پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 932 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,652 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,494,494 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,885,842 |
بررسی ارتباط مهارت خواندن واژه‌ها و درک نحوی با درک متن در کودکان نارساخوان و طبیعی فارسی‌زبان | ||
| زبان پژوهی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 13، شماره 39، تیر 1400، صفحه 9-32 اصل مقاله (367.02 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jlr.2020.29435.1817 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| حوریه احدی* | ||
| استادیار زبان‌شناسی؛ تهران- بزرگراه کردستان- خیابان 64 غربی-پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| خواندن، بی‌گمان یکی از باارزش‌ترین مهارت‌های برجستة بشر است. برخی معتقدند توانایی واژگانی و دستوری، نقش مهمی در تواناییِ خواندنِ کودکان دارد. با توجه به متفاوت بودن زبان‌ها و شیوه‌های نگارشی آن‌ها، لازم است پژوهشی در پیوند با کودکان فارسی‌زبان نیز انجام شود. بنابراین هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی ارتباط مهارتِ خواندنِ انواعِ واژه‌ها و درکِ متن با توانایی دستوری و واژگانی کودکان نارساخوان و طبیعی است. برای انجام این پژوهشِ میدانی، 16 دانش‌آموز نارساخوان و 32 کودک همتای سنی انتخاب شدند. پس از اجرای آزمون‌های خواندن و درک نحو، بیان دستوری و درک و بیان واژگان، یافته‌های آن ثبت گردیده و با نرمافزار اس.پی.اس.اس تحلیل شد. بر مبنای یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر در همة مهارت‌های خواندن و مهارت‌های واژگانی و نحوی، تفاوت معناداری میان دو گروه کودکانِ عادی و نارساخوان وجود دارد. همچنین، یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد در هیچ‌یک از گروه‌ها میان مهارت‌های خواندن با درک ساخت‌های نحوی و بیان ساخت‌های دستوری همبستگی معناداری وجود ندارد. بررسی همبستگی میان مهارت خواندن و توانایی واژگانی نیز نشان داد در گروه نارساخوان، خرده‌آزمونِ واژه‌های تصویری با سرعت و دقت خواندن، خرده‌آزمون واژه‌های ربطی با سرعت خواندن و خرده‌آزمون واژه‌های شفاهی با دقت خواندن و درک متن، همبستگی مثبت و معناداری دارد. افزون بر این، همبستگی معناداری میان خواندن واژه‌های بی‌قاعده و واژه‌های تصویری و واژه‌های شفاهی وجود دارد اما میان خواندن ناواژه‌ها و واژه‌های تصویری، ربطی و شفاهی همبستگی معناداری وجود ندارد. بنابراین تقویتِ توانایی واژگانی کودکان نارساخوان علاوه بر بالا بردن مهارت‌هایی همچون سرعت و دقت خواندن، برای خواندن واژه‌ها به ویژه واژه‌های بی‌قاعده ضروری است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| نارساخوانی؛ کودکان فارسی‌زبان؛ خواندن؛ نحو؛ واژگان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The relationship between reading skills and syntactic and lexical abilities in dyslexic and normal Persian-speaking children | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hourieh Ahadi | ||
| Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Reading is one of the most valuable skills of the human being. This complex behavior is composed of several distinct and separable subskills. Furthermore, different theories of reading methods have been proposed and each language has a different paradigm depending on its writing system. Apparently, the most common method among these is the one-to-one correspondence between phoneme and grapheme. However, this method has some drawbacks. According to Ahri and Snowling (2004), if the sequential decoding strategy is slow and inefficient it overloads the memory leading to inaccurate pronunciation and lack of associative meaning. As a result of repeated exposure to printed words, children's knowledge of spelling patterns is expanded to facilitate its retrieval of meaning. To clarify the role of decoding in reading and reading disability, a simple model of reading is proposed. According to the Simple View (Gough & Tunmer, 1986), reading ability can result from the combination of decoding and comprehension. In this view, reading comprehension is conceptualized as the product of two interrelated -but relatively independent- cognitive processes, that are, decoding (or word recognition) and listening comprehension (or language comprehension). Both of them are necessary cognitive components, and neither alone is sufficient for successful reading comprehension. In addition to word recognition problems, many reading-disabled individuals were found to have impaired reading comprehension. Although the central role of phonological deficits in word recognition difficulties has been widely demonstrated, the role of language abilities in the reading profile of dyslexic individuals has not been fully captured. Dyslexia, also known as specific reading disability, has been defined as one of several distinct learning disabilities that reading performance is markedly below what is expected in normally achieving readers (Siegel, 1992). In some studies, the existence of lexical problems in dyslexic children has been investigated. It has been shown that the level of lexical and semantic ability of children affects their reading comprehension. For example, some have explained that the breadth and depth of children's lexical knowledge affect their ability to recognize words. Additionally, there is evidence that has consistently established a strong association between language competence and reading abilities. In particular, oral vocabulary (measured with an oral receptive/expressive measure or a word definition measure) and semantic skills (measured with a synonym judgment task) were found to be concurrent and longitudinal predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension. Further contribution of oral vocabulary and semantic skills on reading comprehension in these studies provide clear support for the position that reading comprehension involves language comprehension beyond word recognition. Likewise, there are several studies about effective factors in reading. Some believe that vocabulary and syntactic ability play an important role in children's reading ability. There is also evidence that language skills such as syntactic complexity and lexical skills in 2 and 3-years old children are important predictors of their reading accuracy and comprehension in the future. Most of the research about the factors that affect reading has been in English. Hence, because of the different clarity in the orthography of different languages (from transparent to opaque languages), it is necessary to investigate these children in different languages. The present study aims to convey the relationship between reading skills and syntactic and lexical abilities in dyslexic and normal Persian-speaking children. For conducting this research, after issuing necessary licenses, primary school children with dyslexia were identified by referring to learning disorder schools in Tehran. After evaluating and diagnosing the dyslexic children by a psychologist and a speech therapist, 16 dyslexic students were selected. The Syntax Comprehension Test, Grammar Expression Test, vocabulary subtest of TOLD 3:P, and the reading test were then performed in different sessions. The results of the tests were recorded and the data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical package. According to the results of the present study, there is a significant difference in reading skills and syntactic and lexical abilities between dyslexic and normal Persian-speaking children. The results show that there is no significant correlation between reading skills and syntactic abilities. However, regarding lexical abilities in the dyslexic group, there is a significant correlation between the picture vocabulary and speed and accuracy of reading, between relational vocabulary and speed of reading, and also between oral vocabulary and reading accuracy and text comprehension (p <0.05). Moreover, there is a significant correlation between reading irregular words and two other tasks (picture vocabulary and oral vocabulary), but there is no significant correlation between reading non-words and oral vocabulary, and picture vocabulary and relational vocabulary. Therefore, strengthening the lexical ability of dyslexic children, in addition to improving their reading skill's accuracy and fluency, is essential for reading words especially irregular words. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Dyslexia, Lexicon, Persian-Speaking Children, Reading, Syntax | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
حارث‌آبادی، فاطمه (1393). ساخت و استانداردسازی آزمون بیان دستوری در کودکان 4 تا 6 سالۀ فارسی‌زبان. رسالۀ دکتری. دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی. حسن‌زاده سعید و اصغر مینایی (1380). «انطباق و هنجاریابیِ آزمون رشد زبان برای کودکان فارسی‌زبان تهرانی». پژوهش در حیطۀ کودکان استثنایی. دورۀ 1. شمارۀ 1 . صص 3-51. شیرازی، طاهره سیما و رضا نیلی‌پور (1383). «طراحی و معیاریابی آزمون تشخیصی خواندن». توانبخشی. دورة 5. شمارة 1-2. صص 7-11. ضیاءتبار احمدی، سیده زهره، زهره آرانی کاشانی، بهروز محمدی بختیاری و محمدرضا کیهانی (1389). «بررسی توانایی شناسایی واج آغازین کلمه ها و ناکلمه ها در کودکان بهنجار پنج تا شش ساله فارسی زبان». تازه‌های علوم شناختی. دورۀ 12. شمارۀ 4. صص 25-35. محمدزاده عادل، فرامرزی سالار (1398). «اثربخشی آموزش آگاهی تکواژی از طریق بازی بر نارساخوانی افراد با ناتوانی یادگیری ویژه». زبان‌پژوهی. دورۀ 11. شمارۀ 32 . صص 7-26. محمدی، ریحانه (1393). ساخت و استانداردسازی آزمون درک نحوی در کودکان 4 تا 6 سالۀ فارسی‌زبان. رسالۀ دکتری. دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی. نجفی پازوکی، معصومه، علی درزی، مهدی دستجردی و ابوطالب سعادتی شامیر (1392). «درک نحوی، حافظۀ فعال و درک متن». علوم تربیتی و نوآوری‌های آموزشی. دورۀ 45. صص 61-84. نعمتی، پروین، زهرا سلیمانی، علی‌رضا مرادی و شهره جلائی (1387). «مقایسة برخی از ویژگی‌های زبانی کودکان نارساخوان 8 و 7 سالة فارسی زبان با کودکان طبیعی». توانبخشی نوین. دورة 2 . شمارة 3 و4. صص 40-46. نوذری رابری، مریم، حیات عامری، مجتبی منشی زاده و ارسلان گلفام (1397). «مقایسة رشد زبان گفتاری در دانش‌آموزان نارساخوان و عادی پایة اول تا سوم». پژوهش‌نامة آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان. دورۀ 7. شمارۀ 1. صص 31-52. References
Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130 (6), 858-886.
Catts, H., Adlof, S., & Ellis Weismer, S. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: a case for the simple view of reading. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research (JSLHR), 49, 278-93.
Ehri, L. C. & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental variation in word recognition. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 433-460). New York: Guilford.
Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning reading (pp. 3-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Glass A. L., & Perna J. (1986). The role of syntax in reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities,19 (9), 354-359.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7 (1), 6–10.
Haresabadi, F. (2014). Design and validation of Persian photographic grammar expression test for 4-6 years old children (PhD Dissertation). University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran [In Persian].
Hasanzadeh, S., & Minaei, A. (2001). Adaptation and standardization of language development test TOLD-P: 3 for Persian language children (Part 1). Journal of Exceptional Children, 1 (1), 35-51 [In Persian].
Köster, W., Egli, T., Ashbolt, N., Botzenhart, K., Burlion, N., Endo, T., Grimont, P., Guillot, E., Mabilat, C., Newport, L., Niemi, M., Payment, P., Prescott, A., Renaud, P., & Rust, A. (2003). Analytical methods for microbiological water quality testing. Assessing Microbial Safety of Drinking Water: Improving Approaches and Methods. 237-292.
Liu, P. D., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010). Morphological processing of Chinese compounds for a grammatical view. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(4), 605-617
Lyytinen, H., Ahonen, T., Eklund, K., Guttorm, T. K., Laakso, M.-L., Leinonen, S., Leppanen, P. H. T., Lyytinen, P., Poikkeus, A.-M., Puolakanaho, A., Richardson, U., & . Viholainen, H. (2001). Developmental pathways of children with and without familial risk for dyslexia during the first years of life. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 535–554.
Martin, F.H., Kaine, A., Kirby, M. (2006). Event-related brain potentials elicited during word recognition by adult good and poor phonological decoders. Brain and language, 96, 1-13.
Mattis, S., French, J. H. & Rapin, I. (1975). Dyslexia in children and young adults: three independent neuropsychological syndromes. Developmental Medicine and child Neurology, 17, 150-163
McDougall, W. (1938) Body and Mind. New York: Macmillan.
Mohamadi, R. (2015). Development and standardization of a syntax comprehension test for Persian 4-6-year-old children (PhD Dissertation). University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran [In Persian].
Mohamadzade, A., & Faramarzi, S. (2019). The effectiveness of morphological awareness training with play on dyslexia in students with specific learning disability. Zabanpazhuhi, 11 (32), 7-26 [In Persian].
Najafi Pazuki, M. Darzi, A., Dasjerdi, M., Saadati, Shamir, A. (2013). Syntactic awareness, working memory & reading comprehension, educational. Innovation, 12 (45), 61-83 [In Persian].
Nemati P., Soleymani Z., Moradi AR., & Jalaei, Sh. (2008 & 2009). Comparison of some language characteristics between dyslexic children aged 7 & 8 years old and normal ones. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation, 2 (3,4), 41-46 [In Persian].
Nozari Rabari, M. Ameri, H. Monshizadeh, M., & Golfam, A. (2018). Comparing spoken language development in dyslexic and normal first to third grade students. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of other Languages, 7 (1), 31-52 [In Persian].
Oliveira, D., Silva, B., Dias, N., Seabra, A. G., & Macedo, E. C. (2014). Reading component skills in dyslexia: Word recognition, comprehension and processing speed. Frontiers in psychology. 5. 1339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01339.
Ouellette, G. (2006). What's meaning got to do it: the role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98 (3), 554-566.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 461-469.
Satz, P., Taylor, H. G., Friel, J., & Fletcher, J. M. (1978). Some developmental and predictive precursors of reading disabilities: A six-year follow-up. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (Eds.), Dyslexia: an appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 315-347). New York: Oxford University Press.
Scarborough, Hs. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Dev. 61(6),1728-43.
Seabra, A. G., & Dias, N. M. (2012). Reconhecimento de palavras e compreensão de leitura: dissociação e habilidades linguístico-mnemônicas preditoras. Revista Neuropsicología Latinoamericana. 4 (1), 43–56.
Shirazi, S., & Nilipour, R. (2004). Developing and Standardization of a Diagnostic Reading Test. Rehabilitation, 5 (1-2), 7-11 [In Persian].
Siegel, L. S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning disabilities, 25 (10), 618-629.
Torppa, M., Lyytinen, P., Erskine, J., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Language development, literacy skills, and predictive connections to reading in Finnish children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43 (4), 308-321.
Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisiplinary Journal, 19 (6), 587-625.
Xiao, X. Y., & Ho, C. S. H. (2013). Weaknesses in semantic, syntactic and oral language expression contribute to Reading Difficulties in Chinese Dyslexic Children. Dyslexia, 20 (1), 74-98.
Zebardast, M., Danaye Tous, M. (2018). The impact of word regularity on the reading of normal and aphasic Gilak-Persian adults. Caspian J Neurol Sci, 4 (1), 6-12
Ziatabar Ahmadi, S. Z., Arani Kashani, Z., Mahmoodi Bakhtiari, B., & Keyhani, M. (2010). Study of the ability of first phoneme identify of words and nonwords in normal 5-6 year-old Persian-speaking children. Advances in Cognitive Science. 12 (1),1-11[In Persian]. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 618 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 412 |
||
