تعداد نشریات | 25 |
تعداد شمارهها | 932 |
تعداد مقالات | 7,652 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,493,010 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,884,687 |
Casting Light on Teacher Recasts: Learner Noticing and Interpretation | ||
Journal of Language Horizons | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 16، آذر 2023، صفحه 55-82 اصل مقاله (430.62 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/lghor.2022.38327.1584 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Homa Jafarpour Mamaghani* 1؛ Mandana Zolghaldri2 | ||
1Assistant Professor Department of English Language, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran. | ||
2Assistant Professor Department of English Language, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
The role of teacher feedback as a contributor to effective instruction has long been established. However, the types of feedback frequently exploited during English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction and the efficiency of teacher feedback types, addressed in this study, warranted thorough investigation. Moreover, the recasts noticed by learners and the gaps they conveyed were scrutinized to investigate the correspondence between recast types and their interpretation with an eye to learner English proficiency level. To this end, a recast-sensitive teacher’s oral recasts, in four intact communicative English classes, were investigated. To capture the recast episodes, six class sessions were video-recorded, and follow-up stimulated recall interviews on the teachers’ and students’ thoughts and perceptions of each recast were audio-taped. Then the teacher and 31 learners, who had received recasts, were interviewed. The analysis of the coded qualitative data was guided by Nabei and Swain’s (2002) classification of recast types. It revealed that the most frequent recast types were simple, vocabulary-focused, incorporated declarative, direct, and corrective with or without the intention to communicate which also corresponded with the learners’ noticing of the recast. Moreover, chi-square tests indicated that only the linguistic targets were significantly related to learners’ accurate interpretation while the inaccurate learner interpretations were predominantly meaning-focused. The analysis also indicated a positive correspondence between the learners’ English proficiency level and their accurate interpretation of the recasts perceived. The findings have implications for teachers as the results can sensitize them to recast multi-dimensional treatment and their efficient manipulation. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
communicative interaction؛ corrective feedback؛ noticing؛ target؛ type | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
نگاهی بر قالب ریزی مجدد خطاهای زبان آموز توسط معلم: توجه زبان آموز به باز خورد اصلاحی و تعبیر آن | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
هما جعفرپور ممقانی1؛ ماندانا ذوالقدری2 | ||
1استادیار گروه زبان انگلیسی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران. | ||
2استادیار گروه زبان انگلیسی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
نقش بازخورد اصلاحی در آموزش کارآمد جایگاه ویژه ای دارد اما خلأ تحقیق در زمینه باز خورد اصلاحی رایج در آموزش زبان انگلیسی و کارآمدی آن، که در این پژوهش بررسی گردید، همچنان حس می شد. بعلاوه، رابطه ی نوع بازخورد با توجه و برداشت زبان آموزان با نظر به سطح زبان آنان بررسی شد. بدین منظور، عملکرد معلمی حساس به قالب ریزی مجدد در چهار کلاس زبان انگلیسی عمومی، مطالعه شد. برای دسترسی به موارد قالب ریزی مجدد، شش جلسه از کلاس های وی ضبط ویدیویی شد. سپس معلم و شاگردان در مصاحبه ای که متعاقبا" برگزار شد شرکت کردند تا ذهنیت آنها راجع به هر مورد قالبریزی مجدد و برداشت زبان آموزان آشکار شود. فقط 31 نفری مصاحبه شدند که از معلم قالب ریزی مجدد دریافت کرده بودند. واکاوی داده ها پس از کد گذاری منطبق بر دسته بندی نبی و سووین (2002) حاکی از این نتایج بود: پر تکرارترین موارد، قالب ریزیهای ساده، معطوف به واژه و غلط گیری صریح با جایگزین برای اصلاح چه به قصد برقراری ارتباط و چه بدون قصد برقراری ارتباط بودند. این نوع بازخوردها بیشتر جلب توجه می کردند. نتایج آزمون های مجذور خی نشان داد زمانی که عناصر زبانشناختی هدف قرار می گرفتند زبان آموزان بطوری معنادار درکی درست از خطا داشتند. اما وقتی قالب ریزی به معنا می پرداخت در درکش عمدتا" خطا می کردند. یافته های این پژوهش می تواند با ایجاد حساسیت در معلمان برای ارائه ی چند بعدی قالب ریزی مجدد و بهره گیری ازآن روشنگرباشد. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
تعامل ارتباطی, بازخورد اصلاحی, توجه به قالب ریزی مجدد, هدف, نوع | ||
مراجع | ||
