پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 941 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,773 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,854,010 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,152,424 |
شناسایی و رتبه بندی شاخصهای عملکرد کارت امتیازی متوازن (مطالعه موردی: شرکت ملی گاز ایران) | ||
| پژوهش های تجربی حسابداری | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 3، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 10، دی 1392، صفحه 129-146 اصل مقاله (2.46 M) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jera.2014.595 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد نظری پور* 1؛ محسن پارسایی2 | ||
| 1دانشگاه کردستان | ||
| 2دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد همدان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| موضوع و هدف مقاله: از جمله دغدغه های اصلی هر سازمانی، تعیین شاخصهای ارزیابی متوازن عملکرد می باشد. یکی از ابزارهای موثر در این زمینه، رویکرد کارت امتیازی متوازن می باشد. در این پژوهش تلاش شده است تا شاخصهای ارزیابی متوازن عملکرد در شرکت ملی گاز ایران شناسایی و رتبه بندی شوند. روش پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر نحوه گردآوری داده‌ها، توصیفی/پیمایشی است؛ لذا با مرور ادبیات موضوع، نقشه ی استراتژیک شرکت ملی گاز ایران و بهره گیری از نظر خبرگان و کارشناسان، با استفاده از تکنیک دلفی، در نهایت تعداد 27 متغیر بعنوان شاخصهای ارزیابی متوازن عملکرد، شناسایی شدند. یافته های پژوهش: با استفاده از تجزیه و تحلیل آماری و بکارگیری آزمون علامت، اصلی-ترین شاخصها که شامل 24 مورد بودند از میان این 27 شاخص اولیه استخراج شدند. سپس با استفاده از آزمون آماری فریدمن 24 شاخص اصلی شناسایی شده رتبه بندی شدند. توانایی عملیاتی نمودن نقشه ی استراتژیک رمز اصلی موفقیت و تداوم فعالیت هر شرکتی بحساب می آید. نتایج پژوهش نشان می دهد با استفاده از رویکرد کارت امتیازی متوازن می توان بخشهای مهم نقشه ی استراتژیک شرکت ملی گاز ایران را بدرستی و به موقع شناسایی، رتبه بندی و عملیاتی نمود. نتیجه گیری: استفاده از رویکرد کارت امتیازی متوازن در فرایند ارزیابی عملکرد می تواند باعث صرفه جوئی در وقت و منابع شرکت ملی گاز ایران و درنتیجه زمینه ساز کسب مزیت رقابتی آن در بازارهای رقابتی امروزی گردد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| شاخصهای ارزیابی عملکرد؛ نقشه‌ی استراتژیک؛ کارت امتیازی متوازن و شرکت ملی گاز ایران | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identifying and Ranking the Balanced Scorecard Performance Indicators (Case Study: National Iranian Gas Company) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Nazaripour1؛ Mohsen Parsaee2 | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Aim: Among the main concern for any organization is identifying the balanced performance measurement indicators. One of the most effective tools in this regard is the balanced scorecard approach. In this research, it has been attempted to identify and rank the balanced performance measurement indicators in National Iranian Gas Company. Method: In the light of aim, this research is among the applied research and with respect to the method of data collection it is the descriptive/survey research. Therefore, with reviewing the related literature, national Iranian gas company’s strategic map and using experts’ opinions as well as using the Delphi technique, 27 variables were finally identified as the balanced performance measurement indicators. Findings: using the statistical analysis as well as sign test, the main indicators that were 24 variables among 27 initial indicators were selected. Finally, through using Friedman test, these 24 indicators were ranked. The ability of operationalizing the strategic map is considered a key factor in success and going concern of each company. The research findings showed that using the balanced scorecard approach can identify, rank and operationalize the important parts of national Iranian gas company’s strategic map correctly and timely. Conclusion: using the balanced scorecard in the process of performance measurement can lead to savings in time and resources as well as to gain competitive advantage for national Iranian gas company. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Performance Measurement Indicators, Strategic Map, Balanced Scorecard and National Iranian Gas Company | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
