پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 931 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,652 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,491,752 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,884,268 |
تأثیر معاملات با اشخاص وابسته بر وجود تحریف در صورت‌های مالی و کیفیت گزارشگری مالی: با تأکید بر تعدیلات سنواتی و خطای برآورد اقلام تعهدی | ||
| پژوهش های تجربی حسابداری | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 13، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 48، تیر 1402، صفحه 1-26 اصل مقاله (586.67 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jera.2023.42772.3094 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مجید رستگارپویانی* 1؛ حسین اعتمادی2؛ منصور مومنی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حسابداری، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استاد گروه حسابداری دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3استاد گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت، انشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| درخصوص انگیزه‌های معاملات با اشخاص وابسته دو تئوری رقیب وجود دارد؛ تئوری اول، تئوری قرارداد کارآمد است که در آن فرض می‌شود تعامل نزدیک بین اشخاص وابسته، به شرکت‌ها کمک می‌کند تا هزینه‌های معاملات را در مقایسه با هزینه‌های معامله با اشخاص غیروابسته کاهش دهند؛ تئوری دوم مبتنی بر تئوری نمایندگی و دیدگاه فرصت‌طلبانه است. از منظر این تئوری معاملات با اشخاص وابسته برای سهامداران دارای حق کنترل، مدیران و سایر اشخاص وابسته فرصت‌های مناسبی فراهم می‌کند تا از طریق آنها منابع شرکت را به سود خود و به ضرر سهامداران فاقد حق کنترل خارج کنند. هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر این است که مشخص شود معاملات صورت‌گرفته با اشخاص وابسته در ایران با کدامیک از این تئوری‌ها سازگار است. برای این منظور تاثیر معاملات با اشخاص وابسته بر ارائه گزارش‌های مالی حاوی تحریف و همچنین تأثیر آن بر کیفیت گزارشگری مالی بررسی شده است. در همین رابطه تعداد 134 شرکت پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران طی سال‌های 1394 تا 1399 مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. در آزمون فرضیات این پژوهش داده‌های تلفیقی و مقطعی استفاده شده است. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل رگرسیون نشان می‌دهد که مبلغ معاملات با اشخاص وابسته بر تعدیلات سنواتی سال بعد که معیار تحربف در صورت‌های مالی می‌باشد تاثیر مثبت و معنادار دارد. همچنین مبلغ معاملات با اشخاص وابسته بر کیفیت گزارشگری مالی که معیار اندازه‌گیری آن کیفیت اقلام تعهدی است، تاثیر منفی و معنادار دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اقلام تعهدی؛ تحریف؛ تعدیلات سنواتی؛ کیفیت گزارشگری؛ معاملات با اشخاص وابسته | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Association between Related-party Transactions and the Existence of Distortions in Financial Statements and the Financial Reporting Quality: The Role of Restatements and Accrual Estimation Errors | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Majid Rastegarpouyani1؛ Hosein Etemadi2؛ Mansour Momeni3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student, Department of Accounting, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Accounting, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Management, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| There are two opposing theoretical frameworks concerning related party transactions in prior studies. The first theory, known as efficient contracting, argues that related-party transactions can be used to optimize internal resource allocation and reduce transaction costs; the second theory, known as agency theory, argues that related-party transactions provide opportunities for controlling shareholders, managers, and others related parties to extract resources from minority shareholders. The main goal of this study is to determine which of these theories is compatible with the transactions made with related parties in Iran. For this purpose, the impact of transactions with related parties on the presentation of financial reports containing distortions and its impact on the quality of accruals has been investigated, and in this regard, the number 134 firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 2016 to 2021 has been investigated. To test the hypotheses of this research, pooled and cross-sectional data were used, and the regression analysis results show a positive and significant association between the amount of related party transactions and next year's restatements, which is a measure of distortion in financial statements. Also, there is a negative and significant association between the amounts of related party transactions and accrual quality, which is used as a measure of reporting quality in this research. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Related Party Transactions, Accruals, Financial Reporting Quality, Restatements. Distortion | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
منابع
افلاطونی، عباس. (1392). تجزیه و تحلیل آماری با Eviews در تحقیقات حسابداری و مدیریت مالی، تهران: ترمه.
حاجیها, زهره و عادله آزادزاده. 1399. “رابطه بین معاملات با اشخاص وابسته و کیفیت اطلاعات حسابداری: بررسی نقش رفتار فرصت‌طلبانه مدیران.” پژوهش های تجربی حسابداری 9(2): 187–212.
سرلک, نرگس و مینا اکبری. 1392. “رابطه بین معاملات با اشخاص وابسته و مدیریت سود.” بررسی های حسابداری و حسابرسی 74(20): 77–92.
شعری, صابر و الهام حمیدی. 1391. “شناسایی انگیزه‌های معاملات با اشخاص وابسته.” پژوهش های تجربی حسابداری 2(6): 49–64.
