پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 967 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,010 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,573,542 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,616,225 |
اثربخشی زمینۀ محیطی از دیدگاه بوم‌شناختی بر رشد حرکتی و خلاقیت کودکان | ||
| اندیشه های نوین تربیتی | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 60، شهریور 1400، صفحه 249-273 اصل مقاله (663.42 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/jontoe.2021.31695.3063 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد تقی اقدسی1؛ زهرا فتحی رضائی2؛ کوثر عباس‌پور* 3 | ||
| 1استاد گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران | ||
| 3گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف از این مقاله بررسی تأثیر زمینۀ محیطی از دیدگاه بوم‌شناختی بر رشد حرکتی و خلاقیت کودکان بود. بدین منظور از روش نیمه‌تجربی با طرح پیش‌آزمون-پس‌آزمون و روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند استفاده شد. تحقیق حاضر شامل کودکان پیش‌دبستانی 5/4 تا 5/6 ساله است که براساس تفاوت در زمینۀ‌های محیطی در دو گروه 15 نفره تقسیم شدند. گروه اول کودکانی بودند که در فضای طبیعی (مدرسة طبیعت) حضور داشتند و گروه دوم نیز کودکانی بودند که در فضای سرپوشیده (مهدکودک) فعالیت می‌کردند. هر دو گروه فعالیت‌های خود را در محیط‌های مشخص شده، به مدت دو ماه انجام دادند. برای سنجش رشد حرکتی (مهارت حرکتی درشت) از آزمون برونینکس اوزورتسکی و به منظور ارزیابی خلاقیت کودکان از آزمون تورنس استفاده شد. نتایج تحلیل واریانس مرکب نشان داد که مهارت حرکتی درشت کودکان در فضای باز طبیعی بهبود بیشتری نسبت به فضای سرپوشیده دارد. همچنین فعالیت در فضای باز، بر هر پنج عامل خلاقیت (بسط، ابتکار، سیالی، انعطاف‌پذیری و مهارت خلاقیت کل) تأثیر مثبت و معناداری نسبت به فضای سرپوشیده داشت. بنابراین می‌توان نتیجه گرفت محیط طبیعی نسبت به محیط سرپوشیده، بهبود بیشتری بر رشد مهارت حرکتی درشت و خلاقیت کودکان دارد و پیشنهاد می‌شود برای کودکان در دورة پیش دبستانی از تغییرپذیری در زمینة محیطی، به ویژه محیط طبیعی، استفاده بیشتری به عمل آید. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| زمینۀ محیطی؛ دیدگاه بوم‌شناختی؛ رشد حرکتی؛ خلاقیت؛ کودکان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effect of Environmental Contexts from Ecological Perspective on Motor Development and Creativity of Children | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Taghi Aghdasi1؛ zahra Fathirezaie2؛ Kosar Abbaspour3 | ||
| 1Professor of Motor Behavior, Physical Education and Sport Science Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Physical Education and Sport Science Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 3Group of Motor Behavior, Physical Education and Sport Science Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of environmental contexts from ecological perspective on motor development and creativity of children. This quasi-experimental study with a pretest–posttest design, recruited preschool children aged 4.5 to 6.5 years who were divided into two groups of 15 based on differences in environmental contexts (15 from the Nature School and 15 from kindergarten). To measure motor development, the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and to assess children's creativity, the Torrance Test of Creativity Thinking was used. Results of mixed ANOVA showed that activity in outdoor and indoor, had a positive and significant effect on the gross motor development (P=0.0001) and creativity (P=0.0001) of children. Thus, the natural environment is rich from stimulants, which has a remarkable effect on children’s development. Therefore, it is suggested that children have more activity in natural environment during their childhood to improve their motor and creativity development. Introduction The development of motor skills during infancy and childhood depends upon children’s growth and development characteristics (morphological, physiological, and neuromuscular characteristics) and environmental factors (play environment, family, school, etc.) (Pereira et al., 2021). One of the important environmental factors, among those examined in this study, affecting children’s development, is the use of natural space. Given the increasing prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity due to the extensive time children currently spend indoors, a priority for scientific research is to identify the opportunities and methods of motor learning and to increase children’s level of daily physical activities (Tonge et al., 2016; Truelove et al., 2018). Body experience and physical activity contribute to the development of self-awareness and learning different modes of expression, as well as encouraging the acquisition of physically active lifestyles (Ley & Barrio, 2019). Moreover, creative thinking, defined as novel thinking that produces valuable ideas, is a crucial skill in society. The development of these skills in childhood, which is the basis of learning, is very important and valuable (Aini et al., 2020). A recent