پارسایی، محسن. (1391). کاربرد کارت ارزیابی متوازن در شرکت ملی گاز ایران، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد همدان. Aranda, C., & Arellano, J. (2010). Consensus and link structure in strategic performance measurement systems: A field study. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 22, 271–299. Ballou, B., Heitger, D. I., & Tabor, R. (2003). Nonfinancial performance measures in the healthcare industry. Management Accounting Quarterly, 5(1), 11–16. Barney J. (2010). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. Braam, G. J. M. and Nijssen, E. J. (2004). Performance effects of using the balanced scorecard: A note on the Dutch experience. Long Range Planning, 37 (4), 335-349. Chan, L. (2004). Performance measurement and adoption of the balanced score card: A survey of the Municipal governments in the USA and Canada. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17 (2), 21. Chwan-Yi, C., & Lin, B. (2009). An Integration of Balanced Scorecards and Data Envelopment Analysis for Firm’s Benchmarking Management. Total Quality Management, 11(20), 1153-1172. Davis, S., & Albright, T. (2004). An investigation of the effect of the balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance. Management Accounting Research, 15(2), 135–153. DeBusk, G. K., Brown, R. M. and Killough, L. N. (2003). Components and relative weights in utilization of dashboard measurement systems like the balanced scorecard. The British Accounting Review, 35 (3), 215-231. El-shishini, H. (2001). Integrating financial and non-financial performance measures: State of the art and research opportunities). In: Management Accounting Research Group Conference, Aston Business School, Birmingham. doi:10.2139/ssrn.283651. Frigo, M. L., Pustorino, P. G., & Krull, G. W. (2000). The Balanced Scorecard for community banks: Translating strategy into action. Bank Accounting and Finance, 13(3), 17–29. Hoque, Z., James, W. (2000). Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on Organizational Performance, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12, 1-17. Huang, H. C. (2009). Designing a knowledge-based system for strategic planning: A balanced scorecard perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (1), 209-218. Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F. and Randall, T. (2003). Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28 (7-8), 715-741. Kald, M. and Nilsson, F. (2000). Performance measurement at Nordic companies. European Management Journal, 18 (1), 113-127. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70 (1), 71-79. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 71, 134–47. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74, 75–85. Lawton, R. (2002). Balance your balanced scorecard. Quality Progress, 35 (3), 66-71. Leung, L., Lam, K. and Cao, D. (2006). Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network process. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57 (6), 682-691. Lipe, M. G. and Salterio, S. E. (2000). The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review, 75 (3), 283-298. Malina, M., Nørreklit, H., & Selto, F. (2007). Relations among measures, climate of control and performance measurement models. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3), 935–982. Michalska, J. (2005). The usage of the balanced scorecard for the estimation of the enterprise’s effectiveness. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 162-163, 751-758. Niven PR. (2003). Balanced scorecard step-by-step for governments and nonprofits, New York: Jon Wiley and Sons. Norton, D. P., Contrada, M. G., & LoFrumento, T. (1997). Case study: How Chase Manhattan Bank uses the Balanced Scorecard. Banking Accounting and Finance, 11(1), 3–19. Olson EM, Slater SF. (2002). The balanced scorecard, competitive strategy, and performance. Business Horizons, 45, 11–6. Otley, D. and Fakiolas, A. (2000). Reliance on accounting performance measures: Dead end or new beginning?. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25 (4-5), 497-510. Sedera, D., Gable, G. and Rosemann, M. (2001). A balanced scorecard approach to enterprise systems performance measurement. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Australia. Speckbacher, G., Bischot, J. and Pfeiffer, T. (2003). A descriptive analysis on the implementation of balanced scorecards in German-speaking countries. Management Accounting Research, 14 (4), 361-387. Tapanya, S. (2004). Examining the factors which influence performance measurement and management in the Thai banking industry: An application of the balanced scorecard framework. Murdoch University, Perth, Australia. PhD Thesis. Venkatraman N, Ramanujam V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Acad Manage Rev 11(4), 801–814 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,720 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,299 |
||