پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 939 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,734 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,751,848 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,074,307 |
Language Teachers’ Perception of an ELT Program: The Case of Iranian English Reform Developed for Secondary Schools | ||
| Journal of Language Horizons | ||
| دوره 4، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 8، مهر 2020، صفحه 101-122 اصل مقاله (474.98 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/lghor.2020.30942.1285 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Parissa Zare1؛ Mohammad Reza Anani Sarab* 2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate, Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The present study investigated the characteristics of the new ELT program in Iran from the perspective of its most direct implementers both qualitatively and quantitatively. To this end, 19 teachers implementing the new program were interviewed to describe the newly introduced change through their perception of its attributes such as its complexity, explicitness and practicality. After conducting content analysis on the transcribed interviews, the emerged themes were used to survey 256 lower and higher secondary teachers by means of a 5-point Likert-type questionnaire across the nation. The results show that, although the program implementers felt more satisfied with the new program due to the perceived advantages of the change over the previous one, the lack of crucial factors such as giving due attention to the oral skills, adjustability of the change to the needs of a wide range of users, training teachers to improve their skills in making use of methods and techniques compatible with the reality of local language classrooms replete with logistical shortcomings, permeation of change to different layers of the educational system and mobilizing all influential subsystems for putting the change into practice has handicapped the effective fulfilment of the program’s objectives from teachers’ eyes. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| change attributes؛ communicative language teaching approach؛ ELT change program؛ secondary education؛ program evaluation | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| برداشت معلمان زبان از یک برنامۀ آموزش زبان: مورد برنامۀ اصلاح زبان انگلیسی ایران برای دبیرستان‌ها | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| پریسا زارع1؛ محمد رضا عنانی سراب2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری آموزش زبان انگلیسی، گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| در تحقیق حاضر به بررسی کمّی و کیفیِ ویژگی‌های برنامۀ جدید آموزش زبان ایران از نگاه مجریان مستقیم آن پرداخته‌شده‌است. به این منظور، مصاحبه‌ای با 19 دبیر زبانِ مجری این برنامه انجام شد که در آن به توصیف تغییر جدید و برداشت‌شان از ویژگی‌های این تغییر، نظیر پیچیدگی، وضوح، امکان‌پذیر بودن آن پرداختند. پس از انجام تحلیل محتوایی برروی متن مصاحبه‌ها، الگوهای به دست آمده در قالب پرسشنامۀ پنج‌درجه‌ای لیکِرت برای نظرخواهی از 256 دبیر زبان دورۀ متوسطۀ اول و دوم سراسر کشور مورد استفاده قرارگرفت. نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که اگرچه مجریان برنامۀ جدید به‌دلیل مزایای نسبی آن در مقایسه با برنامۀ قبلی راضی هستند، اما از نقطه‌نظر دبیران، عوامل کلیدی همچون جدی گرفته نشدن مهارت‌های شفاهی به‌میزان کافی، سازگار نبودن برنامه با نیازهای طیف وسیعی از کاربران، عدم آموزش معلمان به‌منظور تقویت مهارت‌های آنها در استفاده از روش‌ها و تکنیک‌های متناسب با واقعیت کلاس‌های زبان داخل کشور که متاثر از محدودیت‌های بسیاری است و در عین حال، عدم نفوذ تغییر به لایه‌های مختلف نظام آموزشی و بسیج زیرمجموعه‌های تاثیرگذار در عملیاتی‌کردن تغییر، دستیابی موثر به اهداف برنامه را با اخلال مواجه کرده‌است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| مولفه‌های تغییر, رویکرد ارتباطی آموزش زبان, برنامۀ تغییر در آموزش زبان انگلیسی, آموزش دورۀ متوسطه, ارزیابی برنامه | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahour, T., Towhidiyan, B., & Saeidi, M. (2014). The evaluation of English Textbook 2 taught in Iranian high schools from teachers’ perspectives. English Language Teaching, 7(3), 150-158.
Akbari, Z. (2015). Current challenges in teaching/learning English for EFL learners: The case of junior high school and high school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 394-401.
Akbari, O., & Pourabbas, H. (2015). Evaluation of Iranian second-grade high school English textbook based on needs analysis approach. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(5), 19-34.
Asadi, M., Kiany, G. R., Akbari, R., & Ghafar Samar, R. (2016). Program evaluation of the new English textbook (Prospect 1) in the Iranian Ministry of Education. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 291-301.
Baniasad-Azad, S., Tavakoli, M., & Ketabi, S. (2016). EFL teacher education programs in Iran: The absence of teachers’ involvement. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 61-86.
Barabadi, E., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2015). An activity theory analysis of ELT reform in Iranian public schools, 18(1), 127–166.
Chan, F. (2002). The cognitive element of curriculum change. In V. Crew, C. Davison & B. Mak (Eds.), Reflecting on language in education. Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift fur Soziolgie, Jg, 19, 418-427.
Dahmardeh, M. (2009a). English language teaching in Iran and communicative language teaching [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Warwick. England.
