پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 932 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,653 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,495,022 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,886,454 |
مضمون‌شناسی تطبیقی انسان‌گرایی در دو اثر «داوری اخروی» از هیرونیموس بوش و میکلانژ با رویکرد شمایل‌شناسی پانوفسکی | ||
| جلوه هنر | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 13، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 32، آذر 1400، صفحه 73-86 اصل مقاله (2.15 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jjh.2021.36233.1647 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| علی اصغر کلانتر* | ||
| استادیار گروه صنایع دستی و پژوهش هنر، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در متون مقدس، بازگشت مجدد مسیح برای واپسین داوری در دو مرحله انجام خواهد شد. بازگشت اول در آسمان و بازگشت دوم که با نام داوری اخروی شناخته می‌شود، بر روی زمین رخ می‌دهد. داوری اخروی یکی از موضوعات موردتوجه هنرمندان مسیحی در دوره‌های مختلف بوده است. هیرونیموس بوش (1450-1516 م) هلندی و میکلانژ (1475-1564 م) ایتالیایی، دو هنرمند شاخص هم‌عصر هستند که به این موضوع پرداخته‌اند. مسأله این پژوهش بررسی تفاوت‌ها و شباهت‌های نگاه بوش و میکلانژ به داوری اخروی با هدف شناخت غایت آفرینندگی در آثار این دو هنرمند است. علت انتخاب این دو اثر، اهمیت تاریخی و شاخص بودن هنرمندان آفریننده آنها در تاریخ هنر است. این پژوهش ماهیت کیفی داشته و در انجام آن از روش‌های توصیفی، تحلیلی و تطبیقی استفاده شده است. فرضیه‌ی پژوهش آن بوده که موجودیت آثار خلق‌شده، با ویژگی‌های یک دوره تاریخی، یک گروه اجتماعی و یا یک فرد رابطه دارد. سوال پژوهش آن بوده که دو اثر «داوری اخروی» هیرانیموس بوش و میکلانژ چه شباهت و تفاوت‌های موضوعی و مضمونی (محتوایی) با هم دارند. بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهد وفاداری به روایت رویدادها، بیان همزمان دو مرحله‌ی داوری و به تصویر کشیدن عناصر موجود در رویداد داوری اخروی، شباهت‌های دو اثر هستند. این آثار با رویکردی انسان‌گرایانه، اما متأثر از دو ریشه‌ی متفاوت تاریخی آفریده شده‌اند. بوش در اثر خود، وفاداری به فلسفه‌ی مسیحی قرون‌وسطایی را با تمرکز بر فرودستی انسان در برابر امر متعالی و بر روی سه لوح چوبی به تصویر کشیده و میکلانژ، تولّد و جریان نوپای انسان‌مداریِ (اومانیسم) رنسانس را با تمرکز بر محوریت انسان و با روایت یک آموزه‌ی مسیحی به‌وسیله‌ی تصاویری برگرفته از هنر باستانی یونان، بر دیوار بزرگ محراب کلیسای مشهور سیستین جاودانه کرده است. ازاین‌رو می‌توان گفت اثر هیرانیموس بوش، برای خدا آفریده شده است و اثر میکلانژ برای انسان. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کلید واژه‌ها: هنر مسیحی؛ داوری اخروی؛ رنسانس؛ هیرونیموس بوش؛ میکلانژ | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Comparative Thematology with Regards to the Humanism in Hieronymus Bosch's and Michelangelo’s The Last Judgement Paintings through Erwin Panofsky's Iconology Approach | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Asghar Kalantar | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of Handicrafts and Art Research, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| One of the main beliefs in Christianity is the belief in the return of Christ in the end times and his final judgment. Through this just judgment, the eternal place of human beings in Heaven or Hell is determined. There are numerous references such as the holy books and texts about this return that its conditions are the topic matters of this research. In the scriptures, the return of Christ for final judgment takes place in two stages. The first return occurs in the sky, and the second return, known as the Last Judgment, occurs on Earth. The Last Judgment has been one of the topics to which Christian artists paid great attention in different eras. The fourteenth, fifteenth, and sixteenth centuries of Europe, known as the renaissance, are the period of the rebirth of thought in all fields. Some thinkers focused on the renaissance of traditional education and some on the rebirth of new knowledge. In these developments, the great tendency of people to the classic works of the past culture was called "Humanism". In these developments, southern Europe, including Italy, was mainly focused on the lexical and intellectual heritage of Cicero and the classic works of Greek and Roman civilization; and, in