پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 967 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,010 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,573,778 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,616,429 |
ویژگی‌های مدرن آموزههای مکتب بینالمللی باهاوس بر اساس نظریه عملکردی هانس ون مانن | ||
| مبانی نظری هنرهای تجسمی | ||
| دوره 9، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 17، تیر 1403، صفحه 62-77 اصل مقاله (872.53 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jtpva.2024.44046.1511 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهرا کیانی1؛ فرناز معصوم‌زاده جوزدانی* 2 | ||
| 1گروه ارتباط تصویری، دانشکده هنرهای تجسمی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، ایران | ||
| 2گروه ارتباط تصویری، دانشکده هنرهای تجسمی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هانس ون مانن با رویکرد سیستمی به بررسی هنر در جامعه مدرن پرداخته است و هدف اصلی او در نظریهاش توسعه مدلهایی است که میتواند جهانهای هنری را سازماندهی کند. تحولات اجتماعی را حاصل اثرگذاری هنر بر ارتقاء سطح کیفی اقتصادی، اجتماعی و آموزشی میداند. باهاوس نیز اولین مؤسسه بینالمللی شناخته شدهای بود که نگرش منسجمی را نسبت به طراحی مدرن و ارتباط آن با فرهنگ تصویری تدوین کرد. ساختارشکنیهای مدرنیستی باهاوس بیش از یک رویه تجربهگرایانه بود که توسط برنامه رسمی مدرسه برای جهانیسازی عقلانیت حاصل از تفکر مدرن گسترش پیدا کرد. هدف از انجام این پژوهش شناخت و بررسی آموزههای باهاوس به عنوان نقطه عطفی در مدرنیته بر اساس نظریه عملکرد اجتماعی ارزشهای زیباییشناسی هانس ون مانن میباشد. سؤال اصلی تحقیق این است که آموزههای مدرن مکتب بینالمللی باهاوس بر اساس نظریه عملکرد اجتماعی هانس ون مانن چه ویژگی‌هایی دارد؟ روش پژوهش از نظر نوع کیفی، روش تجزیه و تحلیل توصیفی-تحلیلی با رویکرد تاریخی، گردآوری دادهها به صورت کتابخانهای و با مشاهدهی آثار این مکتب است. تحلیل دادهها با استفاده از نظریه عملکرد اجتماعی هانس ون مانن صورت گرفته است. از یافتههای پژوهش، این نتایج حاصل شد که مکتب بینالمللی باهاوس در پیوند با نظام‌های اجتماعی جهان‌شمول شکل گرفته و مؤلفههای باهاوس با نظریه عملکردی هانس ون مانن همسو است؛ اما آموزهها و اهداف همواره در معرض خطر میباشد؛ به این دلیل که جوامع و افراد فرصت بهرهبرداری از ارزشهای ذاتی هنر را ندارند؛ در صورتی که تنها ارتباط زیباییشناختی و هنری میتواند عملکرد اجتماعی را فراهم کند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| باهاوس؛ ساختار آموزشی؛ مدرنیسم؛ نظریه عملکردی هنر؛ هانس ون مانن | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Application of Genetic Criticism in Painting; A Case Study of a Painting by Henri Matisse | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zahra Kiani1؛ Farnaz Masoumzadeh Jouzdani2 | ||
| 1Graphic Design Department, Visual Art Faculty, Art University of Isfahan | ||
| 2Graphic Design Department, Visual Art Faculty, Art University of Isfahan | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The process of creation of a work and the study of its evolution is a subject that has been the concern of researchers in art studies. The nature of criticism methods is so that researchers make their concentrations on the final text. Genetic criticism focuses on the development process of the text and pays attention to the attitude based on the creative matter in the process of producing the work. The present article tries to study the development process of a Matisse painting by using the methodical model of genetic criticism. Genetic criticism is one of the methods of new criticism which appeared for the first time in the second half of the 20th century and in the 70s, with the invention of the word pretext by Jean Bellman Noel, in France. By focusing on the process of text creation, he expanded this view; every work that is produced by creative method is the result of a process. The use of this method in the arts has received less attention from researchers in this field of criticism. An important number of researches that have been done with this method of criticism are focused on written texts. It seems that genetic criticism in Iran is somewhat unknown to authors, artists and researchers in the field of criticism. This issue shows that there is still a lack of use of theory-based criticism in the study of paintings in Iran. Lack of familiarity with genetic criticism and its nature in Iran, has caused to mistakenly consider this criticism to be the same as Goldman's constructivist criticism in many cases by them. On the one hand, since artists often consider the process of creation and the material documentation of their works to be a confidential matter, it minimizes the possibility of access to the stages of creation of artists' artworks by Iranian researchers. The only book available in Persian language is the book of Genetic Criticism in Art and Literature, written by Bahman Namvar Motlagh and Allah Shokr Asadolahi. In the book possibility of using this criticism in the study of literary and artistic works has been discussed. Another book that briefly introduces this criticism in the tenth chapter is the book Literary Criticism in the 20th Century written by Jadie, Jean Yves and translated by Mahshid Nonahali in 1999. In an article titled Guernica genetic criticism, Manijeh Kangrani has discussed the process of genetic in an article titled Guernica formative criticism. Using genetic criticism and creation, she has discussed