پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 932 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,652 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,493,189 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,884,822 |
احساسِ عاطفۀ نفرت مجازهای مفهومیِ عاطفۀ «نفرت»: تحلیلی شناختی-عصبی-زیستی | ||
| زبان پژوهی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 12، شماره 34 - شماره پیاپی 15، خرداد 1399، صفحه 7-26 اصل مقاله (554.24 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jlr.2019.20974.1560 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فاطمه کوشکی* 1؛ آزیتا افراشی2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری زبانشناسی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی | ||
| 2پژوهشکده زبانشناسی.پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| برخلاف بسیاری از انسان‌ها، عواطف و احساسات را نباید اموری ناملموس و بی‌اساس دانست. جایگاهِ اصلی آن‌ها روشن است و می‌توان آن‌ها را به سیستم‌های مشخصی در بدن و مغز مربوط کرد. هدف از این پژوهش، بررسی مجازهای مفهومیِ مفهومِ عاطفیِ نفرت از دیدگاهی شناختی-پیکره‌ای و تطبیق نتایج تحلیل داده‌های زبانی با یافته‌های عصبی-زیستی است. در این مقاله، ابتدا، تعریف «عاطفه» و تمایز آن با «احساس» از دیدگاه عصبی-زیستی ارائه گردید. سپس، با بررسی مجازهای مفهومی نفرت، معلوم شد که در زبان فارسی به روشنی، هر چهار وجه اثرات عاطفه بر انسان (جسمی، روانی، چهره‌ای و رفتاری) بیان می‌شوند. همچنین، تحلیل‌های زبانی موردِ اشاره، یافته‌های عصبی-زیست‌شناختی عواطف را تأیید کردند. در پایان، نیز یک الگوی سه مرحله‌ای در پیوند با شکل‌گیری و بروز عواطف از جمله عاطفۀ نفرت که نتیجۀ تحلیل شناختی-عصبی-زیستی پژوهش حاضر است، ارائه شد؛ نخست، وقوع رویداد خلاف؛ علتِ شکل‌گیری نفرت؛ دوم، شکل‌گیری عاطفۀ نفرت و سوم، بروز نفرت. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| "نفرت"؛ "زبانشناسی شناختی"؛ "مجاز"؛ "احساس"؛ "عاطفه" | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Feeling the emotion of Hate Conceptual Metonymies of the Emotional Concept of "Hate": Cognitive-Neuro-Biological Analysis | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fatemeh Koushki1؛ Azita Afrashi2 | ||
| 1Ph.D Student, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies | ||
| 2Linguistics Department. the Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The experience of sense is based on first, our sensory-motor experience, our emotions, and our inner relation with the world; and second, our diverse creative capacities in using sensory-motor processes to understand abstract concepts. Even the most abstract concepts, such as emotions, have a meaning that is rooted in our sensory perception and our physical experience. Our knowledge and experience are dependent on our brain, which is within our body and the body operates in the world, so that when the body ends up in a general and destructive way, we lose the power of experience (Johnson, 2007, p. 36). Over the past two decades, there has been a striking breakthrough in our knowledge of what emotions are and how emotions can help us with meaning. “Conceptual metonymies” are one group of the cognitive mechanisms of meaning making that were first introduced in the book “The Metaphors we live by” (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980). Actually, emotional effects are expressed in terms of conceptual metonymies in the language. Unlike many people, emotions and feelings should not be considered intangible or unfounded. Their main position is clear and they can be related to certain systems in the body and the brain (Damasio, 2005, p. 246). In this article, we intend to present the conceptual metonymies of the concept of hatred in contemporary Persian language in a figurative way, and in fact, we seek to reach the goal that Persian speakers feel the concept of hatred. Because feelings of emotion can be expressed through conceptual metonymy, this cognitive mechanism will be used to achieve this goal. The purpose of this research is to examine the conceptual metonymies of the emotional concept of hatred from the cognitive-corpus perspective and to adapt the results of the analysis of linguistic data with neurobiological findings. In this paper, we will present the definition of “emotion” and distinguish it from “feeling”. The conceptual metonymies of hatred showed that in Persian Language, all four aspects of the effects of affection on human beings (physical, mental, facial, and behavioral), along with the linguistic analysis, confirmed the results and neurobiological findings of the emotions. Analysis of data related to the emotional concept of hatred in Persian speakers of the fact that an emotion in addition to the stimulus that causes it (the cause of affection) has a variety of effects on human beings, and these effects are spoken language by means of a conceptually perceptual cognitive tool Expressing From the neurobiological point of view, feelings, cognition of the viscera and musculoskeletal status provide us; in other words, feelings allow us to live up to our body and provide us with a glimpse of what our skin and our flesh pass through. Because emotions are the guarantor of our survival and our ability to function in harmony with the environment and with individuals, so the foundation of the human nervous system is often composed of inherent regulating tendencies that guarantee the survival of living beings. Survival is coincident with the final analysis of the unpleasant state of the body and the achievement of coexistence, that is, balanced biological functions. For example, this internal nervous system is inherently intent on avoiding pain and looking for potential pleasure. In Kövecses’s view (1393, p. 157), conceptual metonymies is a situation in which part of a domain (concept) represents another part of the same domain and vice versa. He says that emotional metonymy can be divided into two general categories: “the cause of emotions instead of emotions” and “the effect of emotions instead of emotions”. Conceptual metonymies related to the concept of hatred fall into two broad categories: the cause of