Dahmardeh, M. (2009b). Communicative textbooks: English language textbooks in Iranian secondary schools. Linguistik Online, 40(4), 4-61. https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.40.431
Davari, H., & Aghagolzadeh, F. (2015). To teach or not to teach? Still an open question for the Iranian education system. In C. Kennedy (2015). English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends, and challenges (pp. 13-19).British Council.
Farhady, H. (2000). Evaluating students’ language achievement at junior high schools in Iran. Research report delivered to the Ministry of Education.
Foroozandeh, E., & Forouzani, M. (2015). Developing school English materials for the new Iranian educational system. In C. Kennedy (Ed.). English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends, and challenges (pp. 59-70). British Council.
Fullan, M. (2006). Change theory: A force for school improvement. Center for Strategic Education Seminar Series Paper, 157, 3-14.
Gholami Pasand, P., & Ghasemi, A.A. (2018). An intercultural analysis of English language textbooks in Iran: The case of English Prospect Series. Journal of Applied Language Studies 12(1), 55-70.
Henrichsen, L. E. (1989). Diffusion of innovations in English language teaching: The ELEC effort in Japan, 1956-1968. Greenwood Press.
Jamalvandi, B. (2014). ELT textbook evaluation in Iran, new insights. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 3(4), 1068-1078.
Janfeshan, K., & Nosrati, M. (2014). A quick look to English language training in Iranian approach. International Journal of Economy, Management, and Social Sciences, 3(1), 100-106.
Kelly, P. (1980). 'From innovation to adaptability': The changing perspective of curriculum development. In M. Galton (Ed.). Curriculum change (pp. 65-80). Leicester University Press.
Kennedy, C. (1988). Evaluation of the management of change in ELT projects. Applied Linguistics 9(4), 329-342.
Kheirabadi, R., & Alavi Moghaddam, S. B. (2014). New horizons in teaching English in Iran: A transition from reading-based methods to communicative ones by English for Schools series. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5(4), 225-232.
Kiely, R. (2012). Designing evaluation into management change process. In C. Tribble (Ed.). Managing change in English language teaching: Lessons from experience (pp. 75-89). British Council.
Li, D. (1998). “It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine”: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 677-703.
Maftoon, P., Yazdani Moghaddam, M., Golebostan, H., & BehAfrain, S. R. (2010). Privatization of English education in Iran: A feasibility study. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 13(4), 1-12.
Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge University Press.
Murray, D. E., & Christisen, M. (2012). Understanding innovation in English language education: Contexts and issues. In C. Tribble (Ed.). Managing change in English language teaching: Lessons from experience (pp. 61-74). British Council.
Peterson, P. W. (2001). Skills and strategies for proficient listening. In M. Celce-Murica (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 87-100). Heinel & Heinel Publisher.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). Free Press.
Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross cultural approach (2nd ed.). Free Press.
Saad Orafi, S. M. (2013). Effective factors in the implementation of ELT curriculum innovations. Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ), 1(5), 14-21.
Safari, P., & Rashidi, N. (2015a). Teacher education beyond transmission: Challenges, concerns, and opportunities for Iranian EFL teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 187-203. http://www.iier.org.au/iier25/safari.html
Safari, P., & Rashidi, N. (2015b). A critical look at the EFL education and the challenges faced by Iranian teachers in the educational system. International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(2), 14-28.
Safari, P., & Sahragard, R. (2015). Iranian EFL teachers' challenges with the new ELT program after the reform: From dream to reality. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 18(4), 65-88.
Sahragard, R., & Alimorad, Z. (2013). Demotivating factors affecting Iranian high school students’ English learning. In M. Cortazzi & L. Jin (Eds.), Cultures of learning (pp. 245-260). McMillan.
Salehi, H., & Amini, M. (2016). Critical analysis of a new English textbook used in Iranian junior high schools. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research,3(3), 42-54.
Shumin, K. (2002). Factors to consider: Developing adult EFL students' speaking abilities. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 204-211). Cambridge University Press.
Stoller, F. (1994). The diffusion of innovations in intensive ESL programmes. Applied Linguistics,15(30), 300-327.
Tabatabaei, O., & Pourakbari, A. A. (2012). An investigation into the problems of teaching and learning English in the Isfahan province high schools, Iran. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 102-111.
Torki, F., & Chalak, A. (2017). An evaluation of English textbooks used in Iranian high schools: Teachers’ and learners’ attitudes. RELP, 5(1), 52-60.
Vandenberghe, R. (1984). Teacher’s role in educational change. British Journal of In-Service Education, 11(1), 14-25.
Wall, D., & Horak, T. (2008). The impact of changes in the TOFEL examination on teaching and learning in central and eastern Europe: Phase 2, coping with change. ETS, TOEFL.
Waters, A. (2009). Managing innovation in English language education: State-of-the-art review. Language Teaching 42(4), 421-458.
Waters, A. (2013).Managing innovation in English language education: A research agenda. Language Teaching 47(1), 92-110. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 582 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 672 |
||