پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 939 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,735 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,724,407 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,066,060 |
آموزش هنر جامعه محور: پدیدار شناسی چالشهای آموزشِ هنرِ مبتنی بر هنرهای جوامع محلی(مورد مطالعه: عروسک‌های آیینی) | ||
| مبانی نظری هنرهای تجسمی | ||
| دوره 5، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 9، شهریور 1399، صفحه 78-90 اصل مقاله (573.95 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jtpva.2020.27999.1117 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مرضیه طلایی1؛ فاطمه کاتب* 2؛ سعید شریفی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری پژوهش هنر دانشکده هنر دانشگاه الزهرا | ||
| 2رییس دانشکده هنر دانشگاه الزهرا | ||
| 3عضو هیات علمی دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،اصفهان، خوراسگان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پژوهش حاضر با هدف پدیدارشناسی چالشهای آموزش هنر مبتنی بر هنرهای جوامع محلی در حوزه عروسک های آیینی انجام گرفت. روش تحقیق به صورت کیفی از نوع اکتشافی، با رویکرد پدیدارشناسانه بود. جامعه پژوهش شامل مربیان، متخصصان و هنرمندانی بودند که از عروسک های آیینی در برنامه های آموزش هنر خود بهره بردند. روش نمونه‌گیری به صورت هدفمند متجانس صورت گرفت که با توجه به معیارهای ورود به پژوهش با 7 نفر به حد اشباع نظری داده‌ها رسید. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته بود. اعتبار اطلاعات گردآوری شده از معیار ارزیابی لینکن و گوبا(1985) و روش دنزین(1978) و پاتون(1999) تایید شد. روش تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها به شیوهای استقرایی و با استفاده از روش هفت مرحله‌ای کولایزی(1978)، انجام گرفت. یافته‌ها نشان داد، چالشهای آموزش هنر مبتنی بر هنرهای کامیونیتی در دو سطح درون و برون نهادی قابل دسته بندی است. در سطح درون نهادی، چالشهای فقدان رویکردی جامع در آموزش هنر، مهارتهای مربیگری، چالش مخاطب شناسی، تولید دیالوژیک، مهارت دانش چند فرهنگی، مهارت رهبری اجتماعی و چالشهای برون نهادی، شامل چالش اقبال اجتماعی، فروکاست منزلت هنر به لذت، فرگشت معنایی، حصر آیینی، تهدید کارکردی، چالش آمیختگی نشانه‌ها، انتظارات بین نسلی بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| پدیدار شناسی؛ آموزش هنر جامع محور؛ هنرهای کامیونیتی؛ عروسک‌های آیینی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Community-Based Art Education: Phenomenology of the Challenges of Art Education Based on Folk Art (Case Study: Ritual Dolls) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Marzieh Talaei1؛ Fatemeh Kateb2؛ Saeed Sharifi3 | ||
| 1The Art Department of the Alzahra university | ||
| 2Faculty member of college of Art, Al-Zahra University | ||
| 3Faculty member Of Management department of Islamic Azad university . Isfahan. khorasgan. Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In their changing, complicated course within the global paradigm, the approaches and attitudes towards contemporary art education have taken new directions mainly towards broader interaction between arts and communities as well as establishing meaningful, critical connection between art programs with that of the learners' daily routines. That is why the study of culture and folk traditions of local communities and integration of such traditions into educational programs tailored to the values and requirements of these communities have been taken into consideration. With a post-modernist perspective, community-based art education is one of the approaches taken to teaching and learning art in an interdisciplinary field, which perceive all types of connections between arts and communities through the elaboration of educational theories and practices. Since one of the important presuppositions of this approach is relying on the rich context of experiences, culture and art of the local/folklore communities, this study will examine the challenges of the area of Iran folklore and indigenous arts pertaining to ritual dolls and elucidate their various dimensions in a community-based art education framework. Then study has employed applied developmental research approach as well as exploratory-qualitative method with phenomenological approach. The study population consisted of educators, artists, and researchers actively involved in the field of indigenous arts, especially puppets, and engaged in art education. The sampling method used was purposeful and homogeneous which, taking into account the inclusion criteria, reached the theoretical data saturation with 9 individuals. Moreover, semi-structured interviews were used to collect data for this study. The validity of the data was confirmed by evaluative criteria of Lincoln & Guba (1985), Denzin (1978), and Patton (1999). The data was analyzed through inductive method using Collaizi's seven-step method (1978). Based on the findings, the challenges of community-based arts education were categorized into two main intra-institutional and extra-institutional levels and 18 themes. At the intra-institutional level, the challenges included the lack of a comprehensive approach to art education, coaching skills, audience analysis, dialogic production, multicultural knowledge skills, and social leadership skills. At the extra-institutional level, the challenges were the social welcome, the reduced status of art to pleasure and delight, semantic evolution, ritual confinement, functional threat, intertwining of symbols and intergenerational expectations. The