وقفی, سیدحسام, مریم سلمانیان, فرزاد مانیان و علی فیاض. 1397. “بررسی رابطه بین معاملات با اشخاص وابسته با کیفیت افشا، مدیریت سود و سودآوری در شرکت‌های بورس اوراق بهادار تهران.” پژوهش های تجربی حسابداری 28(7): 71–94.
References
Aharony, Joseph, Jiwei Wang, and Hongqi Yuan. 2010. “Tunneling as an Incentive for Earnings Management during the IPO Process in China.” journal of Accounting and Public Policy 29(1): 1–26.
Bailey, James A. 2016. “Fraud and Related-Party Transactions: Internal Auditors Can Identify Red Flags and Reduce the Risk and Impact of Related-Party Fraud.” Internal Auditor 73(3): 58–63.
Beasley, Mark S, Joseph V Carcello, Dana R Hermanson, and Terry L Neal. 2010. Fraudulent Financial Reporting: 1998-2007: An Analysis of US Public Companies. COSO, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Bell, Timothy B, and Joseph V Carcello. 2000. “A Decision Aid for Assessing the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19(1): 169–84.
Berkman, Henk, Rebel A Cole, and Lawrence J Fu. 2009. “Expropriation through Loan Guarantees to Related Parties: Evidence from China.” Journal of Banking & Finance 33(1): 141–56.
Chen, Donghua, Ming Jian, and Ming Xu. 2009. “Dividends for Tunneling in a Regulated Economy: The Case of China.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 17(2): 209–23.
Chen, Yenpao, Chien‐Hsun Chen, and Weiju Chen. 2009. “The Impact of Related Party Transactions on the Operational Performance of Listed Companies in China.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 12(4): 285–97.
Cheung, Yan-Leung et al. 2009. “Tunneling and Propping up: An Analysis of Related Party Transactions by Chinese Listed Companies.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 17(3): 372–93.
Cheung, Yan-Leung, P Raghavendra Rau, and Aris Stouraitis. 2006. “Tunneling, Propping, and Expropriation: Evidence from Connected Party Transactions in Hong Kong.” Journal of Financial economics 82(2): 343–86.
DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth. 1981. “Auditor Size and Audit Quality.” Journal of accounting and economics 3(3): 183–99.
Dechow, Patricia M., and Ilia D. Dichev. 2002. “The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors.” Accounting Review 77(SUPPL.): 35–59.
DeFond, Mark, and Jieying Zhang. 2014. “A Review of Archival Auditing Research.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 58(2–3): 275–326.
Djankov, Simeon, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2008. “The Law and Economics of Self-Dealing.” Journal of financial economics 88(3): 430–65.
Dow, Sandra, and Jean McGuire. 2009. “Propping and Tunneling: Empirical Evidence from Japanese Keiretsu.” Journal of Banking & Finance 33(10): 1817–28.
Dyck, Alexander, and Luigi Zingales. 2004. “Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison.” The journal of finance 59(2): 537–600.
El-Helaly, Moataz. 2016. “Related Party Transactions and Accounting Quality in Greece.” International Journal of Accounting & Information Management 24(4): 375–90.
———. 2018. “Related-Party Transactions: A Review of the Regulation, Governance and Auditing Literature.” Managerial Auditing Journal 33(8–9): 779–806.
Fang, Junxiong, Gerald J. Lobo, Yinqi Zhang, and Yuping Zhao. 2018. “Auditing Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Audit Opinions and Restatements.” Auditing 37(2). 73-106
Francis, Jennifer, Ryan LaFond, Per M Olsson, and Katherine Schipper. 2004. “Costs of Equity and Earnings Attributes.” The accounting review 79(4): 967–1010.
Francis, Jennifer, Ryan LaFond, Per Olsson, and Katherine Schipper. 2005. “The Market Pricing of Accruals Quality.” Journal of accounting and economics 39(2): 295–327.
Francis, Jere R., Paul N. Michas, and Michael D. Yu. 2013. “Office Size of Big 4 Auditors and Client Restatements.” Contemporary Accounting Research 30(4): 1626–61.
Gallery, Gerry, Natalie Gallery, and Matthew Supranowicz. 2008. “Cash-Based Related Party Transactions in New Economy Firms.” Accounting Research Journal 21(2): 147–66.
Ge, Wenxia et al. 2010. “Value Relevance of Disclosed Related Party Transactions.” Advances in Accounting 26(1): 134–41.
Gordon, Elizabeth A., Elaine Henry, and Darius Palia. 2005. “Related Party Transactions: Associations with Corporate Governance and Firm Value.” SSRN Electronic Journal.
Gordon, Elizabeth A, and Elaine Henry. 2005. “Related Party Transactions and Earnings Management.” Available at SSRN 612234.
Henry, Elaine, Elizabeth A. Gordon, Brad J. Reed, and Timothy J. Louwers. 2011. “The Role of Related Party Transactions in Fraudulent Financial Reporting.” SSRN Electronic Journal: 1–39. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=993532.