northern Europe, including Flanders, Christian Humanism was formed under the influence of Erasmus. The main motto at the time was "Return to the Sources", and the Bible in the original Hebrew and Greek languages, as well as the works of the early Church Fathers, were highly regarded. Hieronymus Bush of the Netherlands (1450-1516 AD) and Michelangelo of Italy (1475-1564 AD) are two prominent European artists of the 15th and 16th centuries who have dealt with the subject of "Last Judgment". Bush's mysterious art had little in common with the Flemish and Dutch paintings of the time. Hence, his art has been considered an autonomous art. The features of his work are such that his art is often seen as a full-blown mirror of the insurances and hopes of the decline of the Middle Ages with images of torment and fear, painful daily life, and sometimes images of Heaven and salvation. There are three paintings on the subject of the Last Judgment in Belgium, Vienna, and Munich attributed to Bush. In this study, the one which is kept in Belgium (Bruges) is comparatively investigated with the painting of Michelangelo on the wall of a Sistine Chapel. Michelangelo is a sculptor, painter, architect, and poet and one of the most important figures of the Renaissance. "Last Judgment" was one of the first works of art that Paul III commissioned to this artist after the election as the papal in 1534. The objective of this research is to examine the differences and similarities between perspectives of the two artists of Renaissance, Bosch and Michelangelo, on the Last Judgement. The reason for choosing these two works is the historical importance and significance of the artists who created them in the history of art due to the researcher's mental concern about the subject and the knowledge gained from previous studies on these two works. This qualitative research has been done with descriptive, analytical, and comparative methods. The research questioned the thematic and topical differences and similarities between Michelangelo’s and Bosch's The Last Judgment. This research was based on the theory of reflection, and it hypothesized that there is a relation between the existence and substantiality of the created artworks and the characteristics of a historical period, a social group, or an individual. In reading the images, Panofsky's iconographic approach to finding the objective reality of the image and understanding what is depicted in the work of art is considered. In conducting the research, first, the subject of the Last judgment and different perspectives in relation to this event were examined in order to obtain general knowledge about the subject of the works. Afterward, two artists, Hieronymus Bush and Michelangelo, are introduced as related topics regarding their artistic style. Finally, the works of each have been examined and matched, both in terms of visual and structural values and in terms of meaning. Information analysis shows that although the subject of these two works is the same and the socio-historical conditions at the time of creation have similarities, the style and mentality of the artist have played a major role in creating the content and message conveyed by the works. The studies show that loyalty to the narration of events, simultaneous representation of the two stages of judgment, and depicting the elements in the Last Judgment are the similarities of the two artworks. What is obvious at first glance is that the same theme, and the similar Humanistic approach of both artists in creating images, are powerful similarities and commonalities that serve to send a religious message. However, the important point is that these two pillars in the process of creating the work and passing through the artist's world, by sending different messages from two separate paths, reach the desired result of the artist. These works have been created with a Humanistic approach and yet are influenced by two different historical roots. While being loyal to the religious narrative of the Last Judgment, both artists have depicted the religious text based upon their own personal ideology and worldview, so the eventual theme