, H., & Kidd, E. (2014). Resumptive elements aid comprehension of object relative clauses: Evidence from Persian. Journal of Child Language, 41(4), 937-948. doi:10.1017/S0305000913000147
Reznik, M. (1995). Functional categories in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 50(1), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1995.1042
Riis, P. (2000). Perspectives on the fifth revision of the declaration of Helsinki. Jama, 284(23), 3045-3046. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.23.3045
Rizzi, L. (1985). Two notes on the linguistic interpretation of Broca's aphasia. Agrammatism, 23(6), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-402830-2.50010-9
Sahraoui, H., & Nespoulous, J. L. (2012). Across-task variability in agrammatic performance. Aphasiology, 26(6), 785-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.650625
Salimi, A., & Dadashpour, S. (2012). Task complexity and language production dilemmas (Robinson's cognition hypothesis vs. Skehan's trade-off model). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(3), 643-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.177
Sample, E., & Michel, M. (2014). An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 43(8), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1185
Schilling, S. (2019). Linguistic theories about agrammatism: The trace deletion hypothesis and the tree pruning hypothesis. GRIN Verlag.
Schwering, S. C., & MacDonald, M. C. (2020). Verbal working memory as emergent from language comprehension and production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14(6), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068
Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (2001). Constraint satisfaction in language acquisition and processing. Connectionist Psycholinguistics, 12(9), 281-318.
Shetreet, E., Linzen, T., & Friedmann, N. (2016). Against all odds: Exhaustive activation in lexical access of verb complementation options. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(9), 1206-1214. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1205203
Shiani, A., Joghataei, M. T., Ashayeri, H., Kamali, M., Razavi, M. R., & Yadegari, F. (2019). Comprehension of complex sentences in the Persian-speaking patients with aphasia. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 10(3), 199- 218. https://dx.doi.org/10.32598%2Fbcn.9.10.185
Soroli, E., Sahraoui, H., & Sacchett, C. (2012). Linguistic encoding of motion events in English and French: Typological constraints on second language acquisition and agrammatic aphasia. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 3(2), 261-287. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/lia.3.2.05sor
Su, Y. C., Lee, S. E., & Chung, Y. M. (2007). Asyntactic thematic role assignment by Mandarin aphasics: A test of the trace-deletion hypothesis and the double dependency hypothesis. Brain and Language, 101(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.12.001
Sung, J. E., Choi, S., Eom, B., Yoo, J. K., & Jeong, J. H. (2020). Syntactic complexity as a linguistic marker to differentiate mild cognitive impairment from normal aging. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(5), 1416-1429. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/abs/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00335
Tan, U. (2007). The psychomotor theory of human mind. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117(8), 1109-1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450600934556
Tesak, J., & Code, C. (2008). Milestones in the history of aphasia: Theories and protagonists. Psychology Press.
Tzeng, O. J., Chen, S., & Hung, D. L. (1991). The classifier problem in Chinese aphasia. Brain and Language, 41(2), 184-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90152-Q
Uddén, J., de Jesus Dias Martins, M., Zuidema, W., & Tecumseh Fitch, W. (2020). Hierarchical structure in sequence processing: How to measure it and determine its neural implementation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(3), 910-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12442
Wang, X., Hui, B., & Chen, S. (2020). Language selective or non-selective in bilingual lexical access? It depends on lexical tones! PloS One, 15(3), 230-242. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230412
Wanner, E. (2019). On remembering, forgetting, and understanding sentences: A study of the deep structure hypothesis. Walter de Gruyter.
Xu, K., Duann, J. R., Hung, D. L., & Wu, D. H. (2019). Preference for object relative clauses in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from online self-paced reading time. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(4), 221-234. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02210/full | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 504 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 309 |