the process of formation and creation of Guernica painting by Picasso. Sajjad Baghban Maher, in an article entitled "Genetic Criticism of Contemporary Persian Painting", analyzed a painting by Saeed Moirizadeh called "Paper Clothes" based on the model of genetic criticism. By examining paratextual, metatextual and pretextual elements, Baghban Maher comes to the conclusion that the main pretext of this work is the preliminary designs that are influenced by the painting of the seated female figure from the Isfahan school. Criticism of genealogy is one of the new methods of criticism in the seventies. Despite the novelty of this critique, valuable studies have been conducted in other countries in this field; most of these studies are in French. Since 1992, the Institute of Modern Texts and Manuscripts (ITEM) has been organizing lectures, seminars and researches with a focus on genetic criticism every year. It appeared officially due to the use of the term pretext by Jean Bellman-Noel and the first case of its exact term was published in 1979 on the cover of a book by Flamarion Publications as Attempts at Genetic Criticism. The emergence of this critique, like other modern critiques such as hermeneutic critique and formalist critique, is literature, due to its methodical model, it also found its way to visual arts. The subject of this critique is the question about the act of creation and manner of formation of text, and studies the work or text while it is in the stage of birth and emergence. In this method, in order to achieve a detailed study of the creation process of a text or work, the researcher of genetic criticism must collect all the documents and information related to its process of creation, as well as the factors and elements affecting pre-textual transformations. Research on this topic is done in three areas: Para-text, Meta-text and Hypo-text. Then, the collected documents are arranged based on their chronological order, So that not only the credibility of the documents will increase, but also the reconstruction of the stages of the creation of the work will be possible. The next step is based on the number and type of documentation remaining from the text or work and Para-textual, Meta-textual information and the quantity of Hypo-textual and Pre-textual documents. The transformations and evolutions that took place in the path of artistic or literary creation are shaped by the researcher. This article intends to explain how this method of critique is used in painting by studying a painting by Matisse as a visual text based on the pattern of genetic criticism. In this method of critique, instead of dealing with the final text, the developmental stages of the text are examined. Therefore, by following the elements and documents of the pre-text and examining the relationships between them with the surrounding texts, including the para-text, meta-text and hypo-text, in addition to identifying the causes and factors of transformation of the pre-text of a text, the process of its creation is reconstructed. In this research, in addition to providing a practical model of genetic criticism in the study of paintings, these questions have been answered; What is the process of genesis of the painting of Henri Matisse? Which extra-textual and intra-textual elements have been influential in the process of its formation? In order to answer these questions, after explaining the method of genetic criticism approach, a painting by Matisse was analyzed based on the methodical model of genetic criticism and these results were obtained; genetic criticism, due to its methodical pattern and the similarities with the nature of creation in painting, is also effective in painting by studying the material documents left over from the developmental stages that are appropriate for each distinctive semiotic system. Also in artistic texts as well as written texts, material documents of the stages of development remain, which, by studying these documents, the method of genetic criticism is performed. By describing the relationships between the elements of para-text, meta-text, hypo-text and pre-text, as well as the genetic behavior of the painter, it was found that in the development and shaping of this painting, in addition to the pre-text extratextual, which includes the design, it also left the pre-text intertextual. In addition, the para-text of this text includes model, copy of the works of painting masters, Cézanne with regard to the spatial organization of the work, Cubism and failure to pay attention to the details and the whole appearance of the figure, Gauguin in the use of visual symbols, and the view of eastern painting is on the self-sufficiency of color and at the same time its non-descriptiveness. This research is fundamental in terms of purpose and in terms of method, it is descriptive-analytical, the data of which have been collected through documentary methods. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Genetic Criticism, Creation Process, Pre-text, Genetic case, Matisse | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
فدوی، سیدمحمد و حبیبی، مریم (1398). «بررسی ویژگی‌های بصری آثار طراحی گرافیک شاخص مدرسه باوهاوس»، هنرهای زیبا - هنرهای تجسمی، دوره 24، شماره 3، 97- 106.
