پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 939 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,735 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,747,645 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,070,154 |
تاثیر ویژگی‌های هیأت مدیره و جبهه‌گیری مدیریت بر استراتژی متنوع‌سازی شرکت | ||
| راهبرد مدیریت مالی | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 5، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 16، خرداد 1396، صفحه 135-157 اصل مقاله (925.06 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jfm.2017.11516.1139 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| وحید تقی زاده خانقاه* 1؛ مهدی زینالی2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری حسابداری، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه حسابداری، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف این پژوهش بررسی نقش ویژگی‌های هیأت مدیره و جبهه‌گیری مدیریت بر استراتژی متنوع‌سازی شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران می‌باشد. در این راستا تعداد 110 شرکت برای دوره زمانی 1387-1393 انتخاب گردید. از روش داده‌های ترکیبی برای آزمون فرضیه‌های پژوهش استفاده شد. برای بررسی ویژگی‌های هیأت مدیره از شاخص‌های اندازه و استقلال هیأت مدیره و برای بررسی جبهه‌گیری مدیریت از سه شاخص دوگانگی پست مدیر عامل، مالکیت مدیریتی و ریسک سرمایه‌گذاری بیشتر از حد استفاده شده است. همچنین جهت اندازه‌گیری متنوع‌سازی شرکتی از دو شاخص هرفیندال و آنتروپی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که اندازه و استقلال هیأت مدیره به ترتیب یک تاثیر مثبت و منفی بر متنوع‌سازی شرکت دارند. بدین معنی که در شرکت‌هایی با هیأت مدیره‌های بزرگ و استقلال پایین اعضای هیأت مدیره، متنوع‌سازی شرکت در سطح بالایی است. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که دوگانگی پست مدیر عامل و افزایش ریسک سرمایه‌گذاری بیشتر از حد بر متنوع‌سازی شرکت تاثیر مثبتی دارند در حالی که مالکیت مدیریتی تاثیری بر متنوع‌سازی شرکت ندارد. نتایج سازگار با تئوری نمایندگی می‌باشد. مطابق این تئوری افزایش تضاد بین سهامداران و مدیران موجب می‌شود تا مدیران داخلی شرکت برای انجام رفتارهای فرصت‌طلبانه خود در جهت متنوع‌سازی شرکت، انگیزه داشته باشند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ویژگی‌های هیأت مدیره؛ جبهه‌گیری مدیریت؛ تنوع‌سازی شرکت؛ تئوری نمایندگی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effect of the Board Characteristics and Management Entrenchment on Firm Diversification Strategy | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Vahid Taghizadeh Khanqah1؛ Mehdi Zeinali2 | ||
| 1islamic azad university of tabriz | ||
| 2islamic azad university of tabriz | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the board characteristics and the management entrenchment on the diversification strategy at firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. In this regard, 110 companies were selected for the period 2008-2014. Panel data method was used to test the hypotheses. In order to examine board characteristics, board size and board independence proxies and to review the management entrenchment, CEO duality, managerial ownership and over investment risk were used. For measuring corporate diversification, Herfindahl and entropy were used. The results show that the size and independence board have negative and positive effects on corporate diversification. This means that company diversification is at high level with large boards and low independent board members. The results show that the CEO duality and the increase of over investment risk have a positive effect on corporate diversification, while managerial ownership has no effect on diversification. The results are consistent with agency theory. According to this theory, the increase in the conflict between shareholders and managers makes the internal managers motivated for opportunistic behavior in order to diversify their enterprise. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Board Characteristic, Management Entrenchment, Diversification, agency theory | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Aggarwal, R. K., & Samwick, A. A. (2003). Performance Incentives within Firms: The Effect of Managerial Responsibility. Journal of Finance, 58 (4): 1613-1650. - Badavar Nahandi; Y. Taghizadeh Khanqah, V. (2014). The Relationship between Some Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Investment Efficiency in Life Cycle Stages, Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 5 (18): 113-140. (in Persian) - Benston GJ. (1985). The Validity of Profit-Structure Studies with Particular Reference to the FTC's Line of Business Data. American Economic Review, 75 (1): 37–67. - Chen, F., Hope, O-K., Li, Q., Wang, X. (2011). Financial Reporting Qquality and Investment Efficiency of Private Firms in Emerging Markets. The Accounting Review, 86 (4): 1255-1288. - Chen. SH. S. Ho, K. W. (2002). Corporate Diversification, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value: The Singapore Evidence, International Review of Financial Analysis, 9 (3): 315-326. - Chung, K., Wright, P., & Kedia, B. (2003). Corporate Governance and Market Valuation of Capital and R&D Investments. Review of Financial Economics, 12 (2): 161-172. - Connelly, J. T., & Limpaphayom, P. (2004). Environmental Reporting and Firm Performance: Evidence from Thailand. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 12 (1): 137-149. - Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2008). Corporate Governance and Pay-for-Performance: The Impact of Earnings Management. Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (2): 357-373. - Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (3): 269-290. - Delios, A. Wu, ZH. (2005). Legal Person Ownership, Diversification Strategy and Firm Profitability in China, Journal of Management and Governance, 9 (2): 151–169. - Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Agency Problems, Equity Ownership, and Corporate Diversification. Journal of Finance, 52 (1): 135-160. - Denis, D., Denis, D., & Yost, K. (2002). Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. Journal of Finance, 57 (5), 1951-1979 - Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments. Acadamic Management Journal, 32 (3): 543-576. - Eisenmann, T. R. (2002). The Effects of CEO Equity Ownership and Firm Diversification on Risk Taking. Strategy Management Journal, 23 (6): 513-534. - Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (2): 301-325. - Farooqi, J., Harris, O., Ngo, T., (2014). Corporate Diversification, Real Activities Manipulation, and Firm Value, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 28: (October) 130-151. - Hajiha, Z., Saeed. E. (2014). Investigation of Relationship between Corporate Diversification and Information Asymmetry, Journal of Financial Management strategy, 2 (3): 95-114. (in Persian) - Hermalin, B. E., & Michael, S. W. (2003). Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 9 (1): Pp. 7-26. - Hossain, M., Cahan, S. F., & Adams, M. B. (2000). The Investment Opportunity Set and the Voluntary Use of outside Directors: New Zealand evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 30 (4): 263-273. - Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76 (2): 323-329. - Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4): 305-360. - Kim, K. H., Al-Shammari, H., Kim, B. J., & Lee, S. H. (2009). CEO Duality Leadership and Corporate Diversification Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 62 (11): 1173-1180. - Lehn, K & Poulsen, A (1989). Free Cash Flow and Stockholder Gains in Going Private Transactions. Journal of Finance, 44 (3): 771-787. - Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2008). The Determinants of Board Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (2): 308-328. - Lins K. L., & Servaes, H. (2002). Is Corporate Diversification Beneficial in Emerging Market? Financial Management, Financial Management Association, 31 (2): Pp. 5-31. - Marouan, K. (2015). Corporate Board Characteristics, Managerial Entrenchment and Diversification Strategy: Evidence from Tunisian Context, International Journal of Business and Management; 10 (7): 184-195. - Mehdi, I. KH. E. Seboui, S. (2011). Corporate Diversification and Earnings Management, Review of Accounting and Finance, 10 (2): 176 – 196. - Moussa, B. F. Chichti, J. (2014), A survey on the Relationship between Ownership Structure, Debt Policy and Dividend Policy in Tunisian Stock Exchange: Three Stage Least Square Simultaneous Model Approach, International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 2 (1): 1-21. - Nykvmram, H. Hadian, S. A. (2013). Establish the Debt Position and Firm Diversification in Earnings Management, The Financial Accounting and Auditing Researches, 2 (4): 1-28. (in Persian) - Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board Composition from a Strategic Contingency Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29 (4): 411-438. - Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1989). Management Entrenchment: The Case of Manager-Specific Investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25 (1): 123-140. - Shukla, D. M., Dwivedi, N. (2016). Influence of Board of Directors on Corporate Diversification: Evidence from India, Strategic Change, 25 (5): 471–484. - Sinaei, H., Mehrabi, A., Behfarnia, M. (2016). The Investigation of the Relationship between Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Value-based Financial Performance Measures, 4 (2): 41-63. (in Persian) - Stulz, R. M. (1990). Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 26 (1): 3-27. - Volonté, Ch. Gantenbein, P. (2016). Directors’ Human Capital, Firm Strategy, and Firm Performance, Journal of Management & Governance, 20 (1): 115–145 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,592 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,379 |
||