
تعداد نشریات | 25 |
تعداد شمارهها | 967 |
تعداد مقالات | 8,010 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,573,670 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,616,336 |
Inspecting Pragmatic Analysis of Strategies Employed by Iranian EFL Learners in Realization of the Speech Act of Requests | ||
Journal of Language Horizons | ||
دوره 9، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 23، خرداد 2025، صفحه 169-188 اصل مقاله (416.07 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/lghor.2022.39937.1668 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Jamshid Mashhadi* 1؛ mehran memari2 | ||
1Shoushtar Faculty of Medical Sciences, Shoushtar, Iran | ||
2Ahvaz Farhangian University, Ahvaz, Iran. | ||
چکیده | ||
The present paper explores the use of pragmatic strategies by Iranian EFL learners in fulfilling the speech act of request. Accordingly, the analytical classification of request strategies suggested by Blum-Kulka & Olshtain (1984) and the cross-cultural speech act realization patterns (CCSARP) coding manual (Blum-Kulka et al., 1989) were used to examine the corresponding features of pragmatic strategies employed by 22 upper-intermediate Iranian EFL learners in performing the speech act of request. To this end, this descriptive study analyzed the participants’ utterances in both informal and formal situations using a Written Discourse Completion Task (WDCT). The outcomes revealed that among nine request strategies classified by Blum-Kulka & Olshtain (1984), Iranian EFL learners most frequently employed the “query preparatory strategy” as a conventional indirectness strategy on request in informal and formal situations. However, they used the direct strategy of “want statement” in informal contexts. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
discourse completion task؛ pragmatic competence؛ pragmatic؛ strategies؛ speech act.request | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
بررسی استفاده از راهبردهای عملگرایانه زبان آموزان ایرانی برای انجام عمل درخواست . | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
جمشید مشهدی1؛ مهران معماری2 | ||
1گروه پرستاری دانشکده علوم پزشکی شوشتر ،شوشتر، ایران | ||
2گروه زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه فرهنگیان اهواز | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
بررسی و تحلیل استفاده از راهبردهای عمل گرایانه زبان آموزان زبان انگلیسی ایرانی برای انجام عمل درخواست نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی دریافت:29/12/1400 اصلاح: 18/09/1403 نویسندگان ۱.جمشید مشهدی ۲.مهران معماری 1.استادیار گروه پرستاری دانشکده علوم پزشکی شوشتر، شوشتر، ایران (نویسنده مسئول) 1 Jamshidmashhadi111@yahoo.com 2. استادیار گروه زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه فرهنگیان اهواز، اهواز، ایران 2 m.memari@cfu.ac.ir چکیده هدف مقاله حاضر بررسی استفاده از راهبردهای عمل گرایانه زبان آموزان ایرانی زبان انگلیسی در انجام عمل گفتاری درخواستی است. بر این اساس، از طبقهبندی تحلیلی استراتژیهای درخواست پیشنهاد شده توسط بلوم-کولکا و اولشتاین (1984) و کتابچه راهنمای کدگذاری الگوهای تحقق گفتار میان فرهنگی (CCSARP) (Blum-Kulka و همکاران، 1989) برای بررسی ویژگیهای مربوط به عملگرایانه استفاده شد. راهبردهای به کار گرفته شده توسط 22 زبان آموز انگلیسی زبان ایرانی سطح متوسط در اجرای عمل گفتاری درخواستی دنبال شد. به این منظور، با انجام این تحقیق توصیفی، گفتههای تولید شده توسط شرکتکنندگان در هر دو موقعیت غیررسمی و رسمی تحت یک تکلیف تکمیل گفتمان مکتوب(WDCT) مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که از بین نه مورد استراتژی درخواست طبقهبندی شده توسط Blum-Kulka و Olshtain (1984)، زبان آموزان ایرانی یادگیرنده زبان انگلیسی اغلب از پرس و جو مقدماتی به عنوان یک استراتژی غیرمستقیم مرسوم درخواست در موقعیتهای غیررسمی و رسمی استفاده میکنند. با این حال، آنها از استراتژی مستقیم بیانیه خواست در زمینه غیررسمی استفاده کردند. کلید واژه ها: تکلیف تکمیل گفتمان، شایستگی عمل گرایانه، راهبردهای عمل گرایانه، کنش گفتاری، درخواست | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
گفتمان, شایستگی عملی, عمل گرایانه, کنش گفتاری, درخواست | ||
مراجع | ||
Achiba, M. (2003). Learning to request in a second language. Multilingual Matters.
