پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 967 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,010 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,573,670 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,616,336 |
تبیین مفهوم اصالت در هنرهای سنتی در مواجهه با تکثیر مکانیکی | ||
| جلوه هنر | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 46، خرداد 1404 | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jjh.2024.45463.2074 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فرشته پوراحمد1؛ سیدرضا حسینی* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری پژوهش هنر، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه نقاشی، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران، نویسنده مسئول. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هنرهای سنتی در طول تاریخ رویکردهای مختلفی را در میان متفکرین از جمله سنتگرایان به همراه داشته است. دراین میان مفهوم اصالت از جایگاه ویژهای برخوردار است. ازسوی‌دیگر، به واسطة مواجهۀ عصر حاضر با تکثیر مکانیکی، مباحث چالشبرانگیزی در مورد مؤلّفههای هنرهای سنتی مطرح شده است. ازاین‌رو یکی از مباحث مهم، مقولۀ اصالتزدایی در هنرهای سنتی است که میتوان با مطابقت دیدگاه آراء متفکرین به استنباط آن پرداخت. این در حالی است که نزد متفکرین سنتگرا بیشتر مفهوم اصالت موردتوجه قرارگرفته و مباحث مرتبط با اصالتزدایی از سوی نظریهپردازان دیگری همچون والتربنیامین، مطرح شده است. هدف از این پژوهش در مرتبۀ نخست کنکاش مفهوم اصالت در حوزۀ هنرهای سنتی از دیدگاه سنتگرایان و والتر بنیامین است. در مرتبۀ دوم شناسایی و تبیین چگونگی مواجهۀ این مفهوم با تکثیر مکانیکی صورت گرفته است. ازاین‌رو این پرسش صورتبندی شده است که مفهوم اصالت در هنرهای سنتی و مواجهۀ آن با تکثیر مکانیکی چگونه قابل تبیین است؟ روش تحقیق در این پژوهش توصیفی- تحلیلی با مطالعۀ تطبیقی، همراه با کاوش کتابخانه‌ای دادهها است. بدینترتیب به منظور تشریح و تحلیل کیفی این مفاهیم، دیدگاه پنج نفر از سنتگرایان و مقاله والتر بنیامین، تا حد اشباع واکاوی گردیده است. نتایج پژوهش گویای آن است که مطابق با کدگذاری و تحلیلهای صورت گرفته بر آراء مذکور، بخش عمدهای از مقولههای اصلی و زیرمجموعه مفهوم اصالت از منظر بنیامین، با آراء سنتگرایان مطابقت دارد. با بررسی دقیق مشخص گردید که «هستی یگانه در مکان اصلی» و «هنرمند اصیل»، از میان سایر مؤلّفهها، مقولههای هستهای و کلیدی مفهوم اصالت هستند. همچنین براساس تحلیلهای صورت گرفته بر مفهوم تکثیر مکانیکی، مشخص گردید بخشی از مؤلّفههای این مفهوم، نقطۀ مقابل مؤلّفههای مفهوم اصالت است. در نتیجه با تبین تفاوت بین آن‌ها میتوان این ادعا را داشت که مؤلّفههای مفهوم اصالتزدایی همان مؤلّفههای درنظر گرفته شده برای مفهوم اصالت است اما با این تفاوت که هنرهای سنتی در عصر حاضر با فقدان این مشخصهها مواجه شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| کلیدواژهها: اصالت؛ اصالتزدایی؛ هنرهای سنتی؛ تکثیر مکانیکی؛ سنتگرایان؛ والتر بنیامین | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| هنرهای تجسمی و کاربردی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Explaining the Concept of Authentication in Traditional Arts in Contrast of Mechanical Reproduction | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| fereshteh pourahmad1؛ Seyed Reza Hosseini2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student of Art Research, Faculty of Art, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Painting, Faculty of Art, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran, Corresponding Author. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The concept of authenticity in artistic works has attracted the attention of many philosophers and theorists throughout history, from Plato to the postmodern era, and especially traditionalists. Among them, the theorists of the Frankfurt School have focused particularly on this concept. One of the members of this intellectual field is Walter Benjamin, who extensively addresses the concept of authenticity in his famous article "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction". In discussions related to traditional arts, the views of traditionalists have always been of interest, and the concept of authenticity is particularly important among them. Generally, these theorists believe that authenticity is one of the fundamental components of traditional arts, and in examining and expanding on it, one can understand the relationship of other components and characteristics of traditional arts with authenticity. On the other hand, one of the challenging issues of the present era is the existential nature of the concept of authenticity in the face of mechanical reproduction and the emergence of the phenomenon of de-authentication in artistic works. Although the technology of reproduction has been present in various eras with different qualities, its influence has brought about variations in the