hatred instead of hate and the effects of hatred rather than hate. Of the contemporary Persian language, from a total of 96 extracted data, 39 are related to the effects of hatred that fall into subcategories and 57 are related to hatred. Finally, a three-stage model for the formation and emergence of emotions, including the hatred that was the result of cognitive-neurobiological analysis, was presented for the occurrence of the opposite event and the cause of the formation of hatred (the acts and words of the particular people who cause hate): “hateful or disgusting” attributes as the external motive that creates hatred in humans; the formation of the hatred (the effect of hatred on the face and body of hatred experincer); the appearance of hatred (showing hatred in a different way). | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Hatred, Cognitive linguistics, Metonymy, Feeling, Emotion | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
صاحبکاری، اعظم (1392). مفهوم‌سازی استعاره‌های عشق، نفرت، شادی و اندوه در نوشتار فارسی‌زبانان: رویکردی شناختی. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه پیام نور واحد تهران.شریفی مقدم، آزاده، مریم آزادی‌خواه و وجیده ابوالحسنی زاده (1398). «مقایسة استعاره های مفهومیِ غم و شادی در اشعار پروین اعتصامی». زبان‌پژوهی. دورة 11. شمارة 30. صص 179-202.کووچش، زولتن (1393) مقدمه‌ای کاربردی بر استعاره. ترجمۀ شیرین پورابراهیم. تهران: سمت. مولودی، امیرسعید، غلام‌حسین کریمی دوستان و محمود بی‌جن‌خان (1395). «مفهوم‌سازی استعاری «نفرت» در زبان فارسی: رویکردی پیکره‌ای-شناختی». مجموعه مقالات دومین همایش ملی زبانشناسی پیکره‌ای. به کوشش آزاده میرزایی. تهران: نشر نویسه پارسی. صص 225-252. عاصی، مصطفی (2019). پایگاه دادگان زبان فارسی. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی. Retrieved from <http://pldb.ihcs.ac.ir/> References
Assi, M. (2019). Persian linguistic database (PLDB). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. Retrieved from <http://pldb.ihcs.ac.ir/> [In Persian].
Croft, W. (1993). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 335-370.
Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Harcourt: Orlando, FL.
Damasio, A. (2005). Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Penguin Books, N.Y.
Dirven, R. (1993). Metonymy and metaphor: different mental strategies of conceptualization. Leuvense Bijdragen, 82, 1-28.
Edgan, T. (2006). Emotion verbs with to-infinitive complements: from specific to general predication. In M. Gotti, M. Dossena & R. Dury (Eds.), English Historical Linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14) (pp. 223-240). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.295.16ega.
Fillmore, Ch. J. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech, 280, 20-32.
Györi, G. (1995). Historical aspects of categorization. In E. H. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods: the expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics (pp. 175-206). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
James, W. (1980). The principles of psychology (vol. 2). New York: Dover.
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of anger, pride, and love: a lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kövecses, Z. (1995). The “container” metaphor of anger in English, Chinese, Japanese, and Hungarian. In Z. Radman (Ed.), From a metaphorical point of view: a multidisciplinary approach to the cognitive content of metaphor (pp. 117-145). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: a practical introduction (Sh. Pourebrahimi, Trans.). Tehran: SAMT [In Persian].
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphor we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lim, J. (2003). Aspects of metaphorical conceptualization of basic emotions in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar, 32, 141-167.
Molodi, A. S., Karimi Doostan, Gh. & Bijankhan, M. (2016). Conceptualization of “Hatred” in Farsi: a cognitive-physical approach. In A. Mirzai (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second National Conference on the Corpus Linguistics (pp. 225-252). Tehran: Neveeseh Parsi [In Persian].
Musolff, A. (2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. In M. Kopytowska (Ed.), Contemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres(pp. 41-56). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Niemeier, S. (2000). Straight from the heart: metonymic and metaphorical explorations. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 195-214). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ostermann, C. (2015). Cognitive lexicography a new approach to lexicography making use of cognitive semantics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Sahebkari, A. (2013). Conceptualization of the metaphors of love, hatred, joy and grief in Farsi-language text: a cognitive approach, [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran [In Persian].
Sharifi Moghadam, A., Azadikhah, M., & Vahideh A. (2017). Comparison between sadness and happiness conceptual metaphors in the songs of Parvin Etesami. Zabanpazuhi, 11(30), 179-202. doi: 10.22051/JLR.2018.15235.1330 [In Persian].
Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Words and their metaphors: a corpus- based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), corpus-based approach to metaphor and metonymy, 63-105. Berlin: Mouton.
Tissari, H. (2010). English words for emotions and their metaphors. In M. E. Winders, H. Tissari, & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics (pp. 298-332). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Underhill, W. J. (2012). Ethnolinguistics and cultural concepts: truth, love, hate and war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yuditha, T., & Foolen, A. (2014, June 24). Emotion metaphors of ANGER, LOVE and HATE in Indonesian and Dutch: a comparative study. The 6th Language, Culture and Mind Conference, Lublin, Poland. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 732 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 525 |
||
