A Critical Appraisal of University EAP programs in Iran: Revisiting the Status of EAP Textbooks and Instruction

Adorno, T. W. (2006). History and freedom: lectures 1964-1965. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Afshar, H. S., & Movassagh, H. (2016). EAP education in Iran: Where does the problem lie? Where are we heading? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 132-151.

Atai, M. R. (2002). EAP curriculum planning in Iran: an incoherent educational experience. Special Issue of the Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Teacher Training University, 9(3), 17-34.

Atai, M. R., & Fatahi-Majd, M. (2014). Exploring the practices and cognitions of Iranian ELT instructors and subject teachers in teaching EAP reading comprehension. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 27-38.

Atai, M. R., & Mazlum, F. (2013). English language teaching curriculum in Iran: planning and practice. Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 389-411.

Atai, M. R., & Nazari, O. (2011). Exploring reading comprehension needs of Iranian EAP students of health information management (HIM): a triangulated approach. System, 39(1), 30-43.

Atai, M. R., & Tahririan, M. H. (2003). Assessment of the status of ESP in the current Iranian higher educational system. Proceedings of LSP: Communication, culture and knowledge conference. Guilford, England: University of Surrey.

Azimi, A. (2007). Recent initiatives in schools effectiveness and improvement: the case of the Islamic republic of Iran. In T. Townsend (ed.), International handbook of the school effectiveness and improvement: Review, reflection and reframing (pp.379-395). New York: Springer.

Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: theory,politics, and practice. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bhatia, V. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 21-39). London: Longman.

Cherryholmes, C. (1988). Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge, Uk: Cambridge University Press.

Darder, A., Baltodano, M., & Torres, R. D. (2003). The critical pedagogy reader. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Englund, T. (2000). Rethinking democracy and education: towards an education of deliberative citizens. Journal of Curriculum studies, 32(2), 305-313.

Farhady, H., Sajadi Hezaveh , F., & Hedayati, H. (2010). Reflections of foreign language education in Iran. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 13(4),1-18.

Fenton-Smith, B. (2014). The place of Benesch’s critical English for academic purposes. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 8(3), 23-33.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. California: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Giroux, H. A. (1994). Disturbing pleasures: Learning popular culture. NewYork: Routledge.

Giroux, H. A. (2010). Teachers as transformative intellectuals. In K. Ryan, & J. M. Cooper (eds.), Kaleidoscope: Contemporary and classic readings in education (pp. 35-40). Boston: Centage Learning.

Gray, J. (2002). The global coursebook in English language teaching. In D. Block, & D.

Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 151-167). London: Routledge.

Habermas, J., & McCarthy, T. (1985). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon Press.

Hayati, M. (2008). Teaching English for special purposes in Iran: problems and suggestions. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(2), 149-164.

Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical theory: Selected essays (Vol. 1). Edinburgh, UK: A&C Black.

Hyland, K., & Shaw, P. (2016). The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. New York: Routledge.

Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, R. B. (1997). Language planning from practice to theory (Vol.108). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Kennedy, C. (2012). Challenges for language policy, language and development. In H. Coleman (ed.), Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language (pp. 24-38). Brirish Council.

Khany, R., & Tarlani-Aliabadi, H. (2016). Studying power relations in an academic setting: teachers' and students' perceptions of EAP classes in Iran. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 72-85.

Khubchandani, L. (2008). Language policy and education in the Indian subcontinent. In N. Hornberger (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd edition (pp.393-404). New York: Springer Science+Business Media LLC.

Kincheloe, J. (2008). Critical pedagogy primer (2nd ed.). New York: Peter Lang.

Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: the construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1-26.

Lockett, A. (1999). From the general to the specific: What the EAP tutor should know about academic discourse. In H. Boo, & P. Luford (Eds.), Academic standards and expectations: The role of EAP (pp. 49-58). Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press.

Marcuse, H. (2013). Towards a critical theory of society: collected papers of Herbert Marcuse (Vol. 2). London, UK: Routledge.

Mazdayasna, G. & Tahririan, M. (2008). Developing a profile of the ESP needs of Iranian students: the case of students of nursing and midwifery. Journalof English for Academic Purposes, 7, 277-289.

Mouzelis, N. (2000). The subjectivist-objectivist divide: against transcendence. Sociology, 34(4), 741-762.

Naysmith, J. (1987). English as imperialism? Language Issues, 1(2), 3-5.

Nekvapil, J. (2012). The history and theory of language planning. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 871-887). London: Routledge.

Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Pennycook, A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 253-269.

Pennycook, A. (2000). English, politics, ideology. From Colonial Celebration to postcolonial performativity. In T. Ricento, Ideology, politics and language policies: Focus on English (pp. 107-121). Philadelphia, USA: John Benjamins B. V.

Pennycook, A. (2017). The cultural politics of English as an international language. New York: Routledge.

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Riazi, A. (2005). The four language stages in the history of Iran. In A. Lin, & P. W. Martin (eds.), Decolonization, globalization, language-in-education policy and practice (pp. 98-114). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Richards, J. C. (1993). Beyond the text book: The role of commercial materials in language teaching. RELC Journal, 24(1), 1-14.

Swales, J. M., Ahmad, U., Chang, Y., Chavez, D., Dressen, D., & Seymour, R. (1998). Consider this: The role of imperatives in scholarly writing. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 97-121.

Thornbury, S., & Meddings, L. (2001). Coursebooks: the roaring in the chimney. Modern English Teacher, 10(3), 11-13