Authority or Impersonality: A Mixed-Methods Study of Authorial Identity in Iranian Context

Ballantine, J., & McCourt Larres, P. (2012). Perceptions of authorial identity in academic writing among undergraduate accounting students: Implications for unintentional plagiarism. Accounting Education, 21(3), 289-306.‏

Bartholomae, D. (1986). Inventing the university. Journal of Basic Writing, 5(1), 4-23.‏

Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications. ‏

Bazerman, Ch. (2001). Distanced and refined selves: Educational tensions in writing with the power of knowledge. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic writing in context: Implications and applications (pp. 23-29). University of Birmingham Press.

Bowden, D. (1995). The rise of a metaphor: “Voice”; in composition pedagogy. Rhetoric Review, 14(1), 173-188.

Cheung, K. Y. F., Stupple, E. J., & Elander, J. (2015). Development and validation of the student attitudes and beliefs about authorship Scale: A psychometrically robust measure of authorial identity. Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 97-114.

Clark, R., & Ivanič, R. (1997). The politics of writing. Routledge.

Clavero, M. (2010). ‘Awkward wording. Rephrase’: Linguistic injustice in ecological journals. Trends in Ecology Evolution, 25, 552–553.

Dörnyei, Z. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.

Elbow, P. (1994). What do we mean when we talk about voice in texts? In K. B. Yancey (Ed.), Voices on voice: Perspectives, definitions, inquiry (pp. 1-35). National Council of Teachers of English.

Habibie, P., & Hyland, K. (2018). The risks and rewards of scholarly publishing. In P. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers (pp. 1-10)‏. Palgrave Macmillan.

Harwood, N. (2005). ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted… in this article I aim to do just that’: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(8), 1207-1231.‏

Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18(3), 349-382.‏

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow.

Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207-226.‏

Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112.

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.‏

Hyland, K. (2012). Undergraduate understandings: Stance and voice in final year reports. In K. Hyland & C. G. Sancho (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 134-150). Palgrave Macmillan.

Hyland, K. (2015). Teaching and researching writing. Routledge.‏

Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69.

Hyland, K. (2018). The essential Hyland. Bloomsbury.

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2017). ‘We Believe That…’: Changes in an academic stance marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 139-161.‏

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language, 12(1), 39-63.

Ivanič, R. (1994). I is for interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. Linguistics and Education, 6(1), 3-15.‏

Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Benjamin.

Ivanič, R., & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1), 3-33.

Jamshidi, S. (2018). Development and validation of the students’ authorial voice and identity questionnaire (SAVIQ): A multiphase study of authorial identity in the Iranian context (Unpublished master thesis). Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Jiang, F., & Hyland, K. (2015). ‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies, 17(5), 529-550.‏

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.

Maguire, M., Reynolds, A. E., & Delahunt, B. (2013). Self-efficacy in academic reading and writing, authorial identity and learning strategies in first-year students. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 1111-1127.‏

Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse: Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 35-53.

Olmos Lopez, P. (2015). A framework for analysis of authorial identity: Heterogeneity among the undergraduate dissertation chapters (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/78434.

Pittam, G., Elander, J., Lusher, J., Fox, P., & Payne, N. (2009). Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity in academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 153-170.

Riazi, A. M. (2016). The Routledge encyclopedia of research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Routledge.

Shaw, P., & Liu, E. (1998). What develops in the development of second-language writing? Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 225-54.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press.

Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 23-39.‏

Watts, J. H. (2012). Preparing doctoral candidates for the viva: Issues for students and supervisors. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(3), 371-381.