principles of traditional arts in the present age. Consequently, a particular interpretation of the components of traditional arts, including the concept of authenticity, is observed today, and Benjamin's writings have focused on the issue of de-authentication in artistic works. In Benjamin's view, while referring to the characteristics of traditional art forms, direct references have been made to the decline and destruction of artistic components in the age of mechanical reproduction. The analysis and explication of the concept of authenticity in the views of Benjamin and traditionalists can be formulated on this basis. According to Benjamin, authenticity is an abstract thing that encompasses everything that has been transferable from the beginning; from its material continuity to its historical testimony to the history it has passed through. Therefore, from Benjamin's perspective, authenticity is the characteristic of the traditional form of an artwork, and the presence of the artwork is a necessary condition for the concept of authenticity. According to the text of the article, Benjamin considers the component of "unique existence in the original place" as a core and essential element of the concept of authenticity. Based on the inseparable connection of the authentic artwork to its unique existence, both secondary and primary elements have been considered in the analysis of the concept of authenticity, along with codes and concepts that have been differentiated. These elements, in agreement with unique existence, gain meaning and possibility, and all of them can be considered as characteristics of authentic artwork and components that indicate and signify the concept of authenticity. Furthermore, considering that Benjamin categorizes the components precisely in his article, similar concepts and elements can be explained in this regard, and there is no need for designing new vocabulary. Also, in examining this issue, what is important is to clarify the traditionalists' perspective on the concept of authenticity. Because when it comes to traditional arts, the views and writings of traditionalists are initially raised. Based on the codifications and correspondences that have taken place, a significant portion of the issues addressed in explaining the concept of authenticity from Walter Benjamin's perspective can also be elucidated in the views of traditionalists. Although traditionalists and Benjamin are two entirely different intellectual currents, overall, their perspectives on the concept of authenticity can be simultaneously considered. The goal of this research is to explain this concept in the age of mechanical reproduction, and Benjamin is one of the most important theorists who has critically evaluated the aesthetic components of art in the face of mechanical reproduction. Based on this, the research aims to delve into the theoretical dimensions of authenticity and de-authentication in traditional arts by analyzing and critiquing the views of traditionalists and Walter Benjamin, and consequently examining the position and manner of confrontation of the concept of authenticity with mechanical reproduction. In pursuit of answering the question of how the concept of authenticity in traditional arts and its confrontation with mechanical reproduction can be explained, the analysis conducted and in response to the research questions, in addition to elucidating concepts and related issues of authenticity, concepts and characteristics related to the concept of mechanical reproduction have also been identified. Furthermore, works of technical reproduction are considered as independent and novel works, while works of manual reproduction are not taken into account. Therefore, the focus is on works that are presented along with the characteristics of mechanical reproduction. The present research has been conducted from a theoretical foundational perspective and in a descriptive-analytical manner through a comparative study. Data collection was carried out using library research methods until theoretical saturation was reached from available sources, utilizing modern search tools and techniques. The research society initially included Benjamin's perspective in the article "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction," and subsequently the views of five traditionalist thinkers: Guenon, Coomaraswamy, Schuon, Burckhardt, and Seyyed Hossein Nasr, were separately utilized. Following data collection, qualitative analysis was performed with the aim of extracting codes, concepts, and principles. In the initial coding stage, after extracting codes from the data, common