تعداد نشریات | 25 |
تعداد شمارهها | 932 |
تعداد مقالات | 7,653 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,495,012 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,886,448 |
باززایی ریشه های خشونت در آلمان پس از جنگ جهانی دوم با تکیه بر آراء اسلاوی ژیژک مطالعه موردی (آنسلم کیفر_ گئورگ بازلیتس) | ||
مبانی نظری هنرهای تجسمی | ||
مقاله 7، دوره 4، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 8، اسفند 1398، صفحه 85-102 اصل مقاله (734.41 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jtpva.2020.25946.1080 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
میترا بهرامپور1؛ محمدرضا شریف زاده* 2 | ||
1پژوهش هنر_دانشکده هنر_دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی_تواحد تهران مرکز | ||
2دانشیار گروه پژوهش هنر دانشکده هنر دانشگاه آزاد واحد تهران مرکز | ||
چکیده | ||
خشونت تسری شده از جنگ در یک جامعه و عواقب آن در یک برهه زمانی خاص تمام نمی شود و در ادوار مختلف، باقی میماند. تحقیرها و سرخوردگیهای ناشی از جنگ توسط هنرمند تا مدتها پس از آن، به صورتهای مختلف در آثار هنری نمود پیدا می کند. این پژوهش، قصد دارد تا به بررسی تاثیرات جنگ بر آثار هنرمندانی بپردازد که تحت تاثیر دوره پرتلاطم بعد از جنگ، آثار خویش را خلق کرده اند و در پی آن است که نشان دهد، چگونه مفاهیم ناشی از سرکوب، همچون خشونت در آثار هنری نمود می یابد؟ با بررسی فرم و محتوای آثار هنرمندانی که تنها با ویرانه های پس از جنگ روبهرو بوده اند، به این پرسش می پردازد که شرایط اجتماعی و سیاسی، چگونه می تواند بر آثار هنرمندان آن عصر و بعد از آن، تاثیر بگذارد؟ همچنین، بازنمایی خشونت و فقدان هویت در آثار این هنرمندان تا چه میزان موفق عمل کرده است؟ روش پژوهش در این مقاله، توصیفی-تحلیلی است و با استفاده از منابع کتابخانه ای صورت پذیرفته است. چند نمونه از آثار هنرمندان معاصر آلمانآنسلم کیفر- گئورگ بازلیتس، و نوع ارتباط آن با دیدگاه ژیژک در باب خشونت را -که خشونت پنهان را موثرتر از خشونت آشکار می داند- از لحاظ فرم و معنا و مفهوم مورد کنکاش قرار می دهد. این پژوهش نشان می دهد، اثر هنری با وجود اینکه همیشه در طول تاریخ هنر، زیبا تلقی شده، برای بازنمایی زشتی ها و نابرابری ها، عقیم مانده است. زیرا اثر هنری از سوی مخاطب زیبا تلقی شده و این برای هنرمند معترض به شرایط اجتماعی، نوعی شکست محسوب می شود. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
خشونت؛ جنگ؛ اسلاوی ژیژک؛ آنسلم کیفر؛ گئورگ بازلیتس | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Reproducing Roots of Violence in the Post-World War II Germany Based on Slavoj Žižek’s Viewpoints (Case Study: Anselm Kiefer-Georg Baselitz) | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Mitra Bahrampour1؛ Mohammadreza Sharifzade2 | ||
1Art,Islamic Azad University,Tehran,Iran | ||
2Associate Professor of Art research, Faculty of Art, Islamic Azad University Centeral Tehran Branch | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Wars leave indisputable adverse effects on social conditions. Upon the abatement of social traumas left from the World War II, Germany, that had suffered a lot during this time, encountered the question of defining the future. In the meantime, struggling to duplicate the developmental values of the capitalist system and particularly the American consumerism, the country endeavored to present a fresh look. However, the fierce actions resulting from the unstable conditions arising from the world powers’ clash was not only still prevalent, but each day, such condition was emerging in a new form in another part of the world. The development-based values of the Western society were spreading alongside the war ruins. The cold war was the official manifestation of the violence rooted in the ideological confrontations of the World War II. The ferocity of war and its aftermath in a society does not end at a specific time but runs through the history. For a long time, artists keep reflecting the terrors, humiliations and frustrations caused by wars in diverse forms of art. Postwar events and developments left a profound impact on the world of art. Post-World War and frustrations, Cold War challenges and concerns, economic crises, etc. comprised some of the major external elements that made the world