Abbuhl, A. (2021). Interactionist approach to corrective feedback in second language acquisition. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in language learning and teaching (pp. 44–64). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.003 Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060268 Bailey, K. (2012). Reflective pedagogy. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 23–29). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024778.004 Brown, J. D. (2015). Mixed method research. In J. D. Brown & C. Coombe (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning (pp.78–84). Cambridge University Press. Carpenter, H., Jeon, S., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners' interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060104 Davis, J. McE. (2015). Sampling and what it means. In J. D. Brown & C. Coombe (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning (pp. 198–205). Cambridge University Press. Egi, T. (2010). Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: Learner responses as language awareness. The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00980.x Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118271643 Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310606027X Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. J. (2017). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. (2nd ed.). Routledge. Han, Z. (2008). On the role of meaning in focus on form. In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp.45–79). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690159-006 Han, Z. (2021). Corrective feedback from behaviorist and innatist perspectives. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in language learning and teaching (pp. 23–43). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.002 Hancock, C. (2009). How linguistics can inform the teaching of writing. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J Riley & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The Sage handbook of writing development (pp.194–208). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021069.n14 Hassanzadeh, M., Marefat, F., & Ramezani, A. (2019). The impact of single versus multiple recasts on L2 learners’ implicit and explicit knowledge. Heliyon, 5(5), Article e01748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01748 Havranek, G., & Cesnik, H. (2001). Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. In H. Foster-Cohen & A. Nizegorodcew (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook(Vol. 1, pp. 99–122). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.1.10hav Jackson, D. O. (2021). Language teacher noticing in tasks. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800411241 Kennedy, S. (2010). Corrective feedback for learners of varied proficiency levels: A Teacher’s choices. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1054 Kim, J., & Han, Z. (2007). Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and Learner interpretation overlap? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 262–297). Oxford University Press. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1991). Language-learning tasks: Teacher intention and learner interpretation. ELT Journal, 45(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/45.2.98 Leow, R. P., & Driver, M. (2021). Cognitive theoretical perspectives of corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in language learning and teaching (pp. 65–84). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.004 Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 536–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 51–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226319800103X Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034 Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520 Mackey, A. (Ed.). (2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition. Oxford University Press. Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford University Press. Mackey, A., & Bryfonsky, L. (2018). Mixed methodology. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 55–77). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_5 Mackey, A. (2020). Interaction, feedback and task research in second language learning: methods and design. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589284 Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research Synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407–452). Oxford University Press. Mackey, A., Perdue, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004010 Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x Myhill, D., Lines, H. & Watson, A. (2012). Making meaning with grammar: a repertoire of possibilities. English in Australia, 47(3), 29–38. Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language Awareness, 11(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410208667045 Nassaji, H. (2015). Interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning. Bloomsbury. Nassaji, H. (2021). Corrective feedback from a sociocultural perspective. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in language learning and teaching (pp. 85–107). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.005 Oliver, R. & Adams, R. (2021). Oral corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in language learning and teaching (pp. 187–206). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.010 Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program (6th ed.). Open University. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Non-native speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS–NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000044 Saslow. J., & Ascher, A. (2016). Summit: English for today’s world (3rd ed.). Pearson Longman. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 361–392. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr203oa Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 171–195). Oxford University Press. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 178 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 169 |