تعداد نشریات | 25 |
تعداد شمارهها | 932 |
تعداد مقالات | 7,652 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,494,668 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,886,257 |
Hidden Curriculum in Internet-Enhanced English Education: the Representation of Iranian Social Actors in BBC Learning English Program | ||
Journal of Language Horizons | ||
مقاله 2، دوره 3، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 6، مهر 2019، صفحه 29-55 اصل مقاله (1.68 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/lghor.2020.26844.1144 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Khadijeh Karimi Alavijeh* 1؛ Susan Marandi2 | ||
1Assistant Professor, English department, Literature faculty, Alzahra University | ||
2Associate Professor, English department, Literature faculty, Alzahra University | ||
چکیده | ||
Recent years have witnessed drastic enhancements in English language teaching (ELT) especially due to the Internet. Although the literature is well-documented with regard to the positive effects of Internet application in English education, the critical investigation of Internet-mediated ELT sources has rarely been dealt with. In this study, one of the four most favorite Internet-based English programs in Iran and throughout the world (Karimi Alavijeh, 2014), namely, the BBC Leaning English, was investigated in terms of the way it represented Iran. For this purpose, qualitative content analysis was used to extract the main themes of this program and an adapted version of Van Leeuwen’s (2008) Social Actor Network was utilized for the critical discourse analysis of the resulted corpus. The extracted themes, the recognized social actors, and the way different discursive mechanisms and hypertextual techniques had been used to represent them in unfavorable manners unfolded the presence of hidden agenda in a supposedly English learning program. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
hidden curriculum؛ adapted version of Van Leeuwen’s Scial Actor Network؛ Iran؛ BBC Learning English؛ Internet-enhanced English language teaching | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
برنامۀ آموزشی پنهان در آموزش اینترنت-محور زبان انگلیسی: بازنمایی کنشگران اجتماعی ایرانی در برنامۀ یادگیری زبان انگلیسی بیبیسی | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
خدیجه کریمی علویجه1؛ سیده سوسن مرندی2 | ||
1استادیار گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده ادبیات، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران | ||
2دانشیار گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده ادبیات، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
آموزش زبان انگلیسی در سالهای اخیر بهدلیل استفاده از اینترنت رشد خیرهکنندهای داشته است. هرچند ادبیات این رشته بهشکل مبسوط به تاثیرات مثبت بهکارگیری اینترنت در آموزش زبان انگلیسی پرداخته، اما بررسی انتقادی منابع اینترنت-محور آموزش زبان انگلیسی بسیار نادر بوده است. در این پژوهش، یکی از چهار برنامۀ پرطرفدار اینترنت-محور آموزش زبان انگلیسی در ایران و جهان (کریمی علویجه، 2014)، به نام یادگیری انگلیسی بیبیسی، از نظر چگونگی بازنمایی ایران مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. بهاینمنظور، برای استخراج موضوعهای اصلی این برنامه از تحلیل کیفی محتوا استفاده شد و بهکمک مدل سازگارشدۀ شبکۀ کنشگران اجتماعی ونلیوون (2008) تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی روی پیکرۀ حاصل انجام شد. این پژوهش توانست با استفاده از موضوعهای مستخرج، کنشگران اجتماعی شناساییشده، نحوۀ بهکارگیریِ ترفندهای گفتمانمدار و تکنیکهای فرامتنی، از بازنمایی نامناسب کنشگران ایرانی و وجود برنامۀ آموزشی پنهان در پسِ برنامهای که ادعای آموزش انگلیسی دارد پرده بردارد. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
برنامۀ آموزشی مخفی, مدل سازگارشدۀ شبکه کنشگران اجتماعیِ ونلیوون, ایران, برنامه یادگیریِ انگلیسی بیبیسی, آموزش زبان انگلیسی اینترنت-محور | ||
مراجع | ||
Adaskou, K., Britten, D., & Fahsi, B. (1990). Design decisions on the cultural content of a secondary English course for Morocco. ELT Journal, 44(1), 3-10.
Albu, O. E., & Etter, M. (2016). Hypertextuality and social media. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(1), 5-31.