ویتفورد، فرانک (۱۳۸۶). باهاوس، ترجمه مژگان محمدیان، تهران: موج.
Arnason, H. Mansfield, E. (2013). History of Modern Art. (Vol. 1). United Kingdom: Pearson. Benevolo, L. (1977). History of Modern Architecture. Massachusetts: MIT press. Bergdoll, B. Dickerman, L. and 15 more. (2009). Bauhaus 1919-1933: Workshops for Modernity. www.moma.org (accessed on Jan 25, 2022). Bernard, T. J. (2023). Howard S. Becker. Encyclopedia Britannica. 14 Apr. 2023, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Howard-S-Becker. Accessed 28 July 2023. Beşgen, A., Kuloğlu, N., & Fathalizadehalemdari, S. (2015). Teaching/Learning Strategies through Art: Art and Basic Design Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. May. 182. 428–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.813 Brosterman, N. (1997). Inventing Kindergarten. New York: Harry N. Abrams. Byrne, O. (1847). The First Six Books of the Elements of Euclid. London: William Pickering. Retrieved from http://www. math. ubc. ca/~cass/ Euclid/byrne. html, Accessed Apr 29, 2023. Çelik, G.İ. (2008). İç Mimarlık Eğitim Programlarının Karşılaştırmalı Analizine Yönelik Bir Çalışma. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tez, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İç Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı, Trabzon. Dearstyne, H. (1986). Inside The Bauhaus. London: The Architectural Press. Droste, M. (2009). The Bauhaus Object between Authorship and Anonymity. London and New York: Routledge. Esen, E., Elibol, G. C., & Koca, D. (2018). Basic Design Educationa Bauhaus. Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication. January. 1. 37–44. Eversmann, P. G. F. (2009). Global Changes-Local Stage (Themes in Theatre Collective Approaches to Theatre and Performance 5). (Edited by T. Hauptfleisch, and V. Maanen). Amsterdam - New York: Rodopi. Forgacs, E. (1995). The Bauhaus Idea and Bauhaus Politics. (Translated by J. Batki). New York: Central European University Press. Henderson L. D. (1984). The Fourth Dimension and Non-Euclidean Geometry in Modern Art: Conclusion. The MIT Press. Heynen, H. (1999). Architecture and Modernity. Cambrdige: MIT Press. Hoogen, van den Q. L. (2010). Performing Arts and the City: Dutch Municipal Cultural Policy in the Brave New World of Evidence-based Policy. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit. Jaeggi, Annemarie (2009). Bauhaus: A Conceptual Model. Bauhaus: A Conceptual Model: 13-20. Berlin: Hatje Cantz. James-Chakraborty, Ka. (2009). Expressionism and Experiment the Sommerfeld House. Bauhaus: A Conceptual Model: 52-54. Berlin: Hatje Cantz. Kentgens-Craig, M. (2001). The Bauhaus and America First Contacts, 1919-1936. Cambridge: The MIT Press Kepes, G. (1944). The Language of Vision. Chicago: Paul Theobald. Koehler, K. (2009). The Bauhaus Manifesto Postwar to Postwar: From the Street to the Wall to the Radio to the Memoir. Great Britain: Routledge/the Taylor & Francis Group. Luecking, S. (2019). Visual Teaching of Geometry and the Origins of 20th Century. Abstract Art. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics. July. 2. 4-28. Maanen, H. V. (2009). How to Study Art Worlds on the Societal Functioning of Aesthetic Values. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Meggs, Ph. and Purvis, A. (2012). Megg’s History of Graphic Design. Canada: John Wiley and Sons Inc. Miguel, A. Antonio, M. (2023). Redesigning Design Education: Four Teaching Actions Facing the Challenges of the 21st Century. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). June. 6. 