Iterative Mimicry as Writing Back: Role Reversion in Coetzee’s Foe, Disgrace and Life and Times of Michael K

Attridge, D. (1996). Oppressive silence: J.M. Coetzee’s Foe and the politics of canonisation. Critical Perspectives on J.M. Coetzee. Huggan, G. and Watson, S. (Ed.). London: Macmillan Press Ltd.

Attwell, D. (1993). J. M. Coetzee: South Africa and the politics of writing. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bhabha, Homi K. (1987). Of mimicry and men: The ambivalence of colonial discourse. The First Decade. Michelson, Krayss, Crimp, & Copjec (Ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Bhabha, Homi K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge. Print.

Bonnici, Th. (2001). Coetzee’s Disgrace (1999) and postcolonial power. Acta Scientiarum, Maringa. 23(1), 87-92.

Coetzee, J. M. (1986). Foe. New York: Penguin Books.

Coetzee, J. M. (1988). White writing: On the culture of letters in South Africa. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Coetzee, J. M. (1999). Disgrace. 1999. London: Martin Secker & Warburg. New York: Penguin.

Coetzee, J. M. (2003). He and his man. Online document.

Coetzee, J. M. (2004). Life and times of Michael K. Ravan Press. London: Vintage.

Defoe, D. (1720). Serious reflections during the life and surprising adventures of Robinson Crusoe: Romances and Narrative. London: J. M. Dent

Gordimer, N. (1984). The idea of gardening. New York Review of Books, 31 (3).

Gramsci, A. (1972). History of the subaltern classes: Methodological criteria. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Hoare, Q., & Nowell-Smith, G. (Ed.). New York: International. 52-60.

Head, D. (1997). J.M. Coetzee. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kossew, S. (1996). Pen and power: A post-colonial reading of J.M. Coetzee and André Brink. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Kossew, S. (1998). Critical essays on J.M. Coetzee. New York: G.K. Hall.

Mehrabadi, M., & Pirnajmuddin, H. (2006). (Hi)story in search of author(ity): Feminine narration in J. M. Coetzee’s Foe. Modern Literature, 29(2), 75-93.

Mullins, C. C. (2009). Silence as insubordination: Friday and Michael K’s wordless weapon, a post-colonial approach to J.M. Coetzee’s Foe and Life and Times of Michael K. Thesis. Marshall University. Print. /www.mds.marshall.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1744&context=etd/. Accessed 10 March 2014.

Parry, B. (1998). Speech and silence in the fictions of J. M. Coetzee. Writing South Africa: Literature, Apartheid, and Democracy, 1970–1995. Attridge, D. & Jolly, R. (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Poyner, J. (2006,a). J.M. Coetzee and the idea of the public intellectual. Athens: Ohio UP.

Poyner, J. (2006,b). J.M. Coetzee and the paradox of postcolonial authorship. Uk: Ashgate Publishing Co.

Rivkin, J., & Ryan, M. (Eds.). (2004). Literary theory: An anthology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

Schallenberg, M. (2011). Articulating substance: On silence and namelessness in J.M. Coetzee’s Foe and Life & Times of Michael K. Thesis. Hogeschool. Print.

Spivak, G. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak?. Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L. (Eds.). Urbana: University of Illinois. 271–313.

Spivak, G. (1990). The post-colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues, Harasym, S.(Ed.). New York: Routledge.

Spivak, G. (1991). Theory in the margin: Coetzee’s Foe reading Defoe’s Crusoe/Roxana. Consequences of Theory, Arac, J. & Johnson, B. (Eds.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 154–80.

Spivak, G. (2002): Ethics and politics in Tagore, Coetzee, and certain scenes of teaching. Diacritics. 32(3-4), 17-31.

Wang, M., & Tang, X. (2013). A road to grace: Homi Bhabhan reading of “Disgrace”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 293-299.