Aliakbari, M. (2004, August). The place of culture in the Iranian ELT textbooks in high school
level. Paper presented in the 9th Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Korea.
http://www.paaljapan.org/resources/proceedings/PAAL9/pdf/Aliakbari.pdf
Anakwe, U. P., Kessler, E. H., & Christensen, E. W. (1999). Distance learning and cultural diversity: Potential users’ perspective. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 7(3), 224-244.
Anbarian, Z. (1388 [2009 A.D]). Barresi-ye rābete-ye estefāde(h) az internet va hoviyat-e farhangi-ye javānān [in English: The Relationship between youth Internet use and cultural identity] (Unpublished MA thesis). Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
Anderson, T. (2004). Toward a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 3-31). Athabasca University.
Apple, M. W. (1982). Education and power. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Asraf, R. M. (1997). The cultural implications of teaching English as a second or foreign language. Muslim Education Quarterly, 14(4), 4-19.
Bashir, I. M. E. (2011). The portrayal of local and the international cultures in the Sudanese English language syllabus (Spine). Global Journal of Human Social Science, 11(7),8-14.
Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81. http://llt.msu/edu/vol6num1/belz
Berne, S., Frisen, A., & Oskarsson, J. (2019). High school students’ suggestions for supporting younger pupils counteract cyberbullying. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(5), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12538
Bernstein, B. (1981). Codes, modalities and the process of cultural reproduction: A model. Language in Society, 10, 327-63.
Bernstein, B. (1986). On pedagogic discourse. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 205-40). Greenwood Press.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Addison Wesley Longman.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2001). Internet galaxy. Oxford University Press.
Chen, W. C., Eslami, Z. R., & Shin, J. (2011). Presentation of local and international culture in current international English-language teaching textbooks. Language, Culture and Curriculum 24(3), 253-268.
Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive Competence. System, 22(1), 17-31. http://iteslj.org/Articles/Warschauer-Internet.html
Clyde, W., & Delohery, A. (2004). Using technology in teaching. Yale University Press.
Conboy, M. (2010). The language of newspapers: Socio-historical perspectives (advances in sociolinguistics). Continuum.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evacuative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the EFL classroom. In
E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 196-219). Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
Cunningworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Heinemann.
Dendrinos, B. (2001). The pedagogic discourse of EFL and the discoursive construction of the NS’s professional value. Paper Presented in the International Conference on Non-Native Speaking Teachers in Foreign Language Teaching, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain. http://www.davidrobertson.info/uploads/1/0/3/6/10363557/nonnativspeaker_ teachers_ and_ english_as_an_international_language_llurda.pdf
Ducate, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 9-28.
New York.
Ehrensal, K. N. (2001). Training capitalism foot soldiers: The hidden curriculum of undergraduate. In E. Margolis (Ed.), The hidden curriculum in higher education (pp. 97-113).Routledge.
Eisner, E. W. (1985). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. Macmillan Publishing Co.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Text analysis for social research. Routledge.
Farshadnia, S. (2010). Culture in online communication: Netiquette applications and implementations in the TEFL community (Unpublished MA thesis). Alzahra University, Iran.
Fayyazi, M. (2007). The effects of using weblogs in writing classes on Iranian EFL university students’ writing proficiency (Unpublished MA thesis). Alzahra University, Iran.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). Pantheon.
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. Routledge.
Frank, J., Toland, J., & Schenk. K. (2004). The effect of culture on email use: Implications for distance learning. In C. Howard, K. Schenk & R. Discenza. Distance learning and university effectiveness: Changing educational paradigms for online learning (pp. 213-233). Information Science Publishing.
Freire, P. (1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Penguin.
Freire, P. (1982). Education for critical consciousness. Continuum.
Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope. Continuum.
Freire, A. M. A. (2007). Daring to dream: Toward the pedagogy of the unfinished. Paradigm.
Giroux, H. (1981). Ideology, culture, and the process of schooling. Falmer Press.
Gray, J. (2000). The ELT coursebooks as cultural artefact: How teachers censor and adapt. ELT
Journal 54(3),274-283.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985) An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3d ed.). Arnold.
Heiman, J. D. (1994). Western culture in EFL language instruction. TESOL Journal, 3(3), 4-7.
