پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 967 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,010 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,573,762 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,616,381 |
شناسایی مرزهای حرفه ای در روابط بین استاد و دانشجو در بستر دانشگاهی | ||
| اندیشه های نوین تربیتی | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 20، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 72، تیر 1403، صفحه 163-174 اصل مقاله (413.36 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jontoe.2023.42958.3745 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| نگار محمدی1؛ کیومرث عزیزملایری2؛ محسن نظرزاده زارع* 3 | ||
| 1دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد تاریخ و فلسفه آموزش‌وپرورش، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف اصلی این پژوهش شناسایی مرزهای حرفهای در روابط بین استاد و دانشجوست. برای نیل به این هدف، از تحلیل محتوای عرفی استفاده شده. بر این اساس با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری هدفمند از نوع حداکثر تغییرات تعداد 36 (20 دانشجو و 16 هیئت علمی) به عنوان مشارکت کننده در پژوهش انتخاب شدند. ابزار مورد استفاده برای گردآوری داده ها، مصاحبۀ نیمه ساختاریافته بود. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل مصاحبه‌ها از روش تحلیل محتوای استقرایی و در راستای بررسی اعتبار یافته‌ها از سه راهبرد بازبینی توسط مشارکت‌کنندگان، به هم تنیدگی و بازتاب پذیری استفاده شد. یافته ها نشان داد که مرزهای حرفهای در روابط بین استاد و دانشجو شامل: مرزهای عاطفی (پرهیز از روابط عاطفی و احساسی و حفظ رفتار محترمانه)، مرزهای ارتباطی (شفافیت در ارتباط و حفظ حریم خصوصی) و مرزهای قدرت (شفافیت در مرزهای قدرت و اختیار و پرهیز از تمایز و تبعیض) هستند. درمجموع بر اساس نتایج این پژوهش می‌توان گفت که در بستر دانشگاهی، ارتباطات و تعاملات مؤثر بین استاد و دانشجو بهع نوان یکی از عوامل مؤثر در پیشرفت دانشجو و بهبود فرایند یاددهی_یادگیری تلقی می‌شود. ازاین‌رو، نظارت دقیق بر ارتباطات و تشویق به ایجاد روابط درست بین استاد و دانشجو در چهارچوب مرزهای حرفهای معنا و مفهوم پیدا میکند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| استاد؛ دانشجو؛ روابط استاد و دانشجو؛ مرزهای اخلاقی؛ مرزهای حرفهای | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identifying Professional Boundaries in the Professor-Student Relationship in the Academic Context | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Negar Mohammadi1؛ Kiomars Azizmalayeri2؛ Mohsen Nazarzadeh Zare3 | ||
| 1M.A. in History and Philosophy of Education, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences ,Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The present study aimed to identify professional boundaries in the relationship between professors and students through a qualitative content analysis. Hence, 36 (20 students and 16 faculty members) were selected using purposive sampling method with maximum variation. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews, and analyzed through inductive content analysis. The rigor of the findings was examined through member check, triangulation, and reflexivity. The results showed that the professional boundaries in the relationship between professors and students include: emotional boundaries (avoiding emotional and romantic relationships and maintaining respectful behavior), communication boundaries (transparency in communication and maintaining privacy), and power boundaries (transparency in power boundaries and avoiding discrimination and differentiation). Introduction Interactions and communications between professors and students in academic environments are currently inevitable and necessary. Such a relationship is considered an effective part of the teaching-learning process. Nonetheless, neglecting the formation of appropriate communication and interaction between professors and students can not only create problems for both students and professors, but can also increase the level of anxiety in students. Thus, proper interaction and communication in the academic context require attention to ethical and professional principles and boundaries (Toulabi, 2017). The question is what is meant by professional boundaries in the academic context. Professional boundaries are parameters that describe limitations in a relationship and interaction in which an individual entrusts their well-being and security to an expert and powerful person. This expert and powerful person is a teacher or a professor in the educational and academic system (Nazareth College, 2023, p.2). Dimensions of professional boundaries may be violated during relationships and interactions between professors and students. These dimensions include touch, location, gifts, expenses, and privacy (Barnett, 2008). Therefore, violations of professional boundaries may include ethical issues, romantic relationships, and private meetings between professors and students in coffee shops or offices. Accordingly, identifying professional boundaries in relationships between professors and students is aimed at avoiding a phenomenon that some call a "slippery slope" where crossing boundaries leads to boundary violations (Schwartz, 2011). Given that the existing literature has paid less attention to the framework of professional boundaries in professor-student relationships and has emphasized more on violations that occur in these relationships, this study was conducted to identify professional boundaries in professor-student relationships. The main research question: What are the professional boundaries in professor-student relationships in the academic context? Methodology This qualitative study used conventional content analysis. The participants included professors and students from Malayer University. As the researchers aimed to investigate the perspectives of individuals with different academic ranks, educational levels, and diverse fields of study, purposive sampling method with maximum variation was employed, and a total of 36 participants (20 students and 16 faculty members) were selected. The inclusion criteria included willingness to participate for all the participants, being an