پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 938 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,713 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,656,794 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,013,717 |
بررسی روند استفاده از روش های تحقیق در رشته ی زبانشناسی کاربردی در مقالات تحقیقاتی چاپ شده بین سال های 1986 تا 2015 | ||
| زبان پژوهی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 12، شماره 36، آذر 1399، صفحه 87-109 اصل مقاله (807.67 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jlr.2019.24347.1651 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| خلیل تازیک* 1؛ رضا خانی2؛ محمد علی اکبری3 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده پزشکى، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز، اهواز، ایران | ||
| 2دکترای تخصصی آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشیار گروه زبان انگلیسی، هیأت علمی دانشگاه ایلام | ||
| 3دکترای تخصصی آموزش زبان انگلیسی، استادِ گروه زبان انگلیسی، هیأت علمی دانشگاه ایلام | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پژوهش حاضر، بر آن است تا روندهای استفاده از روشهای پژوهش در مقالههای زبانشناسی کاربردی را در سه دهة اخیر (1986 تا 2015) مورد بررسی قرار دهد. به این منظور، 7525 مقالة مستخرج از 10 مجلة رشتة زبانشناسی کاربردی گردآوری شدند. این مقالهها، به وسیلة نگارندگان و چهار دانشجوی دکتریِ آموزشِ زبان انگلیسیِ دانشگاههای ایران، مورد تحلیل و بررسی قرار گرفتند. دادههای بهدستآمده نشان داد که پژوهشهای تجربی با فراوانی 6263 (%23. 83)، بیشتر از پژوهشهای غیرِ تجربی با فراوانی 1262 (%16.77)، مورد استفاده قرار گرفتند. همچنین، یافتهها نشان داد که مابین سالهای 1986 تا 1995، پژوهشهای غیرتجربی با 73% .40، سهم قابلِ توجهی را به خود اختصاص داده بودند. هر چند، این روند در دهههای بعدی کاهش چشمگیری داشت. در بین سالهای 1996 تا 2005، پژوهشهای کمّی بیشترین درصد استفاده را در میان پژوهشگران داشتند (%23 .64). این در حالی است که در دهة اخیر (2006-2015) مطالعات کیفی با %75 .41، روند افزایشی داشتند. به نظر میرسد رشدِ پژوهشهای کیفی که از میانة دهة 90 شروع شده بود، در سالهای اخیر به بالاترین میزان خود رسیدهاست. پژوهشگران و آموزشدهندگان حوزة زبانشناسی کاربردی باید نسبت به این تغییر رویهها آگاه باشند. آنها باید پیش از بهرهگیری از روشهای مورد اشاره، به مفاهیم پایهای روشها، نقاط ضعف و قوت آنها به همراه محبوبیتشان در بین صاحبنظران رشته، توجه کنند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| زبانشناسی کاربردی؛ روشهای تجربی؛ روشهای غیرتجربی؛ تحقیق کمی؛ تحقیق کیفی؛ تحقیق ترکیبی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Trends of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics Research Articles between 1986 and 2015 | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| khalil Tazik1؛ Reza Khani2؛ Mohammad Aliakbari3 | ||
| 1Department of English, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| 2PhD in English Language Teaching, Associate Professor, Department of English, Faculty of Ilam University | ||
| 3Doctor of English Language Teaching, Professor of English Language Department, Faculty of Ilam University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| As regards the definitions and viewpoints toward the field of Applied Linguistics, one might conclude that diversity of definitions mean diversity of research trends and methodologies of research. Pica (2005) believes that such an implication is natural. Research on different issues of the field has expanded over the years and this expansion has attracted a good deal of attention among researchers. Additionally, Applied Linguistics as an interdisciplinary field of study is associated with different disciplines. This multi-disciplinary nature creates a context for the use of different research methods. The appearance of new methods and even the old ones were not considered comprehensively in the current research methodology books (Duff, 2002). Though research methodology has been the subject of many books and research papers, Duff (2002) believes that no textbook has ever provided a comprehensive list of qualitative and quantitative research methods. In addition, the emergence of mixed-methods, action research, and content analysis research approaches have further complicated the matter. It can also be added that no comprehensive report has ever specified to the actual practice of research methods in Applied Linguistics. Therefore, the second aim of this study is to categorize the existing research methods used in Applied Linguistics research articles (RAs). This study aims at investigating trends of research methods in Applied Linguistics research articles in recent three decades (1986 to 2015). To do so, a corpus of 7525 articles published in 10 applied linguistics journals were collected and analyzed by the current writers and four Ph.D. students. In this study, the focus was on the journals and published RAs since (1) they are widely accessible through personal or university library subscription (2) they are academically rigor papers peer-reviewed by referees (3) they cover a range of topics currently practiced in the field and (4) they reflect the research interest of wide range of researchers. The final journals selected for analysis were 10 journals of Modern Language Journal, Language Learning, System, Foreign Language Annals, Applied Linguistics, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, TESOL Quarterly, Language Testing, Applied Psycholinguistics, and Language Teaching Journal. The list was in common with the top-most Applied Linguistics journals by Egbert (2007) and Phakiti (2014). The selected papers picked up from ten journals discussed above. Review articles, comments, and RAs written in languages other than English such as French and German were excluded from the analysis. To have a manageable analysis, the research methods were divided into two broad categories: empirical and non-empirical. Empirical methods included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research and non-empirical included theory