2902-2910. Mueller, R.M. and Thoring, K. (2012). Design Thinking vs. Lean Startup: A Comparison of two User-Driven Innovation Strategies. Leading Innovation through Design: Proceedings of the DMI 2012 International Research Conference. Presented at the DMI, Design Management Institute, Boston, USA. 151-161. Nagy, L. M. (1938). The New Vision: Fundamentals of Design, Painting, Sculpture, Architecture. Mineola (New York): Dover Publication. Otto, E. (2009a). Designing Men New Visions of Masculinity in the Photomontages of Herbert Bayer, Marcel Breuer, and László Moholy-Nagy. London and New York: Routledge. Otto, Elizabeth (2009b). On the “Beautiful” and “Strong” Sexes at the Bauhaus Marianne Brandt, Gender, and Photomontage. Bauhaus: A Conceptual Model: 292-94. Berlin: Hatje Cantz. Payne, A. (2009). Bauhaus Endgame: Ambiguity, Anxiety, and Discomfort. New York: Routledge /the Taylor & Francis Group. Pfützner, K. (2018). Designing for Socialist Need: Industrial Design Practice in the German Democratic Republic 1949–1990. London/New York: Routledge. Poon, S. T. F. (2019). Typography Inspiration in 21st - Century: Social, and Cultural Roles of Modernist Bauhaus in Graphic Design. International Journal of Modern Trends in Social Sciences. December. 7. 23-37. Rossler, P. (2022). New Typography, the Bauhaus, and its Impact on Graphic Design of Bauhaus Effects in Art, Architecture, and Design Book. New York: Routledge. Scheerbart, P. Taut, B. Goesch, P. (2016). Modern Visionaries. (Edited by B. Galerie). Zurich: Scheidegger and Spiess. Schuldenfrei, R. (2009). The Irreproducibility of the Bauhaus Object. New York: Routledge/the Taylor & Francis Group. Siebenbrodt, M. (2009). A Sculptural Worldview in Color, Light, and Sound Johannes Itten’s Tower of Fire. Bauhaus: A Conceptual Model:64-66. Berlin: Hatje Cantz. Siebenbrodt, M., and L. Schöbe. (2015). Bauhaus: 1919-1933, Weimar-Dessau-Berlin. New York: Parkstone Press International. Silvano, D. (2022). Modernismo Na Bauhaus: quando a Arte não é apenas contemplação. DAT Journal. December. 4. 79-93 Smock W. (2004). The Bauhaus Ideal Then & Now (An Illustrated Guide to Modern Design). Chicago: Academy Chicago Publishers. Thompson D. W. (1959). On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Thoring, K., Mueller, R., Giegler, SE., Badke-Schaub, P. (2020). From Bauhaus to Design Thinking and Beyond: A Comparison of Two Design Education School. International Design Conference-Design 2020. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.19 Tóth, E. (2022). Design and Visual Culture from the Bauhaus to Contemporary Art, Optical Deconstructions. New York: Routledge. Ulbricht, Justus H. (2009). “Timeless Gothic” Instead of “Dentist-Style with Housing Cubes” The National Socialist Opposition to the Bauhaus. Bauhaus: A conceptual Model. 355-61. Berlin: Hatje Cantz. van Maanen, J., Zijlstra, A., & Wilders, M. (2013). How Theatre Functions in the City of Groningen: Supply and Use in a Regular Season. University of Groningen: Research Centre Arts in Society. Veldmeijer, S. (2014). Art History of the Low Countries in its European Context. Research Master. Supervised by Sandra Kisters. Netherland: Utrecht University. Völckers, Hortensia & Alexander Farenholtz (2009). A Word of Greeting. Bauhaus: A Conceptual Model: 8-9. Berlin: Hatje Cantz. Wen Lan, Ch. (2023). Exploring the Utilization of Bauhaus Course in Taiwan: A Case Study of Incorporating Bauhaus Aesthetics Course in Freshman Education. International Design Conference on Integrated Interdisciplinary Innovation. Yunlin (Taiwan). Zainel, M. Jassem, N. (2022). The Influence of the Bauhaus in Contemporary Graphic Design. Al-Academy Journal. March. 107. 257-270. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 256 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 206 |
||