and message that is proposed in each work have found an utterly personal content. Bush's Humanism is influenced by the philosophy and form of Humanism of medieval Christianity; and, it seeks to distinguish between man and what is superior to him. The atmosphere of this work is based on the representation of suffering as one of the defining Christian teachings; therefore, Hell and the depiction of its atmosphere have been closer to the artist's thought. In his work, Bosch has depicted the subject on three wooden panels by focusing on humankind’s lowliness vis-à-vis the Sublime. In the upper part of the image, in the peace and sanctity of God, without showing the instruments of torture and harassment, Christ watches over those present in the image and the viewers of the work. The depicted scene is like a visual sermon that, along with the kindness of Christ, conveys punishment and fear of punishment to the general public. Nevertheless, Michelangelo's Humanism is a new re-enactment of Greek Humanism and a construct of thought that distinguishes man from what is superior to him, whether animals or even uncivilized people. With a focus on the pivotal role of humankind and while narrating a Christian teaching using images based upon the art of ancient Greece, Michelangelo has immortalized the birth and the young movement of Renaissance Humanism on the great altar wall of the famous Sistine Chapel. In the middle of the work, Christ, with half of his face in the shadows and thus obscuring the authority of his gaze, is listening to the question of the questioners with a human action similar to the other figures. Hence, we are faced with two works with unique stylistic features that need to be read more carefully. These works have been created with a Humanistic approach but were influenced by two different historical roots. The study of the composition used in the two works shows their adherence to the themes desired by the artists. In Bush's painting, the Last Judgment as a religious belief is the main theme and is conveyed to the audience; however, in Michelangelo's painting, the first and last thing that will engage the audience is the fate of man. The present elements and the quality of their presence in Bush's paintings are a function of the torment of the Last Judgment; and, in Michelangelo's painting, such elements are influenced by their relationship to humans and their effect on their real lives. Consequently, it can be said that the work of Hieronymus Bosch is created for God and Michelangelo’s for humankind. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Christian Art, The Last Judgment, Renaissance, Hieronymus Bosch, Michelangelo | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
اوانز، گیلیان رزماری (1392). فلسفه و الهیات در سده‌های میانه، بهنام اکبری، قم: انتشارات دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب.
آگوستین (آگوستین1393). شهر خدا، ترجمه حسین توفیقی، قم: انتشارات دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب.
پاکباز، رویین (1383). دایره‌المعارف هنر، چاپ چهارم، تهران: انتشارات فرهنگ معاصر،
تیسن، هنری [بیتا]. الهیات مسیحی، ترجمه‌ی طاطه وس میکائلیان، [بیجا]: [بینا].
چاواری، سعید (1388). «مقایسه ساختاری پرده روز محشر محمد مودبر و فرسک داوری واپسین اثر میکلانژ»، فصلنامه هنر، شماره 81، صص 179-160.
دادور، ابوالقاسم و مافی‌تبار، فاطمه (1397). «مطالعه تطبیقی رویکرد بازتاب در نقاشی‌های پیکره‌نگار نادرشاه و ناپلئون»، جلوه هنر، سال 10، شماره 2، صص 44-27.
دووینیو، ژان (1392). جامعه‌شناسی هنر، ترجمه مهدی سحابی، تهران: مرکز.
ساعی، علی (1392). روش پژوهش تطبیقی با رویکرد تحلیل کمی، تاریخی و فازی، تهران: آگاه.
کنگرانی، منیژه (گردآورنده)(1388). مجموعه مقالات دومین و سومین هم اندیشی هنر تطبیقی، تهران: فرهنگستان هنر.
لین، تونی (1395). تاریخ تفکر مسیحی، ترجمه روبرت آسریان، تهران: فرزان روز.
مظفری‌خواه، زینب (1390). «بررسی تطبیقی اثری از یان وان آیک و مارک شاگال با موضوع واحد»، جلوه هنر، سال 3، شماره 2، صص 61-49.
نامور مطلق، بهمن (1389). دانش‌های تطبیقی، تهران: سخن.
نصری، امیر (1392). «خوانش تصویر از دیدگاه اروین پانوفسکی»، فصلنامه کیمیای هنر، سال 2، شماره 6، صص 20-7.
ویور، مری جو (1393). درآمدی به مسیحیت، ترجمه حسن قنبری، قم: انتشارات دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب.