and implication, pedagogical operation, and personal views and perspectives. Results of the analysis indicated that the empirical studies (83.23%) were dominant over the years. It was also shown that non-empirical studies accounted for 40.73% of the papers published in 1986-1995. However, during 1996 to 2005 quantitative research was the dominant method (64.23%). In the recent decade (2006-2015), qualitative research has received much attention and increased to be used in 41.75% of the papers. Review of Applied Linguistics RAs shows that outstanding tendencies and changes in research methods were observed over that past thirty years. At first (during 1986-1995), researchers tended to use non-empirical studies for investigating research problems in Applied Linguistics. They tried to present pedagogical issues, theoretical discussions, and personal views in designs other than empirical ones which established on stronger and more acceptable theoretical bases. However, this trend subjected to remarkable changes and, along with awareness rise in research methodology among researchers, empirical studies dominated the field. The dominance of quantitative methods continued in the following decade (1996-2005). During these years, about 64.23% of RAs conducted according to the quantitative designs which showed an outstanding increase in their applications among researches. As a matter of fact, researchers assumed that quantitative methods more closely examine language learning and teaching problems. In this regard, non-experimental studies were remarkably attracted researchers' attention. In the recent decade of analysis, qualitative methods were found to be dominant in Applied Linguistic studies. These methods accounted for 41.75% of all the RAs published between 2006 and 2015, indicating a significant increase in their use. Quantitative studies, on the contrary, from 64.23% during 1996-2005 decreased to 40.21% during 2006-2015. The abundance of mixed-methods studies in this decade was also observed to be remarkable. This popularity and extension is in line with the emergence of social variables in language studies and paradigm shift towards more critical and constructivist viewpoints. It is discussed that researchers and instructors pay special attention to these trends of research methods and take merits, demerits, and popularity of these methods into account. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Applied Linguistics, Empirical Methods, Non-Empirical Methods, Quantitative Research, Qualitative Research, Mixed-Methods Research | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
قلی فامیان، علی رضا و یعقوب نائبی (1398). «تحلیل ساختار و گفتمان بخش تقدیر پایاننامههای فارسی در دو مقطع کارشناسیارشد و دکتری». زبان پژوهی. دورة 33. شمارة 22. صص 105-127. doi: 10.22051/jlr.2018.17482.1427
References
Aliaga, M., & Gunderson, B. (2002). Interactive statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences.Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Brown, J. D. (2004), Research methods for applied linguistics: scope, characteristics, and standards. In A. Davies and C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 476-500). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Burns, A. (2005). Action research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 241-256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chapelle, C. A., & Duff, P. A. (2003). Some guidelines for conducting quantitative and qualitative research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), 157-178.
Cook, G. (2003). Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Egbert, J. (2007). Quality analysis of journals in TESOL and applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 157–171.
Gao, Y., Li, L., & Lü, J. (2001). Trends in research methods in applied linguistics: China and the West. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 1-14.
Gholi Famian, A., & Naebi, Y. (2020). The structure and discourse analysis of acknowledgments in Persian M.A. and Ph.D. dissertations. Zabanpazhouhi, 11(33), 105-127.
Henning, G. (1986). Quantitative methods in language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 701-708.
Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research,15(9), 1277-1288.
Jung, U. O. H. (2004). Paris in London revisited or the foreign language teacher’s topmost journals. System, 32,357-361.
Lazaraton, A. (2003). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in applied linguistics: whose criteria and whose research? Modern Language Journal,87,1-12.
Lazaraton, A. (2005). Quantitative research methods. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 209-224). Mahwah, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum Associates.
Mackey, A & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: methodology and design. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
Magnan, S. S. (1997). Book review: research design: qualitative and quantitative approaches. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 256-257.
Martynchev, A. (2009). On research methodology in applied linguistics in 2002-2008. (Ph.D. Dissertation), George Fox University, Newberg, USA.
Muijs, R. D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Phakiti, A. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Richards, K. (2009). Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000. Language teaching, 42(2), 147-180.
Van Lier, L. (1994). Forks and hope: pursuing understanding in deferent ways. Applied Linguistics, 15, 328-346.
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (2002). Research criteria for tenure in second language acquisition: Results from a survey of the field. Retrieved from <http://www.uic.edu/depts/sfip/news/slatenur estudy.html.> | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,368 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 532 |
||