of art no longer tolerate conceptual and minimal expression and agree or oppose to the politics of its time. Even the humiliations and frustrations of war was manifest in various forms of art for a long time. Just like others, the artists were witness to the cruelties of their time and suffered although they were not soldiers. In such circumstances, creation of artworks was a reaction to such events in the artists’ style. Anselm Kiefer and Georg Baselitz are among those artists each of whom have responded to the life events in their own specific way. In Germany, many artworks were created to portray the aftermaths of war in a new style influenced by expressionism. Such style is referred to as ‘neo-expressionism’. Employing descriptive-analytical method of research conducted through the desk study of library resources, the study at hand surveys the effects of war on the works of artists who created their artworks under the influence of the turbulent postwar period. Moreover, it seeks to illustrate how the consequences of suppression, such as violence, are portrayed in works of art. Through examining the form and content of the works of artists who have only seen the postwar ruins, the paper analyzes how social and political conditions can affect the works of artists of one specific era and beyond. Keywords such as violence, necessity, deficiency, etc. used to analyze artworks are generalizations that can be derived from an author's point of view in artworks. Hence, no criticism is absolute and artworks require repeated surveys and reviews in the framework of social, cultural, political and artistic developments. Evolution in the world of art world calls us to review the art of the past eons. This study seeks to take a closer look at the works of the two German artists using Žižek’s commentary on violence. The main purpose of this paper is to examine the hidden origins and aspects of violence in the works of postwar German artists based on Žižek’s viewpoints. In fact, the research mainly aims to address this question that how a human being suppressed by and humiliated in war, engages in the world of art. Artworks are ever involved in politics and social affairs whether consciously or unconsciously, explicitly or implicitly. Apparently, this is not a new or even a contemporary phenomenon. If politics is considered a matter of power or relevance, every work of art, even the most conceptual one, is linked to its own contemporary politics and is its product. Wars do not necessarily commence and conclude at a certain point of time; contrariwise, they engage with the cultures and societies for successive periods. Reflection of personal human experiences such as pain, grief, rage, and the like, for which there is no external equivalent, constantly make the contemporary artist face this question that whether such experiences can be demonstrated as art objects. The outcomes of this paper indicate that art is an effective and influential tool that communicates directly or indirectly with human thought and worldview as well as the society conditions. It is within the developments of the society that art currents are shaped and it is in the same ambience that they find meaning. But since the work of art has ever been considered beautiful throughout the history of art, it has been unable to portray ugliness and inequality, because for the audience, a work of art is beautiful and this accounts for a kind of failure for an artist who protests against social conditions.The ferocity of war and its aftermath in a society does not end at a specific time butruns through the history. Postwar events and developments left a profound impact on the world of art. Post-World War terrors and frustrations, Cold War challenges and concerns, economic crises, etc.comprised some of the major external elements that made the world ofart no longer tolerate conceptual and minimal expression and agree or oppose to the politics of its time. Even the humiliations and frustrations of