codes were classified into separate tables, and conceptualizations were conducted. Subsequently, for axial and selective coding, in the first step, common concepts were categorized, and their sub-principles were identified. Then, in the second step, common sub-principles and main principles were formulated, laying the groundwork for clarifying and analyzing the concept of authenticity in the age of mechanical reproduction. As a result, the essential concepts of authenticity have been identified from the perspective of two distinct groups of thinkers. Due to the multiplicity of tables in the coding stages, the presentation of the stages of extracting codes from the data has been omitted in table form, and in the text, reference has been made to the most relevant data for the identification of sub-principles and main principles in the axial coding stage. For this purpose, a section of the tables of the coding stages has ultimately been presented in the appendix. The research results indicate that the concept of authenticity in traditional arts can be elucidated from the perspectives of Benjamin and traditionalists, both of whom hold a particular view and significance regarding the concept of authenticity. According to both groups, when we refer to a work as authentically artistic, two fundamental and key characteristics and components are instrumental in shaping this work. Firstly, it is "a unique existence in its original place," and the artistic work has drawn upon its components and other characteristics as a model. But the second condition that realizes this emulation is the presence of an authentic and traditional artist. This artist engages in emulation and imitation of traditional art forms and decorative patterns with an understanding of the meaning and concept, thereby creating an original and unique version. Furthermore, based on the conducted analysis, the components indicating the phenomenon of alienation in mechanical reproduction in traditional arts are considered the same components and main concepts for the notion of authenticity. However, Benjamin has focused on the negative outcome of all components encountering mechanical reproduction. Thus, the concept of alienation is explained through the conformity of the components of an authentic artwork with the components of the concept of mechanical reproduction as a non-authentic work. Consequently, in the age of mechanical reproduction, two key components of authentic art have faded or been generally forgotten. Therefore, based on the analysis and correspondences in this era with non-authentic artworks, we are faced with works that lack authenticity due to their confrontation with mechanical reproduction, leading to the absence of a unique existence in the original place and the absence of an authentic artist. As a result, works without the component of authenticity are identifiable and recognizable. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Keywords: Authentication, De-Authentication, Traditional arts, Mechanical Reproduction, Traditionalists, Walter Benjamin | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
منابع
احمدی، بابک (1389). حقیقت و زیبایی، درس های فلسفلۀ هنر، تهران: مرکز.
ایمانی خوشخو، زهرا. (1390). هنر نگارگری در عصر تکنولوژی و تأثیر تکثیر مکانیکی بر آن، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، رشته هنر اسلامی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان.
باتومور، تام (1393). مکتب فرانکفورت، ترجمه حسینعلی نوروزی، تهران: نشر نی.
بنیامین، والتر (1377). اثر هنری در عصر تکثیر مکانیکی، ترجمه امید نیک فرجام، فارابی،31، 225-210.
بورکهارت، تیتوس (1389). جهانشناسی سنتی و علم جدید، ترجمه حسن آذرکار: تهران، حکمت.
بینای مطلق، سعید (1382). فریتیوف شوان و معنای زیبایی، در خرد جاویدان، مجموعه مقالات همایش نقد تجدد از دیدگاه سنتگرایان معاصر، تهران: دانشگاه تهران و موسسه تحقیقات و توسعه علومانسانی.
خرمآبادی آرانی، طیبه(1397). مسئله اصالت اثر، اقتباس و کپیبرداری در هنرهای تجسمی غرب در دوران معاصر، پایاننامه کارشناسیارشد، رشته نقاشی، دانشگاه هنر تهران.
خندقآبادی، حسین (1380). حکمت جاویدان، نگاهی به زندگی و آثار سنتگرایان معاصر، تهران: موسسه توسعه دانش و پژوهش ایران.
درخشانی، مژده. (1399). بررسی مفهوم اصالت در صنایع‌دستی (خراطی و ورشوسازی). پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز. دانشکده هنر. گروه پژوهش هنر.
درخشانی، مژده (1392). جستاری در باب اصالت و از آن خودسازی در آفرینش آثار هنرهای تجسمی. فصلنامه پیکره، 18، 92-101.
دهخدا، علیاکبر (1377). لغتنامه دهخدا، جلد2، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
رضوانی، لیلا و کامرانی، بهنام و شریف‌زاده، محمدرضا (1403). هنر و هوش مصنوعی از منظر رفتارگرایی و آزمون تورینگ، فصلنامه جلوه هنر، 43، 88-77.