Holme, R. (2003). Carrying a baby in the back: Teaching with an awareness of the cultural construction of language. In M. Byram & P. Grundy (Eds.), Context and culture in language teaching and learning (pp. 18-31). Multilingual Matters.
Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Jordan, G. (2013). Cultural communication in the global age. Routledge.
Kakavand, N. (2009). Critical discourse analysis of New Interchange Series (Unpublished master’s thesis). Allame Tabatabaei University, Iran.
Karimi Alavijeh, Kh. (2014). The promotion of electronic colonialism in Internet-mediated English education: The representation of Iran in four English educational websites (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
Karimi Alavijeh, Kh., & Abdollahi, A. (2018, February). Digital citizenship norm awareness and practices among Iranian EFL teachers. Paper presented at the first national conference on the New Trends in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Golestan University, Iran.
Karimi Alavijeh, Kh., & Marandi, S. S. (2014). The representation of Iran in English central educational website: unfolding the hidden curriculum. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 119-146.
Karimi Alavijeh, Kh., & Marandi, S. S. (2019). VoA English for Persian learners from the perspective of Persian speakers: A critical analysis. Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies (WSPS), 3(1), 109-159
Kasaian, S. A., & Subbakrishna, R. (2011). Iranian parents’ resistance to incompatible aspects of Western culture: Implications for ELT material development. ELT Journal 4(1), 230-239.
Kazemi, S. A., Asadi Aidinlou, N., & Davatgari Asl, H. (2017). Manifestations of globalization and linguistic imperialism in English language teaching and materials preparation: Ideology in the international ELT textbooks. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 5(2), 223-246.
Kilickaya, F. (2004). Guidelines to evaluate cultural contents in textbooks. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(12),38-48. http://www.metu.edu.tr/~kilickay
Kilroy, R. J. (2008). Threats to homeland security: An all-hazards approach. John Wiley and Sons.
Kim, K. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of online collaboration. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(1). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue1/kimandbonk.html
Kim, I., & Kuljis, J. (2010). Applying content analysis to web-based content. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 18(4), 369-375.
Kiss, T., & Weninger, C. (2013). A semiotic exploration of cultural potential in EFL textbooks. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research 9(1), 19-28. http://www.melta.org.my/majer/vol9(1)/majer%20kiss%20weninger.pdf
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2018). Humanism in an age of globalism: Rethinking English language teaching. Paper presented at TATE’s 6th International Conference, Hammamet, Tunisia.
Lamy, M. N., & Hampel, R. (2007). Online communication in language learning and teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lamy, M. N., & Pegrum, M. (2012). Commentary for special issue of LLT [Theme: Hegemonies in CALL]. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 111-112. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2012/commentary.pdf
Lee, K. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The
Internet TESL Journal 6(12). http://iteslj.org/Articles/LeeCALLbarriers.html
Lee, L. (2008). Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert-to-novice online interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 53-72. http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num3/lee.pdf
Levy, M. (1997). Reading and writing linear and nonlinear texts: A comparison of technologies.
On-CALL Journal, 11(1), 39-46.
Le’vy, P. (2001). Cyberculture. In K. St. Amant, Linguistic and cultural online communication
issues in the global age. Information Science Reference.
Liaw, M. (2006). E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 49-64.
Marandi, S. S. (2017). Virtual walls and bans: E-learning/CALL hegemonies in the Iranian context. In J. Colpaert, A. Aerts, R. Kern & M. Kaiser (Eds.), CALL in context-Proceedings of the XVIIIth International CALL Conference (pp. 488-495). UC Berkeley, California.
Marandi, S. S., Karimi Alavijeh, Kh., & Nami, F. (2015). Layers of CALL hegemonies: An Iranian experience. In F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda & S. Thouseny (Eds), Critical CALL-Proceedings of the 2015 EURPCALL Conference, Padua, Italy (pp. 386-391). Research-Publishing.net. http//dx.doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000363
Margolis, E. (2001). The hidden curriculum in higher education. Routledge
Martin, J. (1983). What should we do with a hidden curriculum when we find one? In H. Giroux & D. Purpel (Eds.), The hidden curriculum and moral education (pp. 122-139). McCutchan.