Henry, Elaine, Elizabeth A Gordon, Brad Reed, and Timothy Louwers. 2007. “The Role of Related Party Transactions in Fraudulent Financial Reporting.” Available at SSRN 993532.
Hogan, Chris E, and Michael S Wilkins. 2008. “Evidence on the Audit Risk Model: Do Auditors Increase Audit Fees in the Presence of Internal Control Deficiencies?” Contemporary Accounting Research 25(1): 219–42.
Hoitash, Rani, Ariel Markelevich, and Charles A Barragato. 2007. “Auditor Fees and Audit Quality.” Managerial auditing journal. 761-786.
Hribar, Paul, Todd Kravet, and Ryan Wilson. 2014. “A New Measure of Accounting Quality.” Review of Accounting Studies 19(1): 506–38.
Hu, H. W., & Sun, P. (2019). What Determines the Severity of Tunneling in China? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(1), 161-184
Hwang, Nen-Chen Richard, Jeng-Ren Chiou, and Ying-Chieh Wang. 2013. “Effect of Disclosure Regulation on Earnings Management through Related-Party Transactions: Evidence from Taiwanese Firms Operating in China.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 32(4): 292–313.
Jia, Nan, Jing Shi, and Yongxiang Wang. 2013. “Coinsurance within Business Groups: Evidence from Related Party Transactions in an Emerging Market.” Management Science 59(10): 2295–2313.
Jian, M, and T Wong. 2004. “Earnings Management and Tunneling through Related.”
Jian, Ming, and Tak Jun Wong. 2010. “Propping through Related Party Transactions.” Review of Accounting Studies 15(1): 70–105.
Johnson, Simon, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2000. “Tunneling.” American economic review 90(2): 22–27.
Jorgensen, Bjorn N, and Julia Morley. 2017. “Discussion of ‘Are Related Party Transactions Red Flags?’” Contemporary Accounting Research 34(2): 929–39.
Kend, Michael. 2008. “Client Industry Audit Expertise: Towards a Better Understanding.” Pacific Accounting Review 20(1): 49–62.
Khanna, Tarun, and Krishna Palepu. 2000. “Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups.” The journal of finance 55(2): 867–91.
Kohlbeck, Mark, and Brian W. Mayhew. 2017a. “Are Related Party Transactions Red Flags?” Contemporary Accounting Research 34(2): 900–928.
Lee, Myung-Gun, Minjung Kang, Ho-Young Lee, and Jong Chool Park. 2016. “Related-Party Transactions and Financial Statement Comparability: Evidence from South Korea.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 23(2): 224–52.
Lennox, Clive, and Bing Li. 2012. “The Consequences of Protecting Audit Partners’ Personal Assets from the Threat of Liability.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 54(2–3): 154–73.
Leuz, Christian, Dhananjay Nanda, and Peter D Wysocki. 2003. “Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison.” Journal of financial economics 69(3): 505–27.
Lev, Baruch, Siyi Li, and Theodore Sougiannis. 2010. “The Usefulness of Accounting Estimates for Predicting Cash Flows and Earnings.” Review of Accounting Studies 15(4): 779–807.
Lo, Agnes W Y, and Raymond M K Wong. 2011. “An Empirical Study of Voluntary Transfer Pricing Disclosures in China.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 30(6): 607–28.
Lo, Agnes W Y, Raymond M K Wong, and Michael Firth. 2010. “Can Corporate Governance Deter Management from Manipulating Earnings? Evidence from Related-Party Sales Transactions in China.” Journal of Corporate Finance 16(2): 225–35.
Mitchell Van Der Zahn, J L W, Greg Tower, and Alistair M Brown. 2006. “Auditor Independence, Auditor Specialisation and Earnings Management: Further Evidence from Singapore.” International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation 3(2): 166–93.
Newton, Nathan J, Dechun Wang, and Michael S Wilkins. 2013. “Does a Lack of Choice Lead to Lower Quality? Evidence from Auditor Competition and Client Restatements.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32(3): 31–67.
Pizzo, Michele. 2013. “Related Party Transactions under a Contingency Perspective.” Journal of Management & Governance 17(2): 309–30.
Ryngaert, Michael, and Shawn Thomas. 2012. “Not All Related Party Transactions (RPTs) Are the Same: Ex Ante versus Ex Post RPTs.” Journal of Accounting Research 50(3): 845–82.
Schipper, Katherine, and Linda Vincent. 2003. “Earnings Quality.” Accounting horizons 17: 97–110.
Thomas, Wayne B, Donald R Herrmann, and Tatsuo Inoue. 2004. “Earnings Management through Affiliated Transactions.” Journal of International Accounting Research 3(2): 1–25.
Vanstraelen, Ann. 2000. “Impact of Renewable Long-Term Audit Mandates on Audit Quality.” European Accounting Review 9(3): 419–42
Wulandari, Trisninik R, Doddy Setiawan, and Ari K Widagdo. 2022. “Related Party Transactions and Firm Value in Indonesia: Opportunistic vs. Efficient Transactions.” Risks 10(11). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 565 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 507 |
||