شادقزوینی، پریسا و فاطمی،فریماه و مرسلی توحیدی، فاطمه (1398). بررسی شاخصههای اصالت در آثار هنری الوگرافیک و اتوگرافیک با تکیه بر نظریه نلسون گودمن، دو فصلنامه مبانی نظری هنرهای تجسمی، 8، 124-115.
شوان، فریتهوف (1394). اصول و معیارهای هنر، در هنر و معنویت(مجموعه مقالاتی در زمینه حکمت هنر، شوان، گنون، کوماراسوامی، نصر و ...)، تدوین و ترجمه انشالله رحمتی، تهران: متن.
عمید، حسن(1372). فرهنگ فارسی عمید، جلد1، تهران: امیرکبیر.
فلدمن، ادموند بورک (1378). تنوع تجارب تجسمی، ترجمه پرویز مرزبان، تهران: سروش.
ککلن، آن (1394). نظریه هنر معاصر، ترجمه بهروز عوض پور، تهران: نگاه.
کوماراسوامی، آناندا (1389). فلسفه هنر مسیحی و شرقی، ترجمه و شرح امیرحسین ذکرگو، تهران: متن.
گنون، رنه (1399). سمبولهای بنیادین، زبان جهان شمول علم مقدس، مجموعه حکمت جاویدان (17)، ترجمه دل آرا قهرمان، تهران: حکمت.
لیپسی، راجر (1389). هنر و نمادگرایی سنتی، گفتارهایی از آنانداکوماراسوامی، ترجمه صالح طباطبایی، تهران: متن.
معین، محمد (1382). فرهنگ فارسی، جلد1، تهران: امیرکبیر.
مهرگان، امید (1384). زیباییشناسی انتقادی، تهران: گام نو.
نادری، سمیه (1390). بررسی مفهوم اصالت در صنایع‌دستی با تکیه بر آراء تئودور آدورنو، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، گروه صنایع‌دستی، دانشگاه هنر تهران.
نصر، سید حسین (1396). معرفت و امر قدسی، ترجمه فرزاد حاجی میرزایی، تهران: فرزان.
نصر، سید حسین (1388). معرفت و معنویت، ترجمه انشالله رحمتی، تهران: سهروردی.
نصر، سید حسین (1386). تیتوس بورکهارت و ارزش معنوی هنر اسلامی، در مبانی هنر اسلامی، ترجمه امیر نصری، تهران: حقیقت.
نصری، امیر (1386). مبانی هنر اسلامی، تیتوس بورکهارت، ترجمه امیر نصری، تهران: حقیقت.
ویلیام اشتودارت، سوفیا (1386). تیتوس بورکهارت و نحله سنت گرایان، در مبانی هنر اسلامی، ترجمه امیر نصری، تهران: حقیقت.
References
Ahmadi, B., (2010). Truth and Beauty Lectures on the Philosophy of Art, (19nd ed), Tehran: Markaz publication, (Text in Persian).
Amid, H., (1993). Amid Persian Dictionary, (9nd ed), Tehran: Amir Kabir publication, (Text in Persian).
Benjamin, Walter (2007). Illuminations, translated by Harry Zohn, New York: Schocken Books publication.
Benjamin, W. (1998).” The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”, translated by: Omid Nik-far jam, Journal of Farabi, 31(8), 210-225, (Text in Persian).
Binaye Motlagh, S., (2003). “Frithjof Schuon and meaning of Beauty”, In holy wisdom of Immortal, Articles collection of the conference of criticism of modernity from the point of view of contemporary traditionalists”, (2nd ed), Tehran: Tehran University and Research Institute and Development of Science Human publication, (Text in Persian).
Boltomore, Thomas Burrton, (2014), The Frankfurt School, translated by: Huseyn Ali Norouzi,( 3nd ed), Tehran: Ney publication, (Text in Persian).
Burckhardt, Titus, (2007), Mirror of the Intellect: Essays on the Traditional Science & Scared Art, translated by: Hasan Azarcar, (2nd ed), Tehran: Hekmat publication, (Text in Persian).
Cauquelin, Anne, (2015), L’art contemporain, translated by: Behrouz Avazpour, (1nd ed), Tehran: Negah publication, (Text in Persian).
Coomaraswamy, Ananda Kentish. (2010), Christian and oriental philosophy of art, translated by: Amir Hoseyn Zekrgoo, (2nd ed), Tehran: Matn publication, (Text in Persian).