war was manifest in various forms of art fora long time. Just like others, the artists were witness to the cruelties of their time and sufferedalthough they were not soldiers. In such circumstances, creation of artworks was a reaction to such events in the artists’ style. Anselm Kiefer and Georg Baselitz are among those artists each of who have responded to the life events in their own specific way. In Germany,many artworks were created toportray the aftermaths of war ina new style influenced by expressionism. Such style is referred to as ‘neo-expressionism’. Employing descriptive-analytical method of research conducted through the desk study of library resources, the study at hand surveys the effects of war on the works of artists who created their artworksunder the influence of the turbulent postwar period. Moreover, it seeks to illustrate how the consequences ofsuppression, such as violence, are portrayed in works of art. Through examining the form and content of the works of artists who have only seen the postwar ruins, the paper analyzes how social and political conditions can affect the works of artists of that era and beyond. The research method in this paper is descriptive-analytical and it is done using library resources. This study seeks to take a closer look at the works of the two German artists using Žižek’s commentary on violence. The main purpose of this paper is to examine the hidden origins and aspects of violence in the works ofpostwar German artists basedon Žižek’s viewpoints. In fact, the research mainly aims to address this question that how a human being suppressed and humiliated in war, engages in the world of art. Artworks are ever involved in politics and social affairs whether consciously or unconsciously, explicitly or implicitly. Apparently, this is not a new or even a contemporary phenomenon. If politics is considered a matter of power or relevance, every work of art, even the most conceptual one, is linked to its own contemporary politics and is its product. Wars do not necessarily commenceand conclude at a certain point of time; contrariwise,they engage with the cultures and societiesfor successive periods. Reflection of personal human experiences such as pain, grief, rage, and the like, which we do not have an external equal, constantly makes the contemporary artist face this question that whether such experiences can be demonstrated as art objects. Keywords such as violence, necessity, deficiency, etc. used to analyze artworks are generalizations that can be derived from an author's point of view in artworks. Hence, no criticism is absolute and artworks require repeated surveys and reviews in the framework of social, cultural, political and artistic developments. Evolution in the world of art world calls us to review the art of the past eons. The outcomes of this paper indicate that art is an effective and influential tool that communicates directly or indirectly with human thought and worldview as well as the society conditions. It is within the developments of the society that art currents are shaped and it is in the same ambience that they find meaning. But since the work of art has everbeen considered beautiful throughout the history of art, it has been unable to portray ugliness and inequality, because for the audience, a work of art is beautiful and this accounts for a kind of failure for an artist who protests against social conditions. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Violence, War, Germany, Slavoj Žižek, Anselm Kiefer, Georg Baselitz | ||
مراجع | ||