McKay, S. L. (2003). Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Re-examining common ELT assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1- 22.
McPhail, T. L. (1987). Electronic colonialism: The future of international broadcasting and communication (rev. 2nd ed.). Sage.
McPhail, T. L. (2006). Global communication: Theories, stakeholders, and trends (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Minjeong, K., & Dongyeon, C. (2018). Development of youth digital citizenship scale and implication for educational setting. Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 155-171. Naji, M. E., & Pishghadam, R. (2012). Analysis of English language textbooks in the light of English as an International Language (EIL): A comparative study. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(2), 83-96.
Nami, F., & Marandi, S. (2013). Wikis as discussion forums: Exploring students’ contribution and their attention to form. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.770036
Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. Longman.
Pennycook, A. (2007a). ELT and colonialism. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 13-24). Springer.
Pennycook, A. (2007b). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. Routledge.
Pennycook, A., & Coutand-Marin, S. (2005). Teaching English as a missionary language (TEML). http://associates.iatefl.org/pages/materials/gi4.pdf
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. Routledge.
Poursadouqi, S. (2012). A case study of the hidden curriculum of prevalent commercial ELT coursebooks in Dezful following the imposed war (Unpblished master’s thesis). Alzahra University, Iran.
Pratt, Y. P., Louie, D. W., Hanson, A. J., & Ottmann, J. (2016). Indigenous education and decolonisation. In L. Jackson (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of globalization and education (pp. 1-31). Oxford University Press.
Progler, J. Y. (2011). Imperialism in education: Observation on curriculum, institutional structure, and the use of textbooks. In S. Ghahremani Ghajar & S. A. Mirhosseini (Eds.), Confronting academic knowledge (pp. 87-104).Iran University Press.
Rahimi, M., & Yadollahi, S. (2009). نگرش مدرسان زبان به ترویج فرهنگ مصرفی غرب در کتب آموزش زبان انگلیسی[English teachers’ views on the promotion of the Western consumerism culture by English coursebooks]. Faslname-ye Farhangi Defaee-ye Khanevadeh, 5(15), 85-112.
Reeder, K., Macfadyen, L., Roche, J., & Chase, M. (2004). Negotiating cultures in cyberspace: Participation problems and patterns. Language learning & Technology, 8(2), 133-152.
Rezaeifard, F., & Chalak, A. (2017). The impact of linguistic and cultural imperialism on Iranian ELT context: Attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(6), 124-135.
Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful Web tools for classrooms. Corwin Press.
Roever, C. (2007). Web-based language testing. Language Learning & Technology, 5(2), 84-94.
Sadeghy, A. R. (2008, April). تهاجم فرهنگی از طریق کتاب های آموزش زبان انگلیسی در ایران [Cultural assault through English course books in Iran]. Paper presented at the National Conference on Progress and Development in Art and Culture. University of Tehran, Iran.
Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Shoeibi, M. (2016). Iran-Britain relations in time tunnel. https://parstoday.com /fa/iran-i11095
Spring, H. J. (2009). Globalization of education: An introduction. Routledge.
Tafani, V. (2009). Teaching English through mass media. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 2(1), 81-96. http://dppd.ubbcluj.ro/adn/article_2_1_9.pdf
Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors in discourse. In C. R. Caldas Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Text and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32-70). Routledge.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.
Walko, Z. (2009). Recontextualizing classroom experience in undergraduate writing: An exploration using case study and linguistic analysis. In A. Carter, T. Lillis & S. Parkin (Eds.), Why writing matters: Issues of access and identity in writing research and pedagogy (pp. 209-230). John Benjamins.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7-26. http://iteslj.org/Articles/Warschauer-Internet.html in November 12
Weber, V., & Abel, A. (2003). Preparing language exams: An online learning system with dictionary and email tandem. ReCALL, 15(2), 169-176.
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyers (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121-145). Sage.
Wolf, C. R. (2001). Learning and teaching on the World Wide Web (educational psychology Series). Academic Press.
Yang, S. (2010). Internet: New shot in the arm for US hegemony. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-01/22/content_9364327.htm | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 658 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 623 |