Dehkhoda, A. A., (1998). Dehkhoda Dictionary, vol. 2, (2nd ed), Tehran: Tehran University publication, (Text in Persian).
Derakhshani, M., (2021). “The Study of the concept of Authenticity in handicrafts (Woodworking, Warsaw making)”, A thesis for the Degree of Master, Faculty of Art Research, Shahid Chamran University, (Text in Persian).
Derakhshani, M. (2019). “Investigation of Originality and Appropriation in the Creation of Visual Arts”, Journal of Paykareh, 18, 92-101, (Text in Persian).
Feldman, Edmund Burke, (1999), Varieties of visual experience, translated by: Parviz Marzban, (1nd ed), Tehran: soroush publication, (Text in Persian).
Imani Khoshkhoo, Z., (2012). “Iranian Panting in the Age of Technology and the Influence of Mechanical Reproduction on it”, A thesis for the Degree of Master, Faculty of Islamic Art, Isfahan Art University, (Text in Persian).
Khandagh Abadi, H., (2001). Immortal Wisdom, A look at the life and works of contemporary traditionalists,)1nd ed), Tehran: Iran knowledge and research development institute publication, (Text in Persian).
Khorram Abadi, T., (2018). “A Survey on the Problem of Originality, Adaption and Imitation in Contemporary Visual Arts”, A thesis for the Degree of Master, Faculty of Visual Art, Tehran University of Art, (Text in Persian).
Lipsey, Rager, (2010), Traditional Art and Symbolism, Selected Paper by Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, translated by: Saleh Tabatabai, (1nd ed), Tehran: Matn publication, (Text in Persian).
Mehregan, O., (2005). Critical aesthetics, (1nd ed), Tehran: Game no publication, (Text in Persian).
Moin, M., (2003). Moin Encyclopedic Dictionary, Volume one, (1nd ed), Tehran: Amir kabir publication, (Text in Persian).
Naderi, S., (2011). “Authentics and its role in Handi Crafts from Teodor W. Adorno’s view point ”, A thesis for the Degree of Master, Faculty of Hand Crafts, Tehran University of Art, (Text in Persian).
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, (2017), Knowledge and sacred, translated by: Farzad Haji Mirzai, (1nd ed), Tehran: Farzan publication, (Text in Persian).
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, (2009), Knowledge and the Sacred, translated by: Insha-Allah Rahmati, (4nd ed), Tehran: Suhrawardi publication, (Text in Persian).
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, (2007), The Spiritual Significance of Islamic Art: The Vision of Titus Ibrahim Burckhardt, translated by: Amir Nasiri, (1nd ed), Tehran: Haghighat publication, (Text in Persian).
Nasri, Amir, (1999), Fundamentals of Islamic art, translated by: Amir Nasiri, (1nd ed), Tehran: Haghighat publication, (Text in Persian).
Goodman, Nelson (1968). Languages of Art, An approach to a theory of symbols, united states publication.
Guenon, Rene, (2020), Symboles fondamentaux de La science sacree, translated by: Delara Ghahraman, (2nd ed), Tehran: Hekmat publication, (Text in Persian).
Rezvani, L. and Kamrani, B. and Sharifzadeh, M., (2024).” Art and Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Behaviorism and the Turing Test”, Journal of Jelve-y-honar, 43, 77-88, (Text in Persian).
Schuon, Frithjof, (2015), "Principles and Criteria of Art", in Art and spirituality (Articles collection of Art Wisdom, Schuon, Guenon, Coomaraswamy, Nasr and …), translated by: Insha-Allah Rahmati, )2nd ed), Tehran: Matn publication, (Text in Persian).
Shad, P. and Fatemi, F. and Morselie Tohidi, F., (2020).” A Survey of Authenticity Indexes in Allographic and Autographic Works Based on Nelson Goodman’s Theory”, Journal of Theoretical Principles of Visual Arts, 8, 115-124, (Text in Persian).
William Stoddart, Sophia, (1999), “Titus Burckhardt and the Tradition School”, in Fundamentals of Islamic art, translated by: Amir Nasri, (1nd ed), Tehran: Haghighat publication, (Text in Persian).
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 44 |
||