study found that creative thinking in young children steadily increases until the third grade, then it levels off. The authors suggest this decrease may be due to increased focus on academic success and too many structured activities at the expense of unstructured, free play time (Wojciehowski & Ernst, 2018). Therefore, there is a need to renew efforts to foster creative thinking in young children. Nature school programs may offer a solution to help reverse this trend. Nature schools use nature themes and daily nature explorations as the central organizing concept of their program (Finch & Bailie, 2015). Children can improve gross and fine motor skills through play as they interact with the small and large loose parts in nature (Fathirezaie et al., 2021; Branje, 2021). Play environments where children can take risks promote increased play time, social interactions (Fathirezaie et al., 2021), creativity and resilience (Harper, 2017). Furthermore, children have been found to show a preference for spaces that allow them to explore their surroundings, try new things, accept challenges, and take risks. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of environmental contexts from ecological perspective on motor development and creativity of children. Methodology This research was quasi-experimental in nature and included two groups (15 children aged 5.5–6.5 years in each group) with a pretest–posttest design, conducted with purposive sampling. The first group were children in the natural space (nature school) and the second group were children who were indoors (kindergarten). Both groups conducted their activities in the specified environments for two months. In the natural space, children were free to explore different ways of feeling, behaving, and interacting with others. There were special spaces in the nature school, which included natural space, adventure space, active play space, quiet play space, and solitude space, which were created to promote and encourage play in nature. These spaces had natural elements such as sand, soil, water, wood, living beings, stone, fire, etc. and The children's activity in the nature school were lack of a definite schedule Because it was done by the children themselves. The second group of the study consisted of children enrolling in the typical kindergarten, those who performed their activities in the indoor space of the kindergarten and the main activities of the children in the kindergarten included painting training, curricula, and crafts. Additionally, the children in this kindergarten did not have any outdoor experiences. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency was used to measure motor development (gross motor skill) that consists of eight subtests (running speed and agility, balance, bilateral coordination, strength, upper-limb coordination, response speed, visual–motor control, and upper-limb speed and dexterity), with a total of 46 separate items that provide a comprehensive index of motor proficiency, as well as separate measures of both gross and fine motor skills (Flegel & Kolobe, 2002). Also Torrance Test of Creativity Thinking was used to measure children's creativity (Trisnayanti et al., 2019). The data were evaluated in terms of normal distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test. A mixed ANOVA analysis of variance was used to examine the research hypotheses. Results The multivariate test of the mixed ANOVA showed that in nature school group, time (pretest-posttest) main effect (F=48.74, p=0.0001, partial eta square =0.63), gross motor main effect (F=32.004, p=0.0001, partial eta squared=0.53), and the interactive effects of time *groups *motor skills were significant (F=48.074, p=0.0001, partial eta squared=0.62). The multivariate tests showed that the interactive effects of the test stages, intervention groups, and gross motor development were significant (p=0.0001). Also in kindergarten group, time (pretest-posttest) main effect (F=439.39, p=0.0001, partial eta square =0.94), creativity main effect (F=1158.19, p=0.0001, partial eta squared=0.98), the main effect of the groups (F=28.80, p=0.0001, partial eta squared=0.51), interactive effect between group and time (F=307.23, p=0.0001, partial eta squared=0.92), interactive effect between creativity and time (F=119.27, p=0.0001, partial eta squared=0.75), interactive effect between group and creativity (F=12.34, p=0.0001, partial eta squared=0.31) and the effect of the interaction of time *groups *creativity were significant (F=71.30, p=0.0001, partial eta squared=0.72). ). The multivariate tests showed that the interactive effects of the test stages, intervention groups, and creativity were significant (p=0.0001). The size effect values also showed that 77% of changes in gross motor skills, 90% in expansion factor, 80% in initiative factor, 69% in fluidity factor, 79% in flexibility factor and 