References Augustine. (1990). City of God, (Trans by H. Tofighi). Qom: University of Religions and Denominations Press (Text in Persian). Camara, E. (2021). Last judgment, Retrieved June 1, 2021 from Khan Academy Website. khanacademy.org/humanities/renaissance-reformation/high-ren-florence-rome/michelangelo/a/michelangelo-last-judgment. Chavari, S. (2009). A structural Comparison of Mohammad Modabber's "Doomsday curtain painting" and Michelangelo's " The last judgment", Faslname Honar, 81(179-160) (Text in Persian). Dadvar, A., Mafitabar, A. (2019). A comparative study of reflection approach in figurative paintings of Nader Shah and Napoleon, Glory of Art (Jelve-y Honar) Alzahra Scientific Quarterly Journal, 10-2(27-44) (Text in Persian). Dixon-Kennedy, M. (1998). Encyclopedia of Greco-Roman mythology, Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. Duvignaud, J. (2013). The Sociology of Art, Tehran: Markaz (Text in Persian). Evans, G. R. (1993). Philosophy and Theology in the Middle Ages, Behnam Akbari. Qom: University of Religions and Denominations Press (Text in Persian). Fernandes, J. W. (2016). Psychoanalytic Considerations on “The last judgment” by Hieronymus Bosch, Curitiba-Brazil. Gibson, W. S. (1973). Hieronymus Bosch (World of Art), London: Thames & Hadson. Kangarani, M. (ed). (2019). Collection of Articles of the Second and Third Symposium of Comparative Art, Tehran: Iranian Academy of the Arts (Text in Persian). Koldeweij, J. (2010). A man like Bosch. Jheronimus Bosch. his sources, 2nd International Jheronimus Bosch Conference, May 22-25, 2007, Jheronimus Bosch Art Center, pp. 16-29. Lane, T. (2016). Exploring Christian Thought, (Trans by R. Asrian). Tehran: Farzan Rooz (Text in Persian). Mozaffarikhah, Z. (2012). A comparative Study of a work by Jan Van Eyck and Marc Chagall on a Single Subject. Glory of Art (Jelve-y Honar) Alzahra Scientific Quarterly Journal, 3-2(49-619 (Text in Persian). Namvar Motlagh, B. (2010). Comparative knowledge, Tehran: Sokhan (Text in Persian). Nasri A. (2013). Reading Image with Erwin Panofsky, Kimiya-ye-Honar, 2-6(7-20) (Text in Persian). Pakbaz, R. (2005). Encyclopedia of Art, Tehran: Farhang-E Moaser (Text in Persian). Panofsky, E. (1995). Meaning in the Visual Arts, New York: Doubleday & Company. Saei, A. (2013). Comparative Research Method: with Quantitative, Historical and Fuzzy Analysis Approach, Tehran: Agah (Text in Persian). Thiessen, H. C. (n.d.) lectures in Systematic Theology, (n.p.) (Text in Persian). Van Straten, R. (1994). An Introduction to Iconography: Symbols, Allusions and meaning in the Visual Arts, New York: Abingdon. Weaver, M. J. (2014). Introduction to Christianity, (Trans by H. Qanbari). Qom: University of Religions and Denominations Press (Text in Persian).
URLs:
URL1: wga.hu/art/b/bosch/7triptyc/8lastjud.jpg (Access Date: 1/1/2021, 3:20 p.m.) URL2: wga.hu/art/m/michelan/3sistina/lastjudg/0lastjud.jpg (Access Date: 1/1/2021, 4:43 p.m.) URL3: https://www.tripimprover.com/blog/apollo-belvedere (Access Date: 2/1/2021, 2:14 a.m.) URL4: https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/the-%E2%80%9Cheyl-aphrodite-%E2%80%9D-an-exquisite-beauty-unknown/vwHyLqVKkQjS7g (Access Date: 2/1/2021, 2:08 a.m.)
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 520 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 359 |
||