results showed that the development of a community-based educational approach is considered a necessity in contemporary Iranian art education. Acknowledging the art, the culture, and the heritage of their communities and benefiting from them in their curriculums, the educators can empower learners’ cultural identity. Besides, the study outcomes indicated that the educators who, through experience, have been able to integrate folk arts such as dolls into their art education program, have experienced unintentionally the social functions of community-based arts. According to another part of the results of this study, local community-based arts should be capable of producing intellectual challenges and audience engagement as well as producing content appropriate to the audience, while this is absent in the current education process for these arts. The extra-institutional challenges section illustrates that community-based arts are not a concern for current society, and one of its important reasons is the shift in intergenerational expectations, semantic evolution, and ritual confinement, limiting the doll to the ritual field, which seems to be considered of no use in today's society. In addition, the current society has at best reduced art to a level of enjoyment and recreation; and thus, learning from arts is not much taken seriously. Community-based arts in this sense cannot be central to society. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Phenomenology, Community-Art Education, Folk Arts, Local Communities, Ritual Dolls | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- آریان‌پور، امیرحسین(1388). جامعه شناسی هنر، تهران: گستره. - ابراهیمی ناغانی، حسین(1394). «زیبایی‌شناسی هنرهای قومی ایران؛ مبتنی بر قانون آمیختگی؛ نمونه سروده های قومی(با تاکید بر بختیاری)»، ادبیات و زبان‌های محلی ایران زمین، شماره 4، 1-20. - حاج حسینی، منصوره و مهران، گلنار(1390). «ویگوتسکیوفریرهدرآموزشمبتنیبرگفتوگو»، علوم تربیتی: پژوهش نامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت، شماره 2، 21-38. - حبیبا، سعید و حبیبی، بهنام(1392). «پاس‌داشت بومیان، درآمدی بر حقوق سنتی مردم بومی»، پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، شماره 5، 9-34. - صابری، رضا(1392). طراحی الگوی برنامه درسی هنر دوره راهنمایی تحصیلی رساله دکتری، مشهد: دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی دانشگاه فردوسی. - طلایی، مرضیه(1398). آموزش هنر جامعه محور با گرایش هنرهای بومی؛ مورد مطالعه: عروسک های آیینی-نمایشی، رساله دکتری پژوهش هنر، تهران: دانشکده هنر دانشگاه الزهرا. - عظیم‌پور، پوپک(1389). فرهنگ عروسک‌ها و نمایش‌های عروسکی آیینی و سنتی ایران، تهران: نمایش. - کروبی، مهدی(1384). « بررسی نقش فولکلور(فرهنگ عامه) در توسعه گردشگری ایران»، مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، شماره 10، 53-78. - لرکیان، مرجان(1390). شناسایی و تبیین ابعاد و سطوح برنامه درسی مغفول هنر در دوره ابتدایی ایران مبتنی بر الگوی مطلوب، رساله دکتری، تهران: دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی. - لش، اسکات(1391). جامعه شناسی پست مدرنیسم، تهران: مرکز.
- Allen, P. B. (2008). Commentary on community-based art studios: Underlying principles. Art Therapy, 25(1), 11-12. - Bastos, F (2002). Making the familiar strange: A community-based art education framework. Contemporary issues in art education, 70-83. - Bastos, F. (1999). Making the familiar strange: teachers' interpretations of community art: a case study. Marilyn Zurmuehlen Working Papers in Art Education, 1999(1), 1. - Catterall, J. S., Chapleau, R., & Iwanaga, J. (1999). Involvement in the arts and human development: General involvement and intensive involvement in music and theater arts. Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning, 1, 1-18. - Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (2000). Greater Understanding of the Local Community A Community-Based Art Education Program for Rural Schools. Art Education, 53(2), 33-39. - Colaizzi, P. F. (1978) Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. Vaile & M. King (Eds.) Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology pp. 48–71) New York: Oxford University Press. - Congdon, K. G. (2004). Community art in action. Davis Publications. - Congdon, K., Blandy, D., & Bolin, P. (Eds.). (2001). Histories of community-based art education. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association - Crown, C., & Russell, C. (Eds.). (2007). Sacred and profane: Voice and vision in southern self-taught art. Univ. Press of Mississippi. - Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (2000). Greater Understanding of the Local Community A Community-Based Art Education Program for Rural Schools. Art Education, 53(2), 33-39. - Davidson, L. (2004). Phenomenology and contemporary clinical practice: Introduction to special issue. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 35(2), 149-162. - Dewey, J. Art As Experience (New York: Minton, Balch & Co., 1934). - Driskell, C. A. (2008). Critical Voices in Action: Teaching for Social Justice in Community-based Art Education. - Efland, A. D., & Neperud, R. W. (1995). Context, content and community in Art education: beyond post modernism. New York; London; Teachers College Press, Columbia University. - Felshin. Nina, (1995) “But Is It Art? The Spirit of Art as Activism” (Seattle: Bay Press, Inc., 1995). 26. Dickson, Art With People, 18. - Fisher, D. H. (1996). Public art and public space. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 79(1/2), 41-57. - Forrestel, P. (2004). Empowering youth: A framework for evaluating community-based art education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida). - Gaudelius, Y., & Speirs, P. (Eds.). (2002). Contemporary issues in art education. Pearson College Division. - Gray, S. R., & Graham, M. A. (2007). This is the right place: Community-based art education at Utah's Springville Museum of Art. Journal of Museum Education, 32(3), 301-310. - Gude, O. (2004). Postmodern principles: In search for a 21st century art education. Art Education,53(1), 6-14. - Gude, O. (2007). Principles of possibility: Considerations for a 21st-century art & culture curriculum. - Gargarella, E. (2007). Landmarks for change: A case study examining the impact of a community-based art education program on adolescents (Doctoral dissertation, University of Akron). - Heise, D. (2010). Folk art in the urban art room. Art Education, 63(5), 62-67. - Holloway, D. L., & Krensky, B. (2001). Introduction: The arts, urban education, and social change. 354-365 - Holloway, I. (1997). Basic Concepts for Qualitative Research. London: Blackwell Science. - Jennings, N., Swidler, S., Koliba, C. (2005). Place-based education in the standards-based reform era—conflict or complement? American Journal of Education, 112, 44-65. - Jung, H. (2008). The development of a community-based art education curriculum for a Korean school in the United States: A case study (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University). - Kader, T. (2000). Material culture studies and art education: Examining the cultural artifacts of the Bohra from makaan to masjid. - Kim, H. (2015). Community and art: creative education fostering resilience through art. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 193-201. - Kincheloe, J., Slattery, P, & Steinberg, S. (1999).Contextualizing teaching. Upper Saddle River, N J: Prentice Hall. - Kincheloe, J. L., Steinberg, S. R., & Chennault, R. E. (Eds.). (2000). White reign: Deploying whiteness in America. Palgrave Macmillan. - Krensky, B., & Steffen, S. L. (2009). Engaging Classrooms and Communities through Art: The Guide to Designing and Implementing Community-Based Art Education. Rowman Altamira. - Lawton, P. (2010). Hand-in hand, building community on common ground. Art Education, 63(6), 6-12. - Lowe, S. S. (2001). The art of community transformation. Education and Urban Society, 33(4), 457-471. - Lowe, S. S. (2000). Creating community: Art for community development. Journal of contemporary ethnography, 29 (3), 357-386. - Marshall, J. (2002). Exploring culture and identity through artifacts: Three art lessons derived from contemporary art practice. Contemporary issues in art education, 279-290. - Matarasso, F. (1998). Poverty & Oysters: The Social Impact of Local Arts Development in Portsmouth. Comedia. - McFee, J. K. (1995). Change and the cultural dimensions of art education. In R. Neperud (Ed.), Context, content, & community in art education: Beyond post modernism. (pp.171-191). New York: Teachers College Press. - McFee, J. K., & Degge, R. M. (1977). Art, culture, and the environment: A catalyst for teaching. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company Inc. - Morris, C. B. (1998). Paulo Freire: Community based arts education. Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 18(1), 44-58. - Nyman, A. L. (2002). Cultural content, identity, and program development: Approaches to art education for elementary educators. Contemporary issues in art education, 61-69. - Newman, T., Curtis, K., & Stephens, J. (2003). Do community‐based arts projects result in social gains? A review of the literature. Community Development Journal, 38(4), 310-322. - Nikouei, A., & Nasirabadi, M. S. (2016). Study of the Importance of Contemporary Iranian Traditional Handmade Dolls and Puppets. Wacana Seni Journal of Arts Discourse, 15. - Qadri, D. (2015). Memories in Motion: Learning, Process, History and Art in Public Space. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55(3), 379-389. - Preminger, S., 2012. Transformative art: art as means for long-term neurocognitive change. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6, p.96. - Roberts, M. Y. (1989). The importance of community-based art education programs for adults. Design for Arts in Education, 90(6), 43-48. - Stephens, P.G (2006). A real community bridge: Informing community-based learning through a model of participatory public art. Art Education, 52 (2), 40- 46. - Ulbricht, J.(2002). Learning about community art behaviors. Art Education, 55(5), 33-38. - Ulbricht, J. (2005). What is community-based art education? - Vail, J. and Hollands, R., 2013. Creative democracy and the arts: The participatory democracy of the Amber Collective. Cultural Sociology, 7(3), pp.352-367. - Wright, R. (2007). A conceptual and methodological framework for designing and evaluating community‐based after‐school art programs. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(1), 123-132. - Whiteland, S. (2016). A Story of CBAE for Future Art Educators. Canadian Review of Art Education: Research and Issues/Revue canadienne de recherches et enjeux en éducation artistique, 42(2), 18-30. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 559 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 401 |
||