Ahangari, S., & Shoghli, M. (2011). Investigating request strategies between Iranian EFL learners and Canadian native speakers of English in various social situations. Paper presented at the International Conference on Languages, Literature and Linguistics IPEDR.
Al-Sha’r, A. A. (2017). Efficacy of teaching pragmatic aspects on improving undergraduate English major students’ conversational skills and expressive abilities in authentic situations. Research on Humanity and Social Science, 7(8), 11-23.
Alerwi, A. A., & Alzahrani, A. (2020). Using sitcoms to improve the acquisition of speech acts by EFL students: Focusing on request, refusal, apology, and complement response. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(1), 63-79.
Alfghe, A., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2021). Realization of the speech act of requesting, suggestion, and apology by Libyan EFL learners. SAGE Open, 11(4),1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211050378
Aufa, F. (2013). The assessment tool of L2 learners’ pragmatic competence: Written discourse completion test (WDCT). IPEDR, 68(19), 113-117.
https://doi.org/1020885
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. In A. Jaworski & N. Coup land (Eds.), The Discourse Reader (pp. 63-75). Rutledge.
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied linguistics, 5(3), 196-213. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196
Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4): Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á. J., & Ott, D. (2019). Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 18, 229-261. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.288
Cohen, A. D. (2008). Teaching and assessing L2 pragmatics: What can we expect from learners? Language Teaching, 41(2), 213-235.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004880
Cohen, A. D. (2010). Coming to terms with pragmatics. In N. Ishihara & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (pp. 3-20). Pearson.
Crystal, D. (1991). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Blackwell.
Daskalovska, N., Ivanovska, B., Kusevska, M., & Ulanska, T. (2016). The use of request strategies by EFL Learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 55-61.
Derakhshan, A., & Eslami, Z. (2020). The effect of metapragmatic awareness, interactive translation, and discussion through video-enhanced input on EFL learners’ comprehension of implicature. Applied Research on English Language, 9(1), 25-52. https://doi.org/ 10.22108/are.2019.118062.1476
Ellis, R. (1992). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Ergaya Ali, G. A. (2018). Politeness and request strategies in Libyan postgraduate student’s-mails/Ergaya Ali Gerair Alsout. University of Malaya,
Ersözlü, Z. N. (2010). Determining the student teachers’ learning and studying strategies. Oxford University Press.
Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587625
Harooni, M., & Pourdana, N. (2017). Politeness and indirect speech act of requesting: Gender-oriented listening comprehension in Asian EFL context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(2), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.2p.214
Hassaskhah, J., & Ebrahimi, H. (2015). A study of EFL learners’ (meta) pragmatic learning through explicit (teacher explanation) and implicit (foreign film) interventions: The case of compliment. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(2), 292.
Hidayat, A. (2016). Speech acts: Force behind words. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 9(1), 1-12.
Hilbig, I. (2009). Request strategies and politeness in Lithuanian and British English. In: YLMP.
Hill, T. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 3905.
Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34(3), 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.02.002
Hussein, N. O., & Elttayef, A. I. (2018). The effect of using authentic materials on developing undergraduate EFL students’ communicative competence. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 2422-8535.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), sociolinguistics (pp. 269-285). Penguin.
Jalilifar, A. (2009). Request strategies: Cross-sectional study of Iranian EFL learners and Australian native speakers. English language teaching, 2(1), 46-61.
Jalilifar, A., Hashemian, M., & Tabatabaee, M. (2011). A cross-sectional study of Iranian EFL learners’ request strategies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 790. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.4.790-803
Jeon, E.-H., & Kaya, T. (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development. In N. John & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. John Benjamins.
Jianda, L. (2006). Assessing EFL learners’ interlanguage pragmatic knowledge: Implications for testers and teachers. Reflections on English language teaching, 5(1), 1-22.