95% change in total creativity of children were influenced by their activity in natural space. Results of mixed ANOVA showed that gross motor skills of children in the natural space were more improved than those in the indoor space. Also, activity in outdoor space had a positive and significant effect on the all five factors of creativity (fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration and total creativity skill) of children. Moreover, the differences between the two groups showed that the children who were active in the natural space made more improvement in gross motor development and creativity factors than kindergarten children. Discussion and conclusion Our findings highlighted that natural outdoor activity has positive and significant effects on gross motor development and creativity of children and it is suggested that children need to be active and play in environments that have a lot of variety and challenges (such as nature). Development of motor skills and abilities in young children are associated with motor active behaviors in adulthood (Kohl & Cook, 2013). Studies also report creative thinking scores have been decreasing significantly in recent years in children across all ages. Creative thinking, defined as novel thinking and production of valuable ideas, is a crucial skill in society (Wojciehowski & Ernst, 2018). Therefore, parents and preschool educators should be aware of the importance of the early identification of environmental factors that could improve optimal development in children and provide a healthy effective environment and plenty of opportunities for perceptual-motor experiences to help children’s development. However, it should be noted studying the factors affecting children’s development cannot be limited to one approach because the environment in which a child is being reared is a multifactorial system. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Environmental Contexts, Ecological Perspective, Motor development, Creativity, Children | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Acar, H. (2014). Learning environments for children in outdoor spaces. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 141: 846-853. Araújo, D., Brymer, E., Brito, H., Withagen, R. & Davids, K. (2019). The empowering variability of affordances of nature: Why do exercisers feel better after performing the same exercise in natural environments than in indoor environments? Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 42: 138-145. Azad, F. (2016). Educating environment through nature school and its impact on children’s personality, personal and social development. Thesis of MS. University of Tehran. (Text in Persian). Bento, G. & Dias, G. (2017). The importance of outdoor play for young children's healthy development. Porto Biomedical Journal. 2(5): 157-160. Bjørgen, K. (2016). Physical activity in light of affordances in outdoor environments: qualitative observation studies of 3–5 years olds in kindergarten. Springerplus. 5(1): 950. Bohling, V., Saarela, C. & Miller, D. (2010). This never would have happened indoors: Supporting preschool-age children’s learning in a nature explore classroom in Minnesota. Dimensions Educational Research Foundation: Lincoln, Nebraska. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human being human: Bio ecological perspectives on human Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Bruninks, R. (1978). Bruninks Oseretsky test of motor proficiency: Examiners manual. Minnesota: American Guidance Service. Czalczynska-Podolska, M. (2014). The impact of playground spatial features on children's play and activity forms: An evaluation of contemporary playgrounds' play and social value. Journal of environmental psychology. 38: 132-142. Dankiw, K. A., Tsiros, M. D., Baldock, K. L. & Kumar, S. (2020). The impacts of unstructured nature play on health in early childhood development: A systematic review. PLoS One. 15(2): 1-22. Dyment, J. E. & Bell, A. C. (2007). Grounds for movement: green school grounds as sites for promoting physical activity. Health education research. 23(6): 952-962. Ernst, J. & Burcak, F. (2019). Young Children’s Contributions to Sustainability: The Influence of Nature Play on Curiosity, Executive Function Skills, Creative Thinking, and Resilience. Sustainability. 11(15): 4212. Ethier, Shelley. (2017). Developmental Benefits of Play on a Natural Playground. Thesis of MS. University of Victoria. Fathirezaie, Z., Abbaspour, K. & Yazdani, Sh. (2018). The Effect of Spontaneous Play in Nature on the Fine Motor Skills and Visual-Motor Integration of Preschool Children. J Res Rehabil Sci. 14(3): 143-150. (Text in Persian). Fjortoft, I. (2001). The Natural Environment as a Playground for Children: The Impact of Outdoor Play Activities in Pre-Primary School Children. Early Childhood Education. Journal. 