تعداد نشریات | 25 |
تعداد شمارهها | 932 |
تعداد مقالات | 7,653 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,495,798 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,886,813 |
تاثیر ادراکات از شخصیت برند بر تمایل به خرید: نقش تفاوتهای فرهنگی و سازگاری مشتری و برند | ||
فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی مدیریت برند | ||
مقاله 2، دوره 2، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 4، دی 1394، صفحه 45-68 اصل مقاله (6.55 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22051/bmr.2015.2579 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
مجید محمدشفیعی* 1؛ یزدان رحمت بادی2 | ||
1استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان | ||
2کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی | ||
چکیده | ||
شرکتهای موفق، از استراتژیهای شخصیت برند برای شکلدهی به رفتارهای مشتریانشان استفاده مینمایند. این رفتارها به تفاوتهای فرهنگی مشتریان و سازگاری آنها با برند بستگی دارد. لذا در این پژوهش این دو متغیر، به ترتیب بهعنوان متغیرهای تعدیلگر و میانجی در ارتباط میان ادراکات از شخصیت برند و تمایل به خرید در نظر گرفته شد. از میان ابعاد تفاوتهای فرهنگی، بر فردگرایی و اجتناب از عدم اطمینان، تمرکز شد و تاثیر این دو بر رابطه ادراکات از شخصیت برند و تمایل به خرید مطالعه شد. جامعه آماری، مشتریان پنج استان منتخب ایران است که نمونهای تصادفی به تعداد 243 نفر به روش خوشهای از میان آنها انتخاب شد. برای تجزیهوتحلیل دادهها از روش مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری با رویکرد حداقل مربعات جزئی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان میدهدکه سازگاری مشتری با برند، نقش میانجی را در رابطه میان شخصیت برند و تمایل به خرید ایفا میکند. بهعلاوه، فردگرایی و اجتناب از عدم اطمینان در جهت مثبت، رابطه سازگاری مشتری با برند و تمایل به خرید را تعدیل میکنند | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
شخصیت برند؛ تفاوتهای فرهنگی؛ سازگاری مشتری با برند؛ تمایل به خرید | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
The impact of Brand Personality Perceptions on Purchase Intention: Role of Cultural Differences and Customer-Brand Congruence | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Majid Mohammadshafiee1؛ Yazdan Rahmatbadi2 | ||
1Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan | ||
2Master of Business Administration, Allameh Tabataba'i University | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Successful companies use brand personality strategies for shaping customers’ behaviors, which depend on customers’ cultural differences and their congruence with brand. So, in this research these two variables are considered as moderator and mediator variables, respectively in the relationship between brand personality perceptions and purchase intention. Amongst the dimensions of cultural differences, the study is focused on individualism and uncertainty-avoidance. Also, the impact of those two dimensions on the relationship between brand personality perceptions and purchase intention is investigated. The statistical population of this study is customers from five selected cities in Iran and a random sample of 243 individuals is selected through cluster sampling method. For analyzing the data, the structural equation modeling method with partial least square approach is used. The results show that customer-brand congruence plays the mediator role in relationship between brand personality and purchase intention. Moreover, individualism and uncertainty avoidance positively moderate the relationship between customer-brand congruence and purchase intention. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Brand personality, Cultural differences, Customer-Brand congruence, purchase Intention | ||
مراجع | ||
فهرست منابع Aguirre-Rodriguez, A. (2014). Cultural factors that impact brand personification strategy effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 31(1), 70-83.
Aguirre-Rodriguez, A., Bosnjak, M., & Sirgy, M. J. (2012). Moderators of the self-congruity effect on consumer decision-making: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1179-1188.
Boksberger, P., Dolnicar, S., Laesser, C., & Randle, M. (2011). Self-congruity theory: to what extent does it hold in tourism? Journal of Travel Research, 50(4), 454-464.
Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655-690). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
D'Astous, A., & Boujbel, L. (2007). Positioning countries on personality dimensions: scale development and implications for country marketing. Journal of Business Research, 60(3), 231-239.
De Mooij, M., & Hofstede, G. (2010).The hofstede model. International Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 85-110.
Eisend, M., & Stokburger-Sauer, N. E. (2013a). Brand personality: Ametaanalytic review of antecedents and consequences. Marketing Letters, 24(3), 205-216.
Eisend, M., & Stokburger-Sauer, N. E. (2013b). Measurement characteristics of Aaker's brand personality dimensions: lessons to be learned from human personality research. Psychology & Marketing, 30(11), 950-958.
Erdem, T., Swait, J., & Valenzuela, A. (2006). Brands as signals: a cross-country validation study. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 34-49.
Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010). Springer handbooks of computational statistics.In Handbook of partial least squares. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Geuens, M., Weijters, B., & De Wulf, K. (2009). A new measure of brand personality.International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(2), 97-107.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., & Mena, J. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
Hensler, J. & Chin, W. W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling, Structural Equation Modeling, 17(11), 82-109.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics, & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277-319). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: the hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26.
Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52-88.
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies, strategic management journal, 20(2), 195-204.
Iacobucci, D. & Duhachek, A. (2003). Mediation analysis – round table acr 2003.Presentation at the round table of the ACR Conference, Toronto.
Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., & Schillewaert, N. (2012). A multinational examination of the symbolic-instrumental framework of consumer-brand identification. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3), 306-331.
Matzler, K., Strobl, A., Stokburger-Sauer, N. & Bobovnicky, A. (2016). Florian Bauer Brand personality and culture: The role of cultural differences on the impact of brand personality perceptions on tourists' visit intentions, Tourism Management, 52, 507-520.
Moss, E., Rousseau, D., Parent, S., St-Laurent, D. & Saintonge, J. (1998). Correlates of attachment at school age: Material reported stress, mother-child interaction, and behavior problem, Child Development, 69(5), 1390-1405.
Nam, J., Ekinci, Y., & Whyatt, G. (2011). Brand equity, brand loyalty and consumer satisfaction. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 1009-1030.
Nunally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Preacher, K. J. & Leonardelli, G. J. (2003).Calculation for Sobel test, an interactive calculation tool for mediation tests.
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332-344.
Rigdon, E. E., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). Structural modeling of heterogeneous data with partial least squares. In N. K. Malhotra (Ed.), Review of marketing research (vol. 7, pp. 255-296). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D.-J., Johar, J. S., & Tidwell, J. (2008). Effect of self-congruity with sponsorship on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 61(10), 1091-1097.
Stokburger-Sauer, N. E. (2011). The relevance of visitors' nation brand embeddedness and personality congruence for nation brand identification, visit intentions and advocacy. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1282-1289.
Stokburger-Sauer, N. E., Ratneshwar, S., & Sen, S. (2012). Drivers of consumerbrand identification. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 406-418.
Sung, Y., & Choi, S. M. (2012). The influence of self-construal on self-brand congruity in the United States and Korea. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(1), 151-166.
Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S. & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness of fit index for PLS structural equation modeling, in: Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, 739-742.
Torelli, C. J., Ozsomer, A., Carvalho, S. W., Keh, H. T., & Maehle, N. (2012). Brand concepts as representations of human values: do cultural congruity and compatibility between values matter? Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 92-108.
Tung, R. L., & Verbeke, A. (2010). Beyond hofstede and GLOBE: Improving the quality of cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1259-1274.
Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L. & Joreskog, K. G. (1974). Intra class reliability estimates: testing structural assumptions, Educational &Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 25-33.
Wetzels, M., Odekeken-Schroder, G. & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for accessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustrations, MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177.
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis.Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 13,039 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 6,592 |