Kasper, G. (1984). Pragmatic comprehension in learner‐native speaker discourse. Language learning, 34(4), 1-20.
Krasner, I. (1999). The role of culture in language teaching. Dialog on language instruction, 13(1-2), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00349.x
Kurdghelashvili, T. (2015). Speech acts and politeness strategies in an EFL classroom in Georgia. International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences, 9(1), 306-309.
Leung, C. (2005). Convivial communication: Recontextualizing communicative competence. International Journal ofAapplied Linguistics, 15(2), 119-144.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00084.x
Li, J. (2016). On the Relationship between Indirectness and Politeness. Paper presented at the 2016 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education.
Lin, M.-X. (2008). Pragmatic failure in intercultural communication and English teaching in China. China Media Research, 4(3), 43-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/snce-16.2016.2
Malmir, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Identity processing styles as predictors of L2 pragmatic knowledge and performance: A case of common English speech acts. Journal of Language Horizons, 4(2), 187-209.
https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2020.120805
Nadar, F. X. (2009). Pragmatic dan penelitian pragmatik. Yogyakarta.
Onchaiya, P. (2021). The use of request strategies by Thai and Filipino teachers. Vacana, 9(1), 47-67. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jed
Plonsky, L., & Zhuang, J. (2019). A meta-analysis of L2 pragmatics instruction. In N. Taguchi (Ed), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics(pp287-307. Routledge.
Pratama, H., Nurkamto, J., Rustono, R., & Marmanto, S. (2017). Second language learners’ comprehension of conversational implicatures in English. 3L. Language, Linguistics, Literature, 23(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2303-04
Rue, Y. J., Zhang, G., & Shin, K. (2007). Request strategies in Korean. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Korean Studies Association of Australasia Conference.
Shakki, F., Naeini, J., Mazandarani, O., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Instructed second-language English pragmatics in the Iranian context. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 39(1), 201-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/LRR.13.6.15
Taghizade Mahani, S. (2011). A cross-sectional study of Iranian EFL learners’ realization of the request speech acts. (Master), Gazimagusa, North Cyprus,
Taguchi, N. (2009). Comprehension of indirect opinions and refusals in L2 Japanese. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence (pp. 249-274). Mouton de Gruyter.
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Tajeddin, Z., & Malmir, A. (2015). The construct of interlanguage pragmatic learning strategies: Investigating preferences of high vs. low pragmatic performers. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 33(4), 153-180.
https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2015.3016
Tajeddin, Z., & Teimournezhad, S. (2015). Exploring the hidden agenda in the representation of culture in international and localized ELT textbooks. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2), 180-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.869942
Takahashi, S. (2010). The effect of pragmatic instruction on speech act performance. In A. Martınez-Flor & E. Use-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 127-144). John Benjamin’s.
Takkaç Tulgar, A. (2016). The role of pragmatic competence in foreign language education. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 10-19.
Tanto, T. (2018). Request strategies in Indonesian: An analysis of politeness phenomena in text messages. Journal of Language and Literature, 18(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v18i2.1569
Tawalbeh, A., & Al-Oqaily, E. (2012). In-directness and politeness in American English and Saudi Arabic requests: A cross-cultural comparison. Asian Social Science, 8(10), 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n10p85
Xodabande, I. (2018). Iranian EFL Learners’ preferences of different digital technologies for language learning beyond the classroom. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(2), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.20
Xu, L., & Wannaruk, A. (2015). Reliability and validity of WDCT in testing interlanguage pragmatic competence for EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), 1206. http://dx.doi.org/10.55766/DQNZ9834
Yazdanfar, S., & Bonyadi, A. (2016). Request strategies in everyday interactions of Persian and English speakers. SAGE Open, 6(4),1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016679473
Yılmaz, C. (2010). The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency, and self-efficacy beliefs: a study of ELT learners in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 682-687.https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.084
Yousefi, M., & Nassaji, H. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pragmatics and the role of moderator variables: Face-to-face vs. computer-mediated instruction. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 170(2), 277-308. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.19012.you
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Zhang, S., & Wang, X. (1997). A comparative study of the speech act of requesting. Modern Foreign Languages, 3, 63-72.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 930 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 42 |