undergraduate, postgraduate, or Ph.D. student with at least one year of academic experience for students, and being an assistant professor, associate professor, or full professor with at least two years of teaching experience in an academic environment for professors. Semi-structured interviews were used as a research tool. Due to limited access to some of the professors and students, the interviews were conducted either by phone or face-to-face over a period of four months. After conducting the interviews, the researchers used the content analysis method based on Graneheim & Lundman (2004) inductive approach to analyze the interview transcripts, which involved the following steps: 1. Determining the unit of analysis, 2. Identifying explanatory units, 3. Conceptualizing the explanatory units, 4. Reviewing the codes based on the text, and 5. Categorizing the issues. In this study, the researchers used three strategies of member check, triangulation, and reflexivity to ensure the credibility of the findings. Ethical considerations were also observed, including voluntary participation in the interview process, assurance of confidentiality and anonymity of the interviewees, and obtaining their permission for recording the interviews. Results Based on the findings obtained, professional boundaries in the relationship between professors and students were divided into three main and six subcategories. Emotional boundaries According to the participating students and professors in the study, emotional boundaries in the relationship between professors and students consist of two subcategories: avoiding emotional and affectionate relationships and maintaining respectful behavior. Avoiding emotional and affectionate relationships The participants believe that not showing special attention to a student in the academic context, and refraining from exchanging special gifts between professors and students are among the behaviors that should be avoided. Maintaining respectful behavior The participants believe that refraining from showing demeaning behavior towards students in academic environments and respecting the opinions and feelings of students are among the behaviors that should be considered in maintaining respectful behavior. Communicative boundaries According to the participating students and professors, communicative boundaries consist of two subcategories: transparency in communication and privacy protection. Transparency in communication The participants in the study believe that refraining from intimate behaviors between professors and students and avoiding one-on-one meetings between professors and students outside the academic environment are among the behaviors that should be transparently defined within the communicative boundaries between professors and students. Privacy protection The participants believe that refraining from providing counseling to students on very personal issues, and avoiding the formation of relationships between professors and students on virtual networks around personal issues are among the behaviors that should be considered in maintaining privacy within the boundaries of the relationship between professors and students. Power boundaries According to the participating students and professors in the study, power boundaries consist of two subcategories: transparency in power boundaries and avoiding discrimination and differentiation. Transparency in the power boundaries and authority Participants in the study believe that refraining from using legal power to pressure students, avoiding using rewards or punishments based on the type of relationship between professors and students, and refraining from using their authority on non-academic issues are among the behaviors that should be transparently defined within the power and authority boundaries. Avoiding discrimination and differentiation The participants believe that refraining from having a gender and ethnic bias in evaluating student performance is among the behaviors that should be avoided within the power and authority boundaries. Discussion and conclusion In conclusion, based on the results of this study, maintaining emotional, communicative, and power boundaries is very important in professional relationships between professors and students. Therefore, establishing emotional relationships between professors and students can question the professionalism of the relationship between them. Furthermore, since the relationships between professors and students are mostly based on professional communication, it is better that educational and research communications be transparent and clear. Moreover, maintaining privacy between professors and students is also very important. Finally, the professor must use their power within the legal framework and for providing education and guidance to students and should refrain from discrimination between their students. In general, observing professional boundaries in the relationship between professors and students helps not only maintain the dignity and protect the interests of both parties, but also create a professional, respectful, and effective learning and research environment within the academic context. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Professional boundaries, Ethical boundaries, Professor and student relations, Professor, Student | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdullahpour, H., Soltani, A. & Asmi, K. . (2016). External interactions of professor-student based on educational behaviors and professional activities of faculty members. Journal of Iranian Higher Education, , 9(3), 152-133. (Tex in Persian). Alagheband, A. (2022). Theoretical foundations and principles of educational management. Ravan Publishing. (Tex in Persian). Asikainen, H., Blomster, J., & Virtanen, V. (2018). From functioning communality to hostile behaviour: Students’ and teachers’ experiences of the teacher–student relationship in the academic community. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(5), 633-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1302566 Attaran, M., Zainabadi, H., Toulabi, S. . (2010). Supervisor selection and student-supervisor relationship perspectives of Ph.D. students. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 4(16), 96-129. (Tex in Persian). Aultman, L. P., Williams-Johnson, M. R., & Schutz, P. A. (2009). Boundary dilemmas in teacher–student relationships: Struggling with “the line”. Teaching and teacher education, 25(5), 636-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.002 Bahador, H., Faraji Armaki, A., Ghorbani, R, Dehghani E. . (2014). Effective factors on communication between teacher and student medical students of basic sciences level view. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 6(4), 195-200. (Tex in Persian). Barnett, J. E. (2008). Mentoring, boundaries, and multiple relationships: Opportunities and challenges. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260701800900 Bernstein‐Yamashiro, B., & Noam, G. G. (2013). Teacher‐student relationships: A growing field of study. New directions for youth development, 2013(137), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20045 Coristine, S., Russo, S., Fitzmorris, R., Beninato, P., & Rivolta, G. (2022). The importance of student-teacher relationships. In Classroom Practice in 2022. . Retrieved June 2023 from https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/educ5202/chapter/the-importance-of-student-teacher-relationships/ Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com/books?id=bttwENORfhgC Dubsky, R. C. (2015). Professional boundaries in teacher-pupil relationships: does the model of professional conduct in regulatory standards and codes of conduct impose teacher-pupil relationships that are pedagogically and personally limiting? Manchester Metropolitan University Eimer, F., & Garkaz, M. (2018). Slippery slope or compensatory behavior? The role of moral disengagement and narcissism in accounting ethical decision making. Management Accounting, 11(37), 41-58 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/aapc.2.4.123 (Tex in Persian). Forkosh-Baruch, A., Hershkovitz, A., & Ang, R. P. (2015). Teacher-student relationship and SNS-mediated communication: Perceptions of both role-players. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 11, 273-289. https://doi.org/10.28945/2329 Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today, 24(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher–student relationship at university: an important yet under-researched field. Oxford review of education, 40(3), 370-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.921613 Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 Kahnoji, M. (2018). Role of emotional elements in student-professor interactions. Bargh Farhan Quarterly, 2(2), 159-166. (Tex in Persian). Koca, F. (2016). Motivation to Learn and Teacher-Student Relationship. Journal of international Education and Leadership, 6(2), n2. Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2018). Program evaluation theory and practice. Guilford Publications. Mortazavi, S. S., Heidari, A., Mortazavi, Z., Seyedtabib M. (2019). Factors affecting teacher-student relationship from the perspective of students in School of Rehabilitation, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. JMED, 12(34), 41-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/edcj.12.34.41 (Tex in Persian) Nazareth College. (2023). In. 2022-2023 Student Code of Conduct: Professional boundaries policy. Nazarzadeh Zare, M. (2022). Teamwork in the academic system: Identifying its challenges in the students' academic activities. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 15(1), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.52547/MPES.15.1.229 (Tex in Persian). Plaut, S. M. (2012). Can My Student Be My Friend? Faculty-Student Boundary Issues in Advising and Teaching. Plaut, S. M., & Baker, D. (2011). Teacher–student relationships in medical education: Boundary considerations. Medical teacher, 33(10), 828-833. Rostami-Nasab, H., Soltani, A. Fazilatpour, M. . (2020). Faculty-student Interaction and its relationship with development of students’ cognitive skills. Studies in Learning & Instruction, 11(2), 1-20 https://doi.org/10.22099/jsli.2020.31474.2699. (Tex in Persian). Salami, F. & Samadi, P . (2018). Effective factors of the centered quality relationship between teacher and student. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 14(1), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.22051/jontoe.2018.3131 (Tex in Persian). Schwartz, H. L. (2011). From the classroom to the coffee shop: Graduate students and professors effectively navigate interpersonal boundaries. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 363-372. Teacher-student professional boundaries. (2019). Perth Retrieved from https://www.trb.wa.gov.au/Professional-Conduct/Teacher-Student-Professional-Boundaries Thornton, P. (2013). Thriving in academe: Reflections on helping students learn. NEA Higher Education Advocate, 30(3), 6-9. Tormey, R. (2021). Rethinking student-teacher relationships in higher education: a multidimensional approach. Higher Education, 82(5), 993-1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00711-w Toulabi, Z. (2017). The relationship between moral literacy, teacher/student interaction and psychological empowerment of students. The Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 12(1), 112-120. (Tex in Persian). Doi: 20.1001.1.22517634.1396.12.1.13.8 Vygotsky, L. (1934). 1986, Thought and Language, translation newly revised and edited by A. Kozulin. In: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Zarghami, S., Ramezani, A. . (2010). Ethical Fundamentals and Principles of Teacher-Student Relations on the Basis of a Comparative Analysis and Critical Study of Viewpoints of Existence Philosophers. Quarterly of Culture Strategy, 3(8-9), 91-114. (Tex in Persian). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 658 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 543 |
||