29(2): 111-117. Gabbard, C. (2016). Lifelong motor development. (7 th ed). Rostamipour, M., Pouraghayi ardakani, M. & Mohammadi, M. (2017). First Edition. Tabriz: Tanin danesh. P: 17. (Text in Persian). Gallahue, D. L., Ozmun. J. C. & Goodway. J. D. (2012) Understanding motor development: Infants, Children, Adolescents, Adults. (7 th ed). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. P: 91-2 Gardner, P. (2019). Goldilocks and the Three Semiotic Bears: Young Children’s Engagement with Early Literacy-A Vygotskian Approach. In Literacy Unbound: Multiliterate, Multilingual, Multimodal. Springer, Cham. Gholami toran poshti, M. & karimzadeh, S. (2011). The effects of computer games on creativity and its relationship to psychological adjustment students. Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education. 7(1): 55-68. (Text in Persian). Gill, T. (2014). The benefits of children's engagement with nature: A systematic literature review. Children Youth and Environments. 24(2): 10-34. Hart, C. H. & Sheehan, R. (1986). Preschoolers’ play behavior in outdoor environments: Effects of traditional and contemporary playgrounds. American educational research journal. 23(4): 668-678. Heft, H. (2018). Places: Widening the scope of an ecological approach to perception–action with an emphasis on child development. Ecological Psychology. 30(1): 99-123. Kiewra, C. & Veselack, E. (2016). Playing with Nature: Supporting Preschoolers' Creativity in Natural Outdoor Classrooms. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education. 4(1): 70-95. Kuh, L. P., Ponte, I. & Chau, C. (2013). The Impact of a Natural Play scape Installation on Young Children's Play Behaviors. Children, Youth and Environments. 23(2): 49-77. Luchs, A. & Fikus, M. (2013). A comparative study of active play on differently designed playgrounds. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning. 13(3): 206-222. Lysklett, O. B., Berg, A. & Moe, B. (2019). Motor competence and physical fitness among children attending nature preschools and traditional preschools. International Journal of Play. 8(1): 51-64. Maynard, T. & Waters, J. (2007). Learning in the outdoor environment: a missed opportunity? Early years. 27(3): 255-265. McClain, C. & Vandermaas-Peeler, M. (2016). Social contexts of development in natural outdoor environments: children’s motor activities, personal challenges and peer interactions at the river and the creek. Journal of adventure education and outdoor learning. 16(1): 31-48. Müller, A. B., Valentini, N. C, & Bandeira, P. F. (2017) Affordances in the home environment for motor development: Validity and reliability for the use in daycare setting. Infant Behav Dev. 47: 138-145. Murtafiah, M., Akbar, Z., & Karnadi, K. (2020). Enhanced Naturalist Intelligence in Early Childhood through Science Fiction Stories. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA. 9(4): 339-352. Nesbitt, K. T., Fuhs, M. W. & Farran, D. C. (2019). Stability and instability in the co-development of mathematics, executive function skills, and visual-motor integration from prekindergarten to first grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 46: 262-274. Palmer, K. K., Chinn, K. M. & Robinson, L. E. (2019). The effect of the CHAMP intervention on fundamental motor skills and outdoor physical activity in preschoolers. Journal of sport and health science. 8(2): 98-105. Pir Khaefi, A. (1993). The relationship between intelligence and creativity among male students in the second theoretical course of high schools in Tehran. Thesis of MS. Allameh Tabatabaei University of Tehran. (Text in Persian). Shafipour Yourdshahi, P., Kianie, M. & Tabatabaian, M. (2018). The Role of Play Space Designs in Nurturing Children`S Creativity. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 11(23), 53-63. Shanahan, D., Franco, L., Lin, B., Gaston, K., & Fuller, R. (2016). The benefits of natural environments for physical activity. Sports Medicine. 46(7): 989-995. Tabatabaian, M., Abbasalizadeh Rezakolai, S. & Fayaz, R. (2016). The Effect of Natural Environment on Children’s Creativity. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 17: 91-102. (Text in Persian). Thompson, C. W. (2013). Activity, exercise and the planning and design of outdoor spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 34: 79-96. White, J. (2013). Playing and Learning Outdoors: Making provision for high quality experiences in the outdoor environment with children 3–7. Routledge. Wilson, R. (2007). Nature and young children: Encouraging creative play and learning in natural environments. Routledge. Wojciehowski, M. & Ernst, J. (2018). Creative by Nature: Investigating the Impact of Nature Preschools on Young Children's Creative Thinking. International Journal of Early Childhood Environme ntal Education. 6(1): 3-20. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,260 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 709 |
||