- آرچر، مایکل(1392). هنر بعد از 1960، کتایون یوسفی، تهران: حرفه هنرمند. - آگامبن، جورجو(1396). باقی ماندههای آشویتس: شاهد و بایگانی، مجتبی گل محمدی، تهران: بیدگل - استالابراس، جولیان(1397). هنر معاصر پس از جنگ سرد، بهرنگ پور حسینی، چ. دوم، تهران: چشمه. - امیرخانلو، محمد مهدی(1397). «گئورگ بازلیتس: مانیفست اولِ آشوب و بلوا، نسخه دوم»، گاهنامه واریته، شماره 001، 90-91. - الله دادی، نفیسه و توانا، محمد علی(1396). «خشونت در وضع طبیعی هابز: بازنمایی انواع خشونت در لویاتان»، پژوهشنامه علوم سیاسی، شماره 3، 7-32. - بقراطی، فائقه(1383). قهرمانهای روحی آسمان، حرفه هنرمند، شماره 8، 92-99. - بکولا، ساندرو(1393). هنر مدرنیسم، پاکباز و دیگران. چ. پنجم، تهران: فرهنگ معاصر. -پاکباز، رویین(1385). دایرهالمعارف هنر، چ. پنجم، تهران: فرهنگ معاصر. -توتونچیان، مهدیه(1394). «دیالکتیک منفی در مکتب فرانکفورت با تکیه بر آرا آدرنو و بررسی تحلیلی آثار بازلیتس و کیفر»، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، تهران: دانشگاه الزهرا. -حسینزاده، سحر(1393). «هنر ژرمن و شوینیسم مترقی؛ به بهانه مروری بر آثار بازلیتس در مونیخ»، تندیس، شماره 283، 6-7. -دانتو، آرتور(1383). «آنزلم کیفر»، ترجمه روبرت صفاریان، حرفه هنرمند، شماره 8، 106-109. -دل زنده،کیانوش(1392). «خشونت در نظرگاه انتفادی اسلاوی ژیژک»،فلسفه نو. -دنچف، الکس(1395). درباب هنر و جنگ و ترور، سپیده اقتداری، تهران: حرفه هنرمند. -ژیژک، اسلاوی(1389).خشونت(پنج نگاه زیر چشمی)، علی رضا پاکنهاد، تهران: نی. - ژیژک، اسلاوی(1396). کژ نگریستن، صالح نجفی و مازیار اسلامی، تهران: نی. -سلانت، ژرمانو(1383). تقدیر هنر، ترجمه مازیار اسلامی، حرفه هنرمند، شماره 8، 100-105. -سلیمانی، فاطمه(1389). بررسی جایگاه و نقش آنسلم کیفر در هنر معاصر، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، تهران: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران مرکزی. -سلیمانی رافع، اکرم(1391). بررسی خشونت در نقاشیهای اکسپرسیونیسم نیمه اول قرن بیست،پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، تهران: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران مرکزی. -شریف زارع، مهدی(1393). مقایسه تحلیلی تاثیرات جنگ در آثار نقاشی اروپا(با نگاهی به آثار فرانسیسکو گویا، پابلو پیکاسو، آلبرتو بوری، آنسلم کیفر)، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، تهران: دانشگاه هنر تهران. - فرایا، هلن(1391). خشونت (درتاریخ اندیشه فلسفی)، عباس باقری، چ. دوم، تهران: فرزان. - قره باغی، علی اصغر(1379). «گئورگ بازلیتس: نقاشی نو _فیگوراتیو»، گلستانه 18و17، 52-57. -گلستانه، علی(1392). احضار شعلههای گذشته: نگاهی به نقاشی مارگارت اثر آنسلم کیفر، گلستانه، شماره 127، 24-28. - لینتن، نوربرت(1395). هنر مدرن، علی رامین، چ. ششم، تهران: نی. -مهرگان، امید(1389). تاریخ به مثابه شوک(شرحی بر عبارتی از والتر بنیامین)، تهران: گام نو. - مُوللّی، کرامت الله(1398). مبانی نظری روانکاوی فروید-لکان، تهران: نی. -نورث، داگلاس؛ والیس، جانجوزف و وینگاست، باری آر.(1395). خشونت و نظمهای اجتماعی(چهارچوب مفهومی برای تفسیر تاریخ ثبت شده بشر)، جعفر خیرخواهان و رضا مجیدزاده، چ. دوم، تهران: روزنه. -وولشلارگر، جکی(1393). «آنسلم کیفر درباره کارنمای خود در آکادمی سلطنتی میگوید»، شکوفه غفاری و علی گلستانه، تندیس، شماره 291، 34-35. - Anselm Kiefer,Mark Rosenthal. October1988,The Museum of Modern Art
-Christian Weikop, "Occupation /Heroic Symbols", in Christian Weikop Publication (ed), In Focus: Heroic Symobds 1969 Anselm Kiefer, Tate Research Publication, 2016,https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/ in focus/heroic-symbols- anselm-kiefer/occupations-heroic-symbols. accessed 30 April 2019. P1 of 24.
- George Baselitz at eighty, Chrstian Welkop,Gagosian,Sep 2018, The Burlington Magazine. 766-771
- Wilmes, U. (ed). (2014). Georg Baselitz: Back Then, In Between, and today. Munich: Prestel.
URLs: URL1. https://www.academia.edu/27471876/Anselm_Kiefers_Ways_of_Worldly_Wisdom_ 1980_as_Object_of_Memory-work
URL2. http://www.artsy.net/artwork/georg-baselitz-with-red-flag
URL3.http://www.artuk.org/discover/artworks/urd-werdande-skuld-the-norns-117775
URL4.http://www.baselitz.staedelmuseum.de/en
URL5.http://www.georgetowner.com/articles/2018/07/25/georg-baselitz-hirshhorn/
URL6.http://www.herfeh-honarmand.com/blog/%D9%8
URL7.http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/great-works/great-works-the-big-night-down-the- http://drain-1962-3-250-x-180cm-georg-baselitz-2183838.html?_gsa=1
URL8.http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/baselitz-untitled-t06729
URL9.http://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/in-focus/heroic-symbols-anselm-kiefer/artist-books | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 532 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 734 |